Thursday, July 2, 2015

One TRILLION Dollar Lawsuit Filed Against MSM For “Staging Sandy Hook Massacre”

2 July A.D. 2015

That the facts about Sandy Hook are being documented and laid at the feet of the controlled media is terrific!  Congratulations to all who are at the head of that effort.  This nation may not realize, yet, the benefit of this effort.

In a bit more distant perspective than expressed by the author of the piece below, let's just say that this suit has an expectation of being big.

Not that this author's perspective is going to change the outcome one iota, the details of this author's perspective will be withheld until there's something official from the judiciary.  Early analytical thoughts include a focus on actual damages to the party(ies) plaintiff and liability in the named parties.  News media, generally, is exactly as Rush Limbaugh describes his program, namely daily "entertainment" programs.  At least Rush doesn't try to say otherwise. And, the official reports out of "government" lie to us all the time.  The "news" reports, regarding what is covered and what is not covered, are all lies, all the time, more of the "omission" type, but as Dan Blather ran into, sometimes of the "commission" type, as well. What they focus on (look who found a new and unusual way to die today "circus" reports) and what the people really need to know are so distant as to be on different planets.  The fact that the controlled media is lying to us (about everything, typically by omission) plus a couple of bucks can afford one of the smaller cups of fancy coffee available these days.

There may be more parties Defendant, and if so, we can focus on the source as distinguished from the messenger.  (Is it the media's problem that they, too, were lied to?)

Proving the lies is a huge part of this litigation effort, and that there's an effort to take the matter into the crucible of judicial fact-finding is also huge.  There is now an official, public Record of "the rest of the story" for this one. Whatever happens judicially, it's a landmark effort intending to prove that the "news" is fully controlled and therefore isn't trustworthy.  That's been an effort of many for several decades now.  It's an effort to "fix" the media by a means that at least stands a chance of reaching that part of the citizenry who are not yet up to the level of critical review of things so as to evaluate what they're "hearing/seeing" via the "news" programming.  It's a statement by that Plaintiff and all who have contributed toward the exposing of the reality in that matter, of being sick and tired of being lied to by "government" via its yip-yip yellow lap dog, the controlled media.  It's a position that speaks for millions and millions of us.

God speed with this one.

P.S.  While there may be a judicial remedy, the rock-solid solution to the lying-media problem is the traditional market solution.  If we'd get a boycott going of the nature and duration of what "we" did regarding Exxon and the oil spill in ALASKA, they'd be out of business (eventually; the very deep pockets propping up that effort at the moment might not even "feel" the effects of such a boycott).  Fundamentally, because they've become mouthpieces for the "official governmental version" of whatever, we know just to stop reading/listening to them. As the liars and government-uber-alles view propagandists are sent packing from the marketplace, legit news-people, who don't consider themselves "journalists" (and entertainers) but actual news-people, who already exist, will fill the information-flow gap.  It'll be a diet change on the "food for thought" part of life, and therefore a gradual but steady modification is the best plan.  In other words, based on yet one more tremendously well-researched and exposed example of the reality of controlled media, we come to terms with the fork in the road of trying to "fix" the "Beast" and its minions or change ourselves. (Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me.)  Over only one of these do we really have any material and meaningful control.  Change is uncomfortable and inconvenient, and this "Beast" system is depending heavily on our lack of desire to change this particular informational diet that they've got us on.  In the exact same way they can't compel us to use the "funny money," they can't compel us to "consume" their propaganda, which they call "news," either.

Harmon L. Taylor

Legal Reality
Dallas, Texas

No comments: