By Anna Von Reitz
This week several information websites/channels have been shut down with censorship being provided (allegedly) by Southern Poverty Law Center and the (formerly and still at heart Jewish) Anti-Defamation League.
I
haven't seen the proof of who the censors are, so reserve judgment on
that part of it, though it does make sense that Google would rely on
organized volunteers instead of spending its own money to do its own
censorship.
This
should, no matter who is responsible, spark a huge debate about
censorship and First Amendment rights and the limits of "federal"
trespass on our property assets--- because make no mistake, rights are
property assets.
Literally.
Those
who elect to function in the capacity of federal citizens have an
obnoxious habit of thoughtlessly trespassing on the rights of others.
They don't even stop to think that if they trespass upon others and
censor others, that they are ultimately also trespassing against their
own estate and curtailing their own freedom.
We
see this with their gun control spiel and we see it with these attacks
against news and media outlets that don't actually do anything immoral
or illegal, but which these people simply find offensive for whatever
reasons.
I
find the overall hypocrisy of the Southern Poverty Law Center
offensive, but I don't try to censor them, even when they are ignorant
and when they tell outright lies. I just figure everyone has a right to
be a horse's rump.
Ditto the (J)ADL --- defaming anyone is a bad thing, even if it is Alex Jones.
As
for Google, what possible excuse does it have as a private business
making use of public airwaves and public infrastructure for infringing
upon the First Amendment Rights of Americans? None that I can see.
It's likely to turn into a full scale you-know-what match, complete with treble damages.
Nobody
has to like the SPLC just like nobody has to like Alex Jones, but when
we actively set out to quash their free speech, that's a different
thing. That's an infringement on the basic principles of this country,
which allows such disparate opinions in the first place, and which we
all depend upon whether we come at it from the standpoint of freedom or
the standpoint of liberty.
My
advice to Google? Review the content and if they aren't advocating
overthrow of the government or showing lewd pictures, turn those
censored sites back on.
My
advice to SPLC and (J)ADL --- stop being schmucks and stomping on other
people's rights in the name of defending your own. Your opinions and
likes and dislikes don't rule the world. Other people have the right to
hold their own opinions and beliefs, too.
And
any infringement of anyone's viewpoint is an infringement on everyone
else's viewpoint. Remember Patrick Henry --- I paraphrase --- 'I may
not agree with what you say, Sir, but I shall defend to the death your
right to say it."
----------------------------
See this article and over 800 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
No comments:
Post a Comment