Tuesday, July 25, 2017

BREAKING! Executive Agreement


FYI: For the Information of the People of the united States

Executive  Agreement

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
This article is about executive agreements between nations in general. For information on executive agreements in US foreign policy, see Foreign policy of the United States.
An executive agreement[1] is an agreement between the heads of government of two or more nations that has not been ratified by the legislature as treaties are ratified. 

Executive agreements are considered politically binding to distinguish them from treaties which are legally binding.

In the United States, executive agreements are made solely by the President of the United States. They are one of three mechanisms by which the United States enters into binding international obligations. 

Some authors consider executive agreements to be treaties under international law in that they bind both the United States and another sovereign state. However, under United States constitutional law, executive agreements are not considered treaties for the purpose of the Treaty Clause of the United States Constitution, which requires the advice and consent of two-thirds of the Senate to qualify as a treaty.

Some other nations have similar provisions with regard to the ratification of treaties.

Contents
In General

Executive agreements are often used in order to bypass the requirements of national constitutions for ratification of treaties. Many nations that are republics with written constitutions have constitutional rules about the ratification of treaties. The Organization for Security and Co-Operation in Europe is based on executive agreements.

In the United States
 
In the United States, executive agreements are binding internationally if they are negotiated and entered into under the president's authority in foreign policy, as commander-in-chief of the armed forces, or from a prior act of Congress. 

For instance, as commander-in-chief the President negotiates and enters into status of forces agreements (SOFAs) which govern the treatment and disposition of U.S. forces stationed in other nations. 

An executive agreement, however, cannot go beyond the President's constitutional powers. An agreement that is beyond the President's authority would require congressional approval, either as a congressional-executive agreement or a treaty with Senate advice and consent. 

If an agreement was neither within the competence of Congress nor within the authority of the President (as for example an agreement which would affect powers reserved to the states), it could still be adopted by the President/Senate method but must not conflict with the United States Constitution

The Supreme Court in U.S. v. Pink (1942) held that international executive agreements validly made have the same legal status as treaties and did not require Senate approval.

The Case Act of 1972 required the president to inform the Senate within 60 days of any executive agreement being made. No restriction was placed on presidential powers to make such agreements. The notification requirement enabled Congress to vote to cancel an executive agreement, or to refuse to fund its implementation.[2]  

References
  1. Jump up ^ Green, William (2004). Schultz, David; Vile, John R., eds. The Encyclopedia of Civil Liberties in America. Armonk, NY: Routledge. pp. 345–348. ISBN 9781317457138. Retrieved 25 April 2016. 
  2. Jump up ^ Case Act on Executive Agreements (1972)

See also

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_agreement

5 comments:

  1. When the Lord God appoints, anoints and directs the affairs of a nation and its Leader, and the people of that nation seek His face, He will always come up with a way to defeat the plans of the STUPID ENEMY - within and without. The above perfectly illustrates that plan to defeat what belongs to the people, in this case the RV. Obama and his criminal cohorts - in the CON-gress and otherwise - input into 'obamacare' that the RV will NEVER be allowed to take place in this nation. This is only ONE of the multiple reasons why it was so important to totally repeal 'obamacare.' There are many provisions in bozocare that are diametrically AGAINST the American people, why Nancy Pelosi refused to allow even more of the CON-gress to read and study it, saying 'you'll find out AFTER you pass this bill' (https://youtu.be/hV-05TLiiLU) Forget Snopes-they are the 'enemy' proven over and over. Rejoice that the Lord showed a way to overcome the bozo devil's plans.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Here's another way- Have President Trump write and sign an executive order that nullifies and makes obsolete the previous ObastardCare law, and kite it over night like 'O' did, an eye for an eye, and make it so an injunction cannot be ratified interfering with the new executive order, or outside source involvement, and above all LIFE imprisonment IF anyone tries to interfere......

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Great idea! I will get your comment to the appropriate individuals for their consideration. Appreciate you very much! Blessings!

      Delete
  3. Olive Oyl, you are so very welcome-It is a game of 'return the favor', if you will, and would be very surprised if Trump didn't think of this himself- The shadow government will never know what hit them!! We appreciate all that you do to make this site 'the''site', for all REAL information!! Love, Terry and Jody!--

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sent the suggestion off shortly after our last 'conversation'. If not before, hopefully will be on the table for consideration tomorrow morning! Love you guys.

      Delete