Fast & Furious Info - MUST READ

Subj: FW: Shotgun!

(1-thousand bcc herein-permission to forward)

The following is a Must Read! (see below herein)….

….considering Fast & Furious and what it was Intended to do with respect to the 2^nd Amendment.

Ø The Attorney General (Eric Holder) of the ‘U.S.’ withholds evidence for a year and half.

Just before he is found in Contempt of Congress, His president issues an Executive Order intended to protect & shield him.

Ø Nancy Pelosi and the Congressional Black Caucus walk out just before the Contempt Vote is Taken, but NOT before Nancy goes on a tirade berating the House.

Ø Many are Dead because of Fast & Furious but the Truth, like so much else, be damned by these Ideological Maniacs.

Ø The same Nancy Pelosi along with the same Congressional Black Caucus who rammed down our throats THEIR ‘mans’ Health Care Program 2-years earlier VIA Reconciliation while walking Defiantly, Smugly & Arrogantly past the Tea Party to enact it.

Ø Afterwards they claimed a Variety of things wherein they claimed the Black members of the CBC were spit upon and called the ‘N’ word.

Despite hundreds of cameras and numerous newsmen present, NOT a single camera or piece of audio equipment could support their claims of Racism.

Ø Nonetheless, Nancy and her Special Interest Constituents used this to Demonize the legitimate protestors expressing their 1^st Amendment Rights and just the SAME as ‘OTHERS’ have done routinely & regularly in pursuit of their perceived injustices BUT,  ‘this time around’- OUR time ‘around’, we are called and  depicted as “Nazi’s, Right-Wingers, Neo-Cons, etc., etc” simply for exercising Our Rights as have others are numerous occasions prior.

These same ‘Elected Officials’ had the Temerity to Publicly call & describe it and us as:

“NOTHING MORE THAN AN ASTRO-TURF MOVEMENT”… displaying their all too familiar grin of arrogance & accomplishment in doing so, knowing they had Screwed us again.

Was the Civil Rights Movement ever called such names?

Why then is a National Expression of Outrage as it relates to Obvious Injustice reduced to such ugliness and ridicule while others are demonstrably vindicated and always given a free pass?

How and Why is One Expression of Outrage Treated with Greater Attention than Another- particularly when this National Outrage is the result of

National Transgression brought about and by the very Officers of Government who WE ‘ELECTED’ TO REPRESENT US WHILE SWEARING AN OATH TO DO SO?

How is it that the substance of one position can be addressed but NOT that of the other?

Aren’t they EQUAL?

In fact, isn’t this current event even MORE Important because of the circumstances and inter-relationship it can have on EVERYONE RESULTING FROM THE PRECEDENCE it is creating?

Ø But NO, she and they would NOW exhibit what they defamed 2-years earlier- allowing themselves, as Government Officials, to Walk Out in Protest!...

…despite the fact they were ‘Elected’ to seek the Truth and sit their fannies in the Seats we pay them to sit in!

What gave them the right to leave that Chamber that we put them in?

Ø ‘Laws’ hence, have now been passed that insulate them from us and prevent any ‘protestor’ from nearing Government Grounds for reasons of ‘Security’ (Ha!), growing Government more distant from the People who sent them there in the first place.

Ø Further, their Dream Act regarding Illegal Immigration is quietly passed & back-ended with another piece of ‘Legislation’.

Ø Equally, the NDAA is also passed (National Defense Authorization Act) whose ‘Language’ is as, if NOT worse, than Obamas’ MANDATE that wasn’t a Tax but is NOW a Tax that he and they still claim is NOT a TAX?

The ‘Language’ within the NDAA is arbitrary & vague but whose measures give YOUR Government the right to Invade and Seize YOUR Homes and Personal Properties without the consent of a Court Order based entirely on that Ambiguity & Vagueness in the name of ‘Supposed Terrorism- Domestic or Foreign’.

Ø As if ALL this isn’t BAD in of itself- His Majesty, Barack Hussein Obama, summarily Ignores Congress and the Laws he doesn’t like by ‘Decreeing’ Amnesty to those Illegals who are here.

I GUESS THE LAW ONLY MATTERS AND APPLIES WHEN THE PAYERS ARE THE ONES GETTING FLEECED AND IF WE DARE ‘PROTEST’ AND DECIDE NOT TO PAY, THEIR LEGION OF NEWLY HIRED 15,000 IRS AGENTS WILL SEE TO IT THAT WE DO!

Ø On top of this their Supreme Court kicks the crap out of what we foolishly think is a ‘Sovereign State’s Law’ by claiming, essentially, they have NO right to protect themselves despite the fact the State was doing what the Federal Government SHOULD BUT WON’T, in protecting OUR Borders despite the ‘laws’ on their Federal ‘books’ to do so--- because His Majesty, Obama refuses TO! ….BUT that’s OK, and finally, the crème de la crème-

Ø Their Supreme Court issues a Plebiscite via an INTERPRETATION based upon ‘Nomenclature’ presented by the Solicitor General at the March hearings which was literally an ad hoc inclusion that received NO worthwhile review BECAUSE it didn’t mean a damn thing.

Yet this NO-ACCOUNT argument within that section became the REASON upon which, Obama Care would stand!

Heah- kiss me before you s___w me PLEASE!

NEED I GO ON OR IS THE PATTERN & ARGUMENT OF SUBJUGATION & CENSORSHIP AT THE HIGHEST BECOMING AS OBVIOUS AS IT SHOULD BE TO EVEN THE BIGGEST ‘DOUBTING THOMAS’ OUT THERE?

Folk’s, if Y’all can’t see the web being woven about you, it is Game Over!

Reichsfuhrer of the Schutzstaffel, Heinrich Luitpold Himmler MUST be smiling in Hell because the German People also didn’t believe what the same spider was doing to them as well.

They said it couldn’t happen, but that little man became head of the ‘Government Sponsored’ National Security Team in 1940.

He headed the Waffen SS and within 6-months they had 150,000 men.

Nicht Kleckern KLOTZEN!

The Republic is being Ripped right OUT from Under Your Feet and Y’all are Denying It EVERY BIT THE SAME AS DID THE GERMAN PEOPLE.

This is the CULMINATION of EVERYTHING the Confederate Republic saw coming resulting in their Legal Secession from what they Realized would be THE End Consequence resulting from the Ideological Corruption thanks to the then known Red-Republicans and the Forty-Eighters of that time under Lincoln.

Ever since, this Republic has been downsized from a Republic under a truly Federal Government into this Mobocracy under a National Government.

The Only Ones that can save You Now are Yourselves.

We Told you this Time would Come.

(Now Read Below and perhaps another ‘Dot’ will ‘Connect’ for you?

For God, Family and the Republic of the Confederation,

Craig Maus,

president, The Confederate Society of America

Ø  Become a Confederate Citizen, before it’s TOO late- see www.CSAGovernment.org

Ø  Become a Member of the Society- see www.deovindice.org

Ø 

PS- Thanks Al for the ‘Shotgun’.

---

Subj: Shotgun! Shotgun!   You're sound asleep when you hear  a thump outside your bedroom door. Half-awake, and nearly paralyzed with fear, you hear muffled whispers. At least two people have broken into your house and are moving your way. With your heart pumping, you reach down beside your bed and pick up your shotgun. You rack a shell into the chamber, then inch toward the door and open it. In the darkness, you make out two shadows. One holds something that looks like a crowbar. When the intruder brandishes it as if to strike, you raise the shotgun and fire. The blast knocks both thugs to the floor. One writhes and screams while the second man crawls to the front door and lurches outside. As you pick up the telephone to call police, you know you're in trouble. In your country, most guns were outlawed years before, and the few that are privately owned are so stringently regulated as to make them useless. Yours was never registered. Police arrive and inform you that the second burglar has died. They arrest you for First Degree Murder and Illegal Possession of a Firearm. When you talk to your attorney, he tells  you not to worry: authorities will probably plea the case down to manslaughter. "What kind of sentence will I get?" you ask. "Only ten-to-twelve years,"  he replies, as if that's nothing. "Behave yourself, and you'll be out in seven." The next day, the shooting is the lead story in the local newspaper. Somehow, you're portrayed as an eccentric vigilante while the two men you shot are represented as choirboys. Their friends and relatives can't find an unkind word to say about them.. Buried deep down in the article, authorities acknowledge that both "victims" have been arrested numerous times. But the next day's headline says it all: "Lovable Rogue Son Didn't Deserve to Die." The thieves have been transformed from career criminals into Robin Hood-type pranksters.. As the days wear on, the story takes wings. The national media picks it up,  then the international media. The surviving burglar has become a folk hero. Your attorney says the thief is preparing to sue you, and he'll probably win. The media publishes reports that your home has been burglarized several times in the past and that you've been critical of local police for their lack of effort in apprehending the suspects. After the last break-in, you told your neighbor that you would be prepared next time. The  District Attorney uses this to allege that you were lying in wait for the burglars. A  few months later, you go to trial. The charges haven't been reduced, as your lawyer had so confidently predicted. When you take the stand, your anger at the injustice of it all works against you.. Prosecutors paint a picture of you as a mean, vengeful man. It doesn't take long for the jury to convict you of all charges. The  judge sentences you to life in prison. This case really happened. On August 22, 1999, Tony Martin of Emneth, Norfolk,  England, killed one burglar and wounded a second. In  April, 2000, he was convicted and is now serving a life term.. How did it become a crime to defend one's own life in the once great British Empire? It started with the Pistols Act of 1903. This seemingly reasonable law forbade selling pistols to minors or felons and established that handgun sales were to be made only to those who had a license. The Firearms Act of 1920 expanded licensing to include not only handguns but all firearms except shotguns.. Later laws passed in 1953 and 1967 outlawed the carrying of any weapon by private citizens and mandated the registration of all shotguns. Momentum for total handgun confiscation began in earnest after the Hungerford mass shooting in 1987. Michael Ryan, a mentally disturbed man with a Kalashnikov rifle, walked down the streets shooting everyone he saw. When the smoke cleared, 17 people were dead. The British public, already de-sensitized by eighty years of "gun  control", demanded even tougher restrictions. (The  seizure of all privately owned handguns was the  objective even though Ryan used a  rifle.) Nine years later, at Dunblane, Scotland , Thomas Hamilton used a semi-automatic weapon to murder 16 children and a teacher at a public school. For many years, the media had portrayed all gun owners as mentally unstable, or worse, criminals. Now the press had a real kook with which to beat up law-abiding gun owners. Day after day, week after week, the media gave up all pretense of objectivity and demanded a total ban on all handguns. The Dunblane Inquiry, a few months later, sealed the fate of the few sidearms still owned by private citizens. During the years in which the British government incrementally took away most gun rights, the notion that a citizen had the right to armed self-defense came to be seen as vigilantism. Authorities refused to grant gun licenses to people who were threatened, claiming that self-defense was no longer considered a reason to own a gun. Citizens who shot burglars or robbers or rapists were charged while the real criminals were released. Indeed, after the Martin shooting, a police spokesman was quoted as saying, "We cannot have people take the law into their own hands." All of  Martin's neighbors had been robbed numerous times,  and several elderly people were severely injured in beatings by young thugs who had no fear of the consequences. Martin himself, a collector of antiques, had seen most of his collection  trashed or stolen by burglars. When the Dunblane Inquiry ended, citizens who owned handguns were given three months to turn them over to local authorities. Being good British subjects, most people obeyed the law.  The few who didn't were visited by police and  threatened with ten-year prison sentences if they didn't  comply. Police later bragged that they'd taken nearly 200,000 handguns from private citizens. How did the authorities know who had handguns? The guns had been registered and licensed. Kind of like cars. Sound familiar? WAKE UP AMERICA;  THIS IS  WHY OUR FOUNDING FATHERS PUT THE SECOND AMENDMENT IN OUR  CONSTITUTION. "...It does not require a  majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless  minority keen to set brush fires in people's  minds.." --Samuel  Adams If  you think this is  important,  please forward to everyone you know.