For all the critics and ignoramuses who choose 

to bash the publishers about content posted, 

You need to read this!

Nesaranews Mission Statement

Question -- What is the goal of this website? Why do we share different
 sources of information that sometimes conflicts or might even be 
considered disinformation? 
Answer -- The primary goal of Nesaranews is to help all people become better 
truth-seekers in a real-time boots-on-the-ground fashion. This is for the purpose 
of learning to think critically, discovering the truth from within—not just 
believing things blindly because it came from an "authority" or credible source. 
 Instead of telling you what the truth is, we share information from many sources so that you 
can discern it for yourself. We focus on teaching you the tools to become your own authority 
on the truth, gaining self-mastery, sovereignty, and freedom in the process. We want each of 
you to become your own leaders and masters of personal discernment, and as such, all 
information should be vetted, analyzed and discerned at a personal level. We also 
encourage you to discuss your thoughts in the comments section of this site to engage in a 
group discernment process. Not to bash publishers!

"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought 
without accepting it." – Aristotle

Tuesday, October 29, 2013

Why Dannon Let Jamie Lee Curtis Tell Lies About Activia

The Rumor Mill News Reading Room 
Why Dannon Let Jamie Lee Curtis Tell Lies About Activia
Posted By: RumorMail [Send E-Mail]
Date: Tuesday, 29-Oct-2013 10:52:40

Activia following its $21 million settlement with the FTC for falsely claiming that the yogurt helps regulate your digestive system, according to Ad Age.
"Slightly?" Perhaps not. The FTC's documents show that the past two years of Activia advertising -- in which Curtis discussed her improved bowel movements in a tasteful, upbeat manner -- were based on lies. Not little lies, either. Here's what Dannon actually knew about the affect of its yogurt:
Dannon's claim that Activia speeds up "intestinal transit," is based on studies that only showed that in elderly subjects.
Two studies that purported to show Activia was helpful were not statistically significant compared to the placebo groups.
Six other studies failed to show a statistically significant improvement in transit time when Activia was compared to a placebo.
"In truth and in fact, eating one serving of Activia daily is not clinically proven to relieve temporary irregularity and help with slow intestinal transit time," the FTC said.
That's right: Studies of Activia generally show that it does absolutely nothing to help your digestive system. Dannon is now banned from:
Claiming that one daily serving of Activia relieves irregularity, or helps people avoid catching colds or the flu.
It may not make any claims about regularity unless it has two properly designed clinical studies showing so.
And it can only advertise those claims if it also mentions that consumers must eat three servings of Activia each day to obtain these benefits.
That's a lot of yogurt (21 pots a week!) and a lot of hurdles for Dannon to jump in order to get Curtis back on to her green sofa.
Dannon may not care. Its message is already out -- does anyone still need to be reminded of the Activia-regularity theme? -- and the settlement is a mere fraction of the brand's $505 million annual sales.
There are plenty of examples of big companies (with enough scientists and lawyers to know better) that have been caught by the FTC making misleading health claims about their products: Nestle, POM Wonderful, Bayer, Rexall Sundown and Extenze. But none of the settlements have recovered more than a few million dollars from each company. That suggests the food business may have learned what the drug business already knows: That settlements tend to be much smaller than the revenues you can earn from false advertising, and that FTC action is therefore not a deterrent to misleading consumers. Rather, settlements with the feds can simply be built in to the revenue model, a cost of doing business.

No comments:

Post a Comment