This is an Awareness Blog to consider the future of your world. Actions are being done now to restore our freedom. County, State, and National Assemblies are forming across our world nullifying the corrupt corporations. Watch and become AWARE! Participate and be a part of making history!
62 MILLION VIEWS PER MONTH
Exclusive public outlet for documentation and notices from The Original Jurisdiction Republic 1861 circa 2010.
Conservation Of Star Trek’s Original USS Enterprise Gets Checked On By Captain Kirk
For years, the model USS Enterprise from Star Trek: The Original Series hung in the Smithsonian’s National Air and Space Museum’s basement gift shop, surrounded by lights and protective glass. Some of the paint was chipped and the 11-foot model had started to sag.
But the infamous starship is going to be getting a new home in 2016 after some extensive examination and conservation efforts by the museum — and its efforts have recently gained viral attention after the input of William Shatner, who played as the Enterprise‘s very own Captain James T. Kirk.“@NASAhistory Did you break my ship?” he tweeted with a picture of an unattached deflector dish. “Smithsonian! I let you borrow my ship and you broke it?” he continued.“@WilliamShatner @NASAhistory In spacedock for conservation. Would you like to come for an inspection, Captain?” the Air and Space Museum’s official Twitter account replied.The Enterprise model was donated to the Smithsonian in 1974, a few years after the original Star Trek series ended in 1969. It spent some time in the Arts & Industries Building, and more recently in the gift shop area, before it was taken down in late 2014 so conservation efforts could begin. The Smithsonian’s conservator, Margaret Weitekamp, explained what was going on to start.
“We took it off display in September 2014 because we were getting it ready for a new location in the Boeing Milestones of Flight Hall, which will open in July of 2016. We have been doing the evaluation that we’ve needed to do in order to figure out how to structurally stabilize the model, clean it and prepare it for its new display location.”
This isn’t the first effort the museum has tried to restore the Star Trek model. Since it arrived in 1974 it has been treated three times, but the restoration in 1991 drew some criticism for its paint job.“It was too weathered and there were grid lines that were too extensive; that’s the key aspect of concern,” explained Star Trek model collector Adam Schneider. Schneider is on an advisory committee for the ship’s restoration.Weitekamp also explained to Trek Core that “before the model came off display, we could see the two nacelles were starting to sag and spread apart slightly.” This problem has also happened with other Star Trek ship studio models, model kits, and other consumer products.But Shatner’s tweets, teasing though they may be, have brought plenty of attention to the project, something that has delighted Weitekamp.
“I think it’s wonderful that people are noticing what we’re doing with the artifact. The Star Trek fan community really still feels very much an ownership of this piece and we are working hard to be responsible to the history of the artifact and also to the passion of the fan community that loves this so much.”
She also explained that the Star Trek actor’s presence at the unveiling next year “would be a lot of fun.” The ship will be put on display just in time for the 50th anniversary of the original series.Since the show went on the air nearly 50 years ago, many technological advances in the real world have come to mirror that of Star Trek‘s incredible vision of the future, like tablet computers, video conferencing and even medical tricorders.
Are you in doubt that the real original jurisdiction De Jure Republic is being restored? Do you have Questions that you want answered? Do you want to get involved? Visit https://national-assembly.net/ for more information and to participate. Check out the forums as the national assembly is 100% transparent to the public and welcomes public participation. This is the real deal folks. This is our last chance to do it right and nullify the 1871 contract that employed the U.S. Corporation to provide 19 governmental services to the people. This is our right under Article 1 of the Bill of rights. This also nullifies General Order 100 of 1863.
Search This Blog "if this search box is working"
Donation to assist in efforts to restore our republic
The DUKE - Patriot!
Born in 1948 Died in 2015
National Assembly of the people returning to self governance
Join the forums and introduce yourself so your state coordinator can connect with you.
Question -- What is the goal of this website? Why do we share different sources of information that sometimes conflicts or might even be considered disinformation?
Answer -- The primary goal of Nesaranews is to help all people become better truth-seekers in a real-time boots-on-the-ground fashion. This is for the purpose of learning to think critically, discovering the truth from within—not just believing things blindly because it came from an "authority" or credible source. Instead of telling you what the truth is, we share information from many sources so that you can discern it for yourself. We focus on teaching you the tools to become your own authority on the truth, gaining self-mastery, sovereignty, and freedom in the process. We want each of you to become your own leaders and masters of personal discernment, and as such, all information should be vetted, analyzed and discerned at a personal level. We also encourage you to discuss your thoughts in the comments section of this site to engage in a group discernment process.
"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it." – Aristotle
11
Followers
The articles on this blog are reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
US Supreme Court, in 1985, “Dowling v. United States”, unequivocally held that allegations of copyright infringement can be prosecuted only under copyright-specific legislation, not criminal law.
No comments:
Post a Comment