This is an Awareness Blog to consider the future of your world. Actions are being done now to restore our freedom. County, State, and National Assemblies are forming across our world nullifying the corrupt corporations. Watch and become AWARE! Participate and be a part of making history!
62 MILLION VIEWS PER MONTH
Exclusive public outlet for documentation and notices from The Original Jurisdiction Republic 1861 circa 2010.
Judge Pirro Assails Obama, Says President ‘Comfortable With Extremism......
President Barack Obama’s comments at this year’s National Prayer Breakfast in Washington came under fire on issues of radical Muslims’ attack on Christianity. Fox News host, Judge Jeanine Pirro, assailed the POTUS and accused him of settling into a worrisome sense of comfort with radical extremists.
On a segment of her show, Justice with Judge Jeanine, Pirro spoke out vehemently against what she refers to as Obama’s nonchalant attitude with the current climate of terrorism abroad and in the homeland. She opened up the show with a poignant comment: “Barack Obama is comfortable with extremism…it’s part of what happens.”Republicans and Conservatives alike scrutinized the president’s speech on a number of ideological levels. However, many political pundits took issue with Obama’s reference to the Crusades and the Inquisition. Judge Pirro led the charge over the weekend.
“With the Crusaders you so easily identify them as Christians, why is it so hard for you to identify today’s jihadi terrorists as Muslim?…That was then and this is now, the Koran is interpreted by some as demanding jihad, the taxing or killing of nonbelievers, and a worldwide caliphate, and, surprise, today’s terrorists are beheading, imposing that same [nonbeliever] tax, and in their march to create an even bigger Islamic state. Stop apologizing and stop pussyfooting around with this language dance. We get it. Not all Muslims are terrorists. It was Egypt, the country of 90% Muslim[s], that rose up against the jihadists, who were also Muslim…Mr. president, please identify what other violence is being committed against Americans in the name of any other religion, or, is it just coincidence?”
Judge Pirro claims President Obama’s messages to Americans and the nation’s allies are mixed on the war on terror. She points out the Obama Administration’s lukewarm response to recent attacks from radical lone wolves who seek to inflict harm on Americans, Christianity, and other non-Muslim religions. Pirro pointed to the president’s alleged selectivity in attending high-profile funerals, his reference to the Fort Hood shooting as “workplace violence,” and his absence in France when a coalition of world leaders met in wake of the Paris shootings.Pirro ended her diatribe with a warning should he stay on the path towards his views on radical Islam.
“The overwhelming majority of Americans think it’s at least somewhat likely Islamic terrorists will launch an attack on US soil soon. But I believe you are so comfortable with extremism, that you’ve lost an understanding of the danger to Americans. You boast a security policy of strategic patience. What are you waiting for? While you wait, they keep winning, and Iran gets closer to nuclear enrichment, all the while you open your borders, reduce our military, and criticize Americans and America at the UN and in Cairo. If nothing more, you’re consistent, extremism is just the part of life. But the danger, your nonchalant attitude puts our entire nation in jeopardy.”
Is Judge Pirro’s castigation of Obama’s comments warranted? Share your thoughts below.[Image via: SodaHead]
Read more at http://www.inquisitr.com/1825928/judge-pirro-assails-obama-says-president-comfortable-with-extremism/#dgOWZDsc7dZRUKOg.99
1 comment:
Anonymous
said...
I like most of what Judge Pirro said, and thank you for posting this here. She appears to be fearless in the face of the President, which is exactly the type of journalism this country seems to lack in modern times. However, I have some thoughts to share about her rant.
I would postulate that a fair percentage of "Muslim" terrorist attacks have actually been the result of influence by Black Ops programs, designed and directed by someone with ulterior motives. If we remember correctly, in decades past the CIA "covertly" trained Afghani troops to fight against the big bad wolf, Russia. Then, lo and behold, the CIA-trained commander, Osama Bin Laden turns out to be a horrible terrorist who was behind the efforts that led to the World Trade Center attacks in 2001. Or, at least that's what we've been told. Well, I don't need to point out how totally convinced everyone is that 911 was truly planned and executed by Muslim extremists! Except maybe....that rogue group of 2,300+ architects and engineers who claim that science proves this tragedy could not have been caused by plane crashes. Many others also share this view, but hey....they must all be extremists, right? So, if we theorize that some percentage of Muslim terror attacks have been the result of Black Ops planning, (apparently for cabal agendas), then the Judge's further comments about Obama's cutting back on the military would seem to be a duplicitous move to fan the flames by infuriating Patriotic Americans who support our fighting men and women.
I wholeheartedly support our fighting men and women. They are all heroes in my eyes. But, I have many questions about the true motives of those ultimately in charge of the fights in which our heroes are ordered to engage. This is in no way a defense of the Muslim faith, extremist or otherwise. I am not qualified to pass judgment on other religions, so long as they do not violate my safety and rights as a sovereign being. I just think it is dangerous to get all worked up about stuff like the Judge's report, when it also leads us into a cycle of frying pan to the fire, back to the frying pan. Carte blanche support of military actions is also carte blanche support for those who profit from war. I think most readers at this site have a pretty good idea of who that is. Just saying.
Are you in doubt that the real original jurisdiction De Jure Republic is being restored? Do you have Questions that you want answered? Do you want to get involved? Visit https://national-assembly.net/ for more information and to participate. Check out the forums as the national assembly is 100% transparent to the public and welcomes public participation. This is the real deal folks. This is our last chance to do it right and nullify the 1871 contract that employed the U.S. Corporation to provide 19 governmental services to the people. This is our right under Article 1 of the Bill of rights. This also nullifies General Order 100 of 1863.
Search This Blog "if this search box is working"
Donation to assist in efforts to restore our republic
The DUKE - Patriot!
Born in 1948 Died in 2015
National Assembly of the people returning to self governance
Join the forums and introduce yourself so your state coordinator can connect with you.
Question -- What is the goal of this website? Why do we share different sources of information that sometimes conflicts or might even be considered disinformation?
Answer -- The primary goal of Nesaranews is to help all people become better truth-seekers in a real-time boots-on-the-ground fashion. This is for the purpose of learning to think critically, discovering the truth from within—not just believing things blindly because it came from an "authority" or credible source. Instead of telling you what the truth is, we share information from many sources so that you can discern it for yourself. We focus on teaching you the tools to become your own authority on the truth, gaining self-mastery, sovereignty, and freedom in the process. We want each of you to become your own leaders and masters of personal discernment, and as such, all information should be vetted, analyzed and discerned at a personal level. We also encourage you to discuss your thoughts in the comments section of this site to engage in a group discernment process.
"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it." – Aristotle
11
Followers
The articles on this blog are reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
US Supreme Court, in 1985, “Dowling v. United States”, unequivocally held that allegations of copyright infringement can be prosecuted only under copyright-specific legislation, not criminal law.
1 comment:
I like most of what Judge Pirro said, and thank you for posting this here. She appears to be fearless in the face of the President, which is exactly the type of journalism this country seems to lack in modern times.
However, I have some thoughts to share about her rant.
I would postulate that a fair percentage of "Muslim" terrorist attacks have actually been the result of influence by Black Ops programs, designed and directed by someone with ulterior motives. If we remember correctly, in decades past the CIA "covertly" trained Afghani troops to fight against the big bad wolf, Russia. Then, lo and behold, the CIA-trained commander, Osama Bin Laden turns out to be a horrible terrorist who was behind the efforts that led to the World Trade Center attacks in 2001. Or, at least that's what we've been told.
Well, I don't need to point out how totally convinced everyone is that 911 was truly planned and executed by Muslim extremists! Except maybe....that rogue group of 2,300+ architects and engineers who claim that science proves this tragedy could not have been caused by plane crashes. Many others also share this view, but hey....they must all be extremists, right?
So, if we theorize that some percentage of Muslim terror attacks have been the result of Black Ops planning, (apparently for cabal agendas), then the Judge's further comments about Obama's cutting back on the military would seem to be a duplicitous move to fan the flames by infuriating Patriotic Americans who support our fighting men and women.
I wholeheartedly support our fighting men and women. They are all heroes in my eyes. But, I have many questions about the true motives of those ultimately in charge of the fights in which our heroes are ordered to engage.
This is in no way a defense of the Muslim faith, extremist or otherwise. I am not qualified to pass judgment on other religions, so long as they do not violate my safety and rights as a sovereign being. I just think it is dangerous to get all worked up about stuff like the Judge's report, when it also leads us into a cycle of frying pan to the fire, back to the frying pan. Carte blanche support of military actions is also carte blanche support for those who profit from war. I think most readers at this site have a pretty good idea of who that is. Just saying.
Post a Comment