http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/04/benghazi-whistleblowers-were-threatened-by-obama-administration/
Benghazi Whistleblowers Were Threatened By Obama Administration
America has been demanding answers in the
Benghazi coverup and it seems we may be getting closer to the truth as Benghazi
whistleblowers are coming forward and talking to Congress. It has
now been reported that at least four career officials
at the State Department and the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) have retained
attorneys, as Rep. Darrell Issa suggested they do, as they prepare to provide sensitive information to Congress
regarding the September 11, 2012 attacks in Benghazi, Libya. Reports are coming
forth that some of these witness are being threatened by Barack Obama’s
administration officials.
“Some
witnesses may be required to retain personal counsel to represent them before
the committee and in the event the agency subsequently retaliates against them
for cooperating with the committee’s investigation,” Issa wrote to the CIA and
other government officials on Wednesday of last week.
“Additional witnesses may be compelled by
subpoena to give testimony to the committee and can be reasonably expected to
retain personal counsel at that time,” he added.“Some witnesses may be required
to retain personal counsel to represent them before the committee and in the
event the agency subsequently retaliates against them for cooperating with the
committee’s investigation,” Issa wrote to the CIA and other government
officials on Wednesday of last week.
“[I]t is important that the agency makes clear
to its employees that they are free to furnish information to Congress in
accordance with their statutory rights,” Issa wrote.
“Additionally, retaliation against a witness who
communicates with the committee can be considered obstruction of a
congressional investigation and is punishable by fine and imprisonment,” he
added. It seems that the Obama administration is not taking Issa’s
statements under advisement.
Fox News reports Victoria Toensing, a
former Justice Department official and Republican counsel to the Senate
Intelligence Committee, is now repres was
on the ground in Benghazi on the night of Sept. 11, 2012, when terrorist
attacks on two U.S. installations in the Libyan city killed four Americans,
including U.S. Ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens.
“I’m
not talking generally, I’m talking specifically about Benghazi – that people
have been threatened,” Toensing said in an interview Monday. “And not just the
State Department. People have been threatened at the CIA.”
Toensing
declined to name her client. She also refused to say whether the individual was
on the ground in Benghazi on the night of Sept. 11, 2012, when terrorist
attacks on two U.S. installations in the Libyan city killed four Americans,
including U.S. Ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens.
However,
Toensing disclosed that her client has pertinent information on all three time
periods investigators consider relevant to the attacks: the months that led up
to the attack, when pleas by the ambassador and his staff for enhanced security
in Benghazi were mostly rejected by senior officers at the State Department;
the eight-hour time frame in which the attacks unfolded, and the eight-day
period that followed the attacks, when Obama administration officials
incorrectly described them as the result of a spontaneous protest over a video.
“It’s
frightening, and they’re doing some very despicable threats to people,” she
said. “Not ‘we’re going to kill you,’ or not ‘we’re going to prosecute you
tomorrow,’ but they’re taking career people and making them well aware that
their careers will be over [if they cooperate with congressional
investigators].”
While federal law provides explicit protections
for federal government employees who are identified as “whistleblowers,” the
Obama administration has gone after whistleblowers more than any other
administration, including an executive order that could be
used against whistleblowers.
Obama’s Acting Director of the Bureau of
Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (BATFE), Todd B. Jones, was called out last year after
his video, which was considered a threat, was viewed by BATFE
employees, in the midst of the other Obama scandal, Operation Fast and Furious.
Congressman Issa wrote to State Secretary John
Kerry on Friday complaining that the State Department hasn’t made the
provisions for attorneys to receive security clearances that they need to
review the classified documents and other evidence.
“It is unavoidable that Department employees
identifying themselves as witnesses in the Committee’s investigation will apply
for a security clearance to allow their personal attorneys to handle sensitive
or classified material,” Issa wrote. “The Department’s unwillingness to make
the process for clearing an attorney more transparent appears to be an effort
to interfere with the rights of employees to furnish information to Congress.”
On Friday, Issa also wrote on his
blog: This
much is clear, the White House and State Department officials have attempted to
suppress information about errors and reckless misjudgments that led to the
death of four brave Americans.
The
American people deserve to have the full truth about what happened both before
and after the attacks in Benghazi. I will convene an Oversight
Committee hearing next month to examine new facts about what happened and
significant problems with the Administration’s own review of security failures.
While
President Obama and his administration may be inclined to give free passes to
senior officials who failed to meet their responsibilities in protecting our
citizens abroad, my Committee will work to expose what they did and hold them
accountable to you, the American people, to ensure that it does not happen
again.
Secretary Kerry though doesn’t seem too
concerned about Benghazi. In fact, he wants to move
on to “more important things.” “I do not want to spend the next
year coming up here talking about Benghazi,” he told Rep. Ed Royce (R-CA) on
April 17.
Meanwhile Kerry’s spokesman Patrick Ventrell
told reporters, “I’m not aware of private counsel seeking security clearances
or — or anything to that regard. I’m not aware of whistle-blowers one way or
another.” While Ventrell pointed to the FBI’s work and the State
Department’s investigation and said it was a “very thorough, independent
investigation,
which we completed and (which was) transparent and shared,” apparently he
doesn’t get that both of those departments fall under the Executive Branch, so
honestly it’s kind of like investigating yourself. Ventrell claims that
“Congress has its own prerogatives” and that “there are many folks who are, in
a political manner, trying to sort of use this for their own political means,
or ends.”
Right, Barack Obama and his administration would never do anything
for political means and ends, would they?
No comments:
Post a Comment