Friday, February 8, 2013

Was Russert another casualty of WMD damage control and the Plame Game?


Take a look at this, as well as other links below to recent information by various architects, engineers, and aviation experts raising serious questions about the official version of the 9/11 tragedy:


Tim Russert's Death

Was Russert another casualty of WMD damage control and the Plame Game?

“Russert hinted on Meet the Press that 9/11 was an inside job.”

     
                           Tim Russert                                                      Scott McClellan                                          
  
Tim Russert's sudden death is one of the most troubling high-profile deaths in recent times. There can be little doubt that Russert had enemies in high places, and they may have feared they would be indicted as war criminals if Russert was not stopped. With Israel's current saber rattling, an Israeli strike against Iran seems eminent, with support from the Bush Administration. When such things are being planned, the plotters must get their propaganda machinery in place prior to the attack. This could be another reason for Mr. Russert's sudden demise…

Russert hinted on Meet the Press that 9/11 was an inside job.
On the June 1st, 2008 airing of Meet the Press, Tim Russert subtly opened the discussion of 9-11 being an inside job. He did this by reading a passage from guest Scott McClellan's book, What Happened(?) - Inside the Bush White House and Washington's Culture of Deception. He read the passage, then he pressed McClellan to say when the Bush Administration first made the decision to invade Iraq. Here is the exchange between Russert and McClellan:

MR. RUSSERT: You write in the book, "The campaign to sell the war didn't begin in earnest until the fall of 2002. But, as I would later come to learn, President Bush had decided to confront the Iraqi regime several months earlier. Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz all saw September 11th as an opportunity to go after Saddam Hussein, take out his regime, eliminate a threat, make the Middle East more secure. And Bush agreed. ...

"Message discipline sometimes meant avoiding forthrightness--for example, evasively dismissing questions about the risks of war as `speculation,' since the decision to go to war supposedly had not yet been made."

And certainly, you were part of that. August 2002, Scott McClellan: "I think it's premature to speculate about--premature to speculate because the President has made no decision about any particular course of action."

A decision had already been made, you said.

MR. McCLELLAN: I, I--well, I came to learn later that that decision was made.

MR. RUSSERT: When?

MR. McCLELLAN: I was deputy press secretary at that time.

MR. RUSSERT: When did you learn?

MR. McCLELLAN: Well, when the president did interviews with Bob Woodward for his book, when the--when I heard the president talk in world leader meetings after I became press secretary about how passionately he cared about spreading freedom and democracy in the Middle East. The real driving motivation, as you've touched on there, was trying to transform the Middle East and spread democracy throughout it. And Iraq would be the linchpin for doing that. Now, that was not something that we emphasized. It was something that was mentioned, but it was downplayed in the lead-up to the war. And I later came to learn that very clearly when I was press secretary. There are, there are elements to that earlier on when I would participate in some meetings for my predecessor and hear that as well.
(To read the full Meet the Press transcript from June 1, 2008, click here.)

Anomalies in Russert's death:

Clearly people within the Bush administration had motive for killing Tim Russert. But motive alone does not equate to guilt. Nevertheless, the following list is a summary of anomalies I have found in Russert's death, followed by additional comments on each anomaly. At this point, the anomalies are based on cursory information obtained from newspaper articles, magazine articles, TV coverage, and Google searches related to Tim Russert's death.

[1] It is unclear who performed Russert’s rush autopsy.

[2] There are conflicting accounts about the cause of death.

[3] Dr. Michael Newman is the only known physician to describe Russert’s heart condition; however, it appears that Dr. Newman does not work at Sibley Hospital, where Russert was pronounced dead.

[4] Sibley Hospital officials have not issued a public statement about Russert’s death at that medical facility.

[5] The news media hyped up the topic of sudden heart attacks immediately after Russert’s death.

[6] There is a disparity regarding the time that Russert went to his son's Georgetown apartment on the day he died to meet a Comcast cable technician. There are also conflicting accounts as to whether Russert died in the morning or the afternoon.

[7] Few eye-witnesses have come forward to describe Russert’s collapse/heart attack, which reportedly occurred during working hours at an NBC studio in Washington, DC. People Magazine reported that Wall Street Journal bureau chief Jerry Seib was a guest on The Tim Russert Show that day, but it is unclear from the People article if Mr. Seib actually witnessed the collapse.

[8] There is a disparity regarding what Russert was actually doing at the studio when he collapsed. Most accounts claim he was doing voice overs for Meet the Press. People Magazine indicates he was videotaping The Tim Russert Show.

[9] Mr. Russert was an enemy of the Bush Administration because his testimony helped convict Scooter Libby.

[10] Karl Rove and President Bush were certainly angry about Russert’s June 1st, 2008 Meet the Press interview where former Bush press secretary Scott McClellan indicated that Bush should have fired Rove for his involvement in the Joseph Wilson harassment case.

[11] John McCain and the Bush Administration must certainly resent an ardent liberal, like Tim Russert, constantly haranguing them about the Iraq War on his weekly show, Meet the Press, which shaped the opinions of millions of viewers.

[12] It is not difficult to fake a heart attack.

Discussion of Anomalies:

The following comments are restatements of the previously mentioned anomalies, with additional comments provided for each.

[1] It is unclear who performed Russert’s autopsy. An autopsy was reportedly performed on Russert within a few hours after his death, but we do not know who performed it or where it was performed. One would think it was performed at Sibley Hospital, where he was pronounced dead, but we simply do not know the details of what happened at Sibley as far the identities of the doctors who pronounced Russert dead and who performed the autopsy soon afterwards.

[2] There are conflicting accounts about the cause of death. Jill Lawrence (USA Today) described it as follows: "Michael Newman, Russert's doctor, told MSNBC that Russert had asymptomatic coronary artery disease that was controlled with medication and exercise. He said Russert performed well on a stress test in late April. He died, Newman said, when cholesterol plaque ruptured in an artery, causing sudden coronary thrombosis. Newman said an autopsy showed he also had an enlarged heart."(1)

Ms. Lawrence mentions an autopsy, but who performed it? One would assume it was Dr. Newman because he supplied the information about the autopsy to Ms. Lawrence. If he was Russert's personal physician, then he most likely did not. Did Dr. Newman even work at Sibley? My research indicates that the answers are negative to both questions; however, it is not certain. (Dr. Newman's background is discussed in Point # 3.)

Assuming that Dr. Newman did not perform the autopsy, and assuming the person who did was a Sibley doctor (which seems more likely), then why didn't that doctor, or someone from Sibley, explain the autopsy results to the public instead of passing the information to another doctor (Dr. Newman)? Perhaps people were rushed and did the best they could. On the other hand, if the doctor who performed the autopsy report would lie about his/her findings because of foul play, then that doctor becomes legally compromised and could be charged with conspiracy to commit murder. By having another doctor lie about the autopsy findings, both doctors are immune.

Nevertheless, "sudden coronary thrombosis" was the initial cause of death, per Dr. Newman. It was repeated by many reporters besides Jill Lawrence.

On June 20, 2008, People Magazine offered a similar, but slightly different explanation. Jill Smolowe wrote the following explanation, with assistance from Molly Lopez and Nicole Weisensee:

How did he die? A cholesterol deposit, called plaque, ruptured suddenly, creating a clot that obscured blood flow. That caused a heart attack and an arrhythmia known as ventricular fibrillation. The national survival rate is only 6 percent. (page 49, People; see Source Note 2)
Dr. Newman's "sudden coronary thrombosis" seems similar to Smolowe, Lopez and Weisensee's "heart attack and an arrhythmia known as ventricular fibrillation." I'm not a doctor, but it seems like doctors and journalists should use verbiage from the autopsy report to describe the cause of death of a well-known person like Tim Russert. That would mean they should be using the same medical terminology, but for some reason, different terms are being used.

[3] Dr. Michael Newman is the only known physician to describe Russert’s heart condition; however, it appears that Dr. Newman does not work at Sibley Hospital, where Russert was pronounced dead. My research reveals that Dr. Newman works at George Washington Hospital, not Sibley. My research also shows that Dr. Newman does medical consulting with the State Department, which is often used as a euphemism for CIA. By law, CIA employees cannot reveal the identity of their employer, so many say they work for the State Department. Dr. Newman was reportedly a Peace Corp worker as a younger man. Many people firmly believe that the Peace Corps is a CIA front; however, it has never been established as fact.

[4] Sibley Hospital officials have not issued a public statement about Russert’s death at that medical facility. Russert reportedly died at Sibley Memorial Hospital in Washington, DC, but there are no known statements about his death by anyone who works at Sibley. As previously stated, the main medical spokesperson to describe Russert's death was a Dr. Michael Newman, who was reportedly Russert’s personal physician, but apparently not affiliated with Sibley. Why are the people at Sibley being so sheepish about commenting on Russert's death? All we know is someone from Sibley Hospital pronounced Russert dead at approximately 2:23 pm on June 13, 2008, according to Jill Lawrence with USA Today.

[5] The news media hyped up the topic of sudden heart attacks immediately after Russert’s death. It wasn’t as though Russert had a rare medical condition that needed explanation. Most Americans certainly realize that people frequently die suddenly from heart attacks. Perhaps a diversion was needed because Russert did well on a stress test in late April.

[6] There is a disparity regarding the time that Russert went to his son's Georgetown apartment on the day he died to meet a Comcast cable technician. There are also conflicting accounts as to whether Russert died in the morning or the afternoon. Russert was reportedly at his son’s Georgetown apartment on the morning he died, according to a Washington Post article by Howard Kurtz. Russert reportedly went there to oversee his son Luke’s setup of cable service by Comcast. The name of the Comcast technician was Michael Hart, from Waldorf, Maryland. Russert and Hart reportedly knew each other casually and exchanged pleasantries. Hart said "they were laughing and joking as he [Hart] set up cable service for Russert's son." Hart reportedly said that Russert touched both of his hands as they left and rode the elevator together. Russert reportedly thanked Hart for taking care of his family and wished him a happy Father’s Day. Hart claims he hugged Russert in return.(3) (This is odd behavior for two adult men. It seems like part of the story was left out for some reason.)

On Friday, June 20, 2008, People Magazine published an article, by Alex Tresniowski, about Russert's life and death. The article indicates that Russert was at the NBC studio in Washington, DC at 9 am to video tape The Tim Russert Show. The following is an excerpt from Mr. Alex Tresniowski's article:

Russert had arrived at NBC's Washington bureau at 9 am to tape a spot for his talk show, The Tim Russert Show. "He looked tired, but I figured it was jet lag," says his guest, Wall Street Journal bureau chief Jerry Seib. Then Russert entered a recording booth. "Somebody said, 'What's he doing?' " recalls Betsy Fischer, "and they looked in the booth and saw he had collapsed." (page 51, People; see Source Note 2)
Oddly, Mr. Tresniowski contradicts himself about the cable man because he also wrote, in the same article, that Russert went to his son's apartment in the morning to "wait for the cable man." The following is an excerpt from Mr. Alex Tresniowski's article:

Indeed, one of the last acts of his life was a fatherly sacrifice: On the morning of the day he died, Russert took a chunk of time off from work to go to his son's new apartment in Washington and wait for the cable man. "He could have hired someone to do it, but that wasn't Tim," says Meet the Press executive producer Betsy Fischer. "When it came to Luke, there was no detail too small." (page 48, People; see Source Note 2)
[7] Few eye-witnesses have come forward to describe Russert’s collapse/heart attack, which reportedly occurred during working hours at an NBC studio in Washington, DC. People Magazine reported that Wall Street Journal bureau chief Jerry Seib was a guest on The Tim Russert Show that day, but it is unclear from the People article if Mr. Seib actually witnessed the collapse. Russert reportedly collapsed while "recording voice overs" for Meet the Press, but no eye-witnesses (studio staff/engineers) to the event were quoted in the press initially; however, they began to emerge over time. Still, very little information has been provided by people at the studio where Russert collapsed.

My research indicates that Alan Etter was one of the first people to see Russert unconscious at the studio, but Mr. Etter was not an eye-witness to the collapse. Mr. Etter works for D.C. Fire and Rescue and reportedly responded to an emergency call at the offices of WRC-TV where the Washington, D.C. bureau of NBC News is housed, where Russert was bureau chief.

According to Jill Lawrence with USA Today, Mr. Etter found Russert "in a small office, so small he almost spilled out of the room. A person with him was trying to breathe for him, using a rescue breathing mask, but wasn't doing chest compressions which are now known to be vital for saving lives." Ms. Lawrence did not identify the person with the breathing mask. Russert reportedly collapsed at 1:40 pm, according to Lawrence, was treated by paramedics approximately four minutes later, was taken to Sibley Hospital at 2:07, arrived at 2:23 pm, and was immediately pronounced dead at the hospital, according to Lawrence. Ms. Lawrence also wrote: "The paramedics on the scene shocked Russert's heart three times to try to restart it, but he did not respond."(1)

The previously cited People Magazine article by Alex Tresniowski is less credible than others because it identifies 13 people as authors of the three-page article; however, Mr. Tresniowski appears to be the lead writer. The article cites two additional people as eye-witnesses to Russert's collapse. They are Wall Street Journal bureau chief Jerry Seib and Betsy Fischer, whom Mr. Tresniowski identified as executive producer of Meet the Press. It is unclear from Mr. Tresniowski's description if Mr. Seib actually witnessed the collapse, but Ms. Fischer was definitely there, according to Tresniowski, who described Russert's death as follows:

Russert had arrived at NBC's Washington bureau at 9 am to tape a spot for his talk show, The Tim Russert Show. "He looked tired, but I figured it was jet lag," says his guest, Wall Street Journal bureau chief Jerry Seib. Then Russert entered a recording booth. "Somebody said, 'What's he doing?' " recalls Betsy Fischer, "and they looked in the booth and saw he had collapsed." (page 51, People; see Source Note 2)
There are some serious logistic problems with Mr. Tresniowski's description of Russert's death. First, Mr. Tresniowski indicates that Russert collapsed in the morning, but most accounts claim he collapsed in the afternoon and was pronounced dead shortly thereafter. As previously stated, Jill Lawrence, of USA Today, wrote that Russert collapsed at 1:40 pm and was pronounced dead at Sibley Hospital shortly arriving there by ambulance at 2:23 pm. Mr. Tresniowski claims Russert arrived at "9 am...entered a recording booth," then collapsed. Perhaps Mr. Tresniowski was in a hurry when he wrote the article and neglected to state that four hours and 40 minutes elapsed from the time Russert entered the studio at 9 am and the time he entered the recording booth and collapsed at 1:40 pm. Regardless of what Mr. Tresniowski intended to write, his actual statements give the definite impression that Russert died in the morning.

I have already mentioned a second problem with Mr. Tresniowski's description of Russert's death where Tresniowski claims that Russert went to his son Luke's Georgetown apartment in the morning to meet a cable technician, but Tresniowski also says Russert was videotaping a show in the morning. (See Point 6 for a description of Russert's meeting with the cable technician, according to Washington Post writer Howard Kurtz and Mr. Tresniowski.)

A third problem is Mr. Tresniowski indicated that a guest had arrived for The Tim Russert Show. That guest, according to Mr. Tresniowski, was Wall Street Journal bureau chief Jerry Seib. Virtually every news account I have read indicates that Russert was doing voice overs for Meet the Press when he collapsed. Had he been videotaping a video segment, as Mr. Tresniowski indicates, there would have been all kinds of witnesses when he collapsed. Besides guest(s), there would have been camera people, audio people, lighting people, a director, the list goes on. If we are to believe Mr. Tresniowski's version of events, where are these people?

Normally eye-witnesses, doctors, nurses, and the general public are quite willing to tell reporters what they observed when a famous person dies, and reporters are usually anxious to get a tip on any big story. When reporters clam up, or give explanations that make little sense, it's usually a red flag signaling a cover-up. This is not an absolute rule, but when a major celebrity dies in the middle of the day, at his office, it is quite unusual to have as few eye-witnesses as we have with Russert's death. So far we have two eye-witness accounts, but they conflict with other reports. Mr. Alan Etter of D.C. Fire and Rescue was a third witness, but he arrived after the fact and did not see the actual collapse.

[8] There is a disparity regarding what Russert was actually doing at the studio when he collapsed. Most accounts claim he was doing voice overs for Meet the Press. People Magazine indicates he was videotaping The Tim Russert Show. This may seem like a small point, but it drives home the issue of apparent secrecy surrounding Russert's death. We really do not know what Mr. Russert was doing in the studio when he collapsed. Some accounts indicate that he collapsed in the morning while videotaping The Tim Russert Show. Other accounts claim he collapsed in the afternoon while doing voice overs for Meet the Press.

[9] Mr. Russert was an enemy of the Bush Administration because his testimony helped convict Scooter Libby. Mr. Russert was called to testify against Scooter Libby by Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald. His testimony on February 7, 2007 ultimately helped convict Libby on four counts of perjury related to White House harassment of Joe Wilson, which included leaking to the press that Wilson's wife was a CIA agent/operative.

[10] Karl Rove and President Bush were certainly angry about Russert’s June 1st, 2008 Meet the Press interview where former Bush press secretary Scott McClellan indicated that Bush should have fired Rove for his involvement in the Joseph Wilson harassment case. On June 1, 2008, twelve days before Mr. Russert’s sudden death, Russert interviewed former Bush press secretary, Scott McClellan, who indicated that Karl Rove lied and perhaps committed perjury in the Joseph Wilson harassment case, and should have been fired by Bush. McClellan also provided compelling eye-witness testimony that Bush himself harassed Wilson by releasing selective portions of classified intelligence documents as a means of discrediting Wilson. Bush reportedly admitted to McClellan that he had performed this unethical deed, according to McClellan. (To read the full Meet the Press transcript from June 1, 2008, click here.)

[11] John McCain and the Bush Administration must certainly resent an ardent liberal, like Tim Russert, constantly haranguing them about the Iraq War on his weekly show, Meet the Press, which shaped the opinions of millions of viewers. Russert did not wear his liberalism on his sleeve, but he began his career as an aide to New York Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan and New York Governor Mario Cuomo. It was common knowledge that Russert liked Barack Obama and was not a fan of Senator John McCain or his blind support of the Bush's decision to invade Iraq and maintain troops there indefinitely. Russert had publicly reminded McCain of his statement that he intended to keep US troops in Iraq for one-hundred years.

[12] It is not difficult to fake a heart attack. My research indicates that it is very easy, particularly if there are no witnesses. If the victim is in his late 50’s, with known heart problems that are not life-threatening, it is even easier to fake. The simplest way is to smother the victim with a pillow, then put out a fake medical explanation by a real physician. Smothering a person in his/her sleep is a common murder technique employed by professional assassins. No traces of foul play are evident. Russert’s wife and son were in Italy when he died, so he was isolated from loved ones.

Since eye-witnesses have not come forward to explain Russert’s final hours in a manner that makes sense, it is plausible that many different scenarios may have occurred. For example, who was the unidentified person seen by paramedic Alan Etter? This person was reportedly using a rescue breathing mask, but was not doing chest compressions. It could have been completely innocent, but why is this individual's name being withheld?

Another scenario involves the morning visit to his son's Georgetown apartment to meet a cable technician. I won't give specific details because real people are involved. Let's just say that if he was smothered, the best way to do it would be away from the studio, then the body is returned, paramedics are called, an unidentified person is intentionally seen attempting to resuscitate him, and he is pronounced dead shortly thereafter.

A tidy medical explanation is quickly disseminated to the public by the news media.




SOURCE NOTES:

(1) "NBC's Tim Russert dead at 58," by Jill Lawrence, USA Today June 14, 2008.
http://www.usatoday.com/life/people/2008-06-13-russert-obit_N.htm?csp=34

(2) People Magazine, June 30, 2008 edition, but it was actually released to the public on June 20, 2008. Reference "A Good Life: Behind the TV newsman's bulldog facade was a man of faith who loved his wife and son above all;" pages 46 through 51. (Actual text of article is approximately three pages.) 13 people are credited as authors of the article. They are Alex Tresniowski, Frank Swertlow, Mark Dagostino, Sandra Sobieraj Westfall, Nicole Weisensee Egan, Susan Keating, Diane Herbst, Sharon Cotiar, Kristen Mascia, Kathy Ehrich Dowd, Silvia Sansoni, Diane Clehane, Robin L. Flanigan. Mr. Alex Tresniowski appears to be the lead writer. (The article has his name at the end, followed by "Reported by," then twelve more names are listed.) A preliminary version of the article is show here: http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20207591,00.html

(3) "Journalist Revitalized Washington Talk Shows," by Howard Kurtz, Washington Post Staff Writer, Saturday, June 14, 2008; A01





___________________________________________________________________________




Subject: RE: Author of new 9/11 conspiracy theory book "suicided", family found murdered

DeWitt,

I refused to consider the possibility of a conspiracy for a long time. I have now come to believe that the unanswered questions are too many and too serious to accept the official version of what happened.


First:

See the presentation by Dr. Judy Wood – she is a materials science engineer – something never seen before happened to the WTC towers. Her presentation is very detailed and very convincing.





Second:

Building Seven of the WTC was a controlled demolition. No airplane hit that building. The photos of that building collapsing looks exactly like a planned demolition.


9/11 Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out




The fall of Building 7 with all of the characteristics of a controlled demolition is the focus of the ongoing campaign called Remember Building 7.


Architects & Engineers - Solving the Mystery of WTC 7 - AE911Truth.org

Third:

No airplane hit the Pentagon. It was a missile. What happened to AA Flight 77?

Undeniable Proof a Plane did NOT Hit the Pentagon on 9/11


LEAKED 9/11 FOOTAGE SUPPOSEDLY SHOWING A CRUISE MISSILE. ALONG WITH ALL THE OTHER EVIDENCE. THE SMALL HOLE, NO PLANE DEBRIS, WITNESSES THAT SAW A MISSILE.



Overwhelming Evidence Pentagon Aircraft Data Is Not From An American Airlines 757




Fourth:

UAL Flight 93 was apparently airborne long after the reported crash, according the automatic ACARS in-flight communications system.




The issues raised by these and many other issues need to be answered. A new independent investigation is essential.

What do you think?

Dave


______________________________________________________________________________________



Subject: RE: Author of new 9/11 conspiracy theory book "suicided", family found murdered

What do you think about this?   

Do you believe there is factual evidence that the 9/11 Attacks are significantly conspiratorial?

The Popular Mechanics articles

Debunking the 9/11 Myths: Special Report
February 3, 2005 12:00 AM

Debunking the 9/11 Myths: Special Report

Debunking 9/11 Myths: Why Conspiracy Theories Can't Stand Up to the Facts
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

There has been fringe discussion of exotic sonic, scalar and/or particle beam weapons used to cause the buildings to collapse, but no proof that I am aware of that these weapons exist or could handle the scale required to collapse multiple buildings.  These theories seem to be more science fiction than science fact.

Clearly the  “unexpected/suspicious” deaths of author and children sends a COLD/CRUEL  PUBLIC message to any that may know of a conspiracy or facts to substantiate such a claim?

Why would this author be “dangerous enough” and to whom, to warrant killing him and his children?






Subject: RE: Author of new 9/11 conspiracy theory book "suicided", family found murdered

Thanks David…Wow!  I forwarded it to Rick.

Dangerous times…






Disclaimer: This email is private correspondence and is copyrighted.  You are not authorized to publish it or share it with others. This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited


Subject: Author of new 9/11 conspiracy theory book "suicided", family found murdered

Author of new 9/11 conspiracy theory book “suicided”, family found murdered
PUBLISHED:17:25 EST, 7 February 2013| UPDATED:17:25 EST, 7 February 2013
Amazon Books: 'He is the leading aviation expert on the September 11th attack’…
Marshall believed that his life was in danger because of the allegations involved.


A pilot who wrote a conspiracy theory book about 9/11 is dead after he (allegedly) shot his two teenage children and family dog before turning the gun on himself.


                                           
                                                 Aviation expert and author Phillip Marshall, children Micalia Phillips and Alex Phillips                                                                                                           

Relatives and friends of Phillip Marshall were stunned by the violent crime which took place in Calaveras County (California) on Saturday.
Their bodies were discovered when friends of the teens went to the family home on Sandalwood Drive and looked through the windows, they could see 54-year-old Phillip Marshall lying on the floor in a pool of blood.
Micalia Phillips, 14, and her 17-year-old brother Alex, were also found dead at the home inside the gated Forrest Meadows community.
Sheriff’s Sgt Chris Hewitt says when deputies arrived around 3pm on Saturday, they found the victims dead of apparent gunshot wounds in what they believe is a murder suicide.
The tragedy came as a shock for those living in the small town.
'Alex is a junior, played football. Micalia was a bright bubbly freshman,' Michael Chimente told CBS Sacramento.
Chimente is the principal of Bret Harte High School in nearby Angels Camp, where the two teens attended.
'Our first concern is not only reaching out to the family and giving them the support they need, but also supporting our students,' said Chimente.
Grief counselors were called in to help students deal with the sudden death of their friends and classmates.
A preliminary examination showed that all three were shot once in the head with a handgun.
Hewitt says the mother of the teens and estranged wife of Phillip Marshall, was out of the country at the time.
The former airline pilot's controversial conspiracy book The Big Bamboozle: 9/11 and the War on Terror was released last year.
While he was writing it, Marshall believed that his life was in danger because of the allegations involved.
According to Santa Barbara View, during the editing and pre-marketing process of Marshall’s book, he expressed some degree of paranoia because the nonfiction work accused the George W. Bush administration of being in cahoots with the Saudi intelligence community in training the hijackers who died in the planes used in the attacks.
He wrote in a statement last year: 'Think about this. The official version about some ghost (Osama bin Laden) in some cave on the other side of the world defeating our entire military establishment on U.S. soil is absolutely preposterous.

'The true reason the attack was successful is because of an inside military stand-down and a coordinated training operation that prepared the hijackers to fly heavy commercial airliners.
We have dozens of FBI documents to prove that this flight training was conducted in California, Florida and Arizona in the 18 months leading up to the attack.'
Amazon says about Philip Marshall: 'A veteran airline captain and former government "special activities" contract pilot, he has authored three books on Top Secret America, a group presently conducting business as the United States Intelligence Community.
'Marshall has studied and written 30-years’ worth of covert government special activities and the revolving door of Wall Street tricksters, media moguls, and their well-funded politicians.
'He is the leading aviation expert on the September 11th attack.'
____________________________________________________________
Book Description
The Big Bamboozle: 9/11 and the War on Terror
Philip Marshall (Author)


Publication Date: February 9, 2012

From the perspective of a Boeing 767 captain and former "special activities" contract pilot, Philip Marshall straps the reader into the cockpits of hijacked commercial airliners to tell the story of the most sophisticated terrorist attack in history. Based on a comprehensive ten-year study into the murders of his fellow pilots on 9/11, he explains how hijackers, novice pilots at the controls of massive guided missiles, were able to beat United States Air Force fighters to iconic targets with advanced maneuvering, daring speeds and a kamikaze finish.

But, as Marshall explains, the tactical plan was so precise that it rules out car-bombers and shoe-bombers known as al Qaeda, KSM and Osama bin Laden.

So then, who was it? That's what you are about learn.

Backed by official NTSB, FAA and black box recordings, Marshall finds the most capable and most documented group of conspirators buried deep within a Congressional Inquiry's report and retraces their work in gripping detail. Fasten your seatbelt--- the sad truth is that all of the solid evidence points to a dark collaboration between members of the Bush Administration and a covert group of Saudi government officials. This is a game changer that will finally set the record straight on the most horrific crime in US history.

This book is a compilation of official reports that disputes the Bush Administration, the Bush Intelligence Community and the American media's account of the 9/11 attack. United States Senator Bob Graham's Congressional Joint Inquiry in 2002 revealed that Saudi Arabian Intelligence agents met the 9/11 hijackers in the Los Angeles in January of 2000, harbored them and led them to 18 months of flight training in Florida and Arizona. Marshall follows reports from FBI field agents that warned George W. Bush's Administration that a "cadre of individuals of investigative interest were engaged in flight training" in the Arizona desert in the spring of 2001.

Marshall identifies three top federal investigators who complained that Dick Cheney obstructed justice by refusing access to suspects who supposedly confessed to the greatest crime in U.S. history. None of the federal investigators were ever allowed to verify the confession of Khalid Sheik Mohammed who had been water boarded over 180 times at Guantanamo detention facility.

The book disputes the video and media confession of Osama bin Laden and points out that none of the accusations by the Bush Administration could be proved.

Marshall asserts that the Saudi government was the true executioners of the 9/11 attack and framed their enemies while CIA special operations set up an elaborate decoy named Osama bin Laden to divert attention away from the Saudi operation. He follows the hijackers to flight training airports and finds that Saudi agents led the hijackers to the Arizona desert where Boeing 757 and Boeing 767 airliners were parked at a secluded CIA operated airport. The operators of the CIA airport were traced to suspicious insider stock trades on two airlines, United Airlines and American Airlines, the only two airlines used in the 9/11 attack.

Marshall breaks down the tactical flight plan that was used by the hijackers and chronicles the actions of Condoleezza Rice, Donald Rumsfeld, Saudi Arabian Prince Bandar bin Sultan, Dick Cheney and George W. Bush to learn that their account of the attack was severely flawed.

Three top investigators wrote that Dick Cheney had obstructed the investigation and redacted the involvement of the Saudi government agents who were employed in California by the Saudi Civil Aviation authority. The Congressional Inquiry reported that the Saudi agents had "seemingly unlimited funding from Saudi Arabia" and had traced the hijacker financial support to Prince Bandar through a Riggs Bank account.

Finally Marshall chronicles the media trial that allowed Bush and Cheney to derail American Justice by trying the 9/11 case with media propaganda and away from the American federal court system.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

More than the global reset, PP's and all that, I want the Bush's, Karl Rove, Cheney, Rumsfeld, and the whole cast of Nazi's arrested and publicly humiliated. Such a reign of terror!