About me and the NLA:
I TRIED to work with NLA early on. I also in good
faith delivered a wet-ink signed and thumb-printed and sealed copy of our
affidavit of probable cause to John Daresh, but nothing was done about our
affidavit---which has been published as "You Know Something Is Wrong When....An
American Affidavit of Probable Cause" available on Amazon.com.
When I attempted to contact NLA regarding their silence and inaction with
regard to the grave accusations of criminality our affidavit raised, they hung
up on me. A couple weeks later, Mr. Gary Jolly, contacted me and said something
inane like, "we know who you are and we don't trust you"--- as if this was an
excuse for failure to address capital crime?
I also rubbed them the wrong way when I revealed that the Common Law Grand
Jury is only about one-fourth of the Common Law Court System we are owed, and
without the Common Law Judges (properly called Common Law Justices) and Trial
Juries and Clerks and other members of the Common Law Courts including the
Sheriffs operating the land jurisdiction of this country, the Common Law Grand
Juries have no enforcement capability. They can hand down their findings, and
the "District Attorney" can ignore them, so that the entire effort goes astray
and has no teeth.
Therefore I pointed out the need to elect people to fill the other,
additional vacated Public Offices we are owed and to re-established the American
Common Law Court System that is supposed to be in place and acting in support of
the Common Law Grand Juries. Mr. Daresh and Mr. Jolly would hear none of it.
Three years have gone by with the Citizens Common Law Grand Juries being
set up and spinning their wheels, accomplishing nothing much for all their work
and good will. Meanwhile, those who waved good-bye to NLA and proceeded to set
up their counties on the land and elect and fill the vacated Public Offices have
made great strides. They are actively setting up and restoring County-level
government and educating people all over this country, while NLA continues to
accomplish.......what?
As a result of all this, I have grave concerns about NLA's leadership.
Some months ago, I heard that John Daresh is actually a Bar Attorney from New
York named John Vidurek. So I asked him, up front, in good faith--- just
wanting to know the truth of the matter. He refused to answer me, but he did
answer Rodger Dowdell in Florida, that yes, this is so. His given name was John
Vidurek and yes, he is from New York and yes, he is a Bar Attorney.
To me, a Bar Card is a strong indicator that Mr. Daresh may not
be operating in good faith.
A second indicator is that he has adopted a nom de guerre that has
nothing whatsoever to do with his real name.
Third, why quote me out of context in a major Writ of Mandamus and not even
bother to contact me, yet leave it seeming that I was involved? That doesn't
add up, either.
Fourth, why harbor vaguely stated and semi-threatening "suspicions" such as
Gary Jolly expressed toward me? Honest men ask honest questions. They don't
hide behind vague insinuations.
A fifth concern about NLA leadership is the lack of progress by the CLGJ
organizations in the states where NLA is in control of the CLGJ's compared to
what is going on in other states where people have struck off and done it
without NLA's "help and direction". These spin off groups are miles ahead in
addressing the real problems we are facing.
A sixth concern in NLA's failure to admit and educate people regarding
the fact that the CLGJ's are just a part--- about one quarter-- of the Common
Law Court System that we are owed and which we need up and fully functioning to
give the CLGJ's both teeth and administrative support. How can you run a wagon
train with one-wheeled carts?
A seventh concern is NLA's complete lack of response to a signed, sealed,
witnessed affidavit of probable cause that has been exhaustively researched and
demonstrated. We brought forward damning evidence of immense, systemic,
institutionalized fraud--- fraud against the Republic, fraud against the probate
and bankruptcy courts, fraud against American States and American people---- and
NLA puts the blinkers on and pretends it never heard a word?
So we are supposed to ignore capital level crimes, including war crimes,
being committed by foreign banks and their storefront organizations run as
"governmental services corporations" because......? Why?
If it is NOT the job of the CLGJ's to investigate crimes against Americans,
just exactly what does Mr. Daresh propose that their job is? To stand around
issuing pointless documents filled with ignorance and outrage so that his
buddies down at the local Bar Association can have a good laugh?
Daresh is a Bar Attorney. He knows better than to send a Writ of Mandamus
to an Admiralty Court. He was playing everyone for laughs. He was saying, "Oh,
look at this, boys! These people are SO clueless, SO dumb, that they are going
to put their time and energy into doing this! Hahahahahah! --- And for EXTRA
fun, I am going to sign Anna's name to it and take her work out of context, so
everyone can laugh at her, too! Hahahahahahah!"
I believe that many, many of the people in NLA are wonderful, patriotic,
well-intentioned, and determined. I believe that the vast majority are trying in
good faith to make a badly needed difference and to fill in a very necessary
Public Office---- but I also believe that they are being purposefully limited
and misguided by leaders who have their own contrary agenda, which is simply to
keep the horse in the barn and not let the CLGJ's function as they could and
ought to, and also prevent people from addressing the need to restore the ENTIRE
American Common Law Court System which is owed and needed to make the work of
the Common Law Grand Juries count.
The way things are run under Daresh, you might as well be riding
unicycles. It's entertaining, but without the other "wheels" of the American
Common Law Courts in place---- the Justices, the Clerks, the Recorders, the
Bailiffs, the Sheriffs operating on the land jurisdiction, and the Trial
Juries----you are stuck, chasing around in circles without enforcement, wasting
your time. Apparently, that kind of window dressing role is what Mr. Daresh
wants. Just "be there" appearing to do something and creating an illusion of
remedy, while in fact providing no real alternative to the Admiralty Court and
Administrative Court System at all.
If the CLGJ's were operating as they should, as part of the American Common
Law Court System, they would hand down orders to a Sheriff operating on the
jurisdiction of the land of this country, and the Sheriff would bring the orders
to a Common Law Justice who would issue the warrants for arrest and to Public
Prosecutors who would prepare the discovery subpoenas and complaints, and this
would all wind up in front of a Jury of Twelve Honest Peers who would review the
facts and hand down a decision for the Justice to read in open court on the
record and execute. That is how it is supposed to work.
As it is, the CLGJ's are misguided to function as laughingstocks for the
Bar Members and spend their days making pleas to District Attorneys who ignore
the CLGJ's just like they ignore everyone else, and writing Writs in Law
addressed to Admiralty Courts that can't even hear a Land Writ.
Sigh. So, there is my assessment of the current status of the CLGJ's and
their role under the limitations imposed by John Daresh and NLA---- and right
where they are is where they are likely to stay, in my opinion, until or unless
people wake up a second time and realize that they are spinning their wheels at
a moment in history when they ought to be making desperately needed progress.
NLA could be instrumental in restoring the entire American Common Law
Court System, in reviving and restoring the land-based government we are
owed---- but that isn't where the NLA leadership has gone and that doesn't
appear to be where they are going.
---------------------------------------
See this article and over 100 others on Anna's website here:www.annavonreitz.com
19 comments:
Seems to me the NLA and Judge Anna are in the same boat. I have seen more than several states operating their own common law courts and juries now.
First I have heard of any of these outfits needing to re-establish a nationwide common law court system.
Have healthy skepticism of the Judge anna's of this world.
They speak all the same things you already know and strum to the tune of their own agenda. Pay attention, heed what you hear but don't follow the messenger if avoidable.
Here we have one pretend legal authority (Anna von Reitz) trashing another phony, John Darash (real name Vidurek). Both have lost in real courts.
Anon 9:58,... and what do you refer to when you state that both have lost in 'real' courts. Would the courts you refer to, be Corporate Courts,... you know the ones who have usurped the real law, the Common Law, from the American people? The ones of Admiralty Law? The Law of the SEA? Seems that you have some need to research. Perhaps a 'serving' of Chris Anne Hall would meet your 'search'.
Slaveman, do you have a clue what "common Law" means?
What you call "Corporate Courts" are the real courts, where legal disputes are resolved and criminal cases are settled. Both "Judge" Anna and the National Liberty Alliance are poseurs, who take your money and get you deeper into debt and into trouble.
Anna loses here: https://www.ustaxcourt.gov/InternetOrders/DocumentViewer.aspx?IndexSearchableOrdersID=108275
Vidurek/Darash loses here:http://law.justia.com/cases/new-york/appellate-division-third-department/2013/515292.html
and here: http://law.justia.com/cases/new-york/appellate-term-second-department/2006/2006-51411.html
and here: http://law.justia.com/cases/new-york/other-courts/2013/2013-ny-slip-op-23169.html
and here:http://www.plainsite.org/dockets/2ergdtjb9/new-york-southern-district-court/vidurek-et-al-v-miller-et-al/
etc.
Huge win for America yesterday in the Lufkin,Texas case. Feds have NO jurisdiction in ANY state of the union! Common Law takes precedence-must read. Judge Ana this is an excellent piece. You are so right here. I have not been able to figure out why? NLA has not gotten further til now either. Especially when they seem to be working for the same cause here. I am not real happy at this moment as last month I sent them a donation,which I could not afford to do. With a little hesitation,hoping and praying they were working with you. I would say John Daresh has some major explaining to do or tear up your damn bar card and do the right thing here. Damnit!
Anon-9:58 AM-keep your head in the sand son.
Therein lies the problem. Anyone who knows anything about law knows that they are NOT maritime/admiralty courts. Corporate law and maritime law are two totally separate arms of the law. This fake judge has no credibility among anyone who can think for themselves because they know this. Nobody can produce any statutory authority or corporate charter that created a corporation that made the president its ceo, congress its corporate rulemakers, and the federal courts its administrative (or MARITIME, LO ) tribunals. And don't say the Act of 1871. You can't show me anywhere in that act it says that. Furthermore, that act has been repealed by the Act of 1874. Until the fake judge learns real law, nobody should pay any attention to her.
And yet you can't produce any rational points to support this. Talk about having your head in the sand.
Anon 2:46 pm
Is your "huge win" this pile of dung? https://supremecourtcase.wordpress.com/
Real courts?? What do you consider a real court?? Where??
Shrill
How about the Prime Law?
THE PRIME LAW
Article I: No person, group of persons or government shall initiate force, or threat of force or fraud against any individual's self, property or contract.
Article II: Force is morally and legally justified only for protection from those who violate Article I
Article III: No exceptions shall exist for Article I and II
Where? Look at the left column of this blog under De Jure Republic document links and read the last 3 documents. That is a real court and tells you where.
Dear Judge Anna, thank you for the information about NLA. I know anytime action is taken with a hidden agenda efforts are sure to fail. I believe John Daresh and his internet radio sidekick's true intention has nothing to do with freedom or common law but is to convert the country to christianity. The calls I have been on open with a long christian prayer, plenty of scripture quotes which often include other christian's opinion and further christian dogma. Often it felt like one third of the call was christian indoctrination which they believe over time participants will surly "get it". Imo NLA is a good little boys christian cult club that feels entitled and obligated to force their good christian beliefs on the entire country. They make it very clear if you don't like it go somewhere else. Which means let us insult you or go somewhere else.
Wait a minute isn't there a part in the Constitution that says something about freedom of religion? I guess that means freedom of religion as long as it's christian. I believe their interpretation of the Constitution is fuled by arrogance and grandiosity to convert the country to christianity. Like Tim Turner I'm sure they believe there will be some sort of christian reward waiting when they have converted the whole country.
I unknowingly called my NLA state Rep one night when I was supposed to be on John Daresh's good christian prayer call and his wife kindly took my name and number and he never returned my call, I'm sure because he knew I wasn't christian. This is the same good old boy christian treatment I got from Tim Turner's cult not long after they made a rule where you couldn't hold an office unless you were christian.
Thanks again
Please give me insight as to why this is a "pile of dung". I really need to know for a reason; I'm not trying to start an argument..just need to know the facts. It looks like it is a big win for all of us; is it not real? Please respond honestly and kindly. Thanks.
Simple, if you send a letter a letter to someone demanding money, and they do not reply within your deadline, you get nothing, and you have no claim for anything and you could be charged with simulating a legal process.
Try to collect.
Sorry, but neither John Daresh and his NLA nor Tim Turner or any of the above have a thing to do with christianity.
The combination of christianity and islam is NOT a religion, is NOT a faith......It is an abomination most likely.
And I have never heard this alaska judge or other judge from iowa denounce it. Just wanted to make this abundantly clear.
What the NLA is promoting is NOT anything to do with true common law, which is already active in the courts. And the two faiths of Christianity or Islam should never ever be mixed together.
Do you know of a case where someone was actually charged with simulating a legal process? Maybe I'm a little dense & still thinking in regards to the present legal system; could you not collect using the legal system ...say small claims court. You then show the judge that you did try to collect without using the courts....like on Judge Judy. Sorry if I'm ignorant to your thought process on this.
Post a Comment