Friday, January 29, 2016

U.S. Government Placed in Checkmate!


Mark Eric
Jan 28, 2016

I have researched and dug and worked long hours under conditions of threat, often going hungry, being ridiculed, losing homes, property, automobiles, lifelong savings, suffering imprisonment, assault, battery, emotional and physical abuse, and it is time to show the world exactly what I have discovered and learned. 

At first I was shocked by what I was uncovering, but as time goes by there is nothing that the 'elite' that think they rule the world do anymore that shocks me. 

They have no empathy, no morals and no conscience. 

They are beyond evil and relish in the suffering of innocent living souls.

I have, however, found the complete and permanent solution of which part of is following in a document that was sent to: 

Secretary of State – John F. Kerry
Attorney General – Eric Himpton Holder
Federal Bureau of Investigation - Director James B. Comey


Anonymous said...

'The only way to win is to refuse to play the game.' - Rumie

Anonymous said...

Excellent! Well done.

Anonymous said...

I can concur with what is said here. If you understand what is said, you will know why there is no reasoning with these people. No argument of law is going to work. Their law ids the law of power and who has the biggest gun. You can argue maritime admiralty, corporate, common law, lien filing, etc., all you want, and it will not matter. They use these arguments against you as a distraction so you will not see what is happening. Do you for one second think the FBI listened to the people at Burns, Or, or even comprehended what they were saying. If you do, then you are living in a fantasy world.

Anonymous said...

What do you mean; placed in checkmate? Did General Dunford finally wake up?

Anonymous said...

They woke up in a pile of rusty broken nails.

Anonymous said...

A better start than many.
He has said who has harmed him and gave their name.
I wish he would not have given their position in the corporation, because living souls do not 'operate' in any capacity, and if they are going to interact with us, then let them be accused as the living soul, and not in any other capacity.

I have to hear it again, but it appears he only identified himself as the living soul.

I have to listen again to hear if he identified his wife as the living soul, the people he wrote the letter to as the living soul, the people who wrote the """ opinion """ for the Supreme Court are living souls.

Equal has no power over equal.
Unequal things cannot be joined together.

His complaint would need to be of equal living souls against him, the living soul.

When he is terrorized, he should know the name of the living soul who has terrorized him and filed the criminal complaint with the agencies using their criminal complaint resources.

When he does, their world is based on rules (Morpheus, The Matrix, 1999), so that means by process or rules, they contact the one who is named in the complaint to get an answer. That one has to answer the complaint.

If the one who the complaint is made, uses the corporate body to communicate with you, the answer for why they [assumed/presumed] they had the authority to do as they do to you, you do not have to accept anything from anyone you do not have consent or agreement with.

Mail can be Refused. It will get back to them, unopened, further proving you do not bend to their will, nor recognize their perception of authority when it comes to your will.
1.0 Recipient Options
1.1 Basic Recipient Concerns
1.1.1 Delivery to Addressee

Addressees may control delivery of their mail. Without a contrary order, the mail is delivered as addressed. Mail addressed to several persons may be delivered to any one of them.
1.1.2 Refusal at Delivery

The addressee may refuse to accept a mailpiece when it is offered for delivery.
1.1.3 Refusal After Delivery

After delivery, an addressee may mark a mailpiece “Refused” and return it within a reasonable time, if the piece or any attachment is not opened. Mail that may not be refused and returned unopened under this provision may be returned to the sender only if it is enclosed in a new envelope or wrapper with a correct address and new postage. The following may not be refused and returned postage-free after delivery:

a. Pieces sent as Registered Mail, insured, Certified Mail, collect on delivery (COD), Adult Signature and return receipt for merchandise.

b. Response mail to the addressee’s sales promotion, solicitation, announcement, or other advertisement that was not refused when offered to the addressee.

(more at that link)

Anonymous said...

where it states the following:
The following may not be refused and returned postage-free after delivery:

Discernment is important. It didn't say it cannot be refused only.
There is an 'and' there, so both criteria has to be met.

Refused and returned postage-free those items cannot.
Refused and returned where you pay the postage for the return, is not mentioned as an exclusion, so be willing to refuse and pay those fees they paid to send it to you, to send it back.

This works for those agencies that trap you with a registered mail, and a postal worker shows up to get your signature (contracts are signed), and then when they see you signed for it, they start a garnishment or confiscation of your bank account.

Also be aware delivering to anyone at the address, that's why you must reasonably return anything received by others who are not you, if you want to refuse the mail.

You must use more brain power for learning to navigate this world.
The poster, has used a lot of their life energy to discover this.
That means missed t.v. programs, and not knowing all the stats of a particular sport.

No one needs hand information that is available to everyone if they would just

seek and ye shall find.

marie said...


Anonymous said...

This whole Oregon situation smells as rotten as denmark.

There's no doubt that Bundy, Hitchens and others have their heart in the right place. They are lawfully making the moves to return oregon to the republic of states.

The problem is they really went about this in a crummy way.
Lets look at square one: Pete Santilli, once upon a time he was good news. Nowadays media big wigs like Santilli are bad news, they like sensationalism.

If there's a shootout over some purported constitution that is sensationalism. If there is a bunch of legal fictions attacking another legal fiction that is sensationalism!!

Remember how Montana gained back their sovereignty! Stop playing by their rules and flat deny consent.

If the Bundy's want to get themselves and the Hammonds out of this in one piece they need to stop relying on big media, and they need to break all ties to the legal fictions. If they do that in time they will be free to walk away from this and never set foot in it again.

But if they don't their next destination is prison. Whoever is in charge of the lawful militia that is backing them up and taking these AHO'S out, they better darn well write a quo warranto up and speak to Sheriff Palmer. I can't believe they didn't do that at the start.

Anonymous said...

FBI agent hired by who? His boss.
Neither he nor his boss can make the decision to take someone's life execution style, especially without imminent danger.

The fact that someone has been seen at some time with a gun doesn't mean the gun is their body and therefore their body is the weapon and someone must shoot them because of what they saw in the past.

AND people by now no matter what they are protecting need to remember their world is contracts.

How many of them signed their selves into the intake system, only to have to fight to get out of the contract later? Huh?
The first thing they will enforce is the signed contract saying they agreed to live there in 'wherever the hell' there is.

Anonymous said...

All this is true,but as long as we are too chickenshit to do away with the crazies that come to enforce their shit rules things will not change.