Feds Protect Their Turf By Re-classifying Patriots As
'Domestic Terrorists'
For all of you who do not know who the BLM is...............
The Bureau of Land Management is assumed falsely to be an actual de jure lawful agency of a lawful constitutional governing body.
The BLM is in fact, a de facto fraudulent usurper and not in any way a lawful Constitutionally recognized agency of the Constitutional Republic.
BLM is actually a sub-corporation of UNITED STATES INCORPORATED, a private foreign owned off-shore corporation since its last incorporation in 1925, copyrighted, trademarked and registered in Puerto Rico.
Under the Reorganization Act of Washington District of Columbia, by it’s own private business charter, neither the BLM, nor any other federal/corporate agency has lawful/legal authority, jurisdiction or interstate nexus within the 50 state geographical landmass.
BLM, is actually classified as an: “Agent of Foreign Principle”, under the intergovernmental Personnel Act.
In other words, they don’t represent the Constitutional Republic or the interests of the American People but rather, a foreign owned principle i.e., the international banking/military corporate cartel of London City, England known as Crown Corporation as their supreme authority.
This has been openly admitted and exposed through Supreme Court cases since and even before 1938.
NOTE: It is now illegal to mention any of these pre-1938 Supreme Court citations in a current court of law in Amerika.
That should prove everything to you right there.
This private criminal foreign owned off-shore corporation (USA Inc.) has in fact, invaded and usurped our Constitutional Republic like a cancer invading a host body since 1871 to present.
The core issue here is that the BLM must be exposed for the invading criminal usurpers that they are. They have no legal/lawful standing and must be deemed as an invading hostile corporate/military enemy of We The People.
This is no different than having a snake-pit of London Banksters coming to Nevada to lord over the Bundy family, which is exactly who the real bosses of the BLM actually are by-the-way.
The only issue that should be addressed is, does the BLM have legal standing?
The answer is: No, they do not have legal standing and they know it. They just hope the American People never come to that realization.
It’s time for the American People to learn the actual truth about our real history as a nation and not all the myths and lies spewed out by our fascist/marxist collectivist controlled school systems.
**********************
Feds Protect Their Turf By Re-classifying Patriots
As 'Domestic Terrorists'
Friday, February 05, 2016 11:39 AM
Feds Protect Their Turf By Re-classifying Patriots
As 'Domestic Terrorists'
Technocracy News
Now that American civilian constitutionalists are being classified as “terrorists,” it is time to reconsider what is truly going on in the Middle East. Perhaps those “terrorists” are more like our patriots that we care to consider. The “war on terror” is a war on civilian nationalists, ever-malleable in its definition, conducted without any constitutional authority, oversight, or constraint.
Kirk F. MacKenzie. All rights reserved.
Citizens Newswire(tm) is a free, volunteer digest of news & views you won't hear on TV.
It spans a wide array of topics regarding the future of our world. Unsubscribe using
the following link, or by emailing me a request.
Kirk@SilentNoMorePublications
TN Note: This is a most dangerous precedent when the government turns its forces against its own citizens. With anti-government sentiments already running so high in America, this could result in a massive confrontation if not checked.
The U.S. Justice Department is considering legal changes to combat what it sees as a rising threat from domestic 'anti-government extremists', senior officials told Reuters, even as it steps up efforts to stop Islamic State-inspired attacks at home.
'Extremist groups' motivated by a range of U.S.-born philosophies present a “clear and present danger,” John Carlin, the Justice Department’s chief of national security, told Reuters in an interview. “Based on recent reports and the cases we are seeing, it seems like we’re in a heightened environment.”
Over the past year, the Justice Department has brought charges against domestic extremist suspects accused of attempting to bomb U.S. military bases, kill police officers and fire bomb a school and other buildings in a predominantly Muslim town in New York state.
But federal prosecutors tackling domestic extremists still lack an important legal tool they have used extensively in dozens of prosecutions against Islamic State-inspired suspects: a law that prohibits supporting designated terrorist groups.
Carlin and other Justice Department officials declined to say if they would ask Congress for a comparable domestic extremist statute, or comment on what other changes they might pursue to toughen the fight against anti-government extremists.
The U.S. State Department designates international terrorist organizations to which it is illegal to provide “material support.” No domestic groups have that designation, helping to create a disparity in charges faced by international extremist suspects compared to domestic ones.
A Reuters analysis of more than 100 federal cases found that domestic terrorism suspects collectively have faced less severe charges than those accused of acting on behalf of Islamic State since prosecutors began targeting that group in early 2014.
The Justice Department aggressively pursued domestic extremists after Timothy McVeigh bombed a federal building in Oklahoma City in 1995, killing 168 people.
The government shifted its focus to international terrorism after al Qaeda killed nearly 3,000 Americans on Sept. 11, 2001.
But in recent years anti-government activists, like those who occupied a wildlife preserve in eastern Oregon last month, have regained prominence.
https://www.technocracy.news/
Kirk F. MacKenzie. All rights reserved.
Citizens Newswire(tm) is a free, volunteer digest of news & views you won't hear on TV.
It spans a wide array of topics regarding the future of our world. Unsubscribe using
the following link, or by emailing me a request.
Kirk@SilentNoMorePublications
3 comments:
"By continuing to hold him in prison you are committing the crime of barratry."
http://annavonreitz.com/ammonbundylawyer.pdf
Well at this point, would you not presume that Judge Darby, Grover and all the real judges in oregon already know that. They don't need a non sworn judge to tell anyone.
I've said it before many times and I'll do it again. The way this "Judge" is intervening right now is dangerous and not beneficial. Most people grow up their whole lives not knowing they are incorporated federal citizens, and just because that is so doesn't mean you can avoid the penalty.
By definition of the law, you are a federal united states citizen unless and until you can prove otherwise. If you insist that you are not and try to play around with these courts, like the court of Portland, you risk immediate torture or solitary confinement or worse.
It is their right to detain federal citizens and do what they wish with them in prison. The only right you have is to whether you are officially prosecuted as a federal citizen, people need to cease pretending otherwise.
If you go in there to make a point you will be tortured. The courts of Oregon do not even recognize international civil standards and on top of that, these are actual federal citizens. Nothing about them shows any proof they are not.
This is a very dangerous game when you are playing with fire. The only way to legally exit Babylon is narrow indeed, and you have to willingly dissolve the incorporation of your status in court. This is the only known way in fact to avoid going under the knife and is the only method that works. If by law after you dissolve your status, you still feel wronged and you go back in there to pick a fight with them many have been tortured.
It isn't worth even the trouble...Get the hell out of Babylon (shred the number) and don't keep going back like this judge would insist. Indict all the officials who have wronged Bundy in some way, after he is safely far away from that group of administrator courts!
Fed's protect their turf? Their turf is 10 miles square. I suggest they go back there and stay in it!
So lets see how this works.
They define Patriot and then they define Domestic Terrorist.
Someone wakes up and after drinking their cup of coffee decides they are the first definition so they must be the second definition.
Someone in essence decides that another One unknown to them can give a word a definition and without putting gun to head, they will accept the word and the definition to describe their self, so they can be associated with the second definition so they can get on the internet and complain about being identified with the word, that they them self, gave them self?
Did I get that right?
If one does not know their self, then they can be called anything someone else wants to call them and they will accept that as who they are.
Doesn't sound like any free thinking people to me, who can be controlled by a word they decide to place upon their own forehead to claim it applies to them.
Those type of people need to be governed so someone can continue to control their mind, as they cannot think for their selves.
Ain't nothing wrong with that.
You either can or you can't.
You either will or you won't.
You can think for yourself or let someone think for you.
I have corrected many who pretend to have authority and think they have the power to give me a label I do not accept.
If I don't accept the label then it's not mine.
Almost like the kid's rhyme.
I'm rubber and you're glue.
Everything you say, bounces off me and sticks to you.
Too bad people grow up and miss the simple lessons of life.
If I say, 'Your momma!', are you made at me now?
For some it's too late, but they come here anyway thinking they can catch up on what they should already know by now.
I hope they can.
Post a Comment