Legal Reality Changing the Conversation |
1 October A.D. 2016 [GMT] |
No real surprise here: The good Chief Justice Moore (AL) has been suspended |
Here's a generic search string. There are already several
stories. No doubt there are more to be written. https://startpage.com/do/ Let's review, briefly, why this is of no real surprise. Scripture stopped being relevant circa 1965, when we, as a nation, abandoned God's system of honest weights and measures and starting using, instead, the banking cabal's "funny money." With the Money (or "funny money") goes the foundational "choice of law." So, where we use God's system of honest weights and measures, the foundational "choice of law" is the Common Law, the origin of which is Scripture. And, where, instead, we use the banking cabal's "funny money," the foundational "choice of law" is the Maritime-based set of commercial principles "supplied" by the banking cabal. With every transaction, we "vote" for our "sovereign." We're either "voting" for God as our Sovereign, by using honest weights and measures, or we're "voting" for the banking cabal as our "sovereign," by using their proposed "funny money" system. The good Chief Justice is in wonderful company, for there are still the super-vast majority of minds in this nation who still have no real idea, at all, what the legal principles are on which this present "funny money" system operates. The good Chief Justice affiliates with the Baptist denomination (a denomination with which this author also affiliated for a couple of years), and despite what that denomination teaches from the pulpit each week, what it teaches by its conduct, which conduct includes the use of the banking cabal's "funny money" system, is anti-Scriptural. Part of what is taught from the pulpit, for many denominations, is "Let your yes be yes, and your no, no." This is a huge part of where the good Chief Justice has strayed. It's clear that he has no idea what he's signed up for by taking not only the oath for the "license" (to "practice law" in the "place" called "this state") but also the oath for his present (and now suspended) office. He's bowed his knee(s) to baal by taking that oath (those oaths). What that oath obligates one to support and defend is the banking cabal's policies, part of which are within the banking cabal's de-population agenda, which includes such activities as War, domestic strife (race, gender, sexual orientation, etc.), abortion, and the promotion of the LGBT assault on Scriptural morality. This author, too, had, for a while, taken that very same oath. It was by Divine Intervention that this author's blindness was cured so as to see the hideous grotesqueness that is our present legal reality (as regards the fact that we don't have a "constitution"). The Terre Haute Litigation was the catalyst, which compelled the study that is documented in "We, The Posterity: Voluntary Bondage," by which study it is confirmed that we've never had a "constitution." It was within six months after that book first circulated that this author had resigned his "commission" ("license"). "Choose ye this day" is the resounding concept, and given what it takes to "earn" that "license," it's no small decision. However, the Scriptural line of thought, word, and deed was/is to take no oath to support and defend this present "Beast" system. The good Chief Justice just isn't yet that far along that path. He doesn't yet understand what he's agreed to, and he doesn't yet understand the depth of the breach of that agreement he's committed. It's hoped that one day he may come to terms with at least enough of our present legal reality so as to turn this lemon tree into a lemonade stand. But that is not expected in the near future. Whatever is the purpose of his "trials," here, he's getting an introduction into our present legal reality. It'll be more than the "padded 2x4" this author received. He got that last time, and there wasn't much padding. The more he fights, the more likely is the expectation that by one step at a time, he'll be removed permanently from not only judgeship eligibility but also "licensed" legal services provision eligibility. Yes, this author expects he'll end up losing his "license." We'll see, of course, but since this is his second venture up into the face of the very system he's taken two oaths to support and defend (and "represent" to the nation/world) (the first being his 10 Commandments statue episode) (and, of course, the Believer knows that there are at least 11 Commandments), and unless he's providing evidence of a "change of mind" (toward supporting this "Beast" and its God-hating, America-hating policies), he's extremely likely to loose his judgeship and all future eligibility for holding such office. To save his "license," he'll want to stop fighting the loss of his position. (And, why he'd want to keep the "license," given what one agrees to support and defend, is another really good question, but that's between God and him.) In general, then, he's "gone the way of Saul" as regards the Gibeonites. Israel made that treaty with the Gibeonites, despite God's direct instructions not to do anything of the kind. And, when Saul, several generations later, sought to exterminate the Gibeonites in defiance of that treaty, God put all Israel under the Judgment of Famine. David made inquiry of God about the Famine, and God told him why it had to be. To end the Famine, David took some rather drastic steps, and the then-surviving Gibeonites hanged those seven descendants of Saul's. Tragic end to a tragic episode. The point being this: God is the One holding us to our agreements. It's a huge reason why it matters that we come to accept that "federal" really and truly means "federal," as in "by agreement." It's not just the minions holding us to our agreements; God is also holding us to our agreements. It's His "Beast" system that He's using to accomplish the teaching of that (hard) lesson. Thus, it's precisely because the good Chief Justice has agreed, twice over, to support and defend the "sovereign's" policies, i.e., the banking cabal's policies (how do we know that the banking cabal is the "sovereign?" because we're using the "funny money" supplied by the banking cabal, and it's the "sovereign" who/that/which supplies that commonwealth's "currency"), and then turned right around and defied that agreement, that he's about to be shown the door. "Here's your hat. What's your hurry?" sort of "shown the door." We'll see if he is also disbarred. Down that path, the first step has been taken. He's been suspended from his office. Of course, he'll appeal, and we'll see what the timing is for that and the result. This author doesn't expect he'll ever serve as a judge (at any level), ever again. Tragic but fully consistent with our present legal reality. Those who are the most upset by what's happening to the good (former) Chief Justice need to do everything they can to find ways to stop using the banking cabal's "funny money." Those who are in any way upset by what's happening to the good (former) Chief Justice need to do what they can to find ways to stop using the banking cabal's "funny money." Those not one bit surprised about this, and who don't like what's happening, need to do everything they can to find ways to stop using the banking cabal's "funny money." Those who don't like having the LGBT agenda shoved down their throats need to do everything they can to find ways to stop using the banking cabal's "funny money." For so long as what circulates is "funny money," the "sovereign" is the banking cabal that is providing that medium of exchange. To return God to the position of Sovereign, we've got to start using His system of honest weights and measures. Fearful to fall into hands of the Living God. Harmon L. Taylor Legal Reality Dallas Texas Subscribe / unsubscribe : legal_reality@earthlink.net Legal Reality Email Resource page: http://home.earthlink.net/~ |
No comments:
Post a Comment