On
Thursday, Tea Party Congressman Steve Stockman announced that he and several
other lawmakers had “filed a resolution directing the Sergeant-at-Arms to
arrest Lois Lerner for contempt.”
Lerner has been at the center of the IRS scandal as she was
the head of the nonprofit department that oversaw tax exempt status
designations. She and the IRS waged a years-long campaign of harassment against
Tea Party groups in an apparent effort to stymie political efficacy.
On Wednesday, Congress discovered emails that show an
attempt by Lerner to cover her tracks as investigators investigated her
department’s actions.
On Thursday, Rep. Stockman announced the resolution calling
for the arrest of Lerner.
“Asking the Justice Department to prosecute Lois Lerner for
admittedly illegal activity is a joke. The Obama administration will not
prosecute the Obama administration. How much longer will the House allow
itself to be mocked? It is up to this House to uphold the rule of law and
hold accountable those who illegally targeted American citizens for simply
having different ideas than the President,” said Stockman.
“Democrats have openly stated the House has the powers to
arrest those in contempt of Congress and imprison them in the Capitol. I
don’t want to go as far as Democrats in exercising the House’s powers to
arrest. Ms. Lerner will be held in the D.C. jail,” Stockman said.
Arresting Lerner would place her in custody where she would
retain all legal rights and be offered an attorney.
“It’s time to for House to stop tacitly endorsing this
administration’s illegal activity by refusing to hold him accountable. I
expect Democrats to defend and even praise criminal activity. The
question is whether Republican leadership will join them in mocking the House
and breaking the law,” Stockman continued.
Undoubtedly, Democrats will take issue with the resolution.
However, a statement from Stockman’s office clarified that the power exists
within Congress. Quoting a New York Times article, Stockman’s office
wrote,
“From the Republic’s earliest days, Congress has had the
right to hold recalcitrant witnesses in contempt — and even imprison them — all
by itself. In 1795, shortly after the Constitution was ratified, the House
ordered its sergeant at arms to arrest and detain two men accused of trying to
bribe members of Congress. The House held a trial and convicted one of them,”
the Times wrote in a Dec. 4, 2007 editorial.
“In 1821, the Supreme Court upheld Congress’s right to hold
people in contempt and imprison them. Without this power, the court ruled,
Congress would “be exposed to every indignity and interruption, that rudeness,
caprice, or even conspiracy, may mediate against it.” Later, in a 1927 case arising
from the Teapot Dome scandal, the court upheld the Senate’s arrest of the
brother of a former attorney general — carried out in Ohio by the deputy
sergeant at arms — for ignoring a subpoena to testify,” the Times wrote.
Former Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi has even mentioned
how she reserved the right to arrest Karl Rove and hold him in the Capitol.
TheTeaParty.net’s Executive Director, Niger Innis, was delighted with the news, saying,
TheTeaParty.net’s Executive Director, Niger Innis, was delighted with the news, saying,
“Unlike Watergate, which was an inconsequential, incompetent
robbery job, Lerner’s crimes are not just her obstruction and cover-up, but
it’s the very act itself of using the police powers of the Executive Branch of
our government as a partisan, political weapon against Tea Party and other
conservative groups, harassing and denying them the opportunity to exercise
their First Amendment rights.”
No comments:
Post a Comment