MOTION
CHALLENGING OBAMA’S PRESIDENCY
D.C. Attorney Montgomery Blair Sibley's
latest attack on Obama's Eligibility - could it go viral?
Sibley Injects
Stuxnet-Like Motion Challenging Obama's Eligibility Into Federal Criminal
Justice Network
For More Information
Contact: MONTGOMERY BLAIR SIBLEY through www.MontgomeryBlairSibley.com February
6, 2013
SIBLEY INJECTS STUXNET-LIKE
MOTION CHALLENGING OBAMA'S ELIGIBILITY INTO FEDERAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE NETWORK
Washington D.C. – A new front
on the legal battle to establish that Barack Hussein Obama, II, is ineligible
to be President was opened today by Montgomery Blair Sibley.
To date, no federal court has
taken up the merits of Obama's eligibility relying instead on the dubious legal
doctrine of “standing” to dismiss every lawsuit. Accordingly, Sibley has
released his Stuxnet-like Motion to Dismiss Indictment into the federal prison
system. The Motion makes the simple argument that: (i) no federal law is valid
under Article I, § 7, cl. 2, of the Constitution unless it is presented to the
President, (ii) Obama is not a legitimate President and thus (iii) his signing
of the Fraud Enforcement and Recovery Act of 2009 (“FERA”) is void.
Accordingly, every
person charge and/or convicted under FERA is entitled to be released. The Sixth
Amendment to the Constitution guarantees: “in all criminal prosecutions, the
accused shall . . . have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his
favor.” Thus the Motion demands federal subpoenas for Obama’s: (i) certificates
of live birth, (ii) college applications from Occidental College, Columbia
University and Harvard Law School, (iii) U.S. Passport application,
(iv) Social Security application and (v) Selective Service registration
information – documents Obama has refused to reveal despite repeated requests.
Sibley has sent the Motion to prisoners convicted under FERA and their defense
attorneys and
expects his Motion to be
filed in dozens of FERA cases by them in the near future. Sibley said:
“Like the Stuxnet computer
virus, my Motion will circulate among the prison and population and criminal
defense bar both of which are very adept at bringing legal pleadings to Court.
Once the Motion is properly presented, the Courts will be forced to deal with
the merits of Obama’s legitimacy. The doctrine of ‘standing’ will no longer be
a barrier to adjudication.
My Motion forces the
Courts to make the choice of issuing the requested subpoenas – thereby finally
settling the issue of Obama’s eligibility to be President – or affirming that
the Sixth Amendment has been repealed by Judicial fiat because it threatens the
status quo. Either way, we will know where we stand as a People and whether it
is time to convene a Constitutional Convention to re-assert our fundamental
rights in a federal judicial system which has evolved to ignore those sacred
rights when they challenge the ruling class.”
No comments:
Post a Comment