Jeff to MGJA = QanonChallenge@gmail.com

MARCH 3, 2018
Q says:  "You, the People, have ALL the POWER.  You simply forgot how to PLAY."

Qpost March 17, 2019
The evening of, March 16, 2019, I posted my recommendation on Nesara News TO "VOID THE SERVICE CONTRACT" which initially hired the foreign corporation, "United States Inc" to provide limited government services, and I recommended declaring BREACHES OF CONTRACT in the de jure courts of justice for the Republic, followed by VOIDING THE SERVICE CONTRACT, which immediately returns all assets to their original owner, WE THE PEOPLE.

  Then, the VERY NEXT DAY, 
 Trump/Qanon tweeted:

Trump tweeted: 
"MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!"

Qanon tweet:  "be proud patriots.  today like in 2016 you are in one united voice, RISING UP, to defend this great nation."


NOTE:  RISING UP = de jure grand jury RISING UP, (Rising up the land above the waters, and above the statutes of maritime law, as statutes are for navigable waterways only.  LAWS are for man, STATUTES are for INTERNATIONAL TRADE ONLY (but are currently being used for SLAVERY instead).



Qanon:

Who has the 'real control?  Answer = The People



Qanon:

Can you remove the top comments?

(My header comments on Nesara News, as well as my cover letter for the recommendation/proposal were very harsh of Q/Trump.  I have removed both.) 

FYI:
(I believe the twitter part in the Q/Trump tweets is just for plausible deniability, Trump used the same type of plausible deniability on another tweet on March 17th, 2019 when he tweeted with a Qanon logo, but he also sent out 17 other tweets with different logos, for plausible deniability, the U.S. NDA(non-disclosure-agreement) signed by these guys must be gnarly).

Hopefully Q/Trump can set the record straight by pointing to Nesara News and our recommendation to VOID THE SERVICE CONTRACT, a fraudulent service contract executed in secret, which was allegedly executed when the Republic hired the foreign owned corporation, "United States Inc" to provide limited government services (international trade only), and then the U.S. quietly mothballed the Republic.

1871 CHARTER
"An Act To Provide A Government for the District of Columbia:
(Document found at the Library of Congress, go read Sec. 17)


(please keep in mind, all U.S. government positions are PRIVATE, as the corporation is run for max profit.  Sec 17 of the above document says that the "legislative body of the United States shall not pass any laws to affect the Republic's Courts of Justice = TRUE PUBLIC OFFICES, which were stolen from us in the dead of the night, replaced with PRIVATE corporate goons to steal, rape and plunder.  The good thing though is, fraud has no laws of limitations, nor statute of limitations.  As well as, assets purloined by pirates still belong to the original owner regardless of who possesses them.)



Below is the recommendation/proposal for de jure court of justice action:


VOID THE CONTRACT!!!
https://nesaranews.blogspot.com/2019/03/president-trump-and-qanon-instruct.html


TRUMP/Qanon... Can you point to it?

If you can point to it, that would obviously change my outlook, and you will find me back in your corner, again.



Saturday, June 29, 2013

Why Does Lois Lerner Have Constitutional Rights?! IRS Official May Be Compelled to Testify

The Rumor Mill News Reading Room 

Why Does Lois Lerner Have Constitutional Rights?! IRS Official May Be Compelled to Testify
Posted By: Infoeditor [Send E-Mail]
Date: Saturday, 29-Jun-2013 04:09:14

Why Does Lois Lerner Have Constitutional Rights?! IRS Official May Be Compelled to Testify
As many are probably aware by now, Lois Lerner, the IRS Official who invoked the Fifth Amendment in order to not testify before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, might be compelled to testify.
Since when do public servants retain all the rights of 'private citizens' who can claim all Constitutional rights?
'We, The Forgotten People' are constantly reminded how we don't have all our Constitutional rights and can be forever detained, no habeas corpus, but this equivalent of an official thug holds up the show claiming she has rights, even though she probably also has a Social Security number and account which is extra legal to The Constitution and she knows it.
How will this legal matter be addressed when it can expose this whole matter of jurisdiction to the public through the press coverage of this matter?
Next time you're in court you might try asserting your so-called Constitutional rights and just see how far it gets you, especially if the court knows your jurisdictional status is a holder of a Social Security number and account. U.S. persons are constantly reminded how we can be searched and seized without warrant - NO RIGHTS!!!!! - and this lecherous official thug, Lerner, gets to claim her 'rights'? Why does Lois Lerner have 'rights' when the nation goes without rights? Which 'rights' does Lois Lerner get to enjoy and which rights do 'We, The Forgotten People' not get to enjoy?
Why do these official thugs (those who work for and support the unlawful, Un-Constitutional IRS) get away with such antics and worse, and go on to get bonuses and do luxury party spending on the taxpayers' dime?!
People of America have really had it with this unlawful crap. The Zionist I.R.S. is not even supposed to exist!!!
___________________________________________________________________________
House panel finds IRS official waived Fifth Amendment right, can be forced to testify in targeting probe
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/06/28/republican-led-house-panel-challenges-irs-worker-who-took-fifth-amendment/?test=latestnews#ixzz2XacW3q3T
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/06/28/republican-led-house-panel-challenges-irs-worker-who-took-fifth-amendment/?test=latestnews
Also see:
Stop the PORK IRS - Sits Atop U.S. Like 800 lb. Gorilla in Room - Another Senior IRS Official Invokes 5th (Again?)
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=280965
and
I.R.S. Official Wants Her 'Rights' - 'We The Peons'
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=277651
Disclaimer: Please do not consider this post as instruction in the law. This is not an instruction in law. Please consult your attorney (if you can find an honest one who is not B.A.R.) for all legal matters.
 1  1  0  0  0