HASTINGS' LESSONS FROM THE GRAVE .......
HAVE WE LEARNED ANY THING?
YOUR VEHICLE CAN BE REMOTELY CONTROLLED!!!!
Investigative
journalist Michael Hastings died in a mysterious car accident two years
ago this month. Will we ever know the truth about his death? Photo
credit: Lord Jim / Flickr
Two years ago this month, the young and ambitious investigative
journalist Michael Hastings died in a mysterious, fiery car crash.
Investigators and journalists have uncovered some startling revelations
regarding the accident in the past two years, though the full truth of
what really happened to Hastings could have been buried with him.
Hastings
was known for challenging conventional wisdom and investigating
authority at the highest levels. With a Polk Award-winning article in Rolling Stone, he brought down General Stanley McChrystal, commander of NATO’s International Security Assistance Force and US Forces-Afghanistan.
At
the time of his death, Hastings had been working on a story about CIA
Director John Brennan. The president of Strategic Forecasting Inc.
(“Stratfor”), a CIA contract global intelligence firm, has described
Brennan in secret emails as someone on a “witch hunt” of investigative
journalists. Brennan, of course, has denied these claims: a CIA
spokesperson told reporter Kimberly Dvorak in an email that notwithstanding WikiLeaks, “any
suggestion that Director Brennan has ever attempted to infringe on
constitutionally-protected press freedoms is offensive and baseless.”
Is
it possible that Brennan felt threatened by the content of Hastings’
would-be story? If yes, how would the CIA have responded to such an
expose ?
Car Hacking—Reality, not Theory
At the time of Hastings’ death, counterterrorism expert Richard Clarke told The Huffington Post
that it was possible that Hastings’ car had been hacked; that the known
details of the crash were consistent with a car cyber attack.
“There
is reason to believe that intelligence agencies for major
powers”—including the United States—know how to remotely seize control
of a car, Clarke said.
At the time, however, Clarke’s suggestion
received little attention from the mainstream media. In the past two
years, the issue of automobile cybersecurity has entered the mainstream
arena.
Since 2013, scientists have proven the possibility of hacking a car, and lawmakers are revealing the lack of cybersecurity against these types of threats built into today’s digital cars.
“Your
car may have as many as 30 separate electronic control units, some of
them built for wireless access. Hackers have shown that they can
disconnect brakes, kill acceleration and more—although most hacks
currently require direct, wired access to the car’s systems. Even so, a
lab technician turned off our test car while we were driving it—from a
cell phone,” Chris Meyer, Vice President of Consumer Reports, said in an email to WhoWhatWhy.
At
the annual hacker conference Defcon2013, just two months after
Hastings’ death, computer security experts Christopher Valasek and
Charlie Miller successfully hacked two cars, accessing almost all of the
car’s electronic control units.
Video demos pre-recorded for the
conference showed Miller and Valasek able to jerk the steering wheel,
disable the car’s brakes, accelerate, manipulate the seat belt, turn off
the engine, mess with both interior and exterior lights, honk the horn,
and program the console to read that the car had a full tank of gas
when it didn’t, according to CNET.
After
this successful demonstration of a computer-generated car hack,
lawmakers sent inquiries to car manufacturers about the cybersecurity of
their automobiles. The results do not provide much of a sense of
security—or cybersecurity—to drivers on the road today.
In February 2014, Sen. Ed Markey (D-MA) released the report Tracking & Hacking: Security & Privacy Gaps Put American Drivers at Risk. Sixteen major automobile manufacturers participated in the report, and four major trends are as follows:
Here are the four trends found in the report:
•
Nearly 100 percent of vehicles on the market include wireless
technologies that could pose vulnerabilities to hacking or privacy
intrusions.
• Most automobile manufacturers were unaware of or unable to report on past hacking incidents.
• Security measures to
prevent remote access to vehicle electronics are inconsistent and
haphazard across the different manufacturers.
• Only two automobile
manufacturers were able to describe any capabilities to diagnose or
meaningfully respond to an infiltration in real-time; most of these
manufacturers rely on technologies that cannot diagnose or respond to
infiltration in real-time at all.
The information on the very real
possibility of carhacking raises the question: was Michael Hastings’
car hacked? Is it possible that someone was trying to shut him up?
“This
was not an accident.” In the immediate days leading up to his death,
Hastings was sure that his car had been tampered with and was scared for
his life. Photo credit: Lord Jim / Flickr
Michael’s Chilling Apprehensions During Last Hours
Hastings’ friends and family time and time again described him as
“fearless.” In the week leading up to June 18, 2013, however, Hastings
was panicked, and openly expressed concerns to his friends and
colleagues that his Mercedes had been tampered with.
Hastings
showed up at a neighbor’s apartment just 24 hours before his death and
“urgently asked to borrow her Volvo,” saying that he was afraid to drive
his own car but that he wanted to leave town, Hastings’ friend and
neighbor Jordanna Thigpen told LA Weekly.
Sixteen hours before his death, Hastings alerted friends and colleagues, including WikiLeaks lawyer Jennifer Robinson, that the FBI was investigating him.
“The Feds are interviewing my ‘close friends and associates,’” Hastings wrote to colleagues at Buzzfeed, at 12:56pm on June 17.
“Perhaps
if the authorities arrive ‘BuzzFeed GQ’, er HQ, may be wise to
immediately request legal counsel before any conversations or interviews
about our news-gathering practices or related journalism issues. Also:
I’m onto a big story, and need to go off the radar for a bit,” he wrote.
He signed the email that he “hoped to see you all soon.”
“As soon as I got [that email] I was nervous my whole body was shaking, I had goosebumps,” friend Joe Biggs told WhoWhatWhy.
And then, at 4:20am on June 18, on Highland Avenue in Los Angeles, Hastings’ silver Mercedes C250 exploded and hit a palm tree. There were no apparent attempts to brake before the collision.
“The whole surrounding circumstances still eat away at me all the time,” Biggs told WhoWhatWhy.
“A car doesn’t just have a flash underneath before it crashes. The
neighbors said that they heard an explosion—a loud explosion—then the
car hit the tree. If a car hits a tree, it will pin the engine going
into the trunk of the tree into the base or frame of the car. Instead,
the engine was ejected, at the path of travel, heading down the road,”
he said.
“I’ve never seen an explosion like that,” Terry Hopkins, a former US Navy military policeman who served in Afghanistan, told WhoWhatWhy two years ago.
“I’ve seen military vehicles explode, but never quite like that. Look,
here’s a reporter who brought down a general. He’s sending out emails
saying he’s being watched. It’s four in the morning and his car
explodes? Come on, you have to be naive not to at least consider it
wasn’t an accident.”
The Immediate Aftermath
In
the days immediately following his death, the FBI promptly responded to
inquiries from the press about whether or not Hastings had been under
investigation—a rare instance of punctuality and seeming transparency
from the agency.
“At no time was journalist Michael Hastings under investigation by the FBI,” said agency public affairs specialist Laura Eimiller.
This
is clearly inconsistent with what Hastings himself thought and wrote
about in the email to his friends and colleagues. VICE News
investigative reporter Jason Leopold and MIT Doctoral Candidate Ryan
Shapiro also thought the FBI’s official position was questionable. In
2013, Leopold and Shapiro spearheaded a Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA) lawsuit to open documents that could reveal whether or not
Hastings was under investigation by the FBI.
The lawsuit revealed that the FBI had misled the public: Michael Hastings was on the FBI’s radar—if not under complete investigation—for “controversial reporting.”
“The
FBI was investigating someone’s reporting. Clearly it wasn’t just
isolated to Hastings, so… that’s a big fucking deal,” Leopold told WhoWhatWhy.
Investigating
reporting threatens investigative reporting, Leopold believes. The
revelation that law enforcement agencies will investigate journalists’
reporting has a “chilling effect on newsgathering and on the ability for
journalists and sources to speak” Leopold said.
Leopold said he
thinks that’s why even two years after Michael’s death there are still
government officials investigating journalists. “Unfortunately,” Leopold
said, “it’s really unclear what these government agencies are doing
behind the scenes… That’s kind of scary.”
Possibility of Foul Play
Despite his misgivings about secret government activities, Leopold doesn’t necessarily think Hastings’ death was murder.
“I
believe Michael Hastings died in a car crash, I want to make that
clear, I have absolutely no thoughts about if there was anything
suspicious.” Leopold said. “I’m well aware that people try to make the
connection ‘oh he’s investigating Brennan and then he died,’ I’m not on
that page.”
Similarly, Hastings’ wife, Elise Jordan, told CNN interviewer Piers Morgan that her husband’s death was a “tragic accident.”
Officials
from the LAPD have also publicly stated that there had been no
indication of foul play in their investigation of the crash, but,
requesting anonymity, a family member of Hastings previously expressed dissatisfaction with the LAPD’s investigation to WhoWhatWhy.
“The
LAPD has done a really sloppy job investigating his case, and they were
hoping for a mother lode of drugs in his system. When they didn’t get
it in the toxicology lab results (science!), they had to insert
speculation throughout their field report to compensate for their lack
of an investigation. It’s so irresponsible,” the family member wrote in
an email.
Investigators did consider the possibility of suicide,
according to the Los Angeles County Coroner’s Department report,
although Hastings was not known to have had any past suicide attempts or
ideations, the report said. In response to the suggestion of suicide as
the cause of death, friends of Hastings told WhoWhatWhy that they highly doubt it.
“No,
he had a good family, he loved everybody in his family. I don’t think
he would allow himself to do something like that because he knew that
would affect so many people,” Biggs told WhoWhatWhy.
“The
world lost a great reporter, he was a fearless journalist who had
bigger balls than most people could ever imagine,” Biggs said. “I think
the whole case should be revisited honestly.”
Panorama credits:
Computer Center: Army Cyber / Flickr , Mercedes Benz C250: Tokumeigakarinoaoshima / Wikimediahttp://whowhatwhy.org/2015/06/
No comments:
Post a Comment