One
does not need to have insider sources to see the unmistakable patterns
emerging from the false flag attack upon Arizona’s Internet covering
approximately half of the state, geographically speaking. However,
insider sources are beginning to emerge. But first, let’s connect some
dots. After 72 hours following the attack on commerce and communications
in central and northern Arizona, there are some disturbing details
beginning to emerge.
Brief Review of the Facts
Brief Review of the Facts
vandals arizona map
In Part One,
it was established the Internet cables were cut, including those
controlling commerce and communications in Arizona, stretching from
north of Phoenix to Flagstaff. These cables were located in a remote and
hard to access area. The cables were dug up and then cut with precision
through a presumably encased and very thick and sophisticated aluminum
alloy covering. The perpetrators made a getaway without so much as
leaving tire treads or footprints leaving investigators with nothing to
go on.
It is also known that the scope of the attack
is much more broad and varied than first believed. Both local reports
and matching insider reports are beginning to filter in. What is curious
is that the BBC and Russia Today are covering this event in greater
detail than the local Arizona or American media. After reading this
article, the reasons for the media blackout are about to become very
apparent.
Sophisticated Attack
This was a very sophisticated operation in which these remotely located cables, in rough terrain were located and cut with precision. The getaway was effected without so much as leaving a clue and we are supposed to believe this was the work of "vandals.
Sophisticated Attack
This was a very sophisticated operation in which these remotely located cables, in rough terrain were located and cut with precision. The getaway was effected without so much as leaving a clue and we are supposed to believe this was the work of "vandals.
This was a very sophisticated operation in which
these remotely located cables, in rough terrain were located and cut
with precision. The getaway was effected without so much as leaving a
clue and we are supposed to believe this was the work of “vandals”.
In Part One, it was established that this false
flag attack on Arizona’s communications and commerce was the work of
highly sophisticated, well-trained professionals. The location of the
cables that were cut is in an extremely remote and rugged area. How did
the so-called “vandals” know where to find the location? Some of the cut
cables were encased in highly protective and reinforced casings.
Therefore, how did they cut these cables which were designed to
withstand the use of a hacksaw, which now the authorities are claiming
was used? Knowing which cable to dig up from three feet deep in the
ground and the prerequisite highly specialized knowledge of the function
of each individual cable is important because I have been told that not
all cables on the scene were “vandalized”!
Since the event began, I have literally
received dozens of tips. With regard to the operational details of the
attack, it is not necessary to rely on unknown sources claiming to have
information. Here is what else I have learned. The cables were
destroyed, and the protective casings were cut through by what is
believed to be a laser. There were absolutely no clues
left behind. Some present and former first responders believe that
there is a chance that satellite imaging could be brought into play and
very possibly the crime could be solved. Please keep in mind that
President Obama announced a couple of weeks ago that DHS was taking
control over all intelligence information from the NSA. If DHS does not
bring this capability to bear, then we know where to start looking with
regard to the origination point of this false flag attack. The fact that
the investigation does, on the surface, appear to be run by the Phoenix
Police Department, means that the sophistication needed to solve a
crime of this complex nature will not be possible given the resources of
a typical police department.
There is widespread awareness within the first
responder community that this was a well-orchestrated attack and it has
many people freaked out. DHS is in charge of the dissemination of media
releases and information and by all reports there are many people who
are not on board with what is transpiring.
3 comments:
Consider also Sheriff Arpaio's Obama Amnesty Litigation in the making.
"Sheriff Arpaio is the elected Sheriff of Maricopa County, Arizona, one of the largest Sheriff’s offices in the United States. Maricopa County is the most populated County in the State of Arizona with 4,009,412 citizens. The County holds more than sixty percent (60%) of all of the population of the entire State of Arizona. Sheriff Arpaio’s office effectively is nearly all of the State of Arizona in terms of law enforcement. Maricopa County is the fourth most populated County in the United States by most reports. If Maricopa County by itself were a State, the County would be larger by population than twenty-four (24) of the States within the United States of America and larger than Puerto Rico and more than five times larger than the entire District of Columbia."
http://www.freedomwatchusa.org/pdf/150129-Final Arpaio brief with ribbon.pdf
Washington DC attacking the sovereign states? AZ Cable cut coincidence?
If it was DHS that would sound about right. During Katrina in Louisiana it was discovered that DHS/Fema cut all communication lines being used by the Jefferson Parish Sheriff's Office for emergency operations. The Sheriff had to post armed guards at the site and warn off DHS/Fema.
This is our false flag to say "Oh please help. We need The DHS." Not working but it sure points a finger a why it might have been done. DEFUND DHS.
Post a Comment