Wednesday, March 25, 2015

Bizarre Ultimatum


Bizarre Federal Ultimatum Could Land Innocent Woman Behind Bars - The Pontiac Tribune
http://pontiactribune.com/federal-ultimatum-land-innocent-michigan-woman-behind-bars/
Shane Trejo (The Pontiac Tribune) — Doreen Hendrickson is a mild-mannered and demure mother of two. She seems more like someone you would see at a church picnic rather than in a jail house.
Thanks to the dirty tricks and heavy hands of the authoritarian federal government, she may be incarcerated very soon. Denied her basic rights in the court of law, Doreen Hendrickson was convicted of contempt of court on July 25, 2014.
Her tale is certainly unusual.
Doreen Hendrickson, along with her husband Pete, are libertarian activists who file tax returns in an unconventional way and encourage others to do the same. Because of this, Doreen was charged by the federal government with defying two court orders.
“One commanded Doreen to repudiate her previously-filed, sworn tax returns and replace them with new ones containing testimony dictated by the government,” her husband Pete Hendrickson said. “Doreen was ordered to swear to her personal belief in the testimony she was ordered to make and to conceal the fact that the returns she was ordered to make would be coerced and false.”
In short, Doreen was faced with an ultimatum.
She could obey the court order and say she falsified a tax return (a felony), or she could stand by her word and her conscience by refusing to obey the court order that would force her to perjure herself. Doreen did what was right and chose the noble option.
Now she may pay a huge price for such integrity.
“I am accused by the government of having committed a crime for refusing to obey an order to swear to facts I do not believe are true. I agreed to obey the order if I could also simply add to my signature that I had been ordered by a judge to swear to the facts. That didn’t suit the government however. Not only must I obey an order to swear to something I do not believe, but I am not allowed to indicate that I’ve been ordered to swear under threat of imprisonment.” – Doreen Hendrickson
When you take a closer look at Doreen and Pete’s activism and the ramifications it could have if widely adopted, it becomes clear as to why the federal government feels so threatened. They are desperate to make an example out of them.
Whereas many complain about federal government corruption and do nothing about it, Doreen’s husband Pete developed a plan to help people protect their economic freedom while chipping away at federal power. He outlined it in his book, Cracking the Code, which in 2003 released the incredible information he compiled about the income tax and the 16th Amendment.
“The limited nature of the income tax is not a matter of my opinion,” Pete Hendrickson says. “In addition to the clear words of the law, dozens of United States Supreme Court rulings agree with my research and analysis, while no Supreme Court rulings support any alternative view, including the broad misunderstanding of the law the IRS likes to encourage.”
Although the information offered in Cracking the Code was not secret, it was deliberately kept hidden from the public for many years by the feds’ and their lackeys.
For generations, Americans have been filing tax returns erroneously and paying more than their ‘fair share’ to Uncle Sam. This truth had fallen by the wayside over the years, but thanks to Pete’s research detailed in his book, it has been revived. Since Cracking the Code was released over a decade ago, tens of thousands have taken his advice and received complete income tax refunds.
Hendrickson estimates that at least $2.3 billion has been forced out of federal coffers and back into the rightful hands of hard-working Americans.
“All of these refunds have been thoroughly vetted by the government before being issued, and all have issued even while the government has striven mightily to suppress the knowledge of the law by which these claims are made,” Pete Hendrickson said. “Cracking the Code invokes the mechanism provided by the Founders for keeping the State restrained and obedient to the law.”
However, this success has come at a price for Pete Hendrickson. Because of the overarching implications that his ideas could have in restricting federal power, he and his wife have come under constant attack by the feds. Falsifying and trumping up charges to discredit and destroy their opposition is one of their common tactics to maintain power.
Ever since Cracking the Code was released, the feds have been trying to destroy the Hendrickson family. Pete has already had to serve jail-time, and now his wife may be forced to do the same.
SmallCartoon
Doreen was not allowed to reference any Supreme Court cases that would have demonstrated her innocence to the jury.
She was not allowed to reference the thousands of stories from Americans who received refunds because they filed tax returns based off of information obtained from Pete’s book. Government attorneys lied about a relevant statute and tried to prevent giving the text of the statute from going to the jury.
Mrs. Hendrickson was not even allowed to get through her opening and closing statements. She was taunted by the arrogant judge and not given the proper time to make her case.
To put it quite simply:
This case was a miscarriage of justice. This was a kangaroo court. This was a railroading. This was a dog and pony show. It was a disgrace to everything that America was founded upon.
“Judges don’t get too far in the system by remembering what the law is and who it’s for,” court-watcher Brian Wright said. Wright penned a book called the Motor City Witchcraft Trials about Doreen’s case. “The current lot of judges at all levels has deteriorated into yes men to whatever mobster, especially federal with DHS and the national security state apparatus, tells them to dance.”
To add insult to injury, the jury was instructed NOT to consider the Constitution of the United States while considering the verdict. They were told, “It is not a defense to the crime of contempt that the court order was unlawful or unconstitutional.”
This twisting of the rule of law, common sense, and basic human decency resulted in what would have been otherwise a completely incomprehensible guilty verdict for Doreen Hendrickson.
At a time when the United States houses the largest prison population in the history of the world and jails are busting at the seams trying to house all of these offenders, a temperate homemaker will possibly be behind bars soon merely for obeying her conscience and standing on principle.
In spite of posing a threat to nobody and committing a ‘crime’ that is highly dubious, to put it mildly, she could face YEARS in prison regardless.
However, this story is not over.
power-to-the-people02
We are not forced to allow this travesty to occur unabated. Government officials can be pressured by the public. If local citizens of southeast Michigan can flood the court room at Doreen’s upcoming sentencing hearing, we can put the fear of God into this crooked judge.
The judge will know that all eyes are on her. She will know this story will not die quietly. Our actions could conceivably affect how Doreen is sentenced.
Hopefully there will be many journalists and activists showing up to her court hearing to make sure this story does not go unnoticed. If we don’t stand for Doreen Hendrickson now, it could be us or our loved ones who the government comes for next.
It is time to say enough is enough. Now is the time to stand up for a good person who desperately needs us.
The hearing takes place on Thursday, April 9, 2015 at 10:30 am at the following address:
231 W Lafayette Ave
Detroit, MI 48226-2702
2nd floor
Fighting corruption requires sacrifice. It takes blood, sweat and tears.
If we show up in full force to Doreen’s sentencing, we can make a powerful statement that corruption in the Judicial system will not be tolerated. All individuals deserve a fair shake in court, and Doreen clearly did not receive that.
We must show solidarity behind this noble woman and fight alongside her on behalf of her innocence. 

 http://www.losthorizons.com/Newsletter/CriminalAssault/WhereIsYourLineInTheSand.pdf

12 comments:

Anonymous said...

Oathkeepers need to be there ready to arrest the "Judge" should there be any judgement against the Oath! Make sure the local chapter is there and ready.
Any "official" making a move against her should also be arrested for Misprision of Felony.
And Doreen needs a way out of this country should they move against her.

Anonymous said...

This is why the second amendment was penned and ratified and the Declaration of Independence was written.

Anonymous said...

I wish I could be there! There are several things that should be done from the get-go that would make that administrator (judge) realize the error of her way and the case would simply be dismissed. The sheriff would also have no recourse but to arrest the administrator (judge) and bailiff and/or anyone else in that courtroom that does anything against the human rights (not Constitutional rights, as those do NOT apply in there) of Doreen as they could be cited as accessories to the crime.
Contracts are very powerful, They are also dead of there is not wet ink signatories from BOTH parties.
Maxim of law: All law is commerce. All commerce is contracts. No contract, no law. . . simple as that.
This is not referring to Common Law, only to statutory law.
DS

defender said...

They have immunity from prosecution under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act; 28 USC section 1603. The United States is a foreign corporation per 28 USC 3002(15) and are operating without a valid corporate charter, so anything they do is ultra vires, null and void and unlawful. Doreen is a sovereign as defined by the court in U.S. vs. Fox, U.S. vs. Lee, U.S. V. United Mineworks, U.S. v. Bond and the Ninth circuit court in Richardson v. Secretary of State. The Social Security number is an IMF entity Account I.D. Number per 26 CFR. The geographical boundaries of the United States for application of the Federal Income tax are defined as the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam and America Samoa. The United States is located in the District of Columbia; UCC 9-307(h). USC 26 has never been voted into positive law by Congress. IRS collection authority under part 6301; Collection Authority, part 6303; Notice and Demand for tax, part 6651; Failure to file tax return or pay tax all get their Enforcement regulations from 27 CFR part 24, 25, 53, 250, 270, 275, 70 and 194, which all have to do with excise taxes on Wine, liquor, beer, tobacco and cigarette papers. I have supplied the FBI with enough legal info on the IRS to have everyone in the IRS indicted and thrown in jail and so far nothing has happened. Go figure. The Federal Judge cannot even hear Doreen's case without having a conflict of interest in violation of 28 USC sec.455 and 18 USC sec 208. If Doreen is working for a non-federal employer for an hourly rate then nothing she makes is taxable under 26 CFR section 1.1402(b)3(d). Doreen has to assert that she is not the Fiduciary Trustee over the IMF account and is not the Nom-deguerre entity (Bender v. Kasnick) and is not a U.S. Corporation. At that point the federal court loses jurisdiction. If you try to argue the tax codes then you will lose as the you have not presented any rule of law in your defense that the court can make a determination on. The Court will also ignore your pro-se defense as you are not an attorney that can defend the charges against the all caps corporate entity. Attorneys can only represent corporations, persons of unsound mind and Wards of the State. So you are screwed either way if you try to play by their rules. You don't get thrown in jail for tax evasion, you get thrown in jail for failure to exercise your duties as assumed trustee over the IMF account by discharging the debt or charges against the IMF account at the demand of the Holder in due course of the Industrial bonds in that all caps name. Doreen needs to ask the Court to verify who is the Principle and what are the full amount of the charges against the IMF entity Account I.D. number. (the SSN). She then has to get the two forms from the Judge and sign them in all caps. They are the forms to access the Treasury funds and the Social security funds. At that point the charges against the IMF account will be satisfied and Doreen's body will not be held as Surety. Why do you think the Grand jury indictment is called a True Bill? It is a bill against the IMF account for a copyrighted code violation of a foreign corporation and is not law. Doreen cannot be held in jail per 42 USC section 1945; (Debtors prison unlawful) and 18 USC sec 4001(a) No citizen shall be incarcerated or otherwise detained by the United States except pursuant to a direct Act of Congress. Doreen's name isn't on any Acts of Congress! Case closed!

Freewill said...

Pete and Doreen are in the best hands right now. I just got off the phone with them. This case is as good as over with.. All that needs to be done now is figure out damages and fees.

You should have seen it when the IRS was after a friend of mine for 26 years tax evasion~ Case was shut down in 16 minutes. You ever see a courtroom full of people with their jaws on the floor? Quite the site!

Freewill said...

The corporate U.S. is a bankrupt corporation. They are civilly dead and do not exist in law. Only a trustee of the bankruptcy can speak on the behalf of a bankrupt corporation.
Your honor may I please the court, This gentleman to my right is not a trustee of the bankruptcy and cannot speak on behalf of the bankrupt corporation.
Your honor may it please the court, since there is no plaintiff present, I move to dismissal of this frivolous case and would like to collect damages and fees.

This woman Judge is very stern and also fair. I am aware of her. Doreen and Pete are not far from me.

Constitution states they only have immunity during a time of good behavior. They are definitely not in good behavior. Therefore no immunity. USC is only the internal corporation rulebook.

Ps. I was the final student of the biggest legend in constitutional law of 52 years in the making ;)

Yes, he is still around and no names... you already know who I am talking about!!

Anonymous said...

Opinion.
I don't know what Cracking the Code had them complete in the IRS tax returns, but if they filed them every year, they entered some contract every year, but someone who tells her to do something, can't really make her do it.
They can tell her to sign the document without modifying the under penalty of perjury statement but that doesn't stop her words on the signature line from being
Under Coercion, Against Free Will, Doreen H.
Under Coercion, not the person, Doreen
Judge So-n-So made me sign this, Doreen
Find your power when someone is taking your power.
You still hold the pen and it's your life being used to make the contract.
No one can tell you how to sign a document, it's your signature, if it was an X or a smiley face it's your signature, check the uniform commercial code for signature, it can be an image, characters, picture, even a stamp of your signature, it could be a letter, number, scriggally line, whatever. You made the mark, it's your mark.

IRS and other entities including courts are known to sit quiet while people exercise their remedy and then years later, pile up the charges while the unsuspecting remedy user has no clue that this stuff is being piled up against them so they can be charged.
Other opinions are, she could bar grieve the attorney if she accepted representation and was not properly represented especially if she was active in her defense, or file a judicial complaint on the judge if he used a power not granted by the people or the legislature, file an identity theft complaint if there is evidence an IRS agent used her identity to make a different tax return without her expressed consent, make known on any document put before her, her lack of consent on it's face so that anyone holding that paper knows consent was not granted.
Of course I know nothing, and will always know nothing because as soon as I think I know something, some thing changes.

Freewill said...

Going into the details of the case is frivolous. USC, UCC, case law, wet ink signed contracts... all just a waste of time and energy. Just simply destroy the cases using the bankruptcy and trustees.

Here is all the information needed to shut down any agent, agency, court, aspect, or business licensed under the corporate U.S. or any of it's franchise states.
You could call this the silver bullet.
http://classawebhosting.com/traficantfiles.doc

Freewill said...

PLEASE NOTE: IF A CORPORATION IS BANKRUPT IN LAW IT IS SAID TO BE CIVILLY DEAD AND NOT A REAL PARTY IN INTEREST WHICH HAS RIGHTS TO MAKE COMPLAINTS OR SUE ANY……BODY, GOT THAT, IT MEANS YOU CAN’T BE SUED BY THAT CIVILLY DEAD CORPORATION OF PERSON.
A party to a Lawsuit must possess the capacity to sue or prosecute their claims. M.C.R. 2.201 (C), AN INCORPORATED ENTITY acquires the capacity to SUE or prosecute their claims in the STATE OF MICHIGAN through incorporation and /or compliance with the Laws of the State of Michigan, M.C.L.A. 450.1911. The Plaintiff(s) MATTER OF FACT DO NOT EXIST AND DID NOT EXIST IN LAW AT THE TIME OF THE ORIGINATION OF THIS COMPLAINT AS BEING A BANKRUPT CORPORATION AND CIVILLY DEAD, SEE HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION 192 JUNE 5th, 1933, and certainly did not exist at the time of the alleged Plaintiff's Complaint and Plaintiff(s)/APPELLEE(S) do not exist presently as a matter of fact and LAW!! THEY ARE A CIVILLY DEAD, a BANKRUPT CORPORATION. . PLAINTIFF(S)/ ARE IN FACT LIARS AND PERJURERS ON THE RECORD, AND I AM TRYING TO BE MY NORMAL POLITE, BUT THE TRUTH IS THE TRUTH!! THEY LIED OVER AND OVER AGAIN, and assumed they would NEVER be caught!! PLAINTIFF(S) YOU ARE CAUGHT, A STONE FACT!
Now your Honor Michigan Courts have consistently held that a dissolved Corporation is essentially a " DEAD PERSON ", the same applies to a BANKRUPT CORPORATION, making any action taken by IT NULL AND VOID OF LAW. Please see Matter of Dissolution of Esquire Products Intern,, Inc. 145 Michigan Appeals 106, 377 NW 2nd 356 (a 1985 case), citing U.S. TRUCK Co. vs. Pennsylvania Surety Corp., 259 Mich. 422, 243 NW 2nd 311 (a 1932 case).
All these cases assumed that at one time the Corporation was in fact in existence LAWFULLY, but some how went into a state of dissolution. THESE PLAINTIFF(S) ARE IN FACT A BANKRUPT CORPORATION AND CIVILLY DEAD ON THE RECORD OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN AS SUCH BANKRUPT CORPORATION PLAINTIFF(S) OPERATE AS A FICTION OR DEFACTO CORPORATION. PLEASE SEE HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION 192, JUNE 5th, 1933., ALSO NOTE MR. Prosecutor/attorney (P-12345) , IS NOT THE TRUSTEE OF THAT STATE OF MICHIGAN BANKRUPTCY, AND WOULD HAVE NO AUTHORITY TO SPEAK FOR THAT BANKRUPT CORPORATION UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES, EVEN IF HE WAS PROPERLY LICENSED AND SWORN HIS TIMELY OATH OF OFFICE, AND FILED HIS SURETY BONDS TIMELY WITH THE PROPER AUTHORITY. HE HAS NO LAWFUL DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY TO SPEAK FOR OR ACT FOR THE BANKRUPT CORPORATION THE STATE OF MICHIGAN. FURTHER THE PLAINTIFF(S) HAVE NO STANDING OR LAWFUL CAPACITY TO SUE THIS Alleged Defendant and any claims to the contrary are 100% FRAUD IN FACT!!
The Plaintiff(s)/ FLAT OUT LIED ON THE SWORN RECORD OF THIS HONORABLE COURT ON SEVERAL OCCASIONS, AND THEIR ATTORNEY (P-12345) SWORE ON THE RECORD THAT THE PLAINTIFF(S) LIES WERE TRUE IN FACT. SEE MICHIGAN COURT RULE 2.114 (A), (B), (C), (D), (E), AND (F) and clearly this is an ABUSE OF PROCESS NOT TO MENTION PERJURY AND FRAUD ON THIS HONORABLE COURT, A CAPITOL FELONY, A FACT!!
Now the Plaintiff(s) APPELLEE(S) are NOT A REAL PARTY IN INTEREST TO SUE, BECAUSE THEY ARE A BANKRUPT ENTITY, SEE HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION 192, JUNE 5TH, 1933, and therefore the Plaintiff's/ APPELLEE'S COMPLAINT ACTION IS BARRED AS A MATTER OF FACT AND LAW. Please see Michigan Court Rule, 2.201(B)
ISSUES REAL PARTY IN INTEREST " STANDING"

" (B) Real Party in Interest. An action must be prosecuted in the name of the REAL PARTY IN INTEREST."

THERE IS NO REAL PARTY IN INTEREST WITH " THE PLAINTIFF(S), THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, which is FRAUD,
., a fraud, as they are NOT INCORPORATED LAWFULLY !!THEY ARE CIVILY DEAD!!

Anonymous said...

Can you elaborate on who helped them? Is the information out there for others to be helped?

Freewill said...

scroll down a few more comments and read what I put in the big comment.

Anonymous said...

Why not counter them......The IRS is not legal.....this lady should not have stepped into their dock once you do that, your on their boat......she could have made mince meat out of them.......by not crossing that line.

There is another person in Pensacola, that went through the same illegal grilling, hes now been incarcerated for close to 10 years.....every time his review comes up, they squash it, this man is a Pastor, and very active against the Corporation, this is why they conjured up a false accusation of Tax evasion against him. He really needs support. Dr Kent Hovind, he can be seen on Youtube