Concluding, from the e-mail from attorney Al Hodges:
=====
High-yield investment programs were/are able to
collect large amounts of money for the criminalist operators because
initial payoffs to first and second round participants (financed from
the stolen money in the case of the giga-scams presided over inter alia
by the aforementioned master crooks) gave the scams momentum by
spreading news of the sizeable initial payments by word of mouth – a
situation that prevails as long as new participants can be found and/or
old participants are foolish enough to leave their money in the schemes
in the hope of gaining high rolled-up interest on their initial
investments. Participants are usually attracted by some form of an
appeal to emotion or faith that the program will help them to achieve
rapid financial freedom. High-Yield Investment Programs may also mirror
pyramid-selling schemes by offering current investors incentive
commissions, for instance, 9% of investment by the participant on top of
promised accruals, to recruit new investors.
Notorious documented High-Yield Investment Programs include:
(1): OSGold, founded as an e-gold ‘imitation’ in 2001 by David Reed, It folded in 2002. According to a lawsuit filed in US District Court in 2005, operators of OSGold may have made off with $230 million.
(1): OSGold, founded as an e-gold ‘imitation’ in 2001 by David Reed, It folded in 2002. According to a lawsuit filed in US District Court in 2005, operators of OSGold may have made off with $230 million.
(2): The second largest documented High-Yield
Investment Program was PIPS (People In Profit System), or Pure
Investors. Started by Bryan Marsden in 2004, this scheme spanned more
than 20 countries. PIPS was investigated by Bank Negara Malaysia in
2005, resulting in Marsden and his wife being charged in a Malaysian
Court with some 97 counts of money laundering more than 77 Malaysian
ringgit, equivalent to $20 million [New Straits Times, 11th October
2006]. Yet even after these charges were brought, many of Marsden’s
followers continued to support him and to believe that they would be
seeing their money in future. A similar rationalisation and denial
syndrome can be observed in many other High-Yield Investment Program
contexts.
(3): Indicted operators or schemes under investigation:
12DailyPro Autosurf (United States: Securities and Exchange Commission); Ginsystem, Inc. (Singapore: Commercial Affairs Department of Singapore); IT4US (United States); PlexPlay (Norway: HegnarOnline, in Norwegian); Solidinvestment (United States).
12DailyPro Autosurf (United States: Securities and Exchange Commission); Ginsystem, Inc. (Singapore: Commercial Affairs Department of Singapore); IT4US (United States); PlexPlay (Norway: HegnarOnline, in Norwegian); Solidinvestment (United States).
The foregoing provides merely a preliminary
outline of the background to these scams, concerning which a
considerable literature now exists. Promoting or perpetuating Ponzi
schemes is a criminal offence punishable by jail terms or fines in most
countries. The fact that the High-Yield Investment Program monitoring
websites publicise disclaimers to the effect that the sites ‘do not
promote the programs advertised’ on their websites, does not absolve the
operators from criminal liability.
A disturbing feature of this environment is
that a large number of High-Yield Investment Program participants
persist in participating in further schemes long after they have already
lost money in schemes that have either folded, or in respect of which
the operator has disappeared. The fact that most of the publicised
schemes are openly labelled scams on the relevant Internet monitor
boards, even though their operators are themselves criminally liable,
suggests that many participants are well aware of the risks they are
running, know that the schemes are fraudulent, but choose to put money
in them anyway, like addicted gamblers.
Former officials and members of the US armed
forces may have been taken in by indications that the operators were
officially connected or even that the scams in which they have
participated were legitimate because of such alleged connections,
including intelligence backgrounds.
The perpetrators play on the understandable
anger felt by those who have been scammed, even though they were
originally enticed by the US perpetrators into becoming prospectively
felonious participants themselves, a condition which leads
psychologically to the state of denial that in turn supposedly provides
the perpetrators with the protection that they require.
However the operators, sitting on their stolen
funds, may well fear the ultimate outcome, should manipulation of the
expectations of the scammed investors cease to remain perversely
‘credible’, or those manipulative counterintelligence Psy-Ops
initiatives are closed down.
•Hypothecation:
Originally a pledge of property as collateral for indebtedness without transfer of possession to the party extending the loan. This arrangement is common in the case of mortgages. The borrower retains legal ownership of the property but provides the lender with a lien over the property until the debt is paid off. Rehypothecation occurs when a broker pledges hypothecated client-owned securities in a margin account to secure a bank loan.
Originally a pledge of property as collateral for indebtedness without transfer of possession to the party extending the loan. This arrangement is common in the case of mortgages. The borrower retains legal ownership of the property but provides the lender with a lien over the property until the debt is paid off. Rehypothecation occurs when a broker pledges hypothecated client-owned securities in a margin account to secure a bank loan.
The fraudulent finance buried inside the
‘sub-prime’ mortgage nexus of scandals was explained in our report dated
26th December 2007 [www.worldreports.org: Archive]. As described in
that report, the ‘homeowner’ has been scammed, either he or she has been
coerced into signing several top copies of the same document, enabling
the lending bank to claim ownership even though the bank has sold the
mortgage on the basis of another top copy, for instance, to one of the
co-conspiring Government-Sponsored Enterprises; or because the bank has
alienated its ownership of the loan to the GSE in question, or has
packaged the mortgage with other loans, as well as with worthless
securities underpinned by no real asset, and has sold such packages on
to parties (usually abroad) which have not performed due diligence.
In our report of 26th December 2007, we advised ALL US ‘homeowners’ facing foreclosure
to let the Court know that the underlying contract has been requested
from the bank. In most instances, the bank will be unable to supply it,
because it has sold on the mortgage to the GSE, having therefore already
passed on the risk. People facing foreclosure who ask for the contract can usually expect to be pleasantly surprised at the outcome of their cases.
•Internal Revenue Service (IRS):
The IRS is part of the US Treasury Department, and was officially created by Act of Congress on 1st July 1962. The IRS is responsible for administering and enforcing the Internal Revenue Code (IRC), as established under US Congressional authority, passed in 1913, to levy taxes on the income of individuals and corporations.
The IRS is part of the US Treasury Department, and was officially created by Act of Congress on 1st July 1962. The IRS is responsible for administering and enforcing the Internal Revenue Code (IRC), as established under US Congressional authority, passed in 1913, to levy taxes on the income of individuals and corporations.
In 1939, the IRC was codified from the separate
Internal Revenue laws. The IRS Code was further overhauled in 1954, with
substantive new provisions being added concerning depreciation, the
double taxation of dividends, research and experimental expenditures,
carryback on operating losses, tax on ‘unreasonable’ accumulations of
surplus, preferred stock bail-outs, and collapsible corporations and
partnerships.
Of the enormous changes to the IRC implemented
since 1954, the most important for the context we are dealing with here
was the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act (TEFRA) of 1982 which,
inter alia, required US taxpayers to report all sources of income,
wherever it was earned anywhere in the world. It follows that all
receipts received by American taxpayers since the passage of this Act
which have not been reported to the Internal Revenue Service are
taxable, which means that all US taxpayer holdings in offshore accounts
that have not been declared for tax are liable for tax and penalties.
Main source: Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., ‘Elite Power & Capital
Markets’, thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements
for the Degree of Master of Science, for The Administration of Justice
Department, Mercyhurst College, Erie, PA, 13th February 2002; see also:
Munn, ‘Encyclopedia of Banking and Finance’, page 589.
•Interlocking Directorates:
These reference commercial banks or savings institutions which have individuals on their Boards of Directors who further serve on the Board or Boards of one or more unaffiliated competitor(s) operating in the same marketplace. The US Financial Institutions Regulatory Act of 1978 prohibits management interlocks by banks operating in the same Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA). But it exempts smaller banks, and also permits interlocks of up to 49% of a bank’s management officers. Source: Thomas P. Fitch, ‘Dictionary of Banking Terms’, 3rd Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 1997, c.v. ‘Interlocking Directorates’.
These reference commercial banks or savings institutions which have individuals on their Boards of Directors who further serve on the Board or Boards of one or more unaffiliated competitor(s) operating in the same marketplace. The US Financial Institutions Regulatory Act of 1978 prohibits management interlocks by banks operating in the same Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA). But it exempts smaller banks, and also permits interlocks of up to 49% of a bank’s management officers. Source: Thomas P. Fitch, ‘Dictionary of Banking Terms’, 3rd Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 1997, c.v. ‘Interlocking Directorates’.
•International Banking Act of 1978:
This legislation essentially places American branches and agencies of foreign banks under the supervision of US bank regulators. The provisions included: authorising the Comptroller of the Currency to license and supervise a foreign bank; authorising Federal bank agencies to examine US offices of any foreign bank; subjecting any foreign bank branch or holding company to the Bank Holding Company Act, just like any US bank holding company; and imposing reserve requirements and Federal deposit insurance coverage for foreign banks to the same extent as the US member banks. Sources: Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., ‘Elite Power & Capital Markets’, thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science, for The Administration of Justice Department, Mercyhurst College, Erie, PA, 13th February 2002; see: Munn, ‘Encyclopedia of Banking and Finance’, page 563.
This legislation essentially places American branches and agencies of foreign banks under the supervision of US bank regulators. The provisions included: authorising the Comptroller of the Currency to license and supervise a foreign bank; authorising Federal bank agencies to examine US offices of any foreign bank; subjecting any foreign bank branch or holding company to the Bank Holding Company Act, just like any US bank holding company; and imposing reserve requirements and Federal deposit insurance coverage for foreign banks to the same extent as the US member banks. Sources: Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., ‘Elite Power & Capital Markets’, thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science, for The Administration of Justice Department, Mercyhurst College, Erie, PA, 13th February 2002; see: Munn, ‘Encyclopedia of Banking and Finance’, page 563.
•International Banking Act of 1987:
Created a Federal regulatory structure similar to the Federal Reserve to examine the assets and liabilities of foreign banks on-site, and to ensure similar licensing and regulation of non-banking activities of foreign banks. It also required the Federal Reserve to maintain the same competitive equity requirements for foreign banks as for US member banks. Sources: Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., ‘Elite Power & Capital Markets’, thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science, Administration of Justice Department, Mercyhurst College, Erie, PA, 13th February 2002; Munn, ‘Encyclopedia of Banking and Finance’, page 563.
Created a Federal regulatory structure similar to the Federal Reserve to examine the assets and liabilities of foreign banks on-site, and to ensure similar licensing and regulation of non-banking activities of foreign banks. It also required the Federal Reserve to maintain the same competitive equity requirements for foreign banks as for US member banks. Sources: Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., ‘Elite Power & Capital Markets’, thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science, Administration of Justice Department, Mercyhurst College, Erie, PA, 13th February 2002; Munn, ‘Encyclopedia of Banking and Finance’, page 563.
•Investment Banking:
The sale and distribution of a new offering of securities, carried out by a financial intermediary (an investment banker), who purchases securities from the issuer as principal, and assumes the risk of distributing securities to investors. Source: Thomas P. Fitch, ‘Dictionary of Banking Terms’, the 3rd Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 1997, c.v. ‘Investment Banking’.
The sale and distribution of a new offering of securities, carried out by a financial intermediary (an investment banker), who purchases securities from the issuer as principal, and assumes the risk of distributing securities to investors. Source: Thomas P. Fitch, ‘Dictionary of Banking Terms’, the 3rd Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 1997, c.v. ‘Investment Banking’.
•Investment Company Act of 1940:
This Act requires that all companies which offer securities or investment advice to the public must register with the Securities and Exchange Commission. For instance, any advisory corporation that offers investment advice (not straight reporting, but advice) must register with the SEC. For those who may be interested, this explains why this service does not offer advice and will not respond to the frequent requests for financial investment advice that we routinely receive. Sources: Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., ‘Elite Power & Capital Markets’, thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science, for The Administration of Justice Department, Mercyhurst College, 13th February 2002; Munn, ‘Encyclopedia of Banking and Finance’, page 589.
This Act requires that all companies which offer securities or investment advice to the public must register with the Securities and Exchange Commission. For instance, any advisory corporation that offers investment advice (not straight reporting, but advice) must register with the SEC. For those who may be interested, this explains why this service does not offer advice and will not respond to the frequent requests for financial investment advice that we routinely receive. Sources: Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., ‘Elite Power & Capital Markets’, thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science, for The Administration of Justice Department, Mercyhurst College, 13th February 2002; Munn, ‘Encyclopedia of Banking and Finance’, page 589.
•Kakocracy: Rule by the worst elements of
society exclusively in their own interests and with cynical and
permanent disregard for the interests of anyone else.
•Kleptocracy: The ascendancy of a rapacious,
thieving class of co-conspiratorial bandits protected by public office
that is bent on maximising the open-ended potential of their office and
power for personal enrichment and for the furtherance of clandestine
agendas divorced from the interests of the people and the constituencies
they are supposed to serve. This term is used in these reports even
though kleptomania is strictly defined in the Oxford Senior Dictionary
as ‘an uncontrollable tendency to steal things, with no desire to use or
profit by them’.
The definition is interesting, because it
reveals an element of madness that is clearly inherent in the behaviour
of the criminalist snakes identified in these reports. This madness can
be observed in the rapacious behaviour, for instance, of the
arch-criminalist DVD godfather, George Bush Sr., whose avarice for other
people’s money notoriously knows no bounds, despite his age, indicating
that he chooses to remain unaware of his own mortality: a
characteristic of greed which can only be described as symptomatic of
mental derangement.
•Leverage, Financial and Investment:
(1): Financial Leverage: Debt in relation to
equity in a firm’s capital structure (such as long-term debt, preferred
stock, and shareholders’ equity. Financial leverage is measured by the
debt-to-equity ratio: the more long-term debt there is, the greater the
financial leverage.
(2): Investment leverage: A means of enhancing
return or value without increasing investment: for instance, by buying
securities on margin with borrowed money. Extra leverage may be
achievable if the leveraged security is convertible into common stock.
(3): Note: Option contracts provide leverage,
with NO borrowings, offering the prospect of high return for little or
no investment.
Source: John Downes and Jordan Elliot Goodman,
‘Dictionary of Finance and Investment Terms’, 7th Edition, Happauge:
Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2006, s.v. ‘Leverage’.
•Maloney Act of 1938: An amendment to the
Securities Act of 1933 which created the US National Association of
Securities Dealers (NASD). The legislation promoted the organisation of
member securities dealers as a Self-Regulating Organizations (SRO) under
the supervision of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to
institutionalise a code of ethics in the securities industry and its
enforcement nationwide. NASD members are known as Broker/Dealers, since
they represent both clients that buy and/or sell securities, and
themselves, as a principal, when they are engaged in underwriting and/or
selling a stock or bond issue directly to the public. The NASD is the
only firm operating under the Maloney Act. See: NASD: National
Association of Securities Dealers. Sources: Michael C. Cottrell, B.A.,
M.S., ‘Elite Power & Capital Markets’, thesis submitted in partial
fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science,
Administration of Justice Department, Mercyhurst College, Erie, PA, 13th
February 2002; NASD, ‘National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.:
Manual, April 1998, page 3171.
•Margin Accounts: See Mark to [The] Market and: Margin Requirements
•Margin Requirements:
The minimum amount that a client must deposit in the form of cash or eligible securities in a Margin Account, as is spelled out under Regulation T of the Federal Reserve Board. Regulation T requires a minimum of $2,000 or 50% of the purchase price of eligible securities bought on margin or 50% of the proceeds of short sales. Also referred to as the Initial Margin. Primary source: John Downes and Jordan Elliot Goodman, ‘Dictionary of Finance and Investment Terms’, 7th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2006, s.v. ‘Margin Requirement’.
The minimum amount that a client must deposit in the form of cash or eligible securities in a Margin Account, as is spelled out under Regulation T of the Federal Reserve Board. Regulation T requires a minimum of $2,000 or 50% of the purchase price of eligible securities bought on margin or 50% of the proceeds of short sales. Also referred to as the Initial Margin. Primary source: John Downes and Jordan Elliot Goodman, ‘Dictionary of Finance and Investment Terms’, 7th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2006, s.v. ‘Margin Requirement’.
•Margin Security:
This is a security that may be bought or sold in a Margin Account. Regulation T of the Federal Reserve Board defines margin securities as:
This is a security that may be bought or sold in a Margin Account. Regulation T of the Federal Reserve Board defines margin securities as:
(1): Any registered security (a listed security or a security having unlisted trading privileges);
(2): Any OTC margin stock or OTC margin bond,
which are defined as any unlisted security that the Federal Reserve
Board (FRB) periodically identifies as having the investor interest,
marketability, disclosure and solid financial position of a listed
security;
(3): Any OTC security designated as qualified
for trading in the National Market System under a plan approved by the
Securities and Exchange Commission;
(4): Any mutual fund or unit investment trust
registered under the Investment company Act of 1940. Other securities
that are not exempt securities must be transacted in cash. Source: John
Downes and Jordan Elliot Goodman, ‘Dictionary of Finance and Investment
Terms’, 7th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2006,
s.v. ‘Margin Security’.
•Mark to [The] Market:
Adjustment of the valuation of a security or portfolio to reflect current (prevailing) market values. For instance, Margin Accounts are marked to market in order to ensure compliance with financial maintenance requirements. (In UK parlance, the definite article is dropped). Source: John Downes and Jordan Elliot Goodman, ‘Dictionary of Finance and Investment Terms’, 7th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2006, s.v. ‘Mark To The Market’.
Adjustment of the valuation of a security or portfolio to reflect current (prevailing) market values. For instance, Margin Accounts are marked to market in order to ensure compliance with financial maintenance requirements. (In UK parlance, the definite article is dropped). Source: John Downes and Jordan Elliot Goodman, ‘Dictionary of Finance and Investment Terms’, 7th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2006, s.v. ‘Mark To The Market’.
•Money laundering:
Passing illegally acquired funds or taxable funds on which no tax has been paid inter alia with the intent to evade tax and to hide the funds from relevant national authorities. American legislation addressing money-laundering includes:
Passing illegally acquired funds or taxable funds on which no tax has been paid inter alia with the intent to evade tax and to hide the funds from relevant national authorities. American legislation addressing money-laundering includes:
(1): The Bank Secrecy Act of 1970;
(2): The Money Laundering Control Act of 1986;
(3): The anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988;
(4): The Annunzio-Wylie Money Laundering Act of 1992;
(5): The Money Laundering Suppression Act of 1944; and:
(6): The Terrorism Prevention Act of 1996.
(2): The Money Laundering Control Act of 1986;
(3): The anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988;
(4): The Annunzio-Wylie Money Laundering Act of 1992;
(5): The Money Laundering Suppression Act of 1944; and:
(6): The Terrorism Prevention Act of 1996.
The Money Laundering Control Act of 1986 made
money laundering a Federal crime corresponding to the previously passed
Organized Crime Control Act of 1970. See separate entries in Glossary.
Sources: Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., ‘Elite Power & Capital Markets’, thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science, The Administration of Justice Department, Mercyhurst College, Erie, PA, 13th February 2002; Munn, Encyclopedia of Banking & Finance, page 109; also: John Madinger and Sydney A. Zalopany, ‘Money Laundering: A Guide for Criminal Investigators’, New York, CEC Press, LLC, 1999, page 43; Howard Abadinsky, ‘Organized Crime’, 6th Edition, Belmont: Wadsworth/Thompson Learning, Inc., 2000, page 411; FINCEN, ‘The Global Fight Against Money Laundering’, Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FINCEN, 1999, available from: http:// www.occ.treas.gov/launder (Internet).
Sources: Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., ‘Elite Power & Capital Markets’, thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science, The Administration of Justice Department, Mercyhurst College, Erie, PA, 13th February 2002; Munn, Encyclopedia of Banking & Finance, page 109; also: John Madinger and Sydney A. Zalopany, ‘Money Laundering: A Guide for Criminal Investigators’, New York, CEC Press, LLC, 1999, page 43; Howard Abadinsky, ‘Organized Crime’, 6th Edition, Belmont: Wadsworth/Thompson Learning, Inc., 2000, page 411; FINCEN, ‘The Global Fight Against Money Laundering’, Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FINCEN, 1999, available from: http:// www.occ.treas.gov/launder (Internet).
•Money Laundering Control Act of 1986:
This legislation made money laundering a Federal crime corresponding to the previously passed Organized Crime Control Act of 1970. See: Money laundering.
This legislation made money laundering a Federal crime corresponding to the previously passed Organized Crime Control Act of 1970. See: Money laundering.
•Money Laundering Suppression Act of 1994:
Legislation which required that ‘any person who owns or controls a money
services business’ must register with the Secretary of the Treasury.
Source: FINCEN, ‘The Global Fight Against Money Laundering’, Financial
Crimes Enforcement Network (FINCEN, 1999, available from: http:// www.occ.treas.gov/launder (Internet).
•Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (MRSB): See Self-Regulatory Organization (SRO), below.
•NASD: National Association of Securities Dealers:
A non-profit organisation that was formed under the joint sponsorship of the Investment Bankers’ Conference and the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in order to comply with the requirements of the Maloney Act. NASD Members include virtually all investment banking houses and firms dealing in the Over-the-Counter Market.
A non-profit organisation that was formed under the joint sponsorship of the Investment Bankers’ Conference and the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in order to comply with the requirements of the Maloney Act. NASD Members include virtually all investment banking houses and firms dealing in the Over-the-Counter Market.
Operating under the supervision of the SEC, the basic purposes of the NASD are to:
(1): Standardise practices in the field;
(2): Establish high moral and ethical standards in the securities trading business;
(3): Provide a representative body to consult with the Government and investors on matters of common interest;
(4): Establish and enforce fair and equitable rules of securities trading;
(5): Establish a disciplinary body capable of enforcing the above provisions.
(1): Standardise practices in the field;
(2): Establish high moral and ethical standards in the securities trading business;
(3): Provide a representative body to consult with the Government and investors on matters of common interest;
(4): Establish and enforce fair and equitable rules of securities trading;
(5): Establish a disciplinary body capable of enforcing the above provisions.
The NASD requires members to maintain 'quick assets' in excess of current liabilities at all times.
Within the NASD, a special Investment Companies
Department concerns itself with the problems of investment companies and
has the responsibility of reviewing companies’ sales literature in that
segment of the securities industry.
Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., has described the
NASD’s contemporary responsibilities as including the following (to be
read in conjunction of the foregoing information):
(1): Nationwide inspections of member firms;
(2): Provision of centralised computerised surveillance of the trading of NASD Automated Quotations, of its sister company NASDAQ;
(3): Enforcement of Securities and Exchange Commission rules and regulations, as well as of its own rules for members;
(4): To review underwriting arrangements for securities offered to the public;
(5): To perform and monitor qualification examinations of personnel of members; and:
(6): To coordinate and cooperate with the SEC, the States and with other Federal agencies.
(2): Provision of centralised computerised surveillance of the trading of NASD Automated Quotations, of its sister company NASDAQ;
(3): Enforcement of Securities and Exchange Commission rules and regulations, as well as of its own rules for members;
(4): To review underwriting arrangements for securities offered to the public;
(5): To perform and monitor qualification examinations of personnel of members; and:
(6): To coordinate and cooperate with the SEC, the States and with other Federal agencies.
The responsibilities of the SEC do NOT include
trading on own account [see text], a gross abuse of which it has been
and continues to be accused. This abuse is inconsistent with its
responsibilities as a regulator and is considered by experts to be a
scandalous development. See also: Financial Industry Regulator Authority
(FINRA). Sources: John Downes and Jordan Elliot Goodman, ‘Dictionary of
Finance and Investment Terms’, 7th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s
Educational Series, Inc., 2006, s.v. ‘NASD’; Michael C. Cottrell, B.A.,
M.S., ‘Elite Power & Capital Markets’, thesis submitted in partial
fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science, The
Administration of Justice Department, Mercyhurst College, Erie, PA,
13th February 2002; Munn, ‘Encyclopedia of Banking & Finance’, page
696.
•National Market System: See: Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
•Non-Disclosure agreement:
An illegal document which, if signed by a participant to a transaction, precludes any recourse to official regulators for protection after the participant has predictably been scammed, and likewise precludes any legal recourse.
An illegal document which, if signed by a participant to a transaction, precludes any recourse to official regulators for protection after the participant has predictably been scammed, and likewise precludes any legal recourse.
•Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC):
This is the chief regulator of US National Banks. The Comptroller of the Currency is appointed by the President of the United States for a five-year term, with Senate confirmation. The OCC, the supervisory agency covering nationally chartered banks, is the oldest US Federal regulator of financial institutions. The Comptroller of the Currency also serves as one of the three Directors of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Source: Thomas P. Fitch, ‘Dictionary of Banking Terms’, 3rd Ed., Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, 1997, c.v. ‘Comptroller of the Currency’.
This is the chief regulator of US National Banks. The Comptroller of the Currency is appointed by the President of the United States for a five-year term, with Senate confirmation. The OCC, the supervisory agency covering nationally chartered banks, is the oldest US Federal regulator of financial institutions. The Comptroller of the Currency also serves as one of the three Directors of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Source: Thomas P. Fitch, ‘Dictionary of Banking Terms’, 3rd Ed., Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, 1997, c.v. ‘Comptroller of the Currency’.
•Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS):
This US Federal agency was established under the Financial Institutions Reform, recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989 to examine and supervise Savings and Loan Associations (‘thrifts’) and Federal Savings Banks. It replaced the Federal Home Loan Bank Board as the primary regulator of State chartered and Federally chartered savings institutions. It is a bureau within the US Treasury Department. The Director and Chief Operating Officer (CEO) of OTS is appointed by the President of the United States with Senate confirmation, and is also one of five directors of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). The fact that the OTS is structured within the US Department of the Treasury parallels the position with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. Source: Thomas P. Fitch, ‘Dictionary of Banking Terms’, 3rd Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 1997, c.v. ‘Office of Thrift Supervision’.
This US Federal agency was established under the Financial Institutions Reform, recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989 to examine and supervise Savings and Loan Associations (‘thrifts’) and Federal Savings Banks. It replaced the Federal Home Loan Bank Board as the primary regulator of State chartered and Federally chartered savings institutions. It is a bureau within the US Treasury Department. The Director and Chief Operating Officer (CEO) of OTS is appointed by the President of the United States with Senate confirmation, and is also one of five directors of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). The fact that the OTS is structured within the US Department of the Treasury parallels the position with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. Source: Thomas P. Fitch, ‘Dictionary of Banking Terms’, 3rd Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 1997, c.v. ‘Office of Thrift Supervision’.
•‘Open outcry’:
A non-electronic method of communication between professionals on a stock or futures exchange involving shouting and the use of hand signals to transfer information primarily about buy and sell orders. The component of the trading floor where this takes place is often called the pit. The best-known ‘open outcry’ markets in the United States remain the New York Mercantile Exchange, the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, the Chicago Board of Trade, the Chicago Board Options Exchange, and the Minneapolis Grain Exchange. In the United Kingdom, the London Metal Exchange (LME) still makes use of the 'open outcry' method. Many traders prefer the ‘open outcry’ system on the basis that physical contact in the pit allows traders to speculate as to the motives or intentions of buyer/seller, so that positions can be adjusted accordingly.
A non-electronic method of communication between professionals on a stock or futures exchange involving shouting and the use of hand signals to transfer information primarily about buy and sell orders. The component of the trading floor where this takes place is often called the pit. The best-known ‘open outcry’ markets in the United States remain the New York Mercantile Exchange, the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, the Chicago Board of Trade, the Chicago Board Options Exchange, and the Minneapolis Grain Exchange. In the United Kingdom, the London Metal Exchange (LME) still makes use of the 'open outcry' method. Many traders prefer the ‘open outcry’ system on the basis that physical contact in the pit allows traders to speculate as to the motives or intentions of buyer/seller, so that positions can be adjusted accordingly.
•Organized Crime Control Act of 1970:
See Money Laundering Control Act of 1986; and Money laundering.
See Money Laundering Control Act of 1986; and Money laundering.
•Over-the-Counter:
(1): Of a security: A security that is not listed and traded on an organised exchange;
(2): Of a market: A market in which securities transactions are conducted through a telephone and computer network connecting dealers in stocks and bonds, rather than, as classically, on the floor of an exchange. Over-the-counter stocks are traditionally those of smaller companies that do not meet the listing requirements of the New York Stock Exchange or the American Stock Exchange.
(1): Of a security: A security that is not listed and traded on an organised exchange;
(2): Of a market: A market in which securities transactions are conducted through a telephone and computer network connecting dealers in stocks and bonds, rather than, as classically, on the floor of an exchange. Over-the-counter stocks are traditionally those of smaller companies that do not meet the listing requirements of the New York Stock Exchange or the American Stock Exchange.
In recent years, however, many companies that
qualify for listing have chosen to remain with Over-the-Counter trading,
because they consider that the system of multiple trading by many
dealers is preferable to the centralised trading approach of the New
York Stock Exchange, where all trading in a stock has to go through the
Exchange specialist in that stock. The rules for Over-the-Counter stock
trading are written and enforced largely by the US National Association
of Securities Dealers (NASD), which is self-regulating (see NASD).
Prices of Over-the-Counter stocks are published
in daily newspapers, with the National Market System stocks listed
separately from the rest of the Over-the-Counter market.
Over-the-Counter markets incorporate markets in both Government and
municipal bonds. Source: John Downes and Jordan Elliot Goodman,
‘Dictionary of Finance and Investment Terms’, 7th Edition, Happauge:
Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2006, s.v. ‘Over-the-Counter (OTC)’.
•Pass-Throughs:
Pass-Through Securities: Pools of fixed-income securities that are backed by a package of assets. A servicing intermediary collects monthly payments from issuers and, after deducting a fee, remits or passes them through to the holders of the pass-through security. This device is also known as a ‘pass-through certificate’ or a ‘pay-through security’. The most common type of pass-through is a mortgage-backed certificate, whereby ‘homeowners’’ payments pass from the original lending bank through a Government agency or investment bank to the investors (per the supposed model).
Pass-Through Securities: Pools of fixed-income securities that are backed by a package of assets. A servicing intermediary collects monthly payments from issuers and, after deducting a fee, remits or passes them through to the holders of the pass-through security. This device is also known as a ‘pass-through certificate’ or a ‘pay-through security’. The most common type of pass-through is a mortgage-backed certificate, whereby ‘homeowners’’ payments pass from the original lending bank through a Government agency or investment bank to the investors (per the supposed model).
•Ponzi Scheme:
A scam designed to entrap the unwary investor, as described in the following analyses published on this website [see Archive) and in International Currency Review:
(1): ‘Treasongate Update: Omega ‘Ponzi Game’ scams, 13th January 2007;
(2): ‘Treasongate Background: Intel Ponzi Scams’, 22nd January 2007.
A scam designed to entrap the unwary investor, as described in the following analyses published on this website [see Archive) and in International Currency Review:
(1): ‘Treasongate Update: Omega ‘Ponzi Game’ scams, 13th January 2007;
(2): ‘Treasongate Background: Intel Ponzi Scams’, 22nd January 2007.
So-called 'lending programs’, a.k.a. High-Yield
Investment Programs operating along Ponzi or Pyramid Scheme lines
promoted clandestinely inter alia by corrupt elements of the criminalist
US intelligence community (including the CIA’s OMEGA OPS scams) will
comply with none of these stringent regulations and requirements, and
are accordingly, by definition, ALL ILLEGAL IN THE UNITED STATES. This
may well be the basis upon which non-payment of these accounts has been
predicated. The question therefore arises: why have these illegal
schemes been so widespread, having given rise to a colossal constituency
of the American ‘broken hearted’, who have been scammed in one way or
another but who have been clinging to the hope, like Rip van Winkel,
that they, their family trusts or their restless associations of ‘the
scammed’, will finally be paid out one sunny day far out into the
future?
The generic answer to this question is that the
cynical, criminalised fraudster élite, headed by the crooks controlling
and inside the intelligence community, have taken precautions to instal
their own corrupt operatives within and in control of certain
enforcement institutions, including the SEC.
Enron and the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation (FDIC) have been used to proliferate and perpetuate these
illegal securities scams: indeed, it is from operations such as the
CIA’s nefarious Enron scamming system, that the derivatives overhang and
crisis have mainly arisen.
As a consequence, blind US official (Federal and
State) eyes have been turned to what has been going on, the securities
regulations have not been enforced with respect to such illegal Ponzi
frauds, and the old system whereby anyone involved with trading
securities was blackballed for life if caught engaged in irregular
activities, has been moribund since the 1970s.
When an uncorrupt SEC Commissioner tried, quite
recently, to enforce the regulations, he was removed from his post on
some typically trumped-up pretext or other. In other words, the wolves
are and have been in charge of the chicken coops.
So key enforcers are, as matters stand,
co-conspirators in the despicable, hitherto (but since the Wantagate and
the subsequent exposures, no longer) proliferating intelligence
community-driven Ponzi Game operations that have devastated an unknown
number of American families – with the proceeds channelled through
corrupt participating banks into offshore accounts. See Appendix to this
report for the narrative of the original Ponzi fraud.
•Principal:
(1): The person with highest authority in a business, or a person for whom another acts as an agent.
(2): A capital sum as distinguished from the interest on it.
(3): See also: Principal, of a Securities firm.
Source: Oxford Senior Dictionary, Oxford University Press, 1984.
(1): The person with highest authority in a business, or a person for whom another acts as an agent.
(2): A capital sum as distinguished from the interest on it.
(3): See also: Principal, of a Securities firm.
Source: Oxford Senior Dictionary, Oxford University Press, 1984.
•Principal, of a Securities firm:
An NASD member firm is directed by a Registered Principal, who can be the sole proprietor, an officer, a partner, a manager of an office of Supervisory Jurisdiction, and/or a Director of the firm.
An NASD member firm is directed by a Registered Principal, who can be the sole proprietor, an officer, a partner, a manager of an office of Supervisory Jurisdiction, and/or a Director of the firm.
The Registered Principal is answerable for all
actions taken on behalf of the firm, and all trades submitted by the
firm, and all actions of its registered representatives, subject to the
rules and regulations of the NASD, SEC and the State of registration.
The Registered Principal must pass the Series 24 (General Securities
Principal) and also the Series 7 (General Securities Representative)
Examinations conducted by the NASD, and must pass the written procedures
and oral interview before assuming this position for the firm. Sources:
Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., ‘Elite Power & Capital Markets’,
the thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the
Degree of Master of Science, Administration of Justice Department,
Mercyhurst College, Erie, PA, on 13th February 2002; NASD, ‘National
Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.: Manual’, April 1998, page 3171;
NASD, NASD Compliance Check List, Gaithersburg: NASD MediaSource, 1992.
•Principle:
A basic truth or a general law or doctrine used as a basis of reasoning or a guide to action or behaviour; a fundamental truth or doctrine, as of law; a comprehensive rule or doctrine which furnishes a basis or origin for others; a settle of action, procedure or legal determination. Also defined as: a truth so clear that it cannot be proved or contradicted unless by a proposition which is still clearer. Sources: Oxford Senior Dictionary, Oxford University Press, 1984.; Henry Campbell Black, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul, West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v., ‘Principle’.
A basic truth or a general law or doctrine used as a basis of reasoning or a guide to action or behaviour; a fundamental truth or doctrine, as of law; a comprehensive rule or doctrine which furnishes a basis or origin for others; a settle of action, procedure or legal determination. Also defined as: a truth so clear that it cannot be proved or contradicted unless by a proposition which is still clearer. Sources: Oxford Senior Dictionary, Oxford University Press, 1984.; Henry Campbell Black, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul, West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v., ‘Principle’.
•Prudent Man Rule:
This is the fundamental American principle that is applicable in respect of professional money management, originally asserted by Judge Samuel Putnum in 1830 as follows:
This is the fundamental American principle that is applicable in respect of professional money management, originally asserted by Judge Samuel Putnum in 1830 as follows:
‘Those with responsibility to invest money for
others should act with prudence, discretion, intelligence, and regard
for the safety of capital as well as income’ [1830 Massachusetts Court
decision: Harvard College v. Armory]. The Prudent Man Rule directs
trustees ‘to observe how men of prudence, discretion and intelligence
manage their own affairs, not in regard to speculation, but in regard to
the management and disposition of their funds, considering the probable
income as well as the probable safety of the capital to be invested’.
Investments in risky Ponzi and Pyramid Schemes and in ‘programs’ such as
those referenced, typically breach the Prudent Man Rule.
•Public Offering Price: See: ‘Underwrite’ below.
•Pyramid Scheme or scam: See: Ponzi Scheme.
•Registered Principal: See: Principal, of a Securities firm.
•Registered Representative, of a Securities firm:
This officer is licensed and authorised to purchase and/or sell stocks, bonds, options, limited partnerships, tax shelters, mutual funds, and variable annuities on behalf of a customer or the firm.
This officer is licensed and authorised to purchase and/or sell stocks, bonds, options, limited partnerships, tax shelters, mutual funds, and variable annuities on behalf of a customer or the firm.
The Registered Representative must have
qualified by passing the Series 7 (General Securities Representative)
Examination and must be registered with the firm as an authorised
representative. Additionally, all licensed representatives must have
passed the NASD Series 63 (Uniform State Law) AntiFraud Examination, and
must register with each State the firm intends to operate in.
Source: Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., ‘Elite
Power & Capital Markets’, thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of
the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science, The
Administration of Justice Department, Mercyhurst College, Erie, PA, 13th
February 2002; NASD, ‘National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.:
Manual’, April 1998, page 3201; NASD, 'NASD Compliance Check List'.
•Risk:
Uncertainty as to whether an asset will earn an expected rate of return, or whether a loss may occur: Various categories of risk apply in the securities market environment:
Uncertainty as to whether an asset will earn an expected rate of return, or whether a loss may occur: Various categories of risk apply in the securities market environment:
(1): Delivery risk: The possibility that the
buyer or seller of an instrument or foreign exchange may be unable to
meet obligations at maturity.
(2): Liquidity risk: The possibility that a bank
may have insufficient cash or short-term marketable assets to meet the
needs of depositors and borrowers.
(3): Settlement risk: The possibility that the
failure of a major bank, or its inability to honour payment commitments
in a wire transfer network, could have a domino effect on other
institutions, causing similar failures elsewhere. In the United Kingdom,
this is usually referred to as ‘systemic risk’.
Source: Thomas P. Fitch, ‘Dictionary of Banking
Terms’, 3rd Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 1997,
s.v. ‘Risk’.
•Risk Free Asset:
A non-callable, default-free bond such as a short-term Government security. While such an asset is not risk-free in terms of inflation, it is (given that the Government can always print money) risk-free in a dollar sense. Source: Jerry M. Rosenberg, ‘The Essential Dictionary of Investing & Finance’, New York, Barnes & Noble, Inc., 2004, s.v. ‘Risk Free Asset’.
A non-callable, default-free bond such as a short-term Government security. While such an asset is not risk-free in terms of inflation, it is (given that the Government can always print money) risk-free in a dollar sense. Source: Jerry M. Rosenberg, ‘The Essential Dictionary of Investing & Finance’, New York, Barnes & Noble, Inc., 2004, s.v. ‘Risk Free Asset’.
•Rule of Law, A (indefinite article):
The way this may be defined in the present context is to begin with the word ‘Rule’. A ‘Rule’ is an established standard, guide or regulation, especially a regulation set up by an official authority. It prescribes or directs action or forbearance. The term also covers a regulation made by a Court of Justice or a public office with reference to the conduct of business therein. Hence, ‘A Rule of Law’ encompasses a legal principle, or a body of legal principles, of general application, sanctioned by the recognition of authorities, and usually expressed in the form of a maxim or logical proposition. The word ‘Rule’ is used because in doubtful or unforeseen circumstances it is a guide or norm for the decision of those concerned (Toullier, tit. Prel. No. 17).
The way this may be defined in the present context is to begin with the word ‘Rule’. A ‘Rule’ is an established standard, guide or regulation, especially a regulation set up by an official authority. It prescribes or directs action or forbearance. The term also covers a regulation made by a Court of Justice or a public office with reference to the conduct of business therein. Hence, ‘A Rule of Law’ encompasses a legal principle, or a body of legal principles, of general application, sanctioned by the recognition of authorities, and usually expressed in the form of a maxim or logical proposition. The word ‘Rule’ is used because in doubtful or unforeseen circumstances it is a guide or norm for the decision of those concerned (Toullier, tit. Prel. No. 17).
Source: Henry Campbell Black, M.A., ‘Black’s Law
Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul, West Publishing Company,
1968, s.v. ‘Rule of Law’.
•Rule of Law, The (definite article): Note that
the foregoing diverges from ‘The Rule of Law’. The common interpretation
of The Rule of Law is that ‘the Law rules’ or is paramount: in other
words that everyone in society, including the Government, operates
within the ordered framework of the Law, precluding arbitrary behaviour.
It is important to distinguish between the indefinite and the definite
article here, because ‘Rule of Law’ has a different meaning, depending
on which is used.
•Savings and Loan Deregulation:
The Garn-St Germain Act of 1982 cut Savings and Loan Associations loose from the tight girdle of ‘old-fashioned’, ‘restrictive’ Federal legislation, opening the door wide to the ransacking and enronisation of the ‘thrift’ banking sector, which in turn laid the groundwork for the subsequent giga-financial scandals that are now being exposed. President Reagan unveiled this legislation at a Rose Garden presentation and signing ceremony on 15th October 1982, before an audience of 200 people. Billed as a major piece of deregulation legislation, this law represented nothing less than the US criminal kleptocracy’s charter to ransack and pillage the middle and working classes. For 50 years, American families had relied on Savings and Loan Associations to finance their homes; but Reagan now pronounced that ‘outmoded regulations left over from the 1930s Great Depression’ had been preventing thrift institutions from competing in the complex, sophisticated financial marketplace of the free-wheeling 1980s.
The Garn-St Germain Act of 1982 cut Savings and Loan Associations loose from the tight girdle of ‘old-fashioned’, ‘restrictive’ Federal legislation, opening the door wide to the ransacking and enronisation of the ‘thrift’ banking sector, which in turn laid the groundwork for the subsequent giga-financial scandals that are now being exposed. President Reagan unveiled this legislation at a Rose Garden presentation and signing ceremony on 15th October 1982, before an audience of 200 people. Billed as a major piece of deregulation legislation, this law represented nothing less than the US criminal kleptocracy’s charter to ransack and pillage the middle and working classes. For 50 years, American families had relied on Savings and Loan Associations to finance their homes; but Reagan now pronounced that ‘outmoded regulations left over from the 1930s Great Depression’ had been preventing thrift institutions from competing in the complex, sophisticated financial marketplace of the free-wheeling 1980s.
When signing the bill with a flourish, Reagan pronounced: ‘All in all, I think we’ve hit the jackpot’.
But those who ‘hit the jackpot’ turned out,
predictably, to be the organised criminal kleptocracy that had
infiltrated official structures, could immediately mobilise criminal
funds to buy their way into thrift institutions, and were embedded
inside the corrupted US intelligence community. A new breed of
swashbuckling Savings and Loan executive sprang up on cue, like weeds,
out of the rich soil fertilised at the October 1982 Rose Garden
ceremony.
Among their leaders was the notorious Neil
Bush, then-Vice President George H. W. Bush’s son, who became a Director
of Silverado Savings and Loan, of Denver, CO, and Andrew Cuomo, the son
of New York Governor Mario Cuomo, who tried to buy Financial Security
Savings of Delray Beach, Florida. The former Governor of Illinois, Dan
Walker, bought First American Savings of Oak Brook, Illinois. Within 18
months of the Rose Garden signing, Edwin Gray, Chairman of the Federal
Home Loan Bank Board (FHLBB) was provided with a grim, classified report
and video, which revealed a swathe of abandoned, half-finished
condominium units financed by Empire Savings and Loan of Mesquite,
Texas: this was when the FHLBB was made aware of the fact that organised
criminal cadres had immediately taken advantage of the deregulation of
the Savings and Loans, and that an open-ended financial implosion was
under way as a consequence. The enronisation of the US thrift industry
was an ‘inside job’ from the outset. Source: ‘Inside Job: The Looting of
America’s Savings and Loans’, Stephen Pizzo, Mary Fricker and Paul
Muolo, McGraw-Hill Publishing Company, New York, 1989, ISBN
0-07-050230-7.
•Securities Act of 1933: This Act, which
followed the 1929 crash and the Great Depression, was framed in
accordance with the interstate commerce clause of the US Constitution,
and requires that any offer for sale of securities using the means and
instrumentalities of interstate commerce must be registered under the
terms of the 1933 Act. Prior to the 1933 Act, the public regulation of
securities in the United States had been governed mainly by State laws
(commonly referred to as the ‘Blue Sky’ laws). With passage of the 1933
Act, the patchwork of existing State securities laws was left in place,
to supplement the Federal legislation. A crucial dimension of the law is
that the 1933 Act makes it illegal to commit fraud in conjunction with
the offer or sale of securities.
Exemptions to the registration process under the Act are extremely tightly prescribed.
Hence, except for extremely narrowly defined
offerings (for instance, to groups of no more than 35 investors),
securities offered or sold to the general public in the United States
must be registered by the filing of a registration statement with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.
The prospectus for the offering is generally
filed in conjunction with the registration statement. The SEC itself
prescribes the relevant forms on which an issuer’s securities must be
registered, and these forms call, inter alia, for:
(1): A description of the issuer’s properties and business;
(2): A description of the securities to be offered for sale;
(3): Information about the management of the issuer;
(4): Information about the securities (if other than common stock); and:
(5): Financial statements certified by independent accountants.
(2): A description of the securities to be offered for sale;
(3): Information about the management of the issuer;
(4): Information about the securities (if other than common stock); and:
(5): Financial statements certified by independent accountants.
It is illegal for an issuer to lie or to omit
material facts from a registration statement or prospectus. Secondary
market transactions may take place without registration. Under Rule
144A, resales of restricted securities between ‘Qualified Institutional
Buyers’ (QIBs) are exempted, thus creating a secondary market in
restricted securities among the largest Wall Street houses.
•Securities Acts Amendments of 1975: See: Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
•Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC): A
Federal agency created under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, to
administer the following legislation:
(1): The Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
(2): The Securities Act of 1933;
(3): The Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935;
(4): The Trust Indenture Act of 1939;
(5): The Investment Advisor Act of 1940; and:
(6): The Securities Acts Amendments of 1975, which ratified free market determination of brokers’ commissions and gave the SEC authority to oversee the development of a National Market System.
(1): The Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
(2): The Securities Act of 1933;
(3): The Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935;
(4): The Trust Indenture Act of 1939;
(5): The Investment Advisor Act of 1940; and:
(6): The Securities Acts Amendments of 1975, which ratified free market determination of brokers’ commissions and gave the SEC authority to oversee the development of a National Market System.
The SEC has five Commissioners, appointed by the
President of the United States on a rotating basis for five-year terms.
The statutes administered by the SEC are designed to:
(1): Promote full disclosure;
(2): Protect the investing public against malpractice in the securities markets;
(3): Require all issues of securities offered in interstate commerce or through the mails, to be registered with the SEC;
(4): Supervise all national securities exchanges and associations;
(5): Supervise investment companies, investment counselors and advisers, Over-the-Counter brokers and dealers, and virtually all other individuals and firms operating in the investment field.
(1): Promote full disclosure;
(2): Protect the investing public against malpractice in the securities markets;
(3): Require all issues of securities offered in interstate commerce or through the mails, to be registered with the SEC;
(4): Supervise all national securities exchanges and associations;
(5): Supervise investment companies, investment counselors and advisers, Over-the-Counter brokers and dealers, and virtually all other individuals and firms operating in the investment field.
Source: John Downes and Jordan Elliot Goodman,
‘Dictionary of Finance and Investment Terms’, 7th Edition, Happauge:
Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2006, s.v. ‘SEC‘.
•Securities Exchange Act of 1934: This
legislation, which governs the US securities markets, was enacted on 6th
June 1934. The Act:
(1): Outlawed misrepresentation and manipulation, and other abusive practices in respect of the issuance and marketing of securities.
(2): Created the Securities and Exchange Commission to enforce the Securities Acts 1933 and 1934.
The primary stipulations of the 1934 Securities Act are as follows:
(1): Registration of all securities listed on stock exchanges, and periodic disclosures by issuers of financial status and changes in condition.
(2): Regular disclosure of holdings and transactions of ‘INSIDERS’ (officers and directors of a corporation and those who control at least 10% of equity securities).
(3): Solicitation of proxies enabling shareholders to vote for or against policy proposals.
(4): Registration with the SEC of stock exchanges and brokers and dealers to ensure their adherence to SEC rules through self-regulation.
(5): Surveillance by the SEC of trading practices on stock exchanges and Over-the-Counter (OTC) markets, to minimise the possibility of insolvency among brokers and dealers.
(6): Regulation of Margin Requirements for securities purchased on credit. These requirements are set by the Federal Reserve Board.
(7): The provision of subpoena power for use by the SEC in investigations of possible violations and in enforcement actions.
(1): Outlawed misrepresentation and manipulation, and other abusive practices in respect of the issuance and marketing of securities.
(2): Created the Securities and Exchange Commission to enforce the Securities Acts 1933 and 1934.
The primary stipulations of the 1934 Securities Act are as follows:
(1): Registration of all securities listed on stock exchanges, and periodic disclosures by issuers of financial status and changes in condition.
(2): Regular disclosure of holdings and transactions of ‘INSIDERS’ (officers and directors of a corporation and those who control at least 10% of equity securities).
(3): Solicitation of proxies enabling shareholders to vote for or against policy proposals.
(4): Registration with the SEC of stock exchanges and brokers and dealers to ensure their adherence to SEC rules through self-regulation.
(5): Surveillance by the SEC of trading practices on stock exchanges and Over-the-Counter (OTC) markets, to minimise the possibility of insolvency among brokers and dealers.
(6): Regulation of Margin Requirements for securities purchased on credit. These requirements are set by the Federal Reserve Board.
(7): The provision of subpoena power for use by the SEC in investigations of possible violations and in enforcement actions.
Source: John Downes and Jordan Elliot Goodman,
‘Dictionary of Finance and Investment Terms’, 7th Edition, Happauge:
Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2006, s.v. ‘Securities Exchange Act
1934’.
•Self-Regulatory Organization (SRO):
These are Federal organisations established to enforce fair, ethical and efficient practices in the securities and commodities futures industries. The practices are referred to as ‘industry rules’ to distinguish them from regulatory agencies such as the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or the Federal Reserve Board. SROs include:
(1): All the national securities and commodities exchanges; and:
(2): The National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD), representing:
•All firms operating in the Over-the-Counter market; and:
•The Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (MSRB), established under the US Securities Acts Amendments of 1975 to regulate brokers, dealers and banks dealing in municipal securities. The NASD enforces the rules promulgated by the MSRB with bank regulatory agencies. Source: John Downes and Jordan Elliot Goodman, ‘Dictionary of Finance and Investment Terms’, 7th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2006, s.v. ‘SRO’.
These are Federal organisations established to enforce fair, ethical and efficient practices in the securities and commodities futures industries. The practices are referred to as ‘industry rules’ to distinguish them from regulatory agencies such as the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or the Federal Reserve Board. SROs include:
(1): All the national securities and commodities exchanges; and:
(2): The National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD), representing:
•All firms operating in the Over-the-Counter market; and:
•The Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (MSRB), established under the US Securities Acts Amendments of 1975 to regulate brokers, dealers and banks dealing in municipal securities. The NASD enforces the rules promulgated by the MSRB with bank regulatory agencies. Source: John Downes and Jordan Elliot Goodman, ‘Dictionary of Finance and Investment Terms’, 7th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2006, s.v. ‘SRO’.
•Settlement:
(1): Of Securities: The conclusion of a securities transaction in which a broker/dealer pays for securities bought for a customer or delivers securities sold, being paid from the buyer’s broker.
(a): Regular Way Delivery and Settlement is completed on the third full business day following the date of the transaction for stocks (called the Settlement Date).
(b): Government Bonds, and Options, are settled on the next business day.
(2): Of Futures/Options: Represents the final price, established by Exchange Rule, for prices prevailing during the closing period and upon which Futures Contracts are Marked to The Market. Source: John Downes and Jordan Elliot Goodman, ‘Dictionary of Finance and Investment Terms’, 7th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2006, s.v. ‘Settlement’.
(1): Of Securities: The conclusion of a securities transaction in which a broker/dealer pays for securities bought for a customer or delivers securities sold, being paid from the buyer’s broker.
(a): Regular Way Delivery and Settlement is completed on the third full business day following the date of the transaction for stocks (called the Settlement Date).
(b): Government Bonds, and Options, are settled on the next business day.
(2): Of Futures/Options: Represents the final price, established by Exchange Rule, for prices prevailing during the closing period and upon which Futures Contracts are Marked to The Market. Source: John Downes and Jordan Elliot Goodman, ‘Dictionary of Finance and Investment Terms’, 7th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2006, s.v. ‘Settlement’.
•Sherman AntiTrust Act:
Passed in July 1890, this legislation described in general terms, without the benefit of definitions, activities that were viewed as monopolistic and were therefore illegal. Many of the definitions had already been determined by case law involving court actions by employers combating the activities of trade unions. The Act forbade ‘every contract, combination… or conspiracy in the restraint of trade or commerce’. Sources: Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., ‘Elite Power & Capital Markets’, thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science, for The Administration of Justice Department, Mercyhurst College, Erie, PA 13th February 2002; Jack C. Plano and Milton Greenberg, ‘The American Political Dictionary’, 4th Edition, Hinsdale, the Dryden Press, 1976, page 328.
Passed in July 1890, this legislation described in general terms, without the benefit of definitions, activities that were viewed as monopolistic and were therefore illegal. Many of the definitions had already been determined by case law involving court actions by employers combating the activities of trade unions. The Act forbade ‘every contract, combination… or conspiracy in the restraint of trade or commerce’. Sources: Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., ‘Elite Power & Capital Markets’, thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science, for The Administration of Justice Department, Mercyhurst College, Erie, PA 13th February 2002; Jack C. Plano and Milton Greenberg, ‘The American Political Dictionary’, 4th Edition, Hinsdale, the Dryden Press, 1976, page 328.
•Story’s First Law:
‘All organisations are run for the benefit of those running the organisation’.
‘All organisations are run for the benefit of those running the organisation’.
•Story’s Second Law:
‘The interests of the supplier and the consumer diverge’.
‘The interests of the supplier and the consumer diverge’.
•Story's Third Law: 'Sooner or later, all operations and covers are blown'.
•Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 (TEFRA):
Federal legislation which reversed some earlier tax reductions, established a 10% withholding tax applicable to dividends, repealed accelerated appreciation deductions and provided that American taxpayers must report all sources of income, wherever it was earned anywhere in the world.
Federal legislation which reversed some earlier tax reductions, established a 10% withholding tax applicable to dividends, repealed accelerated appreciation deductions and provided that American taxpayers must report all sources of income, wherever it was earned anywhere in the world.
It follows that all receipts received by US
taxpayers since the passage of this Act which have not been reported to
the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) are taxable, which means that all US
taxpayer holdings in offshore accounts that have not been declared for
tax are liable for US tax and also for penalties. It also means that
‘program’ participants expecting their funds eventually to be paid into
offshore accounts may not only be in denial about the fact that they
have been scammed, but may have also allowed themselves to become
co-conspirators in tax evasion with the perpetrators of the scams
themselves. It is standard criminalist practice to procure that targeted
victims are enticed into compromising themselves by the perpetrators.
•Terrorism Prevention Act of 1996:
This legislation added terrorism-related crimes as predicates for money-laundering. Madinger and Sydney A. Zalopany, ‘Money Laundering: A Guide for Criminal Investigators’, New York: CRC Press, LLC, 1999, page 43.
This legislation added terrorism-related crimes as predicates for money-laundering. Madinger and Sydney A. Zalopany, ‘Money Laundering: A Guide for Criminal Investigators’, New York: CRC Press, LLC, 1999, page 43.
•Transparency:
(1): In Financial Reporting: Ease of understanding, made possible by FULL, CLEAR and TIMELY disclosure of relevant information.
(2): In Securities Transactions, price transparency means access to information concerning the depth of the market that would enable detection of fraud or manipulation. Source: John Downes and Jordan Elliot Goodman, ‘Dictionary of Finance and Investment Terms’, 7th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2006, s.v. ‘Transparency’.
(1): In Financial Reporting: Ease of understanding, made possible by FULL, CLEAR and TIMELY disclosure of relevant information.
(2): In Securities Transactions, price transparency means access to information concerning the depth of the market that would enable detection of fraud or manipulation. Source: John Downes and Jordan Elliot Goodman, ‘Dictionary of Finance and Investment Terms’, 7th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2006, s.v. ‘Transparency’.
•Trust Indenture Act of 1939:
This legislation supplemented the Securities Act of 1933, requiring the appointment of a suitably independent and qualified trustee to act for the benefit of the holders of securities. The legislation specified certain substantive provisions for such a trust indenture that must be entered into by the issuer and the trustee. The law is administered by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
This legislation supplemented the Securities Act of 1933, requiring the appointment of a suitably independent and qualified trustee to act for the benefit of the holders of securities. The legislation specified certain substantive provisions for such a trust indenture that must be entered into by the issuer and the trustee. The law is administered by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
•Truth in Lending Act:
Federal legislation which established disclosure rules that lenders must observe in dealings with borrowers. The Act stipulates that consumers must be told annual percentage rates, potential total cost, and any special loan terms. Source: John Downes and Jordan Elliot Goodman, ‘Dictionary of Finance and Investment Terms’, 7th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2006, s.v. ‘Consumer Protection Act of 1968’.
Federal legislation which established disclosure rules that lenders must observe in dealings with borrowers. The Act stipulates that consumers must be told annual percentage rates, potential total cost, and any special loan terms. Source: John Downes and Jordan Elliot Goodman, ‘Dictionary of Finance and Investment Terms’, 7th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2006, s.v. ‘Consumer Protection Act of 1968’.
•Truth in Lending Act (TILA) of 1968:
This legislation is designed to protect consumers involved in all kinds of credit transactions, including (and especially) mortgages. It is contained in Title 1 of the Consumer Credit Protection Act as amended. The purpose of the legislation is to promote the informed use of consumer credit by requiring disclosures about its terms, and gives consumers the right to cancel certain credit transactions that may involve a lien on the consumer’s principal home. It regulates certain credit card practices, and provides a mechanism for the fair and timely resolution of credit disputes. The law requires the uniform and standardised disclosure of costs and charges so that consumers can shop around (thereby promoting competition). The legislation further prohibits certain practices associated with credit secured on a consumer’s principal dwelling. The lender must disclose to the borrower the annual percentage rate charged (APR), which must reflect the cost of the credit to the consumer. The legislation proved ineffective in curbing the abuses which were highlighted as a consequence of the corruption exposures, because many mortgage lenders failed to comply with the Act’s disclosure provisions, and were not prosecuted or penalised accordingly.
This legislation is designed to protect consumers involved in all kinds of credit transactions, including (and especially) mortgages. It is contained in Title 1 of the Consumer Credit Protection Act as amended. The purpose of the legislation is to promote the informed use of consumer credit by requiring disclosures about its terms, and gives consumers the right to cancel certain credit transactions that may involve a lien on the consumer’s principal home. It regulates certain credit card practices, and provides a mechanism for the fair and timely resolution of credit disputes. The law requires the uniform and standardised disclosure of costs and charges so that consumers can shop around (thereby promoting competition). The legislation further prohibits certain practices associated with credit secured on a consumer’s principal dwelling. The lender must disclose to the borrower the annual percentage rate charged (APR), which must reflect the cost of the credit to the consumer. The legislation proved ineffective in curbing the abuses which were highlighted as a consequence of the corruption exposures, because many mortgage lenders failed to comply with the Act’s disclosure provisions, and were not prosecuted or penalised accordingly.
•Underwrite:
To assume the risk of buying a NEW ISSUE of securities from an issuing corporation or Government entity and reselling the securities to the public, either directly or through dealers. The underwriter makes a profit on the difference between the price paid to the issuer and the Public Offering Price, called the Underwriting Spread. Source: John Downes and Jordan Elliot Goodman, ‘Dictionary of Finance and Investment Terms’, 7th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2006, s.v. ‘Underwrite’.
To assume the risk of buying a NEW ISSUE of securities from an issuing corporation or Government entity and reselling the securities to the public, either directly or through dealers. The underwriter makes a profit on the difference between the price paid to the issuer and the Public Offering Price, called the Underwriting Spread. Source: John Downes and Jordan Elliot Goodman, ‘Dictionary of Finance and Investment Terms’, 7th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2006, s.v. ‘Underwrite’.
•Underwriting Spread: See ‘Underwrite’ above.
•Vault Cash Act of 1959:
This legislation modified the reserve requirements of Federal Reserve member banks to allow the banks to count their vault cash, in excess of specified percentages of their deposits, as part of their required reserves. This was one of innumerable retrograde modifications since the Second World War which have facilitated covert financial operations, to the detriment of global financial stability and integrity. Source: Munn, ‘Encyclopedia of Banking & Finance’, page 589.
This legislation modified the reserve requirements of Federal Reserve member banks to allow the banks to count their vault cash, in excess of specified percentages of their deposits, as part of their required reserves. This was one of innumerable retrograde modifications since the Second World War which have facilitated covert financial operations, to the detriment of global financial stability and integrity. Source: Munn, ‘Encyclopedia of Banking & Finance’, page 589.
********************************************************************************************
No comments:
Post a Comment