STOP! IRS Liens
and Levies
Know The Truth
Whereas defined
pursuant to; Levy and Distraint: (a) Authority of Secretary. . . . Levy may be
made upon the accrued salary or wages of any officer, employee, or elected
official, of the United States, the District of Columbia, or any agency or
instrumentality of the United States or the District of Columbia, by serving a
notice of levy on the employer (as defined in section 3401(d)) of such officer,
employee, or elected official).
I am not an
officer, employee, or elected official of the United States, the District of
Columbia, or any agency or instrumentality of the United States or the District
of Columbia.
Who is an
officer, employee or elected official or officer of the United
States?
Whereas defined
pursuant to; Title 26 U.S.C. - "Internal Revenue Code" Subtitle C -
Employment Taxes Chapter 24 - Collection of Income Tax at Source on Wages 26
USC Sec. 3401. Definitions: (a) Wages: For purposes of this chapter, the term
''wages'' means all remuneration (other than fees paid to a public official)
for services performed by an employee for his employer.
(c) Employee: For
purposes of this chapter, the term ''employee'' includes* an officer, employee,
or elected official of the United States, a State, or any political subdivision
thereof, or the District of Columbia, or any agency or instrumentality of any
one or more of the foregoing. The term ''employee'' also includes an officer of
a corporation.
*"Include
(Lat. Inclaudere), to shut in, keep within. To confine within, hold as in an
enclosure, take in, attain, shut up, contain, enclose, comprise, comprehend,
embrace, involve." Black's Law Dictionary 4th Ed. (Comment - As in the
case of a restaurant menu, the price of a steak dinner includes a salad,
potato, and a vegetable; those things that are not included, ie. a drink and
desert, being not included in the dinner description, are excluded.)
(d) Employer: For
purposes of this chapter, the term ''employer'' means the person for whom an
individual performs or performed any service, of whatever nature, as the
employee of such person,
Are you an
Employer? You are not my Employer. Nor am I your employee.
Whereas defined
pursuant to Title 26 U.S.C. Sec. 3401(c), It is clear that I have no liability
and I am immune.
Whereas defined
pursuant to; “A private law is one which is confined to particular individuals,
associations, or corporations”: 50 Am.Jur.: 12 p 28. In the instant case the
revenue code pertains to taxpayers.
The distinction
between public and private acts is not always sharply defined when published
statutes are printed in their final form: pursuant to; Case v. Kelly, 133 US 21
(1890). Statutes creating corporations are private acts: pursuant to; 20
Am.Jur. 35, p 60. In this connection, the Federal Reserve Act is private law.
Federal Reserve
banks derive their existence and corporate power from the Federal Reserve Act:
defined pursuant to; Armano v. Federal Reserve Bank, 468 F.Supp. 674 (1979).
A private act may
be published as a public law when the general public is afforded the
opportunity of participating in the operation of the private law. The Internal
Revenue Code is an example of private law which does not exclude the voluntary
participation of the general public. Had the Internal Revenue Code been written
as substantive public law, the code would be repugnant to the Constitution,
since no one could be compelled to file a return and thereby become a witness
against himself.
Under the fifty
titles listed on the preface page of the United States Code, the Internal
Revenue Code (26 USC) is listed as having not been enacted as substantive
public law, conceding that the Internal Revenue Code is private law. Bouvier
declares that private law “relates to private matters which do not concern the
public at large.” It is the voluntary use of private credit, which imposes upon
the user the quasi-contractual or implied obligation to make a return of
income.
Whereas pursuant
to; Supreme Court Annotated Statute: Pollock v. Farmer’s Loan & Trust Co.,
158 US 601 (1895), the Supreme Court had declared the income tax of 1894 to be
repugnant to the Constitution, holding that taxation of rents, wages and
salaries must conform to the rule of apportionment.
USING MAIL TO
DEFRAUD defined: Using mail to defraud. The elements of this offense are the
formation of a scheme or artifice to defraud, and use of mails for purpose of
executing or attempting to execute such scheme or artifice; the latter element
being gist of the offense. 18 U.S.C.A. § 1341. Stryker v. United States,
C.C.A.Colo., 95 F.2d 601, 604, 605. The crime is complete when mails are used
in such scheme, and what happened subsequently is not controlling. United
States v. Ames, D.C.N.Y., 39 F.Supp. 885, 886. See Mail fraud. Black’s Law
Dictionary Sixth Edition (page 1566)
“Your
purpose...should
always
be to know...the
whole
that was intended
to be
known.”
No comments:
Post a Comment