|
Fertility Destroying Chemical Added To Tap, Milk, Salt
http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/fertility-destroying-chemical-added-tap-milk-salt?utm_source=www.GreenMedInfo.com&utm_campaign=e8e5cac43f-Greenmedinfo&utm_medium=email
Fluoride is promoted above good
nutrition as a 'therapeutic' chemical necessary to prevent cavities, but it
lowers IQ, calcifies the pineal gland and harms fertility, among a wide range
of other adverse health effects.
There is no question remaining that fluoride
lowers IQ, at least as far as high-quality epidemiological research published
in peer-reviewed journals has shown.
Take the conclusion of this systematic review
of the literature published in the journal Biological
and Trace Elements Research in 2008, which looked at whether
fluoride exposure has increased the risk of low intelligence quotient (IQ) in
China over the past 20 years:
[C]hildren who live in a fluorosis area [high
fluoride exposure] have five
times higher odds of developing low IQ than those who live in
a nonfluorosis area or a slight fluorosis area.
[See our IQ and Fluoride research page
for seven first-hand study abstracts on this connection]
Arguably, those who do question this causal
connection despite the
research are already under fluoride's powerful spell, since they
don't take sufficient care to reduce their exposure to this
intellectually-disabling chemical. They've drank the fluoride-contaminated
Kool-aid, and are unable to comprehend what is still obvious to those who
have not.
But fluoride's toxicity is not specific to
only one type of tissue, I.e. Neurological, but extends throughout the human
body, having been linked to at least 30 distinct health problems stretching
from calcification of soft tissue and endocrine glands (such as the pineal)
to hypothyroidism, from hair loss to cancer. [see Fluoride Toxicity
citations here]
While lawmakers, regulators and the industry
using it consider the public gullible enough to believe that the IQ-lowering
effects of fluoride a worthwhile price to pay for 'healthy' and 'attractive'
teeth (even though fluoride exposure leads to fluorosis, an irreversible spotting, often
yellowing of the enamel of the teeth), a more serious health problem lurks
beneath the propaganda that has converted an industrial byproduct and
pollutant into a "therapeutic" water, salt and milk additive. That
problem is fluoride's infertility and abortifacient properties.
Back in 1994, a study was published in the Journal of Toxicology and Environmental
Health that found exposure to high fluoride concentrations in
drinking water is associated with decreased birth rates. The researchers had
reviewed the biomedical literature for fluoride toxicity and found decreased
fertility in most animal species studied. This lead them to question whether
fluoride would also affect human birth rates. They reported their method and
results as follows:
A U.S. Database of drinking water systems was
used to identify index counties with water systems reporting fluoride levels
of at least 3 ppm. These and adjacent counties were grouped in 30 regions
spread over 9 states. For each county, two conceptionally different exposure
measures were defined, and the annual total fertility rate (TFR) for women in
the age range 10-49 yr was calculated for the period 1970-1988. For each
region separately, the annual TFR was regressed on the fluoride measure and
sociodemographic covariables. Most
regions showed an association of decreasing TFR with increasing fluoride
levels. Meta-analysis of the region-specific results
confirmed that the combined result was a negative TFR/fluoride association
with a consensus combined p value of .0002-.0004, depending on the analytical
scenario. There is no
evidence that this outcome resulted from selection bias, inaccurate data, or
improper analytical methods. However, the study is one that
used population means rather than data on individual women. Whether or not
the fluoride effect on the fertility rate found at the county level also
applies to individual women remains to be investigated.
Another study published in the American Journal of Industrial Medicine
in 1995 found that among fabrication workers fluoride compound exposure was
associated with an increased risk of spontaneous abortion:
Risk of spontaneous abortion (SAB) was
examined in relation to chemical and physical agents in a retrospective study
of employees of 14 seminconductor manufacturers: After screening over 6,000
employees, 506 current and 385 former workers were eligible. If a woman had
multiple eligible pregnancies, one was selected at random. Telephone
interviews provided data on demographics and occupational and other exposures
during the first trimester. Two
groups of chemicals accounted for the 45% excess risk of SAB among
fabrication-room (fab) workers: photoresist and developed solvents (PDS),
including glycol ethers, and fluoride compounds used in etching.
Women exposed to high levels of both these agents were at greater risk (RR =
3.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.29-5.96). In fab workers without these
exposures, SAB rates were not elevated (adjusted relative risk [RR] = 0.98,
95% CI = 0.55-1.69). An association was seen with workplace stress, which was
not limited to women exposed to PDS or fluoride, nor did stress explain the
associations between these chemicals and SAB.
Considering these findings, now let us zoom
down to the animal level of research, which is unequivocal as far as
fluoride's anti-fertility/contraceptive/abortifacient properties.
Here
are the male studies
Here
are the female studies
From the perspective of Life, interference
with a biological systems' primary imperative (that is, the ability to
reproduce via a healthy germline (ova/sperm)) is the ultimate sin. However,
from the perspective of managing large numbers of human bodies – billions of
them all dependent on limited resources – "side effects" such as
contraception and infertility associated with the use of chemicals like
fluoride could be considered beneficial collateral effects. Another
convenient side effect is its mind-numbing and pineal gland calcifying effects,
rendering exposed populations more docile and easily to manage and control.
Interestingly, "antidepressant" drugs like Prozac contain fluoride,
hence its chemical name fluoxetine.
Those who have experienced this drug's effects know it can disassociate you
from reality, or simply anesthetize your emotions in relation to it.
The reality is that a massive, international
industrial, medical and governmental system supports water and food
fluoridation, and it will take many years of hard work, from the grassroots
up, to reduce our continuous exposure to fluoride-based compounds. Until
then, we have two clear paths to mitigate the damage: 1) Reduce our exposure.
2) Consume a diet rich in compounds that mitigate fluoride toxicity. There
are a number of natural compounds that have been experimentally confirmed to
reduce fluoride toxicity. Twenty-six of these are listed on our Fluoride
Toxicity research page. This is not an exhaustive list, and tens of thousands
of natural compounds, from spices to vitamins, nutrients to minerals, are
likely to confer the same types of protections identified in those studies.
The point is that simple dietary steps, especially incorporating into our
diet organically-produced (better yet biodynamic) foods, can go a long way to
protecting us from fluoride and thousands of other xenobiotic compounds we
are exposed to on a regular basis.
Learn more about the story of how Fluoride, a
poison, was converted into a "therapeutic" compound via propaganda, watch Fluoridegate:
An American Tragedy on GreenMedTV.
|
||||
|
|
||||
Wednesday, March 13, 2013
Fertility Destroying Chemical Added To Tap, Milk, Salt
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment