http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2015/04/01/montana-gov-bullock-vetoes-anti-commandeering-bill-ignorant-of-the-law-or-a-liar/
Montana Gov. Bullock Vetoes Anti-Commandeering Bill: Ignorant of the Law, or a Liar?
Either Montana Gov. Steve Bullock doesn’t
understand the constitutional relationship between his state and the
federal government, or he’s a liar.
On Friday, Bullock vetoed a bill that would have
prohibited state and local agencies in Montana from enforcing any
future federal gun laws.
Rep. Art Wittich, sponsored HB203. The bill
banned the state “from enforcing, assisting in the enforcement of or
otherwise cooperating in the enforcement of” a federal act enacted on or
after Jan. 1, 2015 that “prohibits, restricts, or requires individual
licensure for ownership, possession, transfer, or use of any firearm or any magazine or other ammunition feeding device.”
Bullock vetoed the bill, saying it “puts law enforcement officers in the position of violating laws they have sworn to uphold.”
To put it bluntly, Bullock is full of crap. It does no such thing.
The governor vetoed a similar bill in 2013 and gave the same reason.
He was wrong then.
He’s still wrong now.
HB203 would not create some kind of moral
dilemma for Montana cops. In fact, Bullock makes an absolutely absurd
assertion when he claims the bill would put law enforcement officers in a
position of “violating laws.” How does leaving the enforcement of
federal statutes to federal law enforcement violate any law?
Bullock pretends Montana operates under some
kind of sacred obligation to enforce every federal law that comes down
the pike from Washington D.C.
It does not.
Nothing says states must enforce federal laws.
Nothing.
Nowhere.
In fact, the Supreme Court has consistently held
the exact opposite under a well-established legal principle known as
the anti-commandeering doctrine. The federal government cannot
commandeer state resources or require state personnel to implement any
federal act or enforce any federal law.
Bullock must know this. Heck, virtually
everybody involved in the political or legal process knows this. We
pointed this fact out to him two years ago. Since then, legislators from
across the political spectrum have introduced hundreds of bills based
on the anti-commandeering doctrine, from measures to prohibit state
cooperation with federal immigration enforcement to bills that would end
state support for implementation of Obamacare. Last year, Idaho Gov.
Butch Otter signed a bill almost identical to HB203 into law.
Nobody of any significance
questions the legal basis of any of these bills. The anti-commandeering
doctrine stands as “settled law.” ......
1 comment:
Sheriff Joe Arpaio is persecuted for trying to uphold federal (immigration) law. The liberal hypocrisy is amazing. They want what they want, regardless what the law says.
Post a Comment