The Truth About Your Birth Certificate.........

Tuesday, March 17, 2015 15:44

(Before It's News)

This video explains how you exist as a human being, as well as a straw man, a legal fiction, a piece of paper which the government needs you to be, in order to make contracts with you.

 

Birth certificates only started in 1933 in the USA, enabling living beings, your spirit and your soul to be monetised.

 

You are held as collateral to secure the debt owed to international bankers. 

 

 We don’t even own our lives. 

 

 We are chattels.

PROOF Putin is DEAD & Double Was Used on March 16th, Real Putin Whacked Via Coup D'état....

Tuesday, March 17, 2015 14:52

(Before It's News) As you recall last week my article Putin is Dead, A Double Will Fill in For Him Until Elections Detailed specifically that The Real Putin was dead and a double would fill in until elections. Many individuals in the truth community have caught on and started to report on it Will the real Vladimir Putin Please stand up This youtube user in particular by the screen handle professor doom 1, reported on my work and did not give me credit. (if you’re going to blatantly steal my work, atleast give me credit.)
The Author of this article has experience in this field, The author of this article is responsible for uncovering agents with double identities.
http://hollywooddeathfakers.com/
http://alexjonesisbillhicks.com/
Now let’s begin

As you can see, the double you saw on Monday is sporting a scar or patch of hair missing from his left eyebrow.

Here is the real Putin, the double seems bloated and out of place.

Sweaty and drugged up double on March 16, 2015

Real Putin in Middle Fake Putin Top, as you can see, the hands and fingers are way diffirent. The sizes are way off

Check out the scar or Mole left side under this “Putins” Nose

No scar/mole on this Putin, how many doubles does Putin have?

Pay Close Attention to the “real” Putin’s left ear, the lobe.

Now take a look at The fake Putin from March 16th

Whats going on here? Oh I know, The Russians are trolling and The Real Putin got Whacked

The Rats are POURING out of DC’s Sinking Ship*******

Wednesday, March 18, 2015 7:45

(Before It's News) from The Wealth Watchman:


TOO MUCH ROTTEN CHEESE IN D.C......LETS SEE WHERE WE CAN HIDE OUT NEXT...
DO YOU SUPPOSE WE CAN PRETEND TO JOIN UP WITH THE CHINESE AND TAKE OVER THEIR SYSTEM....WE WILL ONLY HAVE TO EAT CHINESE FOOD FOR A LITTLE WHILE....LETS DO IT.....

Ya ever heard that old saying, “Ya catch more flies with honey than with vinegar”?
Ah good, because DC and “the City” sure haven’t!
As many here know, the East has been trying to formulate its banking alternatives for its member states these past several years.  This is of monumental importance to Eurasian alliances, because without a network of lending institutions of their own, they’ve often been at the (lack of) mercy of the Western banking powers.  For several years now, Eastern alliances such as the BRICS, have made a great deal of progress on this front.
That progress has been met with fear and loathing from DC and London, as previously, they’ve enjoyed the perks from being the world’s predatory lender through institutions like the World Bank and IMF.

During the last week however, while many of us weren’t looking, some very interesting developments have been taking place on the “grand chessboard”!
In times past, especially since the previous “Cold-War”, DC’s full-spectrum control of the geopolitical arena has been almost absolute.  Since they and London had owned “all the gold”(on paper, at least), and had the lending institutions(the IMF, World Bank) to pile debt atop it, as well as the largest, deep-state apparatus, and military-industrial industries to depend on, they’ve basically used  a very short list of “strategies” to bring other peoples and nations “to heel”.
In fact, previously if any national leader told DC “no!” to things like “opening up trade” or dealing with the IMF, they were usually all told:
DC: “Heeeey, that’s ok! You don’t have to say yes or anything like that!”
Anyone else: “We don’t?”
DC: “Noo sirree, but just know, between us, you’ll have to pick from a litany of other options!”
Anyone Else:” Other options, like what?”
DC: “Oh, swell things!  Like”:
Internet Spying and Sabotage!

Obliteration of your Currency!

Or violent overthrow!

DC: “The last one’s our personal favorite!  So, which will it be?”
Anyone Else: “Uh, where do we sign?”

Banking Monopoly is Over

That’s all changing, and changing quickly, as the Eastern Alliance has been fast-tracking several financial and lending competitors to DC’s money mafia. Things like the BRICS Bank, which now carries over $100 billion in assets to help shield its members from financial/currency crisis(which they’ll likely have to use soon), have made enormous headway.  Now though, you can add to the list of worries for the ruling order, the fledgling Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank(AIIB).

The AIIB is the newest kid on the block, having only been established in October of 2013.  Yet remarkably, within the first year, it has basically sewn up most of the far East in its roster already. By the end of 2014, over 2 dozen Asian nations had signed onto its establishment, including:

India, Malaysia, New Zealand, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, Thailand, etc!  We’re talking some big names here!

At first, DC and London responded to the AIIB, as it did the BRICS Bank: with smarmy scorn.  As time passed, however, and the powers that be began to see that the bank has gained serious traction, they switched tactics, from ridicule to threats.  Obama and Cameron started applying tremendous pressure on their strongest “allies” to remain uninvolved with China’s alternative lending facility to the US’s Asian Development Bank.

Why wouldn’t they?  After all, the real power of the US and UK has always been a money power. Without that banking and fiscal dominance and monopoly, and the ability to pyramid new debts upon the backs of humanity, their empire would come crashing down, double quick.

That’s precisely why this newest show-stopping announcement by UK officials must’ve come as complete shocker to the buzzards on the Potomac!

“Britain applies to join China-backed Asia bank, US is furious“



HOW CONVOLUTED IS THIS....A KNOWN SACRIFICAL BLOOD DRINKER WITH THE QUEEN..... AND IS SHAKING HANDS WITH A COMMUNIST LEADER...... WHAT I WANT TO KNOW IS?? ..... WHAT DOES THE CHRISTIAN RED DRAGON FAMILY THINK OF THIS?? SOMETHING SMELZ ROTTEN.. YET THERE IS NO RV/GCR....




Yeeeep!  So much for the “special relationship” between the Rothschild and Rockefeller dynasties! It just goes to show that when it’s all on the line, and it’s down to survival(and any semblance of any relevance whatsoever), they’re all just scorpions in a bottle, waiting to turn on one another.
Just listen to George Osborn explain the rational behind the decision:

“I am delighted to announce today that the UK will be the first major Western country to become a prospective founder member of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, which has already received significant support in the region…

This government has actively promoted closer political and economic engagement with the Asia-Pacific region and forging links between the UK and Asian economies to give our companies the best opportunity to work and invest in the world’s fastest growing markets is a key part of our long term economic plan.”

Sooooo, the UK was the first non-regional country to become a founding member in the AIIB? Comical!
Banksters in London, staring down the barrel of their own irrelevance, have decided to jump in, and save what little influence they still can.  They know this process is forging ahead, with or without them, and thusly, they’ve scrambled to jump on board to become a “founder” before the deadline at the end of March 2015.
As you can imagine, this is not a very popular decision on Capitol Hill, with the Obama administration accusing Britain of “constant accommodation to China.”  This is certainly a riot coming from the original nation who gave China “most favored nation” status in the first place!  As with everything else, the “exceptional nation”, claims to be the only one who can do such things.
That’s not all though!  DC says they can’t support the AIIB, because they’re “concerned” that the AIIB wouldn’t have “high standards of governance”, and that it would lack “social or environmental safeguards”!  
Classic!
This, of course, is coming from one of the world’s premiere violators of every imaginable human right you could think of!  The only reason DC hates the AIIB is that they don’t control it!  Period!
If their “special partner”, the UK, joining the AIIB wasn’t enough though, they were in for another shocker!  As just yesterday France, Germany and Italy have all jumped in headfirst as well!  That’s right, in one day half the G-7 confirmed their intent to “switch sides”, without consulting their DC overlords first!  

Americans pay a percentage of their taxes to the Queen of England via the IRS.

Americans pay a percentage of their taxes to the Queen of England via the IRS.

Americans pay a percentage of their taxes to the Queen of England via the IRS. The IRS is not an agency of the Federal Government.

It is an agency of the International Monetary Fund which is an agency of the United Nations. No law has ever been passed legalizing the charging of income tax. The 1040 tax form is the payment of a foreign tax to the King/Queen of England.

American citizens have been in financial servitude to the British Monarch since the Treaty of 1783 and the War of Dependence.

All tax payers have an Individual Master File and are held liable for a tax via a treaty between the U.S. and the U.K. and payable to the U.K. Prior to 1991, the Business Master File in 6209 was U.S.-U.K.

Tax Claims, non-refile DLN. That means that everyone is considered a business and involved in commerce.

SNIP

The 16th Amendment Purporting To Authorize Federal Taxation Of US Individuals Was Never Ratified By The States.

The first Federal income tax in the United States occurred during the civil war, through the passage of The Revenue Act of 1861: three percent for those making between $600 and $10,000, and five percent for those making over $10,000. This income tax was repealed ten years later.

The U.S. Supreme Court, however, ruled that the Federal income tax violated the U.S. Constitution because it was a direct tax on individuals and not apportioned between the States, required by the Constitution. The Constitution protects individuals against the abuse of Federal government power by stripping from the FEDs the power to tax individuals, knowing the power to tax is the power to destroy.

So the Federal power-seekers sought to overrule our forefathers and to empower the Federal Government, (that is, our US Federal Corporation, hereinafter, “The FEDS”) with the power to tax individuals through the 16th Amendment.

The ratification of the 16th Amendment is dubious. In 1913, the same year British agents steered through Congress the FED fraud on the night before Christmas Eve, the 16th Amendment was hatched. But the founders made changing the Constitution difficult, to say the least. One of two ways to alter our founding document requires any proposed Constitutional Amendment be ratified by three-fourths of the States.

FEDS CONTINUE TO ASSAULT THE BILL OF RIGHTS

New Bill Would Prohibit ATF Ban on Popular Ammunition

Rep. Patrick McHenry accuses feds of assaulting bill of rights

Paul Joseph Watson

Prison Planet.com

March 17, 2015



Rep. Patrick McHenry (R-NC) has introduced legislation that will prohibit future ATF ammunition bans as the fight over attempts to restrict the second amendment intensifies.

The Ammunition and Firearms Protection Act would “prevent the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) from classifying M855 ammunition as armor-piercing and from instituting any ban on the sale and manufacture of ammunition that is intended, marketed, and sold for rifle use.”

McHenry accused the feds of launching an “assault on our Constitution and Bill of Rights,” adding that his bill is designed to “put an end to this attack on our Second Amendment.”

The move comes hot on the heels of a new bill introduced by four Democrats that would ban the sale of “green tip” bullets commonly used on the AR-15 rifle for sporting purposes.

After introducing the Armor Piercing Bullets Act, Rep. Eliot Engel (D-N.Y.) asserted, “these rounds can easily be loaded into concealed pistols and other short guns, making them particularly dangerous to police officers.”

Last month, the ATF announced a “proposal” to ban green tipped bullets under a new regulatory framework that would remove the ammo from a list of exemptions under the justification that the bullets are “armor piercing” and are being used against law enforcement officers.

The federal agency backed down on the ban after a huge backlash from second amendment activists and gun groups, but indicated that it would attempt to resurrect the issue in future, with ATF Director B. Todd Jones saying the agency was “figuring out how we do this rationally”.

The prospect of the bullets being banned has prompted a run on supplies across the country, with gun stores reporting huge demand from customers eager to stock up.

Facebook @ https://www.facebook.com/paul.j.watson.71
FOLLOW Paul Joseph Watson @ https://twitter.com/PrisonPlanet

*********************

Paul Joseph Watson is the editor at large of Infowars.com and Prison Planet.com.

Related posts:

1. Bill To Audit Federal Reserve Now Has 213 Co-Sponsors
2. The War On Preppers: Obama Bans Ammo For The Most Popular Rifle In America
3. Ammo Ban: ATF Apologizes For Omitting ‘Green Tip’ From Exemption List
4. Fed Sicks Attack Dogs On Ron Paul After Audit Amendment Passes
5. DoD Admission: Only One Plane Available To Transport Infected Soldiers Out of Africa, One at a Time, Four Per Week

http://www.prisonplanet.com/new-bill-would-prohibit-atf-ban-on-popular-ammunition.html

US blows through $18trn debt limit

March 16, 2015 11:18

 

On Monday, the US reached its legal debt limit of $18 trillion -more than the country’s entire GDP. Lawmakers will either have to again lift it, or attempt to cap spending.
As of March 12, the US Treasury reported federal debt at $18,114,324,000,000.00 in its daily treasury statement. This figure is above the statutory debt limit, which was extended by Congress through March 15 this year.


Treasury Secretary Jack Lew told Congress that the limit would be reached on March 16, and he also requested lawmakers raise the debt ceiling “as soon as possible,” in a letter written in early March.


Under current arrangements, the US government can keep running until October using so-called extraordinary measures, or accounting tricks to keep money flowing into government programs, according to the Congressional Budget Office.


Now that a new zenith has been passed, a fresh showdown between lawmakers and the President about America’s spending habits can be expected.


The US raised the debt ceiling to $17.2 trillion in February 2014, keeping the economy a safe distance from the so-called ‘fiscal cliff’. Before striking a deal, Republicans shut down the government in October 2014, which put many federal employees out of work for two weeks, and cost the economy an estimated $24 billion.


The US government is again left with the decision to raise its debt ceiling- the maximum amount of money it can borrow. If it isn’t raised, the country in theory could default. The debt ceiling, which has been around since 1917, has been raised over 100 times to accommodate the world’s largest economy’s ballooning budget.
Republicans and Democrats have long been viciously divided over how to fund the budget, and which programs the government can afford to fund.


The debt, largely foreign-held, is worrisome not only for the world’s largest economy, but for global markets, which are always put on edge when the debate comes up.


READ MORE: 'Manufactured' crisis cost US $24bn -S&P

http://rt.com/business/241001-us-18-trillion-debt-limit/

American Millennials Score Poorly Against Other Nations

American Millennials Score Poorly Against Other Nations in Skills Assessment
     
Written by  Warren Mass
Monday, 16 March 2015


   A recently released report from the Educational Testing Service (ETS) indicated that American “millennials” (those born after 1980 who were 16 to 34 years of age at the time of the study) scored near the bottom of the pack among 23 countries evaluated for various skills.


Researchers at Princeton-based ETS tested those born in the last two decades of the last century in skills including literacy, technology problem solving, and numeracy (mathematical skills). The ETS report was the first to use data from the Program for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies (PIAAC), a study that was developed under the auspices of the Paris-based Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). The Preface to the report made a statement that many found surprising:

Despite having the highest levels of educational attainment of any previous American generation, these young adults on average demonstrate relatively weak skills in literacy, numeracy, and problem solving in technology-rich environments compared to their international peers.



In comparing the performance of U.S. participants with those from other countries, the report noted these rankings: 

• Literacy: U.S. millennials place 17th out of 23 participating countries. Only millennials in Spain and Italy had lower scores.

• Numeracy: U.S. millennials ranked 21st and tied for last place with Italy and Spain.

• PS-TRE (Problem Solving, Technology-Rich Environments): U.S. millennials ranked 18th and tied for last place, along with the Slovak Republic, Ireland, and Poland.

Japan ranked first and Finland ranked second in all categories. American millennials with four-year college degrees received test scores comparable with those having only high school diplomas in Finland, Japan, and the Netherlands.


Casting a somewhat pessimistic outlook, the report’s authors noted several factors that reflect poorly on the products of the American education system. They noted that by targeting those in the millennial generation, their study included “the most recent products of our educational systems.” Furthermore, recent reports suggested that this group of Americans had “attained the most years of schooling of any cohort in American history.” Finally, the performance of this age group is important because “millennials will shape the economic and social landscape of our country for many years to come.”


The report also refutes the common assumption that merely completing a number of years of higher education automatically confers a high level of proficiency. Its findings, note the authors:


Offer a clear caution to anyone who believes that our policies around education should focus primarily on years of schooling or trusts that the conferring of credentials and certificates alone is enough. While it is true that, on average, the more years of schooling one completes, the more skills one acquires, this report suggests that far too many are graduating high school and completing postsecondary educational programs without receiving adequate skills.


The report noted that since 2003, the percentages of U.S. millennials scoring below level 3 in numeracy (the minimum standard) increased at all levels of educational attainment.
The significance of this report is underscored by statistical studies conducted by Pew Research indicating that sometime during this year, the number of millennials in our population will exceed the number of Baby Boomers (those born between 1946 and 1964). (The former is increasing due to immigration and the latter decreasing because of deaths.)


Those at ETS who conducted the study were surprised not only at how poorly U.S. millennials did in comparison with those in other countries, but also compared with Americans in preceding generations. “We really thought [U.S.] Millennials would do better than the general adult population, either compared to older coworkers in the U.S. or to the same age group in other countries,”


Madeline Goodman, an ETS researcher who worked on the study, was quoted by Fortune. “But they didn’t. In fact, their scores were abysmal.”


While U.S. millennials with college degrees managed to score higher on the survey than Americans with only a high school diploma, Goodman concluded that “a degree may not be enough” to prove that an individual is proficient in basic English, can perform skills employing “workaday math,” or is able to use technology in a job.


While Goodman and others may have been surprised by the findings of ETS’s research, they probably shouldn’t have been, since U.S. educational standards have been in decline for decades. When Rudolf Flesch published his ground-breaking work Why Johnny Can't Read — And What You Can Do About It in 1955, he started a national debate. His book was critical of the practice of teaching reading by sight (the “look-say” method) and advocated a revival of the phonics method of teaching students to sound out words. 


The critique of American education was continued by a long-time contributor to The New American, Samuel L. Blumenfeld, who has spent much of his career researching and writing about the decline in American literacy, and has authored 10 books on education, including N.E.A.: Trojan Horse in American Education, Alpha-Phonics: A Primer For Beginning Readers, and Is Public Education Necessary?


Blumenthal explored the reasons why Americans schoolchildren fared poorly in comparison with their international counterparts in a four-part series of articles for The New American last December through January, “Who Are the World's Smartest Kids? Not Americans.”


In his final article Blumenfeld noted that in 2013, he wrote a letter to former Florida Governor Jeb Bush advising him that the simplest and most direct way to improve American education would be to get rid of the prevalent sight method of teaching reading. Blumenfeld maintains: “If every child in America were taught to read with intensive, systematic phonics, this would create literate students who could read anything and would thereby demand substance to their education.”


Of course, as the ETS study reveals, Americans have problems even beyond reading skills, and did poorly in math and technical skills, as well. In Part 3 of his series, Blumenfeld addressed our failures in math and science. He related the story of a student from Pennsylvania named Tom who went to a school in Poland and was overwhelmed by the tough math curriculum in that country. Blumenfeld wrote:


As the days passed, Tom noticed the difference between how math was being taught in Pennsylvania and in Poland. In the United States, Tom and his fellow students all used calculators. But in his Polish class, calculators were not permitted. Polish kids were doing a lot of math in their heads. Apparently, Polish educators understood that arithmetic is a system that requires memorization for its efficient use. But in the United States, progressive educators had banned rote memorization, considering it to be a form of child abuse.


Much has been written about the factors contributing to the deficiencies in the American educational system responsible for the poor results reflected in the recent ETS study. The conclusion reached by Blumenfeld and other advocates of a disciplined, traditional education program is that we are suffering from more than a century of the system of “progressive” education advocated by John Dewey and his colleagues. This change in our educational methods did not come about overnight. Dewey outlined a plan to implement his progressive agenda in an essay written in 1898, “The Primary-Education Fetish.”


Since Japanese millennials came out on top in all three categories surveyed by ETS, a good place to begin improving our educational system might be to take a look at Japanese educational methods and determine what they are doing right that we are doing wrong.


Related articles:
Education Expert Says College Freshmen Read at Seventh-grade Level
Fifty Years of Title 1: Has It Worked?
Common Core Is Rotten to the Core
OECD: U.S. Schools Mediocre on Education Compared to World
America's Math Problem
Who Are the World's Smartest Kids? Not Americans
Who Are the World's Smartest Kids? Part 2
Who Are the World's Smartest Kids? Part 3
Who Are the World's Smartest Kids? Part 4


http://www.thenewamerican.com/culture/education/item/20418-american-millennials-score-poorly-against-other-nations-in-skills-assessment

Australia Joins China's Regional Bank

"Colossal Defeat" For Obama As Australia Joins China's Regional Bank

Tyler Durden on 03/16/2015

Having attacked its "closest ally" UK for "constant accomodation" with China, we suspect President Obama will be greatly displeased at yet another close-ally's decision to partner up with the Chinese-led Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB). As The Australian reports, "make no mistake," the decision by Australia's Abbott government to sign on for negotiations to join China’s regional bank, foreshadowed by Tony Abbott at the weekend,  "represents a colossal defeat for the Obama administration’s incompetent, distracted, ham-fisted dip­lomacy in Asia."

As The Australian's Greg Sheridan writes Op-Ed,

The decision by the Abbott government to sign on for negotiations to join China’s regional bank, foreshadowed by Tony Abbott at the weekend, represents another defeat for Barack Obama’s diplomacy in Asia.

The Abbott government is right to make this decision. It had well-founded concerns about the vague and unsatisfactory governance arrangements of the institution when Beijing first invited Canberra to join.

Those arrangements have ­improved since then and Australia is only signing on to negotiate terms of accession.

If the terms are no good, Australia will ultimately walk away.

Canberra’s move follows similar decisions by Britain, Singapore, India and New Zealand.

Make no mistake — all this represents a colossal defeat for the Obama administration’s incompetent, distracted, ham-fisted dip­lomacy in Asia.

The Obama administration didn’t want Australia to sign up for the China-led AIIB. The Abbott government rightly feels that it owes Obama nothing.

Obama went out of his way to embarrass the Prime Minister politically on climate change with a rogue speech at the G20 summit in Brisbane.

The speech had been billed as dealing with American leadership in Asia and instead was full of ­material designed to embarrass Abbott.

Since then, the Abbott government has felt absolutely zero subjective good will for Obama.

This is an outlook shared by many American allies.

It’s important to get all the distinctions right here.

The Abbott government operates foreign policy in Australia’s national interest.

That includes full fidelity to the American ­alliance and to supporting US strategic leadership.

But the Obama administration has neither the continuous presence, nor the tactical wherewithal nor the store of goodwill or personal relationships to carry Canberra, or other allies, on non-essential matters.

The Obama administration has tried to convince both its friends and ­allies not to join the China Bank.

This was probably a bad call in itself, but, as so often with the Obama administration, it was a bad call badly implemented.

The characteristically bad implementation has helped shred Obama’s diplomatic credibility.

The Chinese have been the US’s best friends in Asia, diplomatically. Their territorial aggressiveness in the East and South China Seas has driven Asia to embrace America’s security role more tightly than ever.

The American military are now the best American diplomats in Asia by far.

Such prestige as the US enjoys in Asia these days rests disproportionately on the shoulders of the US military.

Obama has neglected and mistreated allies and as a result Washington has much less influence than previously.

The saga of the China Bank is almost a textbook case of the failure of Obama’s foreign policy.

*  *  *
As we have detailed recently, Australia is in trouble economically and its pivot to China makes perfect self-preservation sense... as Sheridan notes:

Obama treats allies shabbily and as a result he loses influence with them and then seems perpetually surprised at this outcome.

The Asian professionals in Washington regard the Obama administration as particularly ineffective in Asia.

The consensus is that the Obama White House is insular, isolated, inward-looking, focused on the President’s personal image and ineffective in foreign policy.

* * *
De-dollarization continues... As Simon Black recently concluded, now we can see words are turning into action...

Britain and Australia might be too polite to tell the US straight up– “Look, you have $18.1 trillion in official debt, you have $42 trillion in unfunded liabilities, and you’re kind of a dick. I’m dumping you.”

So instead they’re going with the “it’s not you, it’s me” approach.

But to anyone paying attention, it’s pretty obvious where this trend is going.

It won’t be long before other western nations jump on the anti-dollar bandwagon with action and not just words.

*  *  *
Bottom line: this isn’t theory or conjecture anymore. Every shred of objective evidence suggests that the dollar’s dominance is coming to an end.

World Debt Reaches All-Time High as Central Banks Panic to Save Economy!

World Debt Reaches All-Time High

as Central Banks Panic to Save Economy!  

  



The Money GPS ~ Author Exposing the Truth 1 day ago

Global GDP has been pumped up using fraudulent data and still the debt burden has far surpassed this! Central banks are in PANIC MODE as they have already lowered interest rates hundreds of times and the results are a deeper wound to the individual citizen.

Due to the corruption deep into the core of the political and financial system, we can surmise that this will not be saved and instead will be run directly into the ground, intentionally.

Monsanto Documentary - This is a shocking video about the company

Monsanto Documentary


This is a shocking video about the company

Child Porn Crisis Infecting U.S. Government Agencies

The Sickening Child Porn Crisis Infecting U.S. Government Agencies

Shane Harris

Mar 16 2015

At least 22 current local, state, and federal employees have been convicted of horrific crimes against children. Even worse: There are likely many more of these monsters.

Daniel Rosen, a senior State Department official arrested last month for soliciting sex online with a minor, was reportedly arrested again Sunday night in Washington, D.C., and charged with an earlier crime of voyeurism after police searched his cellphone. And he is only the latest in a long string of government employees to have been accused of crimes against children.


Public records and reports reviewed by The Daily Beast show that at least 22 current and former local, state, and federal employees have been convicted of crimes ranging from distributing child pornography to conscience-shocking acts of violence against infants. The crimes have occurred over the past decade, with many of the cases coming in the past four years. Experts say the numbers are likely far higher and may not be thoroughly documented by law enforcement agencies across the United States.


There is a veritable rogues gallery of sexual predators from the ranks of local law enforcement to the diplomatic corps. Their crimes usually involve some online component, either distributing graphic images or using text messaging and chat rooms to lure victims.


At the State Department, where Rosen worked, a senior technology project manager was arrested in 2012 and accused of 10 counts of possessing child pornography. The same year, a former special agent with the Bureau of Diplomatic Security was sentenced to seven years in prison for possession of child porn, including some 30,000 images contained on computer equipment in his house. And in 2008, a Foreign Service Officer was sentenced to 20 years in prison for possession of child pornography and admitted to videotaping his sexual encounters with girls while working abroad as a consular officer.


At the CIA, the former station chief in Algeria was sentenced to more than five years in federal prison for drugging and raping a Muslim woman and for illegally possessing a firearm while under the influence of cocaine. Authorities also discovered child pornography on his laptop computer, though no charges were filed for that offense. At the Homeland Security Department, six now ex-employees are doing time for crimes including possession of child pornography, soliciting sex with minors, and human sex-trafficking. And in 2011, a U.S. Army lawyer and West Point graduate pleaded guilty to “forcible sodomy with an infant” and making and distributing violent images of child abuse.


Crimes against children aren’t limited by government agency or the profession of the offenders, who hail from the military, local law enforcement, and federal departments. “Child porn within our government agencies has reached crisis level,” Lori Handrahan, a researcher of child sex abuse cases, wrote in a recent blog post. Handrahan, who has documented other cases in and out of government, says large numbers of men are downloading child pornography frequently from their work computers.


Precisely how many government employees have been convicted on child pornography charges is difficult to assess because official reports don’t distinguish by employment category. And many of the most frequently cited government reports on child sexual crime rates haven’t been recently updated.

This handout photo provided by the Fairfax County, Virginia, Sheriff’s Office shows the booking photo of Daniel Rosen of Washington, D.C. The 44-year-old State Department official was released Friday on $25,000 bond and was to be free pending trial on charges he solicited a minor online despite prosecutors’ objections that he presented a flight risk. Rosen reportedly was arrested again Sunday night and charged with an earlier crime of voyeurism after police in Washington searched his cellphone. (Fairfax County, Va. Sheriff’s Office/AP)

But federal statistics show a rising trend in child pornography and exploitation cases. Between 2007 and 2012, more than 11,447 defendants were convicted in federal courts for offenses related the sexual exploitation of a minor, according to a Justice Department report. “These crimes have ranged from production of obscene visual depictions of minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct to receipt, distribution, possession, and/or production of child pornography to the direct physical, sexual abuse of a minor.”


In 2010, the Justice Department released the first-ever National Strategy for Child Exploitation Prevention and Interdiction, which aimed to assess the dangers from child pornography, online enticement, and other crimes against children. It found that between 2005 and 2009, there was a 432 percent increase in child pornography movies and files submitted to the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children, which attempts to identify victims.


“Although documenting the precise quantity of child pornography is difficult, it is evident that technological advances have contributed significantly to the overall increase in the child pornography threat,” the strategy report found. From 2005 through 2009, it said, U.S. Attorneys prosecuted 8,352 child pornography cases, “and in most instances, the offenders used digital technologies and the Internet to produce, view, store, advertise, or distribute child pornography.”

There is a veritable rogues gallery of sexual predators from the ranks of local law enforcement to the diplomatic corps.

The label “pornography” arguably doesn’t capture the depravity of some of the crimes committed against children. In 2012, a Ganby, Connecticut, police captain was sentenced to 10 years in prison for possessing and trading videos that “horrifically depicted children being sexually abused by adults,” according to a U.S. prosecutor. Among the images the former cop sought from fellow traders were those of babies being bound and tortured, officials said.


Also in 2014, the former acting director of cyber security at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services was convicted for his participation in a child porn ring that included images so violent and disturbing that even veteran investigators said they were shocked by what they saw. A federal prosecutor said the employee used his technical expertise to navigate anonymous computer networks frequented by child porn peddlers.


Cases of violent child abuse in the United States have mirrored recent revelations from an organized abuse ring in the United Kingdom featuring senior members of the British government. Shocking cases of crimes against children went unreported or covered up for decades. As The Daily Beast reported Friday, the potential key witness in the ring, who was himself allegedly a victim as a schoolboy, fled Britain and now lives in the United States.  


The international dimensions of child pornography and violence haven’t escaped the FBI, which last week helped to take down an alleged porn kingpin in South Africa. The accused was reportedly arrested at his home in Grahamstown, near the country’s southern coast, and had 16 hard drives, a laptop, and video and still cameras. FBI agents are said to have discovered the network after seven people were arrested in the United States using Web sites designed to coax children into performing sexual acts while surreptitiously being videotaped. The FBI is seeking to extradite the man because most of the victims were in the United States.


—Brandy Zadrozny contributed research.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/03/16/the-sickening-child-porn-crisis-infecting-u-s-government-agencies.html

Have You Been Hornswoggled? Which Flag is Which?

 

American War Flag Have You Been Hornswoggled?

 Which Flag is Which?

 By Richard McDonald

 American Peace Flag The people of the United States actually have two national flags: one for our military government and another for the civil. Each one has fifty stars in its canton, and thirteen red and white stripes, but there are several important differences.

 Although most Americans think of the Stars and Stripes (above left) as their only flag, it is actually for military affairs only. The other one, meant by its maker for wider use, (peacetime), has vertical stripes with blue stars on a white field (above right). You can see this design, which bears civil jurisdiction, in the U.S. Coast Guard and Customs flags, but their service insignias replace the fifty stars.

 I first learned of the separate, civil flag when I was reading Nathaniel Hawthorne's The Scarlet Letter, published in 1850. The introduction, titled "The Custom House," includes this description:

 From the loftiest point of its roof, during precisely three and a half hours of each forenoon, floats or droops, in breeze or calm, the banner of the republic; but with the thirteen stripes turned vertically, instead of horizontally, and thus indicating that a civil, and not a military post of Uncle Sam's government, is here established.

 It took me two years of digging before I found a picture that matched what he was describing: my second clue was an original Illuminated History of North America (1860). If this runs against your beliefs, look up these two references.

History book publishers contribute to the public's miseducation by always picturing the flag in military settings, creating the impression that the one with horizontal stripes is the only one there is. They don't actually lie; they just tell half the truth. For example, the "first American flag" they show Betsy Ross sewing at George Washington's request was for the Revolution -- of course it was military.

The U.S. government hasn't flown the civil flag since the Civil War, as that war is still going on. Peace has never been declared, nor have hostilities against the people ended. The government is still operation under quasi-military rule.

You movie buffs may recall this: In the old Westerns, "Old Glory" has her stripes running sideways and a military yellow fringe. Most of these films are historically accurate about that; their stories usually took place in the territories still under military law and not yet states. Before WWII, no U.S. flag, civil or military, flew within the forty-eight states (except in federal settings); only state flags did. Since then, the U.S. government seems to have decided the supposedly sovereign states are its territories, too, so it asserts its military power over them under the "law of the flag."

Today the U.S. Military flag appears alongside, or in place of, the state flags in nearly all locations within the states. All of the state courts and even the municipal ones now openly display it. This should have raised serious questions from many citizens long ago, but we've been educated to listen and believe what we are told, not to ask questions, or think or search for the truth.

NOTES
1. hornswoggled: deceived. The term comes from the traditional image of cuckolded husbands wearing horns.óEditor 
2. canton: The rectangular section in the upper corner of a flag, next to the staff. 
3. The Scarlet Letter: An Authoritative Text, edited by Sculley Bradley, W. W. Norton, New York, 1978, pp. 7-8. 
4. There is also a picture of the Coast Guard flag in Webster's Third New International Dictionary of the English Language Unabridged, G. & C. Merriam Company, Springfield, Mass., 1966. 
5. For more about the law of the flag, see "A Fiction-at-Law . . . ," in the printed version of Perceptions Magazine May/June1995, Issue 9, page 11. 

About the author: Richard McDonald is a California Citizen domiciled in The California state Republic. He does legal research and has his own site on the web, State Citizen's Service Center. This article was transcribed, without permission, from the May/June '95 issue of Perceptions Magazine, c/o 10734 Jefferson Boulevard, Suite 502-RW, Culver City, California, [Postal Zone 90230] Telephone: 310-313-5185. 

source:  http://www.lawfulpath.com/ref/whchflag.shtml

Over a dozen Congress members are currently under fire for taking unlawful campaign contributions.

===================
BrasscheckTV Report
===================

Over a dozen Congress
members are currently
under fire for taking
unlawful campaign
contributions.

Are we finally ready to
call out the bribery?

Video:

http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/28056.html

- Brasscheck TV

P.S. Please share Brasscheck TV with your
friends and colleagues.

================================