Decapitation succession talk behind doors on Capitol Hill

(John, I have permission from Wayne)

Demise of Federal Government is starting and it will be quick.

The following reporting just came out on "The Wayne Madsen Report" on what is happening on the hill behind closed doors and with urgency.

April 12-13, 2011 -- Decapitation succession talk behind doors on Capitol Hill

For the first time since the weeks and months after 9/11, Congressional leaders and staff are, once again, discussing presidential line-of-succession. The focus is on the Senate President pro tem position, which, according to the Presidential Succession Act of 1947, places the Senate President third in line of succession to the President after the Vice President and Speaker of the House of Representatives. Also being discussed in the re-constitution of the U.S. Congress in the event that a major "catastrophe" wipes out a number of senators and representatives.

Increasingly, lawmakers are concerned about the fact that due to seniority, the current and last Senate Presidents pro tem have been aging octogenarians. The current president, Senator Daniel Inouye of Hawaii, is 86. Inouye replaced Senator Robert Byrd last year. Byrd was 92.

In the cases of Byrd, had the top leadership, the President, Vice President, and Speaker of the House, been lost in a major catastrophic event, the duties of the presidency would have fallen, for all practical purposes, on Byrd's senior staff. The same situation now exists with the aging Inouye.

Although Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) has been reluctant to talk about proposals to change the Senate rules to ensure that someone more able-bodied and -minded is in the Senate President pro tem position, the seniority achieved by senators like Byrd and Inouye make it virtually impossible to force them to give up the prestigious position with all its perks.

Another term being used by Congressional staffers concerned about line-of-succession is "decapitation," a term not heard much since the days after 9/11. Decapitation refers to the sudden elimination of the top leadership of the U.S. government as the result of a catastrophic event, which could include a surprise nuclear attack on Washington, a major terrorist attack, or a Armageddon-level natural disaster.

It is not known what has prompted Congress's renewed interest in the line-of-succession debate.

This is evidence that there are white hat insiders that are in the know that the Fed Gov is going to be "decapitated".

They are looking at traditional catastrophes, however, this is more like someone knows that Obama is going to be exposed for being ilegit. A terrorist or nuclear attack wouldn't do nearly the decapitation job as going into a constitutional crisis because the president is null and void. This crisis would nullify the legitimacy of Biden, executive appointees, 2 Supreme Court judges, and Federal Judge appointees. This situation is fraud and treason. It is an overthrow of the government by an imposter - this act is treason. The domino effect reaches into both the Senate and Congress to anyone who participated in the cover-up - they have committed Misprision of Treason making them equally culpable.

Neither an act of terrorism, or natural disaster (e.g. Japan), can guarantee the "decapitation" of the Federal government. Deeming Obama inelligible to be president guarantees that the Fed government will be decapitated. This constitutional crisis effectively wipes out the Executive Branch, large chunks of the Legislative Branch and the Judicial Branch (Supreme Court and Federal Court). I'd say it is truly a decapitation in the truest sense. By virtue of them talking about making constitutional changes in the Line of Succession (using that lame smoke screen of the age of the President of the Senate) is a good indication that the tradtional line of succession would not be legit either or would have to go so far down that there are no longer any consitutional parameters.