By Anna Von Reitz
1. Regarding the Bundys calling for an American Common Law Court to try their case:
Everyone
who has had a Birth Certificate issued in their NAME has to take action
to correct the false legal presumptions that that creates.
As
things stand, the Bundys and the others have never corrected their
status and so still stand subject to federal courts. That doesn't mean
they can't bring their case to American Common Law Courts, too--- but it
doesn't solve the problem, which is federal over-reach and false
presumption and racketeering based on falsified public records kept on
each one of us.
Worse,
there probably aren't enough people in that county who have corrected
their status to form a jury pool of their "peers"---yet.
There
has to be an entire education and organization process to even form the
court necessary--- to elect the justices of the peace, to elect a
clerk, a bailiff, a bondsmen, a coroner, and most importantly, a sheriff
knowledgeable enough and willing to enforce the Public Law. And
Deputies acting in lawful capacity to support him.
I
am not saying that all this shouldn't be done or couldn't be done--- it
must be done, and the sooner the better all over this country, but
Trump's Administration also has to co-operate and recognize the proper
jurisdiction of the people and the court, which is just as big a problem
and educational effort. Yes, most Federales are just as dumb or dumber
about all this stuff as we have been.
Take a deep breath and plod forward---- learning and teaching as you go. Which reminds me-- this is Thursday. That means that there is a national conference call sponsored by the Michigan General Jural Assembly tonight:
National Conference Call: 9 PM EST, call in number: 1-712-770-4160, access code 226823#. Help to set up local county jural assemblies at their website: http://1stmichiganassembly.
2.
The Rod Class Supreme Court victory announced yesterday is important,
but not yet getting to what I had hoped--- the constitutionality of the
statute. Instead, this is a preliminary challenge (I knew about it, but
thought it had already been resolved) to clear the way to make the
constitutional challenge.
Here is the actual meat of the SOTUS decision yesterday:
Held:
A guilty plea, by itself, does not bar a federal criminal defendant
from challenging the constitutionality of his statute of conviction on
direct appeal.
So
even if you plead guilty to the facts of a statutory charge, and even
if you are a "federal citizen" you can still come back on appeal and
challenge the constitutionality of the statute. That's good to have
established and many people who have been railroaded will be able to
find their voice again because of it.
----------------------------
See this article and over 800 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
No comments:
Post a Comment