Who and what is the IRS?

Who and what is the IRS?


..What is the United States of America? As it turns out, there
are two entities called the "United States of America". The first
and original, mentioned in the Preamble and Article II of the
Constitution of the United States, was formally created in the
Articles of Confederation. But some time after the Civil War,
probably early in the twentieth century, a second "United States
of America" came into being. The second is a political alliance or
compact of the insular possessions of the United States.

Here I'm going to introduce evidence secured by John M. Ohman, an
Idaho Falls, Idaho attorney. In the case styled Diversified Metal
Products, Inc. v. T-Bow Company Trust, Internal Revenue Service,
and Steve Morgan, case CV93-4117, filed in the District Court of
the Seventh Judicial District of the State of Idaho, the Booneville
County Magistrates Court, Ohman filed an impleader petition.

Diversified Metal was served a notice of levy for money owed to
the T-Bow Trust. In order to determine rightful ownership, Ohman
filed the interpleader action on behalf of Diversified Metal. In
his complaint, he stipulated facts. His fact #4 is as follows:
"Defendant Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is an agency of the United
States government(tm)"

In her January 24, 2000 response, U.S. Attorney Betty H. Richardson
made the following correction to Ohman's averment: "Denies that
the Internal Revenue Service is an agency of the United States
Government but admits that the United States of America would be
a proper party to this action."

This is something I've tried to impress on people for most of two
years, but few grasp the implications: The Constitution of the
United States creates and vests authority in a governmental entity
known as the "United States" or "United States Government." While
it is "for" the United States of America, the Constitution vests
absolutely no authority in the United States of America. Any time
the United States prosecutes as case, whether civil or criminal,
it must be in the name and by authority of the United States, not
the United States of America. The only place the "United States
of America" has any standing is in territorial courts in insular
possessions of the United States, then the styling must be, "United
States of America, ss, President of the United States". See title
48 of the United States Code for particulars relating to Puerto
Rican and Virgin Islands courts.

If we read notes following the current 18 U.S.C. Section 1001,
we find that the "United States of America" is currently defined
as an agency of the United States. [PP NOTE: see definition of
"agency" at 18 U.S.C. Section 6]. In the context of the Downes
v. Bidwell decision, we find that these insular possessions, which
are not incorporated in the constitutional scheme, are "foreign"
to the United States, i.e., to the Union of States. Therefore, this
political alliance or compact known as the United States of America,
which first appeared in 1918 legislation, is a government foreign
to the United States and the several States even though the member
insular possessions belong to the United States.

The Richardson correction above verifies that the Internal Revenue
Service is not an agency of United States Government, but the United
States of America, clearly a distinct and different entity, would
be a party of interest. It would be difficult to be any clearer on
the subject, and the Rechardson correction tells us that people
such as U.S. Attorneys, attorneys in the Department of Justice,
and Federal judges are fully aware of the difference.

Michael Bufkin, a Dundee, Illinois attorney, undertook a delightful
project. On December 18, 1998, he sent a Freedom of Information Act
request to the Department of the Treasury asking for documentation of
authority for the Department of Justice to defend Internal Revenue
Service personnel in civil or criminal cases. In an August 2,
1999 response, Leslie Howard in the national IRS office responded
with the following: "A search was performed with the Office of Tax
Crimes (Criminal Investigation) and with the Assistant Chief Counsel
(Disclosure Litigation) and we have no documents responsible to
your request. However, you may forward a copy of your request to
the U.S. Attorney General's Office within the Department of Justice."

Bufkin did just that. In response to his September 21, 1999 FOIA
to the Attorney General, Thomas J. McIntrye informed Bufkin that,
"We have conducted a search of the appropriate indices to Criminal
Division records and did not locate any records responsive to
your request."

We don't know who has lawful authority to defend IRS personnel,
but the Department of Justice and U.S. Attorneys don't. Possibly
the foreign "United States of America" that is principal of interest
and benefits from IRS initiatives has a raft of attorneys ready to
defend these foreign agents.

As chance would have it, one of the people in our group recently
received certification of documents on IRS Austin Region stationary
that is headed, "United States of America, Department of the
Treasury, Internal Revenue Service". The certification letters are
dated November 16, 1999.

What we are dealing with amounts to invasion of a foreign government
accommodated by our respective State governments...

Read more here:
<http://usa-the-republic.com/revenue/who%20and%20what%20is%20the%20irs.html>

==============================

===============
No law compels a private-sector non-governmentally-privileged work eligible man or woman to submit a form W-4 or W-9 (or their equivalents), nor to obtain or disclose an SSN as a condition of being hired or keeping one's job. With the exception of an order from a court of competent jurisdiction issued by a duly qualified judge, no amounts can be lawfully taken from one's pay (for taxes, fees or other charges) without the worker's explicit, intentional, knowing, voluntary, written consent.
http://www.preferredservices.org/NonconsensualTaking.html