Wednesday, July 4, 2012

Subject: If This Passes, There Will Be A Civil War


Subject: If This Passes, There Will Be A Civil War


If This Passes, There Will Be A Civil War which is what I think BO wants so he can invoke martial law.

“Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch.
Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote ! ”
--Benjamin Franklin

The Full Article Here:
http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSTRE59E0Q920091015


U.S. reverses stance on treaty to regulate arms trade

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States reversed policy on Wednesday and said it would back launching talks on a treaty to regulate arms sales as long as the talks operated by consensus, a stance critics said gave every nation a veto.

The decision, announced in a statement released by the U.S. State Department, overturns the position of former President George W. Bush's
administration, which had opposed such a treaty on the grounds that national controls were better.

On Wednesday Obama Took the First Major Step in a Plan to Ban All Firearms in the United States. The Obama administration intends to
force gun control and a complete ban on all weapons for US citizens through the signing of international treaties with foreign nations. By
signing international treaties on gun control, the Obama administration can use the US State Department to bypass the normal legislative process in Congress. Once the US Government signs these international treaties, all US
citizens will be subject to those gun laws created by foreign governments.
These are laws that have been developed and promoted by organizations such as the United Nations and individuals such as George Soros and Michael Bloomberg. The laws are designed and intended to lead to the complete ban
and confiscation of all firearms.

The Obama administration is attempting to use tactics and methods of gun control that will inflict major damage to our 2nd Amendment before US
citizens even understand what has happened. Obama can appear before the public and tell them that he does not intend to pursue any legislation (in the United States) that will lead to new gun control laws, while cloaked in secrecy, his Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton is committing the US to international treaties and foreign gun control laws. Does that mean Obama is
telling the truth? What it means is that there will be no publicized gun control debates in the media or votes in Congress. We will wake up one
morning and find that the United States has signed a treaty that prohibits firearm and ammunition manufacturers from selling to the public. We will wake up another morning and find that the US has signed a treaty that prohibits any transfer of firearm ownership. And then, we will wake up yet another morning and find that the US has signed a treaty that requires US citizens to deliver any firearm they own to the local government collection and destruction center or face imprisonment.

This is not a joke nor a false warning. As sure as government health care will be forced on us by the Obama administration through whatever means
necessary, so will gun control.

Please forward this message to others who may be concerned about the direction in which our country is headed.

We are being led like a lamb to the slaughter (Socialism/Dictatorship).

DON'T KEEP THIS - SEND IT OUT TO YOUR LIST


2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Under Ucc law contracts that violate our rights are supposed to be null and void. So how do they get passed this? Let alone the fact that the U.S. is a corporation and not a government. The american people are the governing body . So if they do this and start a war in America It will be an illegal war. The american people definitely need to start standing up with lawful paperwork to separate themselves from this corproration. If we all do this then we have the right to put them out of office and try them for treason on our soil. They were given the ten square miles of D.C to operate the business of the american people with the american people having informed consent. If we do not have informed consent then the corporation takes its chances with violation of the RICO statute. I am a peaceful person and I wouldnt want to hurt anyone but I will stop them from hurting me. Their U.S. Corporate charter should be revoked and all of the treaties they signed without our informed consent should either be renegotiated or broken by We ,The People of America and not the U.S Corporation. Definately break the Virginia land deal and take D.C. back. I know that by doing those things that it will provoke the corporation to take action against we the people but we still havent won the war of independence the corporation just made us think we did. As this war progressed they just changed the theatre from outright killing to covert financial terror and no matter how you look at it the U.S. Corporation had no lawful right to do these things. What the corportion is doing is illegal because they will only negotiate by consensus, the popular opinion of the ill informed directly related to our educational system they provided us with to dumb us down. As it surely stands this corporation broke its contract with "We the people who are its creditors and not the other way around. No amount of legalese on a contract can cover that up as we wake up from the stupor we have all been in. So if we do what Jesus did Just say I am a Son of God and take our place as heirs using justice tempered with mercy and a load of paperwork LOL maybe we can change this thing. Se what Iceland did and how they did it because whatever they did they used peace and justice to do it. I know they used the UCC law and just as a large country of men and women took resposibility to protect themselves in law and lawfully we can too. One more thing if they intend to kill us anyway then we have no choice but to use the lawful way and arrest them because what they deserve we the people need to let God decide and He decides with a fair trial and proper punishment because we the people do not have to act uncivilised when we have the truth and enough evidence to convict them by a jury of their peers which consequently is "WE THE PEOPLE" and "WE THE PEOPLE AROUND THE WORLD"

Anonymous said...

Has anybody bothered to look up the definition of the term "Firearm" in the U.S. Code?

Title 26 › Subtitle E › Chapter 53 › Subchapter B › Part I › § 5845


For the purpose of this chapter—
(a) Firearm
The term “firearm” means
(1) a shotgun having a barrel or barrels of less than 18 inches in length;
(2) a weapon made from a shotgun if such weapon as modified has an overall length of less than 26 inches or a barrel or barrels of less than 18 inches in length;
(3) a rifle having a barrel or barrels of less than 16 inches in length;
(4) a weapon made from a rifle if such weapon as modified has an overall length of less than 26 inches or a barrel or barrels of less than 16 inches in length;
**(5) any other weapon, as defined in subsection (e)**;
(6) a machinegun;
(7) any silencer (as defined in section 921 of title 18, United States Code); and
(8) a destructive device. The term “firearm” shall not include an antique firearm or any device (other than a machinegun or destructive device) which, although designed as a weapon, the Secretary finds by reason of the date of its manufacture, value, design, and other characteristics is primarily a collector’s item and is not likely to be used as a weapon.

**(5)(e)** Any other weapon

The term “any other weapon” means any weapon or device capable of being concealed on the person from which a shot can be discharged through the energy of an explosive, a pistol or revolver having a barrel with a smooth bore designed or redesigned to fire a fixed shotgun shell, weapons with combination shotgun and rifle barrels 12 inches or more, less than 18 inches in length, from which only a single discharge can be made from either barrel without manual reloading, and shall include any such weapon which may be readily restored to fire. Such term shall not include a pistol or a revolver having a rifled bore, or rifled bores, or weapons designed, made, or intended to be fired from the shoulder and not capable of firing fixed ammunition.

And if somebody says, "Well, under item (8)they (the Corp. Government) can come and get your handgun or standard barrel length shotgun or rife." If that is the case then the section definition means nothing to start with.Also see item **(5)(e)**