FEDERAL Juristiction Is LIMITED

Hi John,

Until the Republic is restored this information helps to keep people out of "foreign courts" or being tricked out of  their homes, cars ect... do you think the people would want to know federal jurisdiction is limited to outside the limits of the 50 Union states John?

Whereas defined pursuant to; Title 18 of the United States Code at §7 specifies that the "territorial jurisdiction" of the United States extend only outside the boundaries of lands belonging to any of the 50 Union states.

By their own rules of jurisdiction, the UNITED STATES attorneys have no business prosecuting anyone outside of the District of Columbia or Federal territories. 

Extra territorium jus dicenti non paretur impune. One who exercises jurisdiction out of his territory is not obeyed with impunity.

IMPUNITY defined: Not being punished for a crime or misdemeanor committed. The impunity of crimes is one of the most prolific sources whence they arise. lmpunitas continuum affectum tribuit delinquenti. 4 Co. 45, a; 5 Co. 109, a. 

The UNITED STATES CODE, in its entirety, is Copyrighted Private International Law “Applicable only in the District of Columbia.” 

1871 The Government Of The District of Columbia The Private Bifurcated Government of The Ten Miles Square whose jurisdiction extends only over corporate entities created by the municipal corporation and operative only in the District of Columbia. Washington.

District of Columbia is the capitol of the District of Columbia, not the United States of America, and all laws passed within the District of Columbia are applicable and enforceable only in the District of Columbia and it's possessions. 

What was not said in 1871, but was implicit… was what is plainly defined pursuant to; Title 28, 3002(15)(3): That all departments of the UNITED STATES CORPORATION are part of the corporation.

The first attempt by Congress to define citizenship was in 1866 in the passage of the Civil Rights Act (Revised Statutes section 1992, 8 United States Code Annotated section 1). The act provided that:

"All persons born in the United States and not subject to any foreign power are declared to be citizens of the United States."

And this in turn was followed in 1868 by the adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment, United States Code Annotated Amendment 14, declaring:

"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside."

At this period of time, the only people in the United States who were under the jurisdiction of the private bifurcated government of the ten miles square of Washington, D.C., were the government employees, those within the territories owned by the United States and now the former slaves. The former citizens of the South, now "captured" became 14^th Amendment citizens. The remainder of the people could still invoke the power over government through original jurisdiction of the Republic side of the Constitution.

A new 13^th Amendment was enacted December 18, 1865 and the 14^th Amendment was enacted July 28, 1868. It was ratified in Southern states under martial law. A state could only obtain its freedom from federal military rule by ratifying this amendment. Any contract entered under duress is void. But then the Constitution was not even in effect following sine die and the proclamation of martial law.

The 14^th Amendment brought the freed slaves, whose previous owners were also owners of private plantations and transferred those slaves under subjection of the government, the ten miles square jurisdiction of Washington, D.C. And it offered its protection to those who would choose to become its subjects.in exchange for their sovereignty.

When referring to this "District" United States, the Internal Revenue Code uses the term "Within" the United States. When referring to the 50 Union states, the Internal Revenue Code uses the term "Without" the United States.

Dozens, perhaps hundreds, of court cases prove that federal jurisdiction is limited to the few federal territory areas above indicated. For example, in two Supreme Court cases, it was decided:

"The laws of Congress in respect to those matters do not extend into the territorial limits of the states, but have force only in the District of Columbia, and other places that are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the national government," Caha v. United States, 152 U.S., at 215.

"We think a proper examination of this subject will show that the United States never held any municipal sovereignty, jurisdiction, or right of soil in and to the territory, of which any of the new 50 Union states were formed..."

"[B]ecause, the United States has no constitutional capacity to exercise municipal jurisdiction, sovereignty, or eminent domain, within the limits of any 50 Union states or elsewhere, except in the cases in which it is expressly granted..."

"Illinois is therefore entitled to the sovereignty and jurisdiction over all the territory within her limits, subject to the common law," Pollard v. Hagan, 44 U.S. 221, 223, 228, 229.

See: http://www.scribd.com/doc/201918359/FEDERAL-Juristiction-is-LIMITED 

Lex semper dabit remedium. The law always gives a remedy. 3 Bouv. Inst. n. 2411.