Subj: Privacy World's January 2014 Newsletter Issue 1Jan
Privacy World's January 2014 Newsletter Issue 1Jan
Privacy World - The WORLD'S SHREWDEST PRIVACY NEWSLETTER
Emails from subscribers:
Dear PW,
Happy holidays. In regards to your last December [2-13]
newsletter issue, If you listen closely enough, you can hear the crushing
sound of a nation being brought to ruin. I think that if America falls into
ruin because of economic collapse,then every other nation will fall also
as they depend on the American dollar. Some countries are trying to get
away from the dollar at this very minute.
Thanks
DT
Dear PW,
A BIG THANK YOU FOR REPUBLISHING the newsletter below!!!
This is an EXCELLENT reprint [Dec 2013 NL] ...and I am going to share it
with your info with my associates... I have a list of about 2500 or so,
so thank you again.
J.
Dear PW,
In regards to your new 2014 passport program:
Bad guy is a relative term...lol....If a person has not injured a
person or property he has committed no crime, in the eyes of lawful
minded people. Even if our statutory system tries to state
otherwise. Ironically most governments (control of your mind), are
guilty of the some of the most heinous crimes one could imagine.
There should be no restrictions for any freeman absent of injury to
his fellowman to be limited from his god given right to be or go
where ever he/she chooses. I push for the day where no borders
exist and we are able to travel freely unabridged, unmolested, by
the system governments.
It is time to push for all borders to be removed and let free men
be free. Time has come to remove all those that stand in the way of
true freedom. Passports, visas are slave tools and more control no
matter from what country. Why does anyone need to provide so much
personal information about themselves to the government to travel.
they claim terror, but all who are aware/awake knows the real
terror lies in those that govern(false flags),imitation terror
directed by implants to cause fear and confusion. We are no longer
fooled by the deception they put out.. enough is enough...thanks
for letting me vent!
BFN
Privacy World's January 2014 Newsletter Issue 1Jan
How the US Government Betrayed the Constitution and invented an
Imaginary Fascist One
The idea of having a strong Federal government was controversial in
the early United States, and one of the ways Federalists reassured
Americans that it wouldn't become tyrannical was to append a Bill
of Rights to the Constitution.
That attempt to prevent despotism has failed, because the Federal
government and its various agencies have set aside the Bill
of Rights as a dead letter, substituted for them a bizarre set
of interpretations of law, and either avoid having the courts
adjudicate their fascist fantasies or managed to have appointed
to the bench unethical or authoritarian judges that will uphold
virtually anything they do.
How corrupt our system has become is evident when even the New
Yorker emphasizes that a secret Senate report found that torture in
the Bush years was "unnecessary" and "ineffective." Not that it was
"unconstitutional."
The Eighth Amendment of the US constitution forbids 'cruel
and unusual punishment.' US courts have found that the Framers'
injunction was intended to be dynamic, and did not only forbid
those things thought barbaric in 1789 but those things contemporary
Americans would find cruel and unusual. As Cornell Law school put it,
in Weems v. United States it was concluded that the framers
had not merely intended to bar the reinstitution of procedures
and techniques condemned in 1789, but had intended to prevent the
authorization of "a coercive cruelty being exercised through other
forms of punishment." The Amendment therefore was of an "expansive
and vital character"41 and, in the words of a later Court, "must
draw its meaning from the evolving standards of decency that mark
the progress of a maturing society."
If a sheriff in a small town arrested a shoplifter and waterboarded
him 54 times, the sheriff would go to jail. Federal officials? Not
so much.
Let us just underline the Supreme Court's diction here in Weems. The
Framers had sought, they said, to forestall "a coercive cruelty
being exercised through other forms of punishment."
Coercive cruelty. Coercive cruelty was the hallmark of treatment of
Federal detainees in the Bush era. That was what Abu Ghraib, Bagram
and Guantanamo were about. Some prisoners were likely victims of
manslaughter by coercive cruelty (it is hard to know when to stop).
Waterboarding is illegal (not to mention setting German shepherds
on people to viciously bite them). Professor of Law Wilson R. Huhn
writes:
"Three major treaties that the United States has signed and
unambiguously ratified prohibit the United States from subjecting
prisoners in the War on Terror to this kind of treatment. First,
Common Article 3 of the Geneva Convention Relative to the Treatment
of Prisoners of War, which the Senate unanimously ratified in
1955, prohibits the parties to the treaty from acts upon prisoners
including "violence to life and person, in particular murder of
all kinds, mutilation, cruel treatment and torture; . . . outrages
upon personal dignity, in particular, humiliating and degrading
treatment."[18] Second, the International Covenant on Civil and
Political Rights, which the Senate ratified in 1992, states that
"[n]o one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or
degrading treatment or punishment."[19] Third, the United Nations
Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading
Treatment, which the Senate ratified in 1994, provides that "[e]ach
State Party shall take effective legislative, administrative,
judicial or other measures to prevent acts of torture in any
territory under its jurisdiction,"[20] and that "[e]ach State Party
shall undertake to prevent in any territory under its jurisdiction
other acts of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment
which do not amount to torture . . . ."
The United States has enacted statutes prohibiting torture and cruel
or inhuman treatment. It is these statutes which make waterboarding
illegal The four principal statutes which Congress has adopted to
implement the provisions of the foregoing treaties are the Torture
Act, the War Crimes Act and the laws entitled "Prohibition
on Cruel, Inhuman, or Degrading Treatment or Punishment of Persons
Under Custody or Control of the United States Government" and
"Additional Prohibition on Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment
or Punishment." The first two statutes are criminal laws while
the latter two statutes extend civil rights to any person in the
custody of the United States anywhere in the world.
The Torture Act makes it a felony for any person, acting under
color of law, to commit an act of torture upon any person within the
defendant's custody or control outside the United States. Torture
is defined as the intentional infliction of "severe physical or
mental pain or suffering" upon a person within the defendant's
custody or control. To be "severe," any mental pain or suffering
resulting from torture must be "prolonged."[29] Under this law,
torture is punishable by up to twenty years imprisonment unless the
victim dies as a result of the torture, in which case the penalty
is death or life in prison."
But somehow employees of the US military, the CIA and other Federal
agencies managed to ignore all that. So yes, unnecessary and
ineffective. But also, illegal and unconstitutional and treasonous.
Then of course there is the National Security Agency's gutting of
the Fourth Amendment ban on unreasonable search and seizure. As long
as the unreasonable search and seizure happens on the internet,
apparently that is all right. What arrogance, what hypocrisy,
what fascism.
An honest appeals court just ruled that the government needs
a warrant to put a tracking device on your car and follow
you around by GPS. But your cell phone metadata also reveals
your movements, and the NSA is scooping that information up,
effectively following you around without a warrant, exactly what
the court just found unjustified. But the Federal government (yes,
the Obama administration) has succeeded in keeping NSA practices
out of the courts.
While few Americans care that the NSA was intensively spying on
the Mexicans, French and Germans, even on German chancellor Angela
Merkel's private cell phone, they should. The Bill of Rights were
once a point of inspiration for human rights activists around the
world. Much of what the youth who led the Arab upheavals of 2011
wanted was enshrined in the Bill of Rights. American ideals and
rule of law were part of America's soft power in the world. The
European Union is suddenly less cooperative because of our allies'
outrage at being spied on. No one wants to be like creepy peeping
toms or vicious torturers, and that is what Americans have become.
Moreover, the NSA foreign spying is racist. Yes, on top of everything
else, it involves a racist hierarchy. The US doesn't intensively
spy on Canadians, British and Australians, i.e. on what were called
in the 19th century 'Anglo-Saxons.' It is only the inferior races
that Washington subjects to surveillance.
But all that is crashing and burning as the US government has
betrayed those ideals over and over again. We're being massively
spied on by our government, our location, the people we call,
the websites we visit, all being monitored constantly. And if
the government decides we are terrorism suspects, we could well be
tortured. Martin Luther King's principle of civil disobedience would
be categorized as terrorism today, and if he were active in our time,
instead of naming a Federal holiday after him, the government would
have MLK waterboarded by police dressed up as military commandos.
The above by Juan Cole
We'd like to take this opportunity to wish our readers and
customers a Happy, Safe and Prosperous New Year 2014!
Until our next issue stay cool and remain low profile!
Privacy World
PS - If you are serious about obtaining an excellent second
passport with vast visa free travel ability, and avoids having to
disclose your primary nationality, here's an extraordinary opportunity
to obtain, IMO, probably the best second passport on the market, bar none.
With this program you apply for and receive the document at the countries
embassy nearest you. This is a brand new program that starts January 3rd,
2014. To get in on the ground floor before the doors of opportunity closes,
just email for details by placing "New-4-2014" in your email subject heading.
--
Best regards,
Privacy mailto:privacy@privacyworld.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe, send a blank message to PrivacyWorld-on@mail-list.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank message to PrivacyWorld-off@mail-list.com
To change your email address, send a message to PrivacyWorld-change@mail-list.com
with your old address in the Subject: line
To contact the list owner, send your message to
PrivacyWorld-list-owner@mail-list.com
Privacy World, 502 Hotta-kata, 3-6-10 Hirusaido, Kagurazaka, Shinjyuku-ku, Tokyo Japan
To unsubscribe, or change your email address, click here.
<http://cgi.mail-list.com/u?ln=privacyworld&nm=doclawwithme%40aol.com>
This message was launched into cyberspace to doclawwithme@aol.com
Privacy World - The WORLD'S SHREWDEST PRIVACY NEWSLETTER
Emails from subscribers:
Dear PW,
Happy holidays. In regards to your last December [2-13]
newsletter issue, If you listen closely enough, you can hear the crushing
sound of a nation being brought to ruin. I think that if America falls into
ruin because of economic collapse,then every other nation will fall also
as they depend on the American dollar. Some countries are trying to get
away from the dollar at this very minute.
Thanks
DT
Dear PW,
A BIG THANK YOU FOR REPUBLISHING the newsletter below!!!
This is an EXCELLENT reprint [Dec 2013 NL] ...and I am going to share it
with your info with my associates... I have a list of about 2500 or so,
so thank you again.
J.
Dear PW,
In regards to your new 2014 passport program:
Bad guy is a relative term...lol....If a person has not injured a
person or property he has committed no crime, in the eyes of lawful
minded people. Even if our statutory system tries to state
otherwise. Ironically most governments (control of your mind), are
guilty of the some of the most heinous crimes one could imagine.
There should be no restrictions for any freeman absent of injury to
his fellowman to be limited from his god given right to be or go
where ever he/she chooses. I push for the day where no borders
exist and we are able to travel freely unabridged, unmolested, by
the system governments.
It is time to push for all borders to be removed and let free men
be free. Time has come to remove all those that stand in the way of
true freedom. Passports, visas are slave tools and more control no
matter from what country. Why does anyone need to provide so much
personal information about themselves to the government to travel.
they claim terror, but all who are aware/awake knows the real
terror lies in those that govern(false flags),imitation terror
directed by implants to cause fear and confusion. We are no longer
fooled by the deception they put out.. enough is enough...thanks
for letting me vent!
BFN
Privacy World's January 2014 Newsletter Issue 1Jan
How the US Government Betrayed the Constitution and invented an
Imaginary Fascist One
The idea of having a strong Federal government was controversial in
the early United States, and one of the ways Federalists reassured
Americans that it wouldn't become tyrannical was to append a Bill
of Rights to the Constitution.
That attempt to prevent despotism has failed, because the Federal
government and its various agencies have set aside the Bill
of Rights as a dead letter, substituted for them a bizarre set
of interpretations of law, and either avoid having the courts
adjudicate their fascist fantasies or managed to have appointed
to the bench unethical or authoritarian judges that will uphold
virtually anything they do.
How corrupt our system has become is evident when even the New
Yorker emphasizes that a secret Senate report found that torture in
the Bush years was "unnecessary" and "ineffective." Not that it was
"unconstitutional."
The Eighth Amendment of the US constitution forbids 'cruel
and unusual punishment.' US courts have found that the Framers'
injunction was intended to be dynamic, and did not only forbid
those things thought barbaric in 1789 but those things contemporary
Americans would find cruel and unusual. As Cornell Law school put it,
in Weems v. United States it was concluded that the framers
had not merely intended to bar the reinstitution of procedures
and techniques condemned in 1789, but had intended to prevent the
authorization of "a coercive cruelty being exercised through other
forms of punishment." The Amendment therefore was of an "expansive
and vital character"41 and, in the words of a later Court, "must
draw its meaning from the evolving standards of decency that mark
the progress of a maturing society."
If a sheriff in a small town arrested a shoplifter and waterboarded
him 54 times, the sheriff would go to jail. Federal officials? Not
so much.
Let us just underline the Supreme Court's diction here in Weems. The
Framers had sought, they said, to forestall "a coercive cruelty
being exercised through other forms of punishment."
Coercive cruelty. Coercive cruelty was the hallmark of treatment of
Federal detainees in the Bush era. That was what Abu Ghraib, Bagram
and Guantanamo were about. Some prisoners were likely victims of
manslaughter by coercive cruelty (it is hard to know when to stop).
Waterboarding is illegal (not to mention setting German shepherds
on people to viciously bite them). Professor of Law Wilson R. Huhn
writes:
"Three major treaties that the United States has signed and
unambiguously ratified prohibit the United States from subjecting
prisoners in the War on Terror to this kind of treatment. First,
Common Article 3 of the Geneva Convention Relative to the Treatment
of Prisoners of War, which the Senate unanimously ratified in
1955, prohibits the parties to the treaty from acts upon prisoners
including "violence to life and person, in particular murder of
all kinds, mutilation, cruel treatment and torture; . . . outrages
upon personal dignity, in particular, humiliating and degrading
treatment."[18] Second, the International Covenant on Civil and
Political Rights, which the Senate ratified in 1992, states that
"[n]o one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or
degrading treatment or punishment."[19] Third, the United Nations
Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading
Treatment, which the Senate ratified in 1994, provides that "[e]ach
State Party shall take effective legislative, administrative,
judicial or other measures to prevent acts of torture in any
territory under its jurisdiction,"[20] and that "[e]ach State Party
shall undertake to prevent in any territory under its jurisdiction
other acts of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment
which do not amount to torture . . . ."
The United States has enacted statutes prohibiting torture and cruel
or inhuman treatment. It is these statutes which make waterboarding
illegal The four principal statutes which Congress has adopted to
implement the provisions of the foregoing treaties are the Torture
Act, the War Crimes Act and the laws entitled "Prohibition
on Cruel, Inhuman, or Degrading Treatment or Punishment of Persons
Under Custody or Control of the United States Government" and
"Additional Prohibition on Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment
or Punishment." The first two statutes are criminal laws while
the latter two statutes extend civil rights to any person in the
custody of the United States anywhere in the world.
The Torture Act makes it a felony for any person, acting under
color of law, to commit an act of torture upon any person within the
defendant's custody or control outside the United States. Torture
is defined as the intentional infliction of "severe physical or
mental pain or suffering" upon a person within the defendant's
custody or control. To be "severe," any mental pain or suffering
resulting from torture must be "prolonged."[29] Under this law,
torture is punishable by up to twenty years imprisonment unless the
victim dies as a result of the torture, in which case the penalty
is death or life in prison."
But somehow employees of the US military, the CIA and other Federal
agencies managed to ignore all that. So yes, unnecessary and
ineffective. But also, illegal and unconstitutional and treasonous.
Then of course there is the National Security Agency's gutting of
the Fourth Amendment ban on unreasonable search and seizure. As long
as the unreasonable search and seizure happens on the internet,
apparently that is all right. What arrogance, what hypocrisy,
what fascism.
An honest appeals court just ruled that the government needs
a warrant to put a tracking device on your car and follow
you around by GPS. But your cell phone metadata also reveals
your movements, and the NSA is scooping that information up,
effectively following you around without a warrant, exactly what
the court just found unjustified. But the Federal government (yes,
the Obama administration) has succeeded in keeping NSA practices
out of the courts.
While few Americans care that the NSA was intensively spying on
the Mexicans, French and Germans, even on German chancellor Angela
Merkel's private cell phone, they should. The Bill of Rights were
once a point of inspiration for human rights activists around the
world. Much of what the youth who led the Arab upheavals of 2011
wanted was enshrined in the Bill of Rights. American ideals and
rule of law were part of America's soft power in the world. The
European Union is suddenly less cooperative because of our allies'
outrage at being spied on. No one wants to be like creepy peeping
toms or vicious torturers, and that is what Americans have become.
Moreover, the NSA foreign spying is racist. Yes, on top of everything
else, it involves a racist hierarchy. The US doesn't intensively
spy on Canadians, British and Australians, i.e. on what were called
in the 19th century 'Anglo-Saxons.' It is only the inferior races
that Washington subjects to surveillance.
But all that is crashing and burning as the US government has
betrayed those ideals over and over again. We're being massively
spied on by our government, our location, the people we call,
the websites we visit, all being monitored constantly. And if
the government decides we are terrorism suspects, we could well be
tortured. Martin Luther King's principle of civil disobedience would
be categorized as terrorism today, and if he were active in our time,
instead of naming a Federal holiday after him, the government would
have MLK waterboarded by police dressed up as military commandos.
The above by Juan Cole
We'd like to take this opportunity to wish our readers and
customers a Happy, Safe and Prosperous New Year 2014!
Until our next issue stay cool and remain low profile!
Privacy World
PS - If you are serious about obtaining an excellent second
passport with vast visa free travel ability, and avoids having to
disclose your primary nationality, here's an extraordinary opportunity
to obtain, IMO, probably the best second passport on the market, bar none.
With this program you apply for and receive the document at the countries
embassy nearest you. This is a brand new program that starts January 3rd,
2014. To get in on the ground floor before the doors of opportunity closes,
just email for details by placing "New-4-2014" in your email subject heading.
--
Best regards,
Privacy mailto:privacy@privacyworld.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe, send a blank message to PrivacyWorld-on@mail-list.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank message to PrivacyWorld-off@mail-list.com
To change your email address, send a message to PrivacyWorld-change@mail-list.com
with your old address in the Subject: line
To contact the list owner, send your message to
PrivacyWorld-list-owner@mail-list.com
Privacy World, 502 Hotta-kata, 3-6-10 Hirusaido, Kagurazaka, Shinjyuku-ku, Tokyo Japan
To unsubscribe, or change your email address, click here.
<http://cgi.mail-list.com/u?ln=privacyworld&nm=doclawwithme%40aol.com>
This message was launched into cyberspace to doclawwithme@aol.com
2 comments:
This fucken spook talks about how passports and visa's are instruments of slavery, yet in his last paragraph he wants you to apply for instruments of slavery ! motherfuckers like this would be hung at the nearest tree back in the day ! But, as i keep repeating, in a nation of spineless cowards aint nothin gonna happen, cept longer lines of them same pure yellow belly cowards on their knees in the welfare line !
this guys comments above me are the perfect example of what has been wrong in this country--not really seeing or paying attention. this article was PRECEDED BY COMMENTS FROM "BFN"--HE IS THE ONE REGARDING THEM AS INSTRUMENTS OF SLAVERY--NOT PRIVACY
My comment applies to the same post--does this BFN not realize that his "imaginary world" already exists for the illegal aliens that are already here? There is no border control between Mexico and the US and California is now bankrupt..Look what a mess it is making in our country--they get all the benefits--being illegal that we as citizens don't and they don't have passports.
In the world he imagines..there would be mass exodus from crowded countries into our country and the freedoms that we "used to-were supposed to have" would be lost forever...are people really that stupid? BFN doesn't know what "true freedom" is. Yes, things are terribly wrong but what he describes is idiotic shortsightedness. He is probably a hippie from the 70's that got arrested or had to put his toys away and is living in a dreamworld..
Post a Comment