IN GOD WE TRUST
Suspension of the Government of the united
states of America. On
December 20 1860 the congressmen of the southern States of America walked out
of congress in session because they did not agree with the policies of the
northern States had forced on them. This action caused a State of Emergency,
which suspended the Republic of the united States of America and therefore
suspended the constitution and its government. Over 150 years since that time
America has been without a government, however, through contract the Republic
was placed under (understand-standing under) a foreign operated private
corporation called UNITED STATES (U.S.)
History of Current Contract. On March 9, 1933, due to impending
bankruptcy the UNITED STATES made a “New Deal” with the US Citizens (not the
Sovereign People of America) entitles, Senate Document No. 43 73rd
Congress, 1st Session herein “contract.” The contract stated, “It
(Federal reserve notes Bills and Bonds, etc) will represent a mortgage on all
the homes and other property of all the people in the Nation.” As a result,
legal title of all property was turned over to the State as evidenced by the
statement in the contract “The ownership of all property is in the State.” In
order to account for the monetary increases gained by the use of the people’s
property and production, the UNITED STATES created artificial entities termed
“Persons,” for each of the people, using the people’s own names written in all
capital letters. For example, John Doe the man would have a Person entitled
“JOHN DOE” a derivative of the God-Given name. A artificial entity called a CESTUI QUE TRUST, entitled JOHN DOE, an image of John: Doe, to conduct commercial
business and to interface with other legal fictions in regard to contracts
transactions, negotiations and judgments.
The following are
legal persons and artificial entities called private “foreign” corporations:
UNITED NATIONS (U.N.), INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND (IMF), FEDERAL RESERVE BANK
(FRB) and sub-corporations, UNITED STATES (U.S.) and its sub-corporations
including the “STATE OF” ILLINOIS and the other 49 “STATES OF,” and all their
COUNTIES, MUNICIPALITIES and other sub-corporations, and all other registered
corporations on planet earth. Defined pursuant to “Contract” all are “Trustees”
for the Beneficiary.
TRUST defined:
A legal entity created by a grantor for the benefit of designated beneficiaries
under the laws of the state and the valid trust instrument. The trustee holds a
fiduciary responsibility to manage the trust's corpus assets and income for the
economic benefit of all of the beneficiaries. A confidence reposed in one
person, who is termed trustee, for the benefit of another, who is called the
cestui que trust, respecting property which is held by the trustee for the
benefit of the cestui que trust. State ex reI. Wirt v. Superior Court for
Spokane County, 10 Wash.2d 362, 116 P.2d 752, 755. Any arrangement whereby
property is transferred with intention that it be administered by trustee for
another's benefit. A fiduciary relationship in which one person is the holder
of the title to property subject to an equitable obligation to keep or use the
property for the benefit of another. Scotti's Drive In Restaurants, Inc. v.
Mile High-Dart In Corp., Wyo., 526 P.2d 1193, 1195.
CESTUI QUE
TRUST defined: The person for whose benefit a trust is created or who is to
enjoy the income or the avails of it. See Beneficiary. Black’s Law Dictionary
Sixth Edition (page 1510)
1 comment:
It has nothing to do with any name being in all caps. There are NUMEROUS court rulings citing this as a frivolous argument.
It is not how the name is spelled. It is the fact the name has a last name attached.
Man does not have a last name. Last names which is just a surname is only the name of the family one is born from. It is not a part of man's given name. The given name is completely separate and distinct from the surname, where those two separate and distinct names should never be attached as one full name pertaining to a man's name.
For example, the man called by Bob and the woman called by Jane have a baby. The man called by Bob was born from the family called Smith. The woman called by Jane adopted the man called by Bob's family name upon being married.
When the man and woman had a baby they gave their baby the given name of John-Henry
The new baby now to be called by John-Henry was born from the family called Smith.
Along comes the State where the State creates an entirely new name to create a new artificial legal "person" where the State takes and uses the same common given name of the new baby called by John-Henry and the State takes and uses the same name of the family the baby was born from, which is Smith, and the State combines those two different and separate distinct names together thereby creating a new name John Henry Smith.
With every new birth of a baby there is actually 3 different names involved. One name is existing already and two names are newly created.
The first name that is already existing is Smith. Smith is the family name that is shared among all members born of that family. This name is not only not given, it cannot be given, because if were given to the baby, then none of the other family members could use Smith anymore because the name Smith would have been given away to the baby where Smith would solely belong to that baby and no longer be able to be shared by other family members as the family name.
Smith = only the name of the family.
John-Henry = actual name given to the baby.
The man, called by John-Henry, from the family called Smith
That is the proper way to use the use the given name.
John Henry Smith = new artificial person name created by the State on its State document it created called Certificate of Live Birth.
There are now three different names from this one birth event.
The family called Smith
The baby called by John-Henry
The artificial legal "person" John Henry Smith
No matter how you spell it makes no difference. A first middle last name is just an artificial person name. Not a man's name.
The Certificate of Live Birth being the original document that created the artificial person name is the legal title to that property. That original legal title is held by the State where the State owns that artificial legal person name.
The State then issues you the man a certified COPY of the State's legal title to that Name, which authorizes you the man to use the State's property name to operate with in commerce. Everything you use that name for, anything put in that name automatically vests in the State as property of the State since the State owns that name you use to put everything in that name.
The State is fully liable for anything done in that name as the owner of that Name. You the man not knowing this out of ignorance you volunteer to assume the State's liability for its property name where you volunteer to pay its debts which you do because you believe you are that artificial person and because you believe that name is your property, when in fact it is property of the State!
Are you tired of volunteering to assume all the State's liability yet? If so, simply stop claiming that name as yours!
Post a Comment