Disabled Navy Vet Left ‘Devastated’ After All of His Guns Are Confiscated — and He Still Can’t ‘Believe’ Why
A disabled U.S. Navy veteran in Glendale, Arizona, is “devastated” after he says police confiscated 28 of his guns, valued at over $25,000, after a neighbor made “false” allegations that he threatened him.
Rick Bailey, a 56-year-old retired software systems engineer, told TheBlaze on Tuesday that he and his neighbor were engaged in a months-long dispute over his landscaping company. He said his neighbor would park two large, smelly “dump trucks” used for his business and other vehicles in the small cul-de-sac where they live.
Bailey said he eventually filed a complaint with the city and the neighbor was ordered to remove all dump trucks and other work-related equipment from the private residence. Though he initially complied with the city’s order, the veteran said his neighbor would sometimes bring the trucks back on some weekends, when the city was closed, “just to irritate us.”
After over two months of calm in January and February, the situation climaxed on March 16 after Bailey called police because he smelled what he thought were “toxic chemicals” coming from the neighbor’s property.
“I spend my days sitting out on my patio relaxing,” he told TheBlaze, explaining that he is severely disabled. “The smell got so bad, I had to come back to my patio and use my inhaler — so I called the police to see if anything could be done.”
When the police arrived, Bailey said he was told by police officers that the neighbor alleged he had threatened to “shoot” him, a claim he said was “bulls**t.” The very next day, March 17, the neighbor told authorities that Bailey had threatened him and filed for an “injunction against harassment.”
Bailey said he’s been trained on firearms since he was a kid and fully understands the implications of threatening to “shoot” someone, even as a joke.
But the protective order doesn’t even appear to mention Bailey making any gun-related threats. The neighbor alleged that Bailey threatened to “stuff me in my dump truck,” demanded that he move his trucks, and told him to move his boat to the other side of his property, according to a copy of the neighbor’s injection petition.
Read all of the complains the neighbor listed as reasons why he needed a protective order here:
Bailey denies threatening his neighbor. He also said he is physically incapable of harming the man due to his disability. Bailey said he was medically discharged from the Navy after four years of service due to a serious back injury. His condition eventually forced to retire from his job as well.
Still, a judge apparently found the neighbor’s allegations sufficient enough to not only issue the protective order, but to also order the confiscation of his 28 firearms. The judge attached a separate order directing officers to take Bailey’s guns and revoking his right to purchase firearms, according to documents obtained by TheBlaze.
Under “other orders,” the judge wrote: “Def shall not have/buy firearms, surrender any to Glendale PD.”
Bailey told TheBlaze the Glendale Police Department wasted no time, arriving at his house to confiscate his guns the same day the judge signed the order.
Glendale Police Department spokesman Sgt. David Vidaure confirmed to TheBlaze that police received the court order and acted on it by confiscating Bailey’s firearms. He said the police department did not play a role in the decision.
“I was totally devastated,” Bailey told TheBlaze. “I couldn’t believe something like this could happen. I had a 3-hour anxiety-slash-panic attack while officers were there and after they left. They wanted to call an ambulance.”
The Navy veteran intends to appeal the judge’s court orders and attempt to reclaim the confiscated firearm stash that took him over a decade to collect. A GoFundMe page has since been started to raise money for legal fees in the case.
Vidaure said the protective order is valid for one year, and — in theory — Bailey should get his guns back when it expires.
Bailey said he hopes his case can serve as a precedent to prevent other gun owners from having their weapons confiscated over wrongful allegations.
“I want people to be able to look it up and say, ‘This is so unjust, it should not be done, period.’ And anybody who makes false claims like this, once it’s proven, should face a federal punishment. They should be put in jail.”
Calls made to the Glendale City Court were not immediately returned.
3 comments:
THIS SO CALLED JUDGEY WUDGEY WHO IS NOT EVEN A JUDGE BUT A MAGISTRATE (MARITIME LAW) SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO DO ANYTHING TO US AS THE CORPORATION IS DEFUNCT.... MORE COMING ON THIS ONE....
This man will not get his guns back until he goes mano e mano.
He needs copy of the papers that purportedly ordered the guns removed.
He needs names of all of those people, and he must record the 'theft' to some agency. If the police won't take it, the DA, and if he wont' take it the AG, and if he won't take it the FBI, and keep going.
Every state has in the criminal procedures a process to go through to get confiscated property back, and he'll have to go through that as well.
He also has the ability to prove he has no criminal record to go with that purported threat. I was assuming he was arrested, bonded out and as part of that 'agreement' that he did a wrong that he had to pay 10% to be let free again, that they confiscated the guns.
Property is property, and unless he has an agreement not mentioned, he still has a right to property, and unless the men who took it had power of attorney over him, they can't have it, and whoever said they could had best produce the document that gave power of attorney or the right to rule over this man's property.
The underlying paperwork is what he needs to take the time to discover and create his own using the criminal code section for getting property back, it includes noticing the local court and copying the department of justice and 30 days time to settle the issue in compliance with law.
All this stuff just gets me because people won't read, they won't study.
They just complain about how they were wronged, when we all know 'their world is based on rules', as Morpheus in the Matrix said.
Because it is rules based they can't break them, but our world is not based on their rules, you use their rules cause they don't follow them. Like some people, no one reads and studies even when it's their job to know what they can and cannot do.
If I rob you, you'll file a police report, but if the police rob you and there is no report, to the rest of the world, there is an underlying agreement, you may complain about it, but to us, there is an agreement that you just don't like.
If there is no agreement! What are you waiting for! Go get your stuff back!
I can't give legal advice until I become an attorney and that's not going to happen so you'll never get legal advice from me. Anything not written under penalty of perjury is just opinion. News is opinion
watch Karl Letnz on you tube:
"i, a man, require you restore my property now!"
Post a Comment