Media Blackout? Obama’s Supreme Court Hearing Was Friday –
Decision On Tuesday
|
http://shiftshaper.org/freeatlast/2013/02/16/media-blackout-obamas-supreme-court-hearing-was-friday-decision-on-tuesday/
Media Blackout? Obama’s Supreme Court Hearing Was Friday – Decision On Tuesday Leave a reply For all the ridiculous stories that are pumped through the media airways, one would think they could at least squeeze THIS story in somewhere? We are talking about the President of the United States of America, the Full Supreme Court, and complete with possible involvement of the CIA nominee John Brennan, and no one in our pathetic media feels this is news worthy? “Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, the Hon. John Roberts has scheduled to hear a case by attorney Orly Taitz dealing with Barack Hussein Obama’s use of forged IDs to be heard in conference before the United States Full Supreme Court.” The Hon. John Roberts, Chief Justice has scheduled to hear case regarding Obama’s forged IDs in conference before the Full Supreme Court Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, the Hon. John Roberts has scheduled to hear a case by attorney Orly Taitz dealing with Barack Hussein Obama’s use of forged IDs to be heard in conference before the United States Full Supreme Court. A Congressional Petition has been posted online replacing the Taitz petition that was removed from WhiteHouse.GOV. This new Congressional Petition has taken on a life of its own! The birther case became less a source of entertainment when New York Times best-selling author Jerome Corsi suggested that the president’s nominee to head the Central Intelligence Agency, John Brennan, may have played a role in removing birther evidence from Barack Obama‘s passport records. It appears that in 2008, a State Department insider was simultaneously employed by Analysis Corporation of McLean, Va. (then headed by Mr. Brennan) and was reprimanded for accessing (and possibly altering) Obama’s passport records. It is likely that the overwhelming information coming from credible parties cannot be ignored any longer and it might be the reason behind the decision by the Hon. Chief Justice John Roberts to grant Taitz a full Supreme Court Conference on February 15, 2013. This story will be updated as the events evolve. The case titled Noonan, Judd, MacLeran, Taitz v Bowen provides a mountain of evidence of Barack Obama using a last name not legally his, forged Selective Service application, forged long form and short form birth certificate and a Connecticut Social Security number 042-68-4425 which was never assigned to him according to E-Verify and SSNVS. Additionally, this case provides evidence of around one and a half million invalid voter registrations in the state of California alone.Please, keep in mind, Richard Nixon was reelected and sworn in, but later was forced to resign as a result of Watergate. We cannot forget that over 30 high ranking officials of Nixon administration including Attorney General of the United States and White House Counsel were indicted, convicted and subsequently wound up in prison. According to Orly Taitz, Obama Forgery gate is a hundred times bigger then Watergate. More corrupt high ranking officials, US Attorneys, AGs and judges were complicit, committed high treason by allowing a citizen of Indonesia and possibly still a citizen of Kenya Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barack (Barry) Soebarkah, aka Barack (Barry) Soetoro to usurp the U.S. Presidency by use of forged IDs and a stolen Social security number SCOTUS printout is below. No. 12A606 Title: Edward Noonan, et al., Applicants v.Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State Docketed: December 13, 2012 Lower Ct: Supreme Court of California Case Nos.: (S207078) Proceedings and Orders Dec 11 2012 Application (12A606) for a stay, submitted to Justice Kennedy. Dec 13 2012 Application (12A606) denied by Justice Kennedy. Dec 26 2012 Application (12A606) refiled and submitted to The Chief Justice. Jan 9 2013 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 15, 2013. Jan 9 2013 Application (12A606) referred to the Attorneys for Petitioner: Orly Taitz 29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy (949) 683-5411 Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688 Party name: Edward Noonan, et al. Attorneys for Respondent: Kamala Harris Attorney General (916) 445-9555 P. O. Box 944255 Sacramento, CA 94244-2550 Party name: Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State The decision of the Supreme Court will be released on Tuesday ----------------- http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=391205 The decision of the Supreme Court will be released on Tuesday http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=269554 |
6 comments:
Decision NOW. Nothing is going to happen.
THE QUESTION I HAVE TO ASK IS ..... AFTER READING THE SLUSH FUND REPORTS FROM THE VATICAN, I NOTICED THAT OF ALL THE CROOKS GETTING PAY-OFFS..... JUDGEY WUDGEY ROBERTS WAS PAID MORE THAN ANYONE ...... OVER 1B ...... HERE IS THE ?? HOW IS THE #1 CROOKED JUDGEY GOING TO CONVICT HIS PARTNER IN CRIME??? TOO MUCH CRAP IN HERE... FOR ME TO BELIEVE... WE ARE BEING LIED TO CONSTANTLY.
The one question I have is...Why all the forgeries? What does this man have to hid? What is to gain? He admitted, before he ran for President, that he was born in Kenya. Who is behind all of this?
This is part of the systematic looting of America.
Has anyone considered the George Soros consortium which includes a collection of megabillionaires, such as the founder/owner of the Progressive Ins Co. They are using selected Progressives in Congress and the cabinet as toadies to do the heavy work to reach a goal of one world rulership. Soros was caught on tape several years ago as saying, "...if he (Obama) can't get the job done, we'll get somebody else.".
This is my understanding of the Supreme Court process, which differs from yours:
Friday, February 15, 2013, the Supreme Court released a list of case for which they granted a review. The petition for review submitted by Orly Taitz was NOT on the list. The Supreme Court will issue a second list on Tuesday, February 18, 1013. This second list will contain the petitions for which they did not grant a review;
it may contain the names of a few petitioners that the Court decided to review at the last moment. In any event, the Supreme Court did not hold a hearing on Taits's petition, or any other petition on Friday, February 15, 2013..
Sorry. I wish the facts were otherwise. But this is where Taitz stands at the moment. Maybe a higher power will intervene and Taitz will get a hearing.
Post a Comment