Friday, May 17, 2013

This Article & the One Yesterday About Nixon Explain's a Great Deal!


THANKS HOBIE! This Article & the One Yesterday About Nixon Explain's a Great Deal!
Posted By: Truthseeker1 [Send E-Mail]
Date: Thursday, 16-May-2013 22:47:15
Thank You Hobie for Posting This!
These Last 2 Report's from Jon, I believe Shed Bright LIGHT on what has been in Back of the Various Big Events, that so often occur in Relation to the White House & It's Occupants -- "Regardless of PARTY"! And that Last Fact, I believe, is of GREAT IMPORTANCE, & something for All of Us to Remember! Both PARTIES ARE VULERNABLE & the Parties are filled with CONGRESS PEOPLE & other PARTY OFFICIALS Putting "ON AN ACT"! It is basically one BIG MASQUERADE, in the Name of Patriotism. Yes, at this Point in Time, < ONE HUGE "SHAM">, No Longer even Slightly REAL! Any Person Involved that is Not Fake, has to be Deluding Themselves!

Truthseeker1 -(Anne)
: Reader B. forwards to us: =====

: Stunner: who is suddenly telling liberal jackals to attack
: Obama?

: by Jon Rappoport
: May 16, 2013
: www.nomorefakenews.com

: When Chris Matthews files for divorce from Barack Obama, you
: know the world is upside down.

: When the liberal online rag, Politico, features a clip of
: Matthews saying, "[Obama] obviously likes giving
: speeches more than he does running the executive
: branch," we're through the Looking Glass.

: The liberal jackals are stalking their own leader, the
: President. After making mind-bending excuses for Obama's
: disastrous presidency, they've suddenly heard a supersonic
: whistle, and they're out for blood.

Jonathan Turley, famous liberal constitutional lawyer, is
: counting Obama's sins, ranging far beyond the current IRS
: and AP phone-tapping scandals.

: James Goodale, former lawyer for the NY Times, is writing, at
: the Daily Beast, "Obama is fast becoming the worst
: national security press president, worse than Nixon, and it
: may not get any better."

: Liberal radio host Bill Press is calling for Obama to fire
: Eric Holder. Charley Rangel says, "No one believes
: that the president has given us a sufficient answer [to the
: IRS and DOJ scandals]."

: Representative Zoe Lofgren and NBC's Brian Williams are down
: Obama's neck.

: Just a few weeks ago, after the Boston bombing, Obama was
: unassailable. He was still the king with his own people.
: Now, he's turning into lunch meat.

: Liberals could be shouting and claiming that the IRS targeting
: of conservative, patriot, and constitutional groups had
: nothing to do with Obama, that he's entirely innocent, that
: he just got rid of the IRS chief and all is well...but
: they're not saying it.

: They could be insisting that the DOJ tapping AP phones was all
: on Eric Holder, and Obama had nothing to do with it...but
: they're not saying it.

: The current press virus is: Obama is Nixon.
: What's going on?
: Who's giving liberals the order to go after Obama? Who shifted
: the political wind overnight?

: Yesterday, I examined Watergate from the perspective of
: Nixon's betrayal of the Rockefeller family. That was the
: key to his ouster from the presidency. The Washington Post
: was used as the attack dog. Are we looking at something
: similar here?

: Has Obama failed to live up to his promises to people far more
: powerful than he is? If so, what is his betrayal?

: Is it simply the fact that the Trilateral Commission and the
: Council on Foreign Relations have chosen Hillary Clinton as
: the next president---and in order to make that happen,
: major diversions have to guide the press and public away
: from her role in the Benghazi catastrophe? Is that why
: we're suddenly seeing the IRS and DOJ scandals erupting?

: Rockefeller's Trilateral Commission (TC) certainly wields
: enough power to torpedo Obama, if they want to. And they
: surround Obama.

: Patrick Wood, author of Trilaterals Over Washington, points
: out there are only 87 members of the Trilateral Commission
: who live in America. Obama appointed eleven of them to
: posts in his administration.

: Keep in mind that the original stated goal of the TC was to
: create "a new international economic order."
: Consider the following TC members, who have held Obama
: posts: Tim Geithner, Treasury Secretary;

: James Jones, National Security Advisor;
: Paul Volker, Chairman, Economic Recovery Committee;
: Dennis Blair, Director of National Intelligence.
: All Trilateralists.
: In the run-up to his inauguration after the 2008 presidential
: election, Obama was tutored by the co-founder of the
: Trilateral Commission, Zbigniew Brzezinski.

: The TC is the hand that feeds Obama. Has he bitten it?
: Zbigniew Brzezinski wrote, four years before birthing the TC
: with his godfather, David Rockefeller: "[The] nation
: state as a fundamental unit of man's organized life has
: ceased to be the principal creative force. International
: banks and multinational corporations are acting and
: planning in terms that are far in advance of the political
: concepts of the nation state."

: A closer look at Tim Geithner's circle of economic advisers
: reveals the chilling Trilateral effect: Paul Volker; Alan
: Greenspan; E. Gerald Corrigan (director, Goldman Sachs);
: and Peter G Peterson (former CEO, Lehman Brothers, former
: chairman of the Council on Foreign Relations). These men
: are all Trilateral members.

: How many foxes in the hen house do we need, before we realize
: their Trilateral agenda is controlling the direction of our
: economy?

: Any doubt on the question of TC goals is answered by David
: Rockefeller himself, the founder of the TC, in his Memoirs
: (2003): "Some even believe we are part of a secret
: cabal working against the best interests of the United
: States, characterizing my family and me as
: 'internationalists' and of conspiring with others around
: the world to build a more integrated global political and
: economic structure-one world, if you will. If that is the
: charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it."

: So yes, if the Trilateral Commission wanted to sink Obama's
: presidency, they could call that shot. They could radically
: influence press coverage of the president, they could pull
: strings and end the worshipful celebration of Obama as the
: great prophet. They could bring hard doom to him.

Nixon started imposing tariffs on imported goods. That was his
: Waterloo. He ran afoul of the massive Rockefeller free
: trade agenda. What has Obama done?

: Is he stalling on war with Iran? Has he gone too far in his
: embrace of Islamic partners? Has he finally balked at
: continuing the war in Afghanistan?

: Setting economic and political policy for the US is a prime
: operation of the Trilateral Commission. If Obama has
: crossed swords with the TC, he would be treading on very
: dangerous ground.

: From the shadows of history, let me give you an illustration
: of how far and deep the TC can reach. It really does boggle
: the mind.

: Here is a close-up snap shot of a remarkable moment-in the
: form of a conversation between a reporter, Jeremiah Novak,
: and two Trilateral Commission members, Karl Kaiser and
: Richard Cooper.

The interview took place in 1978. It concerned the issue of
: who exactly, during President Carter's administration, was
: formulating US economic and political policy.

: The careless and off-hand attitude of Trilateralists Kaiser
: and Cooper is astonishing. It's as if they're saying,
: "What we're revealing is already out in the open, it's
: too late to do anything about it, why are you so worked up,
: we've already won..."

: NOVAK (the reporter): Is it true that a private [Trilateral
: committee] led by Henry Owen of the US and made up of
: [Trilateral] representatives of the US, UK, West Germany,
: Japan, France and the EEC is coordinating the economic and
: political policies of the Trilateral countries [which would
: include the US]?

: COOPER: Yes, they have met three times.
: NOVAK: Yet, in your recent paper you state that this committee
: should remain informal because to formalize 'this function
: might well prove offensive to some of the Trilateral and
: other countries which do not take part.' Who are you afraid
: of?

: KAISER: Many countries in Europe would resent the dominant
: role that West Germany plays at these [Trilateral]
: meetings.

: COOPER: Many people still live in a world of separate nations,
: and they would resent such coordination [of policy].

: NOVAK: But this [Trilateral] committee is essential to your
: whole policy. How can you keep it a secret or fail to try
: to get popular support [for its decisions on how Trilateral
: member nations will conduct their economic and political
: policies]?

: COOPER: Well, I guess it's the press' job to publicize it.
: NOVAK: Yes, but why doesn't President Carter come out with it
: and tell the American people that [US] economic and
: political power is being coordinated by a [Trilateral]
: committee made up of Henry Owen and six others?After all,
: if [US] policy is being made on a multinational level, the
: people should know.

: COOPER: President Carter and Secretary of State Vance have
: constantly alluded to this in their speeches.

: KAISER: It just hasn't become an issue.
: Source: "Trilateralism: The Trilateral Commission and
: Elite Planning for World Management," ed. by Holly
: Sklar, 1980. South End Press, Boston. Pages 192-3.

: Of course, although Kaiser and Cooper claimed everything being
: manipulated by the Trilateral Commission committee was
: already out in the open, it wasn't.

: Their interview slipped under the mainstream media radar,
: which is to say, it was ignored and buried. It didn't
: become a scandal on the level of, say, Watergate, although
: its essence was far larger than Watergate.

: If the mainstream press hay
: positions would signal a surrender of White House widely, and commented upon it with
: relentless fervor and disgust and shock (a pipe dream, to
: be sure); if the interview had been pushed and publicized
: as a scandal of the greatest depth; if ensuing denials and
: distractions had been cast aside; the exposure of the
: Trilaterals would have shaken the country's foundations,
: and the press would have had to admit all their coverage of
: government was a farce and a cartoon.

: US economic and political policy run by a committee of the
: Trilateral Commission-the Commission had been been created
: in 1973 as an "informal discussion group" by
: David Rockefeller and his sidekick, Zbigniew Brzezinski,
: who would become Jimmy Carter's National Security Advisor.

: Shortly after Carter won the presidential election, his aide,
: Hamilton Jordan, said that, if after the inauguration, Cy
: Vance and Brzezinski came on board as secretary of state
: and national security adviser, "We've lost. And I'll
: quit." Lost-because both men were powerful members of
: the Trilateral Commission and their appointment to key
: positions would signal a surrender of White House control
: to the Commission.

: Vance and Brzezinski were appointed secretary of state and
: national security adviser, as Jordan feared. But he didn't
: quit. He became Carter's chief of staff. He gave up.

: That's the kind of power we're talking about. Barack Obama
: would merely be a minor figure blowing in the wind, if the
: TC decided he'd betrayed them. Obama's administration is
: stacked with TC members.

: They could foment the sudden liberal opposition to this
: president, which has bloomed overnight like a mushroom in
: the dark.

: No one at the moment is plajust testified
: before Congress that he doesn't know anything about
: anything. He's pretty much said, "Ask me a question
: about any scandal and I'll plead vast ignorance. That's my
: defense."

: Holder is ripe for a takedown. And then the press hounds would
: be that much closer to pinning blame on Obama himself.

: I'm not saying Obama m these two
: doofuses. Indeed, he may try that.

: As long as his liberal allies keeping pounding on the fact
: that he's a great president who has been served badly by
: his inferiors, the ship could hold water. But right now,
: that's not happening. The sudden sea change is swamping the
: boat.

: Remember, with Watergate, we saw a successful attack on
 the US
: Attorney General, John Mitchell, on the way to nailing
: Nixon and knocking him out of the box. That Rockefeller
: operation worked like a magic machine.

: Eric Holder, the current Attorney General, has just testified
: before Congress that he doesn't know anything about
: anything. He's pretty much said, "Ask me a question
: about any scandal and I'll plead vast ignorance. That's my
: defense."

: Holder is ripe for a takedown. And then the press hounds would
: be that much closer to pinning blame on Obama himself.

: I'm not saying Obama will be impeached or will
: resign---although in politics, never say never. I'm saying
: his presidency, such as it is, could be destroyed very
: quickly among and by his own supporters.

: The clue here, again, is the sudden and boggling liberal press
: turnaround, their all-out assault on Obama. This kind of
: thing doesn't happen by accident. It certainly doesn't
: happen from the bowels of the president's rabid worshipers.
: But it is happening.

: That means marching orders. That means screws have been turned
: by people who expect and demand and can count on

obedience.
: Those people are players who live far above government.
: Government is their mechanism, as is the press, when it
: needs to be.

: And right now, it needs to be.
: Jon Rappoport
: The author of two explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED
: and EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US
: Congressional seat in the 29th District of California.
: Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an
: investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on
: politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA
: Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and
: magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures
: and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and
: creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign
: up for his free emails at www.nomorefakenews.com

:

No comments: