Sunday, May 26, 2013

HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON: LIAR, GLOBALIST TRAITOR

Subject: Hillary
To:

HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON: LIAR, GLOBALIST TRAITOR


By: Devvy
May 26, 2013
NewsWithViews.com
There is much speculation whether or not Hillary Rodham Clinton, will run for president in 2016.
The former co-president with her lying, cheating husband, Bill Clinton, received enormous support in 2008, but those who really call the shots decided a bi-racial, constitutionally ineligible candidate, Barry Soetoro aka Barack Hussein Obama, would be the better choice to continue the planned destruction of America. Hillary Rodham Clinton carries a lot of old, dirty baggage. Perhaps wait eight more years to install Comrade Clinton.
Much of Hillary Rodham's support comes from ignorant women who have no facts other than the carefully polished image built to portray Comrade Clinton as a friend of women. By championing murdering unborn babies using clever propaganda like "protecting women's reproductive rights", Comrade Clinton is lauded by women who kill their unborn babies as some sort hero. By championing the filth of sodomy and promoting AIDS/HIV by supporting sexual deviants, Comrade Clinton assured herself a nice fat bankroll for her run for the senate and president. Bushels of money from sexual deviants in Hollywood.
Tens of millions of ignorant women have been played by the one of the most skilled, consummate liars ever to hold public office. And, quite frankly, they don't care just as long as Comrade Clinton continues to promise them your paycheck to pay for things like their sexual activities. In February 2011, I wrote a column titled, Get My Wallet Out Of Your Vagina. Oh, how the "feminists" squealed on their web sites because they can't stand the truth:
"How many times have we heard female politicians bleat about "women's issues" during elections? How many times have we heard the old chant about "empowering women" from female members of Congress? The feminization of Congress and our state legislatures is destroying constitutional government, running America into oceans of unpayable debt and breeding generations of helpless women, whining for mother government to take care of them and their every need...
"The legions of females out there are herded in the desired direction with promises of stealing from the people's treasury for their wants and needs. All those "independent, strong women" are nothing but whiners demanding the fruits of your labor. Real women take care of the babies they bring into this world. Real women know that family planning means keep your panties on and being a responsible adult. Strong, independent women do not demand mother government steal from taxpayers to fund their personal lives. Strong and independent? Horsecrap. Strong, independent women do not demand someone else pay their way whether it's health care, day care or "basic family planning."
Such concepts are alien to millions of women under the age of 50. They have gone through the government's indoctrination centers called pubic schools. They "look up to" hard core feminists from the Hollywood crowd. Female political figures are their toxic role models. All who tell those "empowered" women it's their right to steal your paycheck to pay for their bad choices in life. Her success is why Comrade Clinton became so important to the masters of the game who own Washington, DC.
The nauseating accolades bestowed upon Comrade Clinton for her failed and unlawful stint as Secretary of State is simply more propaganda fed to ignorant sycophants who haven't a clue about world events. I say unlawful because Hillary Rodham Clinton usurped the office of Secretary of State. Prior to her confirmation, members (both parties) of the joke called the Senate Judiciary Committee were told by Judicial Watch a lawsuit would be filed to stop Comrade Clinton from holding that office because it violated the emolument clause of the U.S. Constitution. What is that?
Article I, section 6 of the U.S. Constitution provides: “No Senator or Representative shall, during the Time for which he was elected, be appointed to any civil Office under the Authority of the United States, which shall have been created, or the Emoluments whereof shall have been encreased during such time....This provision, known as the “Emoluments” or “Ineligibility” clause is an absolute prohibition and does not allow for any exceptions. The “Ineligibility Clause” is interpreted by most as designed by our Founding Fathers to protect against corruption and ensure the separation of powers among the three branches of government. On January 29, 2009, Judicial Watch filed a lawsuit against newly confirmed Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton on the ground that she is constitutionally ineligible to serve as Secretary of State under the Ineligibility Clause. The “emoluments” or salary of the U.S. Secretary of State increased at least three times during Mrs. Clinton’s most recent U.S. Senate term. That term, which began on January 4, 2007, does not expire until January 2013, regardless of Mrs. Clinton’s recent resignation."
And:
"....there is another lawsuit that has run its course, meaning denied for hearing by the U.S. Supreme Court, you might find of interest: Rodearmel v. Clinton. That lawsuit was filed in January 2009 on behalf of a 19-year veteran of the Foreign Service Officer under the State Department, David Rodearmel, a retired Lt. Col. in the U.S. Army Reserve Judge Advocate General Corp. While I support and respect Judicial Watch in their pursuit of making sure no one is above the law, I simply did not understand why they didn't use the Quo Warranto for Rodearmel's case.
"The defendants (mother government) moved to dismiss and in their filing, there is an important footnote; number 6 at the bottom of page 25:
"The D.C. Court of Appeals has observed that a plaintiff who seeks to directly attack the appointment of an official (as opposed to attacking an action of that official) will rarely if ever have standing. See Andrade v. Lauer, 729 F.2d 1475, 1496-97 (D.C. Cir. 1984). In the same case, the court suggested that the only proper way to assert such a direct attack is through an action for a writ of quo warranto. See id. at 1497 (citing cases). A quo warranto action may only be brought by the Attorney General of the United States or the United States Attorney or, if these Executive Branch officials decline a request, by a private party who has obtained leave of court. See D.C. Stat. §§ 16-3502-3503; see also Rae v. Johnson, 1993 WL 544295, at *1"
As I said, to this day I don't understand why Judicial Watch did not file a Quo Warranto to get Comrade Clinton removed. It was a no brainer as far as standing for Rodearmel; he absolutely qualified under Newman v. United States ex Rel. Frizzell. In the end, the case was dismissed. The gutless cowards (both parties) on the Senate Judiciary Committee thumbed their noses at the U.S. Constitution once again with disastrous results. Benghazi comes to mind with Rodman's now famous outburst revealing the ugliness that has always been Hillary:
"What Difference Does It Make?" whether or not U.S. Ambassador Stevens and three other Americans were slaughtered because of an act of terrorism or some silly Internet video no know ever heard of? video here. If the U.S. Congress would ever seriously press for the truth, Hillary's finger prints are all over what happened September 11, 2012. Stop the tap dancing. Obama's enforcer, Eric Holder, has been jerking around congressional committees for two years over 'Fast and Furious'. It's now been nine months since the disaster in Benghazi. The families are still waiting for answers. Get a special counsel appointed and ram this down Clinton and Obama's throats. We the people are sick and tired of traitors walking free of their crimes.
Make no mistake about it: Hillary Rodman Clinton is a valuable asset to those working to destroy this country. She is a dirty traitor right along with that pathetic piece of work she's been married to for 38 years. A partnership, not a marriage. Millions who support Comrade Clinton are too young to remember Whitewater, Fostergate and the litany of scandals that plagued the co-presidents and destroyed lives forever.
While insiders and the controlled "mainstream" media know the truth about the Clinton's, few Americans were interested when the duo ran for the presidency both times. It was all just a "right-wing conspiracy" by Republicans. The Clinton duo played the American people like a fine tuned fiddle. The FBI knows all about the Clinton's and who they give their money to: The Marxist Influence and the IPS:
1. IPS has firm ties to anti-American terrorists and militant Marxists worldwide; and IPS has firm ties to Bill and Hillary Clinton.


Hillary Rodham Clinton: What Every American Should Know by Christian Josi
Big Sister Is Watching You: Hillary Clinton and The White House Feminists Who Now Control America - And Tell The President What To Do
Subscribe to the NewsWithViews Daily News Alerts!

Enter Your E-Mail Address:
Bill and Hillary Clinton have been tied at the hip for 38 years. What he knows, she knows. I also recommend these books because what he knows and did, she knows and approved:
Bill Clinton: Friend or Foe by Ann Wilson
The Clinton Chronicles Book
The Secret Life of Bill Clinton - The Unreported Stories by Ambrose Evans-Prichard (Among other things: the cover up in the death of Vince Foster and Bill's connection with the underworld of drugs in Arkansas)
Hillary Rodham Clinton is a blue blood Marxist. Those who go ballistic when they read that either have done zero research on her entire life or they support Marxism. It's one or the other.
Important Links:
Click here to visit NewsWithViews.com home page.
© 2013 - NewsWithViews.com and Devvy - All Rights Reserved


Share This Article
Click Here For Mass E-mailing


Devvy Kidd authored the booklets, Why A Bankrupt America and Blind Loyalty; 2 million copies sold. Devvy appears on radio shows all over the country. She left the Republican Party in 1996 and has been an independent voter ever since. Devvy isn't left, right or in the middle; she is a constitutionalist who believes in the supreme law of the land, not some political party.
Devvy's regularly posted new columns are on her site at: www.devvy.com. You can also sign up for her free email alerts.
E-mail is: devvyk@npn.net



5 comments:

Anonymous said...

What the Hell?!! Who exactly are these women having all their sex with pray tell that requires birth control?! I dare say it is MEN. Women who have sex with women, Don't need birth control. If the men would Man up and support the children they produce and the women while they care for those children. Perhaps the issue wouldn't be so distasteful as youseem to find it.
Where do you get off deciding anything for women?
I have never aborted a fetus. And I have given birth to four children naturally, as In without the "benefit" of drugs narcotics or otherwise. I have Always paid for my own healthcare insurance And my own necessities. I was married for 25 years and worked for most of them. I also took care of my own children. They were Never farmed out to anyone else! And I have seen them all through a college education. On my nickle, thank you! Where exactly do you get off deciding for me that I can't or shouldn't have the option to use birth control?!?!

You are a biggoted, small minded Troll, In my humble opinion.

Anonymous said...

Huh? Aren't you a little off topic? Or are you referring to "Get Your Wallet Out of My Vagina"? She isn't deciding if you should or shouldn't have birth control. She is saying...and I agree with her...WE shouldn't have PAY for YOUR birth control or anyone else's, any more than you want to pay for my mascara. It is not the role of government. PERIOD!

Anonymous said...

Really with all the S##T government is and has been doing this is what you pick to take a stand on?????

Wake up this small crap is just that it creates diversion for the programmed masses while they ram the big stuff through senate and around the world.

Thank God we are not counting on the easy manipulated to have our backs. REALLY

Anonymous said...

Ok, I'm not debating the evil influence of HRC. Nor do I deny the crap she has perpetrated on the citizenry of the united states of America. What I am saying Is, lets not trash the female citizenry in general. Women are not all small minded, nor are we all easily manipulated. We think and process and decide how to conduct our lives to the best of our abilities with the resources at our disposal. You want to see meaningful change? Then educate don't denigrate. The only fools are those who do not realize that each of us acts in the interest of our own survival no matter what selfless spin you'd like to put on it. Show women, in a respectful way, how putting this woman out of office and out of a position of power and influence will benefit us and those we care about. It's not about" keeping our panties on". It's about putting our boots on and kicking some butt out of office.

Anonymous said...

No, not off topic. The first half of this article is devoted to the subject of why women who " can't keep their panties on" make poor political decisions and expect others, read the tax paying populous, to pay for their loose moral decisions. I call Bullshit on this line of thinking.
And, yes, I did read the remainder of this post. Because though I possess a vagina, I also hold a job and my own wallet and a brain with which to reason and consider different points of view. Don't alienate me with biggoted rhetoric. Lest the message you hope to broadcast fall upon deaf ears.