from Political Vel Craft...
New 2014 Obama Eligibility Challenge Reaches United States
Supreme Court: Obama Guilty Of Treason!
February
12, 2014 
3 Comments
Supreme Court Offers Opinion,
Doesn’t Make Law
(Jan. 28, 2014) — A petition for certiorari regarding Barack Hussein
Obama’s constitutional eligibility to serve as president and commander-in-chief
arrived at the U.S. Supreme Court and was docketed as of January 23, 2014 after
a long and circuitous routing through the New York State courts.
Hmmmmmmm?
Obama’s eligibility has been questioned since late 2007,
when commentator Chris Matthews stated on air that Obama was “born in
Indonesia,” followed by a similar report in a Hawaii newspaper. Various reports
in African newspapers dating back to before Obama’s first presidential election
in 2008 stated that Obama was born in Kenya. His own biographer concurred until
April 2007, when the official narrative changed to say that Obama was born in
Hawaii.
- Logic and Defining the
“Natural Born Citizen” Clause
- Stop DC by refusing to comply:
Anti-Commandeering to Nullify
Article II, Section 1, clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution requires the president and commander-in-chief to be a “natural born Citizen.”
Compounding doubt as to whether or not Obama meets the constitutional criteria, he claims that his father was a citizen of Kenya and later, Great Britain, following Kenyan independence in 1963. Research into the intent of the “natural born Citizen” clause has shown that the citizenship of the parents, and not the birthplace, was actually paramount in determining a child’s citizenship and allegiance. In the modern era, however, the term has been eviscerated such that most Americans interpret it to mean a simple birth on U.S. soil without regard to the parents’ citizenship.
- Boyles: Obama Has Social
Security Number That Ain’t His; Investigator Explains
- Obama’s Birth Certificate
Lawyer Judith Corley Goes Missing In The White House
Obama claims a birth in Hawaii, but the two birth
certificates he has allegedly presented to the public were declared
“computer-generated forgeries” in 2012 by a criminal investigatory team. His
Selective Service registration form, likewise, was found fraudulent.
Neither the courts nor Congress have been willing to examine the issue of whether or not Obama is usurping the office of the presidency.
Laity’s current case, Laity v. New York, began in December 2011 with a ballot challenge filed by Robert Christopher Laity with the New York State Board of Elections which Laity said became a “hot potato” that the courts “didn’t want to handle.”
A 100% disabled U.S. Navy veteran, Laity is the founder of the “Society for the Preservation of Democracy and Human Rights.” He told The Post & Email that “recently, it was changed to the ‘Society for the Preservation of our American Republic’ on the suggestion that he more accurately illustrates the mission of the organization.”
Laity has extensive legal training and has served as a legal advocate for others. Because of his disability, he performs virtually all of his work on his home computer. He wrote the eligibility challenge, which consists of 27 pages, without any assistance. Although he said that the actual writing of the brief took “a few hours,” he later clarified that it “was actually the end result of five years of writing on the subject.”
Before filing his current case, Laity took part in the American Grand Jury organized by Bob Campbell in 2009 and attempted to file a criminal complaint against Obama with a local magistrate, Leslie Foschio.
“We were to give the presentments to our local officials, so I presented them to all three major networks in the area, and they all interviewed me, but not one of them put me on TV” Laity said.
Neither the courts nor Congress have been willing to examine the issue of whether or not Obama is usurping the office of the presidency.
Laity’s current case, Laity v. New York, began in December 2011 with a ballot challenge filed by Robert Christopher Laity with the New York State Board of Elections which Laity said became a “hot potato” that the courts “didn’t want to handle.”
A 100% disabled U.S. Navy veteran, Laity is the founder of the “Society for the Preservation of Democracy and Human Rights.” He told The Post & Email that “recently, it was changed to the ‘Society for the Preservation of our American Republic’ on the suggestion that he more accurately illustrates the mission of the organization.”
Laity has extensive legal training and has served as a legal advocate for others. Because of his disability, he performs virtually all of his work on his home computer. He wrote the eligibility challenge, which consists of 27 pages, without any assistance. Although he said that the actual writing of the brief took “a few hours,” he later clarified that it “was actually the end result of five years of writing on the subject.”
Before filing his current case, Laity took part in the American Grand Jury organized by Bob Campbell in 2009 and attempted to file a criminal complaint against Obama with a local magistrate, Leslie Foschio.
“We were to give the presentments to our local officials, so I presented them to all three major networks in the area, and they all interviewed me, but not one of them put me on TV” Laity said.
“I gave copies to my mayors, to the Supreme Court, and to
all the U.S. District Court judges and magistrates. I sent letters out asking
to swear out a criminal complaint against Obama, and it was Judge Foschio who
told me – I went up to his chambers and spoke to his judicial assistant while
he was in the other room and she went in and talked to him – ‘The first thing
you have to do is notify your law enforcement about this complaint.’
I went to the FBI, and they said ‘We don’t take criminal complaints; we only investigate them.’ They gave me a number to call, and it was for the Secret Service. And they said, ‘We’ve talked to you about this before,’ and I said, ‘No, you haven’t.’
So I filed a local police report with my town police, and they gave me a complaint number. The chief of police told me that they were down there talking to them about me, not about my complaint…’What kind of guy is this? Do you have any trouble with him?’ The police told me that federal agents were in their precinct, and they did refer it to the FBI, and that was in 2010.”
I went to the FBI, and they said ‘We don’t take criminal complaints; we only investigate them.’ They gave me a number to call, and it was for the Secret Service. And they said, ‘We’ve talked to you about this before,’ and I said, ‘No, you haven’t.’
So I filed a local police report with my town police, and they gave me a complaint number. The chief of police told me that they were down there talking to them about me, not about my complaint…’What kind of guy is this? Do you have any trouble with him?’ The police told me that federal agents were in their precinct, and they did refer it to the FBI, and that was in 2010.”
Laity had charged Obama with treason and ineligibility to be
president. “That was what Judge Foschio told me to do,” Laity said. He also
filed the complaint with the U.S. Attorney for
the Western District of New York but was told that they couldn’t accept it.
“The complaint had to be generated by them,” Laity said. “Prior to 1946 and the
revised Rules of Criminal Procedure,
we had citizen grand juries, which are a constitutional right.
Those juries go all the way back to the Magna Carta… and some ‘rulemaker’ says they’re ‘obsolete…?’ That right does exist; it’s never gone away. It just has to be dusted off and used.”
The Post & Email has reported extensively on prosecutors and judges’ denial of access to citizens to current sitting federal grand juries. Local grand juries are often corrupt and completely controlled by the judiciary. The National Liberty Alliance, now active in 50 states, is attempting to reconstitute citizen control of courts and grand juries.
Those juries go all the way back to the Magna Carta… and some ‘rulemaker’ says they’re ‘obsolete…?’ That right does exist; it’s never gone away. It just has to be dusted off and used.”
The Post & Email has reported extensively on prosecutors and judges’ denial of access to citizens to current sitting federal grand juries. Local grand juries are often corrupt and completely controlled by the judiciary. The National Liberty Alliance, now active in 50 states, is attempting to reconstitute citizen control of courts and grand juries.
- Jury’s Power Of Nullification
Is The U.S. Republic’s Justice!
- Police State Stopped Cold,
Dead Cold ~ Texas Grand Jury Nullification: Nullifies Murder Charges
Against Citizen Who Shot A Police Deputy During Break And Entering Raid Of
His Residence!
When Mr. Laity was seven years old, he and his older sister
skipped school to hear John F. Kennedy, then a presidential candidate, speak in
his home town of Wilkes-Barre, PA. “I remember that we had
a gazebo in the town square, and he was speaking from there. This was back in
1959. I climbed up onto the gazebo, on the speakers, to get a better look at
him, and two guys grabbed me, one on each arm…’Get down form there, kid!’ and I
still remember that to this day. So I guess I was a political activist even
then,” Laity chuckled.
The Post & Email asked Laity the origins of his case and why he filed it, to which he responded:
The Post & Email asked Laity the origins of his case and why he filed it, to which he responded:
I was reading all of the information about Obama’s not qualified
to be president because he’s not a natural born citizen, etc., I had actually
at one time considered voting for him, but then I heard a lot of talk about his
not being qualified. So I saw “Obama Ballot Challenge” (now defunct) and read a
few articles there, and I said to myself, “They’re right; this guy isn’t
qualified.” So I filed a ballot challenge with the New York State Board of
Elections in Albany in December 2011. I thought, “Well, that is a town record
now, and I don’t have to worry about it.” Their rule is that you have to wait
until the person is actually placed on the ballot before it can be challenged.
So in February 2012, Obama’s name showed up on the ballot, and I immediately
sent an email to the Board of Elections, reminding them of the letter I sent by
certified mail in December 2011.
I thought that constituted the filing of my challenge. For
the next several weeks, I was on the phone back and forth with the Election
Board, and they were telling me that my challenge was in the general counsel’s
office, and if it gets registered, something will be done about it. There were
maybe five or six other people who challenged Obama in New York.
THE POST & EMAIL:
On the same grounds?
MR. LAITY: Yes, that he’s not a natural born Citizen. So after the three days were up – it’s only a small window that you have to crawl through when you file a challenge – they came and notified me that I didn’t file the complaint properly. It had to be in writing. So I said, “I made a complaint in writing; I filed it in December and I reconfirmed it in February by email.” So they ended up eventually telling me that it wasn’t filed properly; it was filed in the wrong venue; I didn’t serve Obama, because I’m supposed to make service on Obama if I’m challenging him, and so forth and so on.
MR. LAITY: Yes, that he’s not a natural born Citizen. So after the three days were up – it’s only a small window that you have to crawl through when you file a challenge – they came and notified me that I didn’t file the complaint properly. It had to be in writing. So I said, “I made a complaint in writing; I filed it in December and I reconfirmed it in February by email.” So they ended up eventually telling me that it wasn’t filed properly; it was filed in the wrong venue; I didn’t serve Obama, because I’m supposed to make service on Obama if I’m challenging him, and so forth and so on.
Sheriffs
Well, I did make a formal complaint, and I did serve Obama;
I sent a letter to Eric Holder, who is the person who accepts formal service on
anything sent to Obama. So I appealed to the New York Court of Claims, and they ended
up telling me that I was seeking more than monetary damages; I was seeking
action by the court which it had no jurisdiction to effect.
While I was in the Court of Claims, I realized I was told I was in the wrong court, so I asked them to transfer the case to the Supreme Court, which, believe it or not, is the lower level in New York, not the highest level; they’re at the first tier. The second tier is the appellate division, and the third tier is the Court of Appeals.
So within the 90 days that I had to appeal the Board of Elections ruling, I asked the court to transfer the case to the Supreme Court because I had found out that it was in the wrong court. What they did is tell me they didn’t have the authority to transfer it, so I filed the same case myself. The state then came back and said, “We don’t have any defense briefs in this case,” and I was wondering, “Why wouldn’t they want to answer the charge?” Usually when you’re sued by somebody, you make an answer to it; you make some sort of affirmative defense, and they didn’t even want to. So I never got to present any evidence before the Supreme Court just dismissed the case out-of-hand.
THE POST & EMAIL: Did you think that something was wrong at that point?
MR. LAITY: Yes, because it didn’t seem procedurally correct. I had asked the court to give me a date, but the other side wasn’t even defending the case. So I just took it in stride and appealed it to the New York State Supreme Court, Third Appellate Division in Albany. They ended up rejecting it, too, saying that it was two separate cases, and told me to go back to the lower courts and have separate appeals prepared.
The other side, New York State, wasn’t cooperating; when I asked for their signature on the form, they refused to give it to me, and I had to move the court to grant me permission to submit the record on appeal without the other side’s signature, and they denied that. Then I made a motion for rejoining the case, because it wasn’t two cases. I tried to explain to them what happened, that I went to the wrong court…There were multiple procedural deficiencies and failure on New York State’s part to even follow procedure. I had never seen anything like this; they just weren’t defending it.
While I was in the Court of Claims, I realized I was told I was in the wrong court, so I asked them to transfer the case to the Supreme Court, which, believe it or not, is the lower level in New York, not the highest level; they’re at the first tier. The second tier is the appellate division, and the third tier is the Court of Appeals.
So within the 90 days that I had to appeal the Board of Elections ruling, I asked the court to transfer the case to the Supreme Court because I had found out that it was in the wrong court. What they did is tell me they didn’t have the authority to transfer it, so I filed the same case myself. The state then came back and said, “We don’t have any defense briefs in this case,” and I was wondering, “Why wouldn’t they want to answer the charge?” Usually when you’re sued by somebody, you make an answer to it; you make some sort of affirmative defense, and they didn’t even want to. So I never got to present any evidence before the Supreme Court just dismissed the case out-of-hand.
THE POST & EMAIL: Did you think that something was wrong at that point?
MR. LAITY: Yes, because it didn’t seem procedurally correct. I had asked the court to give me a date, but the other side wasn’t even defending the case. So I just took it in stride and appealed it to the New York State Supreme Court, Third Appellate Division in Albany. They ended up rejecting it, too, saying that it was two separate cases, and told me to go back to the lower courts and have separate appeals prepared.
The other side, New York State, wasn’t cooperating; when I asked for their signature on the form, they refused to give it to me, and I had to move the court to grant me permission to submit the record on appeal without the other side’s signature, and they denied that. Then I made a motion for rejoining the case, because it wasn’t two cases. I tried to explain to them what happened, that I went to the wrong court…There were multiple procedural deficiencies and failure on New York State’s part to even follow procedure. I had never seen anything like this; they just weren’t defending it.
- BREAKING…Obama’s Kenyan Birth
Records Discovered In British National Archives: Where Lies Go To Die!
So nine months later, the Appellate Division sent me a
letter telling me that I didn’t follow instructions about getting the record on
appeal from the lower courts. I told the court, “There are only a few documents
available because there is no record, because there was no defense, no evidence
presented, no opportunity to do so…” And I said, “What you have in your hand is
the record; that’s it, only five or six papers. There’s a ruling by the claims
court of a couple pages by a judge , but he dismissed it because of a lack of
jurisdiction to give me what I wanted.
THE POST & EMAIL:
Did you get the feeling that they were orchestrating their denials?
MR. LAITY: That’s exactly the way I felt. They found every technical way to get rid of it, like a hot potato that they didn’t want to handle.
Finally, I went to the highest court in the state, the New York State Court of Appeals. They simply gave me a one-line ruling that said, “It’s dismissed because it does not lie,” which means that there is no foundation for it; it’s not ripe for review. So I said, “Well, I’m going to the U.S. Supreme Court, and I ended up writing the 27 pages.
I think the case has a lot of foundation in it because it’s a prima facie case. We all know what “natural born Citizen” is, and being from this area, I read The Law of Nations in the original French. Being so close to Canada, we kind-of dabble in French. Even some of our merchandise is in French and English. Niagara Falls has bilingual signs up. The Canadians are over here quite a bit. I hate to say this, but I can sing the Canadian national anthem better than I can sing our own.
MR. LAITY: That’s exactly the way I felt. They found every technical way to get rid of it, like a hot potato that they didn’t want to handle.
Finally, I went to the highest court in the state, the New York State Court of Appeals. They simply gave me a one-line ruling that said, “It’s dismissed because it does not lie,” which means that there is no foundation for it; it’s not ripe for review. So I said, “Well, I’m going to the U.S. Supreme Court, and I ended up writing the 27 pages.
I think the case has a lot of foundation in it because it’s a prima facie case. We all know what “natural born Citizen” is, and being from this area, I read The Law of Nations in the original French. Being so close to Canada, we kind-of dabble in French. Even some of our merchandise is in French and English. Niagara Falls has bilingual signs up. The Canadians are over here quite a bit. I hate to say this, but I can sing the Canadian national anthem better than I can sing our own.
FedEx
proof of delivery of Laity v. New York at the U.S. Supreme Court
THE POST & EMAIL:
Ours is not easy to sing. Did you know French before you read The Law of Nations in its original
language?
MR. LAITY: I went to high school and was taught by French-Canadian priests. My instructors told me that I was bastardizing the French language, so I went to study German after that. I like to study languages; that’s one of my hobbies. When you look at the definition of “natural born Citizen” in English, it’s “born in a country of parents who are citizens,” but when you look at the original French, it says “parents citoyens,” which means “parents” [plural], and “citoyens” is “citizens” [plural]. So that means both parents. It doesn’t say “of a parent who is a citizen;” it says “of parents who are citizens.” So right away, Obama’s prima facie shows he is not qualified because everybody knows his father was not naturalized. So it’s prima facie; there’s no other proof necessary.
MR. LAITY: I went to high school and was taught by French-Canadian priests. My instructors told me that I was bastardizing the French language, so I went to study German after that. I like to study languages; that’s one of my hobbies. When you look at the definition of “natural born Citizen” in English, it’s “born in a country of parents who are citizens,” but when you look at the original French, it says “parents citoyens,” which means “parents” [plural], and “citoyens” is “citizens” [plural]. So that means both parents. It doesn’t say “of a parent who is a citizen;” it says “of parents who are citizens.” So right away, Obama’s prima facie shows he is not qualified because everybody knows his father was not naturalized. So it’s prima facie; there’s no other proof necessary.
So all this discussion about the birth certificate…I
don’t care if he was born in the Lincoln Bedroom; his
father was not American. The dominoes fall from there, because if he’s not
authorized to be in the Pentagon or in a military war room, that
makes him a spy.
THE POST & EMAIL: I know you’ve said that in many of your comments at The Post & Email.
MR. LAITY: I checked that out with a military lawyer, and after talking to him back and forth, he saw my point of view. Last week I spoke with (Capt.) Pamela Barnett (Ret.), and when I mentioned to her about the UCMJ, a light lit up in her head. She said, “I never thought of it that way.”
THE POST & EMAIL: Were you assisted at all in producing your brief?
MR. LAITY: Yes, I paid Cockle Legal Briefs to print it. There are strict rules that the U.S Supreme Court has. The book has to be in a certain “Century” typeset and it has to be bound and on 6 x 9-inch paper on a 65-pound weight. You have to send out 40 copies to the Supreme Court, and each of the persons served has to be given three copies. I couldn’t do it myself, so I paid a professional legal brief preparation company to do it, and they did a very good job.
THE POST & EMAIL: I know you’ve said that in many of your comments at The Post & Email.
MR. LAITY: I checked that out with a military lawyer, and after talking to him back and forth, he saw my point of view. Last week I spoke with (Capt.) Pamela Barnett (Ret.), and when I mentioned to her about the UCMJ, a light lit up in her head. She said, “I never thought of it that way.”
THE POST & EMAIL: Were you assisted at all in producing your brief?
MR. LAITY: Yes, I paid Cockle Legal Briefs to print it. There are strict rules that the U.S Supreme Court has. The book has to be in a certain “Century” typeset and it has to be bound and on 6 x 9-inch paper on a 65-pound weight. You have to send out 40 copies to the Supreme Court, and each of the persons served has to be given three copies. I couldn’t do it myself, so I paid a professional legal brief preparation company to do it, and they did a very good job.
THE POST & EMAIL: I’m
sure it was very expensive.
MR. LAITY: Actually it was only $1,500, including the $300 filing fee.
I had a Supreme Court case 20 years ago for whistleblowing retaliation when I worked at the Veterans Administration. They have what they call in forma pauperis, which means that if you cannot afford to pay the fee, they’ll let you just type your brief and submit only ten copies. You go to Kinko’s or FedEx, and it’s not much to make the copies: $3.00 or $4.00. I qualified for in forma pauperis then. But because I make too much money right now, as I’m getting a 100% pension, I couldn’t apply for in forma pauperis, because I just wouldn’t meet the guidelines. I had to professionally prepare the brief as a lawyer would.
THE POST & EMAIL: You seem very knowledgeable about legal filings.
MR. LAITY: I am a trained legal assistant, and I have an honorary degree in law. I take online courses in law. The vice president of my organization, Jim Carney, also worked for the VA. He worked for the VA; he’s been there for 41 years. He used to be the union chairman. Years ago, he had a case in which he was wrongfully terminated. He and I fought for 16 years to get his back pay for that one year that he was wrongfully terminated, because they restored him without pay loss. After 18 years, we finally won. In his case, he went pro se all the way to the Supreme Court, and my whistleblowing case went all the way to the Supreme Court pro se. So we had lawyers in the community saying, “You’re the only janitors that we know who ever “pro-se’ed” themselves to the Supreme Court.
The bottom line of this story is that I went onto becoming a legal assistant because I wanted to help him, because he has PTSD, and he’s a three-time Purple Heart recipient. At the time, I was a union official, and I wanted to get justice for him. So I specifically went to legal assistant school so I could learn something about the law. Everything clicked with me; I love the law.
I retired in 2003, and I still have clients. Under federal law, you don’t have to be an attorney to appear before administrative boards such as the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB). You don’t have to be an attorney. It’s all done from my computer at home; I send the research by email and snail mail.
THE POST & EMAIL: So you don’t have to go to court hearings?
MR. LAITY: No, you don’t have to have oral arguments or hearings; you just waive those. I have several cases in the EEOC right now in Washington. It’s amazing; a few days ago, on January 22, I felt kind-of good because it was “pro-life day,” and right there, when they were talking about pro-life on the steps of the Supreme Court, I was thinking, “My case is going in there today.” I always wanted to go to the pro-life march, but it’s always so cold that I don’t want to take the chance.
THE POST & EMAIL: What is the process for your case now?
MR. LAITY: The case has been given a docket number, 13-875. The book was stamped, and I got it back in the mail with the docket number stamped on it. Now they will take the case to conference. If there are Supreme Court justices who accept the case, then I’m in.
MR. LAITY: Actually it was only $1,500, including the $300 filing fee.
I had a Supreme Court case 20 years ago for whistleblowing retaliation when I worked at the Veterans Administration. They have what they call in forma pauperis, which means that if you cannot afford to pay the fee, they’ll let you just type your brief and submit only ten copies. You go to Kinko’s or FedEx, and it’s not much to make the copies: $3.00 or $4.00. I qualified for in forma pauperis then. But because I make too much money right now, as I’m getting a 100% pension, I couldn’t apply for in forma pauperis, because I just wouldn’t meet the guidelines. I had to professionally prepare the brief as a lawyer would.
THE POST & EMAIL: You seem very knowledgeable about legal filings.
MR. LAITY: I am a trained legal assistant, and I have an honorary degree in law. I take online courses in law. The vice president of my organization, Jim Carney, also worked for the VA. He worked for the VA; he’s been there for 41 years. He used to be the union chairman. Years ago, he had a case in which he was wrongfully terminated. He and I fought for 16 years to get his back pay for that one year that he was wrongfully terminated, because they restored him without pay loss. After 18 years, we finally won. In his case, he went pro se all the way to the Supreme Court, and my whistleblowing case went all the way to the Supreme Court pro se. So we had lawyers in the community saying, “You’re the only janitors that we know who ever “pro-se’ed” themselves to the Supreme Court.
The bottom line of this story is that I went onto becoming a legal assistant because I wanted to help him, because he has PTSD, and he’s a three-time Purple Heart recipient. At the time, I was a union official, and I wanted to get justice for him. So I specifically went to legal assistant school so I could learn something about the law. Everything clicked with me; I love the law.
I retired in 2003, and I still have clients. Under federal law, you don’t have to be an attorney to appear before administrative boards such as the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB). You don’t have to be an attorney. It’s all done from my computer at home; I send the research by email and snail mail.
THE POST & EMAIL: So you don’t have to go to court hearings?
MR. LAITY: No, you don’t have to have oral arguments or hearings; you just waive those. I have several cases in the EEOC right now in Washington. It’s amazing; a few days ago, on January 22, I felt kind-of good because it was “pro-life day,” and right there, when they were talking about pro-life on the steps of the Supreme Court, I was thinking, “My case is going in there today.” I always wanted to go to the pro-life march, but it’s always so cold that I don’t want to take the chance.
THE POST & EMAIL: What is the process for your case now?
MR. LAITY: The case has been given a docket number, 13-875. The book was stamped, and I got it back in the mail with the docket number stamped on it. Now they will take the case to conference. If there are Supreme Court justices who accept the case, then I’m in.
THE POST & EMAIL:
Do you have any idea of the time frame?
MR. LAITY: The term started in October. They usually don’t take too long. I would say that the longer you wait, the more chance you have, because normally if they’re not going to take the case, they’ll notify you quickly.
THE POST & EMAIL: What are the major points you made in your brief, and why do you think the court should review it?
MR. LAITY: I’m claiming that Obama is not a natural-born Citizen, and he’s not constitutionally qualified to be president; that he’s never been the president; he’s not bona fide; that he has no lawful authority to act as presidency, and
MR. LAITY: The term started in October. They usually don’t take too long. I would say that the longer you wait, the more chance you have, because normally if they’re not going to take the case, they’ll notify you quickly.
THE POST & EMAIL: What are the major points you made in your brief, and why do you think the court should review it?
MR. LAITY: I’m claiming that Obama is not a natural-born Citizen, and he’s not constitutionally qualified to be president; that he’s never been the president; he’s not bona fide; that he has no lawful authority to act as presidency, and
Deploying On
Obama Beach
the fact that he usurped the
presidency during time of war constitutes a violation of the UCMJ in the
section that refers to unauthorized presence in a military base, such as the
Pentagon, the war room, a ship, or an air base. He has no authority whatsoever.
There are several articles in Canada Free Press which state
that Obama could not pass a national security test,
and there’s an old article I have that says that presidential candidates don’t
even get background checks.
THE POST & EMAIL:
Just after the Cold Case Posse gave its second press conference on July 17,
2012, an FBI spokesman told me that the agency does not vet political
candidates.
MR. LAITY: When I was a radarman in the Navy, I had to have an FBI background check. I had a Secret Clearance in the Navy.
THE POST & EMAIL: They go and talk with your neighbors and past employers, don’t they?
MR. LAITY: Absolutely; you can’t get the job without a background check.
MR. LAITY: When I was a radarman in the Navy, I had to have an FBI background check. I had a Secret Clearance in the Navy.
THE POST & EMAIL: They go and talk with your neighbors and past employers, don’t they?
MR. LAITY: Absolutely; you can’t get the job without a background check.
Woodrow
Wilson ~ The President who signed the bill allowing Rothschild’s private
federal reserve in the United States.
Check out his teeth ~ The 28th President’s mother was born in Carlisle, Cumberland, England. Rothschild Banking Cabal England – Woodrow Wilson England – Hmmmmmmm ! Both Teeth & Fed Reserve Are Rotten To The Core! Was Wilson Eligible To A U.S. President?
Check out his teeth ~ The 28th President’s mother was born in Carlisle, Cumberland, England. Rothschild Banking Cabal England – Woodrow Wilson England – Hmmmmmmm ! Both Teeth & Fed Reserve Are Rotten To The Core! Was Wilson Eligible To A U.S. President?
THE POST & EMAIL: It
seems that Americans who have been following this issue have learned that it
apparently isn’t politically correct to check out politicians…The bigger issue
with Obama is that we don’t really know who he is. Recently a criminology
professor hypothesized as to why Obama used the alias “Soebarkah” on his
mother’s passport records.
MR. LAITY: I sent the professor an email. I am wondering why two companies in England were established the day after Obama was elected. Isn’t it interesting that Obama, our second usurper, and Chester Arthur, our first, were born with British citizenship?
I sometimes wonder if it’s an insidious plan for the British to take our country back. It’s a strange thing. Chester Arthur used to have his staff salute the Union Jack.
MR. LAITY: I sent the professor an email. I am wondering why two companies in England were established the day after Obama was elected. Isn’t it interesting that Obama, our second usurper, and Chester Arthur, our first, were born with British citizenship?
I sometimes wonder if it’s an insidious plan for the British to take our country back. It’s a strange thing. Chester Arthur used to have his staff salute the Union Jack.
THE POST & EMAIL: I
didn’t know that, although I had read that his father did not naturalize until his
son was about 14 years old.
Chester Arthur burned the family Bible, where birth records were kept. Historically,
a child took the citizenship of his father.
MR. LAITY: The founders wanted our president to be 100%, to have a mother and a father who were Americans.
THE POST & EMAIL: What else did you say to the Supreme Court?
MR. LAITY: The founders wanted our president to be 100%, to have a mother and a father who were Americans.
THE POST & EMAIL: What else did you say to the Supreme Court?
Rothschild
Czar Barry Soetoro ~ While Employed As A Senator In New Jersey – Obama Went To
Kenya To Campaign For His Islamic Fascist Cousin Odinga In Order To Over Throw
The Christian Kenyan Government. Odinga Lost and Retaliated By Committing
Genocide With His Thugs.
Obama spent U.S. taxpayer money to commit treason against The United States Of America.
Obama spent U.S. taxpayer money to commit treason against The United States Of America.
MR. LAITY: That
Obama also stands accused of treason. In 18 USC, Part 1, Chapter 115, Section
2381, it says that if a person is guilty of treason, he cannot hold any office
in the United States of America. I said that prior to his becoming president,
he campaigned for an
enemy of the United States, Raila Odinga. President Kibaki was
our ally, and Odinga ran against him. Odinga actually admitted to the press
that Obama is his paternal cousin. Odinga is a Marxist, and so was his father.
Very strange things are going on; we don’t need a person like this in our
presidency.
THE POST & EMAIL: Obama
called Jakarta, Indonesia his “old home town,” we don’t know why he has several
aliases, and both of his birth certificates are declared forgeries. Now Obama
is saying men in the military can wear turbans and beards. What do you think
about that?
- Obama The Impostor From
Indonesia!
- When Barack Obama Was Barry
Soetoro From Indonesia!
- NWO’s British Petroleum Ruin
America’s Gulf ~ But Drills 15 New Oil & Gasoline Projects In Obama’s
Indonesia.
- Update On The Sudden Death Of
Obama’s Sister Lia Soetoro: Information From The Consulate General Of The
Republic Of Indonesia.
MR. LAITY: Allen
West said it’s a bad idea, and I agree with him. Believe it or not, Obama is
having Bibles prohibited; you can’t have them on your desk in the Army or Navy
now; he’s taking crosses down in chapels because they might offend Muslim
soldiers and sailors, which is totally against the Establishment Clause; he
calls the military “his own,” and he’s purging the military of anybody who has
refused to fire upon fellow Americans. I truly believe he’s a traitor and is
throwing monkey wrenches into the works.
On The Holy
Bible Of Jesus Christ
- Obama Orders Priests Arrested
If They Say Mass On Military Bases
- FRC Sues For Obama
Administration’s U.S. Navy Records: Banning Bibles From Walter Reed
Hospital.
- Thank You Mr Obama For
Reminding Us Why We Should Be Ever Vigilant: In Fact 252 Reasons Why!
- McCain’s U.S. Armed &
Created Al-Nusra Rebels In Syria : Turn To Murdering Roman Catholic Priest
Fr. François.
THE POST & EMAIL:
There is a candidate for office from Florida who happens to be black…
MR. LAITY: In fact, that’s his name, Mr. [Joshua] “Black.”
THE POST & EMAIL: Yes, you’re right. He has also named Obama as a traitor.
MR. LAITY: In fact, that’s his name, Mr. [Joshua] “Black.”
THE POST & EMAIL: Yes, you’re right. He has also named Obama as a traitor.
Traitors
Hanged
MR. LAITY: When
I had the Secret Service here, their main
complaint was that I was mentioning the death penalty. And I said, “That’s the
law; it’s not my writing; I didn’t make the law. Whether you’re for it or
against it, that’s what it says. The law says he faces the death penalty if
convicted. I didn’t say, “I’m going to go out and hurt Obama.” I said, “If he’s
convicted, he faces the death penalty.” And I told them right to their faces,
“You guys are risking your lives for an imposter.”
THE POST & EMAIL: What did they say to that?
MR. LAITY: “That’s above my pay grade.”
THE POST & EMAIL: Obama doesn’t seem to have lived the American experience but then purports to be “president” of all Americans.
MR. LAITY: Every time Fox News refers to him as “president,” they’re doing a great disservice. Sometimes I wonder if they do it on purpose, because they say it an awful lot. No matter how many times they’re going to repeat a lie doesn’t make the lie truthful. There’s the apparent Connecticut Social Security number. Adolf Hitler did the same thing as Obama: his real name was “Schicklgruber.” Whoever is the real “Hitler” probably had a good reputation, but Schicklgruber took it and shoddied up the name.
THE POST & EMAIL: What did they say to that?
MR. LAITY: “That’s above my pay grade.”
THE POST & EMAIL: Obama doesn’t seem to have lived the American experience but then purports to be “president” of all Americans.
MR. LAITY: Every time Fox News refers to him as “president,” they’re doing a great disservice. Sometimes I wonder if they do it on purpose, because they say it an awful lot. No matter how many times they’re going to repeat a lie doesn’t make the lie truthful. There’s the apparent Connecticut Social Security number. Adolf Hitler did the same thing as Obama: his real name was “Schicklgruber.” Whoever is the real “Hitler” probably had a good reputation, but Schicklgruber took it and shoddied up the name.
Adolf
- Obama’s Death Panel Modeled
After Hitler’s T4 Program!
- Obama & Hitler From No
Where: Thats How Rothschild Likes It.
- Russia’s Pravda : Barack Obama
and Adolph Hitler Share Similar Ancestries!
- Obama’s First Graduating Class
Of Hitler Youth: 231 Gun Totting FEMA Kamp Kids Graduated.
- Centralizing America Thru
Corporate Banking Power: Remembering Benito Mussolini & Adolph Hitler
Related News:
- The Obama “mama” Timeline: 6
Lost Months Prior To Birth
- Father Of Communist China ‘Sun
Yat-Sen’ & Obama, Received Hawaii’s COLB.
- Obama’s Sister Maya Soetoro’s
Long Form Vault Birth Certificate From Indonesia, Has Hawaii COLB Just
Like Barack.
- The World And Our Tasks In
2014: To Make The World Citizen Defensive Using Psyops & Deceptive
Usurping Operations.
- Anita Dunn’s Husband &
Council For Obama’s $2.8 Million COLB Legal Fees: Bob Bauer Resigns From
Obama Administration!
- The World And Our Tasks In
2014: To Make The World Citizen Defensive Using Psyops & Deceptive
Usurping Operations.
5 comments:
IT DOESN'T MATTER WHAT THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT RULED ON!
If they voted 5-4 in favor of Obama then there would be no problem and it would just go thru the assumed legal system till after Obama leaves office for his opponents to fight it.
If they voted 5-4 for Obama's Treason, then it still would got thru the assumed legal system till after Obama leaves office, and some of those Justices may have some accidents as suicide after a recent ruling would NOT be appropriate.
Also, the UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT is a division of THE UNITED STATES, INC. and therefore the CEO has Full Authority to overturn the decision.
You The People Need to STAND UP and bring forth the Organic Act of 1871, or else Obama can NOT Claim to be CEO of the corporation!
Re: ". Research into the intent of the “natural born Citizen” clause has shown that the citizenship of the parents, and not the birthplace, was actually paramount in determining a child’s citizenship and allegiance. "
IF that were the intent of the writers, they would have said so, but not one of them ever did. And the meaning of Natural Born Citizen came from the common law and referred to the PLACE of birth, not the citizenship of the parents at the time that a US-born child was born.
“Under the longstanding English common-law principle of jus soli, persons born within the territory of the sovereign (other than children of enemy aliens or foreign diplomats) are citizens from birth. Thus, those persons born within the United States are "natural born citizens" and eligible to be President. Much less certain, however, is whether children born abroad of United States citizens are "natural born citizens" eligible to serve as President ..."---- Edwin Meese, et al, THE HERITAGE GUIDE TO THE CONSTITUTION (2005) [Edwin Meese was Ronald Reagan’s attorney general, and the Heritage Foundation is a well-known Conservative organization.]
There should be 5 choices to be checked into as to who can run for President and then be President.
1. Both parents and the child were born in any Authorized State of the United States.
2. Just the parents were born in any Authorized State of the United States.
3. Just one parent and the child were born in any Authorized State of the United States.
4. Just the child was born in any Authorized State of the United States.
5. There doesn't need to be anyone born in any Authorized State of the United States.
If these are acceptable then why are some candidates denied to run for President?
Number '1' would be most obvious.
Number '2' may mean that one of the parents were in the military or working a job in a foreign country which should still qualify them.
Number '3' is Obama's situation which many claim is still good.
Number '4' could mean that the child of Illegal aliens could run.
Number '5' would mean that it is a foreign corporation and the CEO doesn't need to be born here.
Just bring up people in each of these situations and then file lawsuits if they are denied to get it in COURT!
Re "Columbia University Student ID card" that you show is a forgery. Columbia does not and has NEVER issued a student ID card that shows foreign students as a different category than all students. This, of course, you could check by calling Columbia University and asking for the PD department.
http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2013/11/blogger-sh...
http://rcradioblog.wordpress.com/2014/02/17/ahnee...
Post a Comment