Architect
of the brink: Meet the man behind the government shutdown
By
Leigh Ann Caldwell, CNN
updated 3:54 PM EDT, Mon September
30, 2013
This
newly elected tea party aligned lawmaker downplays his position, saying he has
relatively little influence. But in reality, his efforts have pushed Washington
to the brink.
At
issue is the Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare. Some Republicans are
demanding that it be dismantled -- or at the very least delayed - and they
think the best way to do that is attach it to a must-pass bill to fund the
government.
The
idea has rankled Washington for more than a week and exposed fissures in the
Republican Party.
So
who is the lawmaker quietly influencing the debate?
Sen.
Ted Cruz, who staged a 21-hour talk-a-thon on the Senate floor disparaging
Obamacare, would be a good guess. But it would be wrong.
The persuasive
The
answer? Mark Meadows, who represents the western part of North Carolina and has
wielded his influence behind the bright lights of the television cameras and
the hot microphones.
In
August, while lawmakers spent time in their districts, Meadows wrote a letter
to his Republican leaders suggesting they tie the dismantling of Obamacare to
the bill that funds the government for the next year.
The
letter read: "James Madison wrote in Federalist No. 58 that 'the power
over the purse may, in fact, be regarded as the most complete and effectual
weapon... for obtaining a redress of every grievance...'"
Meadows
successfully convinced 79 of his colleagues to sign on to his letter. And he
went further, leading a group of 40 lawmakers to demand that the continuing
resolution, or the short-term government funding bill at issue, zeroes out
funding for President Barack Obama's signature domestic policy achievement so
far.
In
a lengthy interview with CNN, Meadows explained his case.
"Our
intent has never been to shut down the government," Meadows said.
"It's to stop the [health care] law."
Senate
Majority Leader Harry Reid called those advocating for such a plan
"anarchists."
A
"bad day for government is a good day for the tea party," Reid said
on the Senate floor last week.
Meadows vs. the GOP
Republican
leaders in the House were reluctant and dismissed the plan -- at first. Speaker
John Boehner and many Republicans believed the strategy could lead to shutdown
as the Democratic-led Senate would never agree to such a plan.
Additionally,
leaders believed that Republicans would be blamed for a shut down. Polling
backs up their concern. A recent CNN/ORC
International Poll indicated that 51% of respondents would blame
Republicans. That's a political risk that leadership didn't want to risk.
Even
though Meadows' letter doesn't represent a majority of the caucus, it was
a factor in persuading Boehner to reverse course and put forward a plan
that funds the government but defunds Obamacare.
Running against politics
Meadows
said he understands that "leadership has a different responsibility."
And that leadership is responsible for thinking about the party. "This
type of vote could potentially hurt our long term goals. I understand
that," he said.
But
he said that's not his concern.
"My
job first is to make sure I represent the people back home," Meadows said.
"I don't believe that when I get here that people expect me to look at the
political implications. That's for somebody else to focus on."
For
him, getting rid of Obamacare is priority No. 1. "[T]o ignore that would
be to ignore our duty to represent the people back home," he said.
'Persona non grata'
"For
me it's about representing the 749,000 people I was elected to represent,"
Meadows told CNN in his small Capitol Hill office. He said his constituents
want him to fight against Obamacare "regardless of consequences."
Meadows
represents a conservative constituency. He was elected in 2012 and succeeded
Democrat Heath Shuler, who decided not to run for reelection after the latest
round of redistricting made the district swing heavily Republican.
Meadows
won by 15 percentage points. Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney won
the district with 61% of the vote, an impressive outcome in a state he won by 1
point.
But
there's more to the story. Meadows works very closely with the tea party groups
and he is a conduit to their agenda.
In
fact, his catapult from local businessman to elected official was launched with
the help of local tea party groups. He underwent a vigorous interview process
with the North Carolina-aligned tea party groups that included an intense
vetting and interviewing process.
Jane
Bilello, head of the Asheville, North Carolina, tea party group and its
separate political action committee, said it is to ensure candidates
"truly represents who we are and what we want them to do."
Bilello
is pleased with Meadows' job performance so far. She said Meadows is
"turning out to be our poster boy."
On
the issue of Obamacare, "he truly represents us," Bilello said.
Well-funded
national tea party-aligned organizations, such Freedom Works, are also watching
closely.
Like
Bilello's organization, they hold lawmakers accountable. Not only do they keep
scorecards of how lawmakers vote on legislation, they are keeping track of what
letters they sign on to and their role in every step of the legislative
process.
Republican
leaders are well aware of the influence of these organizations.
Republican
Rep. Lee Terry of Nebraska, who was elected in 1998 and finds himself between
the new generation of tea party-aligned groups and the more traditional
Republican leadership, said the tea party groups "impacts everybody."
Billelo
said that Meadows hosts conference calls with the groups' members to explain
what's happening in Congress, including the challenges that he faces promoting
their agenda.
She
said he told them he's "persona non grata" around the halls of
Congress. Bilello said she and her members remind him: "They don't elect
you. We do." They also offer assurance: "We have your back. We will
support you," Bilello said she tells him.
Meadows
relayed a similar sentiment. "There's nobody in Washington, D.C., who ever
voted for me and there's no one in Washington, D.C., who will ever vote for
me," Meadows said. "So it's about representing the people back
home."
The non-leadership leader
"I
think everybody wants me to pick a fight with leadership," Meadows said.
But he contended that he isn't about playing the rebel, but finding results.
Are
his tactics working? Meadows said yes.
"The
Senate for the first time is having to vote ... on Obamacare," Meadows
said. "That's why we had to do this."
The
House has now voted 42 times on either defunding or repealing all or parts of
Obamacare.
Many
Republicans in the Senate thought the idea was a lost cause, including Texas
Republican John Cornyn, who said Friday that the strategy "won't
work."
The
Senate
eliminated the health care portion of the bill on Friday before sending a
revised spending plan back to the House for consideration over the weekend. A
shutdown would occur Tuesday, if there is no spending plan in place.
But
Meadows successfully convinced a reluctant Boehner to go along with his plan.
And then after it became clear the Senate wasn't going to play ball, the
speaker hoped to move past the fight and pass a funding bill that would be able
to pass the Senate, meaning it wouldn't defund health care.
But
Boehner's Republican caucus, once again with Meadows in the forefront, rejected
that plan.
Boehner's
now working on a plan that will appease members such as Meadows.
Meanwhile,
Meadows vowed to hold his ground.
"If
there is a real plan to make sure we can accomplish it through some other
means, I'm willing to look at that," he said. But he said it must involve
"at least delaying" the implementation of Obamacare.
If
it doesn't, he is willing to buck his leadership and oppose any bill he doesn't
think goes far enough.
He
admits some will have to take "some tough votes" to take. But for him
he's right where his constituents want him to be.
"It's
a safe place for me to be," Meadows said.
Polarizing Washington
Meadows
rejected the idea that he is adding to the gridlock in Washington. He said
Washington politicians have lost their way, but it's not because of their
inability to compromise.
"Pragmatism
has been at the cost of principle and principle has been at the cost of
pragmatism," he said.
Still,
Meadows asserted that he is willing to compromise with the Democrats.
"My
ultimate success will be viewed by whether there is something we can
accomplish," he said.
1 comment:
Washington politicians have indeed lost their way, because if they don't "do as they're told", they'll lose "their ticket to the underground." This government is run on blackmail, threats, scandals, and it's so good to see someone who actually has INTEGRITY standing up at all costs to do what is the right thing to do and in the best interests of everyone!
Post a Comment