Wednesday, September 19, 2012

ARPAIO INVESTIGATOR: HAWAII STILL COVERING UP FOR OBAMA - MIKE ZULLO BACK FROM ANOTHER TRIP WITH 'MORE EVIDENCE'


The Rumor Mill News Reading Room 

ARPAIO INVESTIGATOR: HAWAII STILL COVERING UP FOR OBAMA - MIKE ZULLO BACK FROM ANOTHER TRIP WITH 'MORE EVIDENCE'
Posted By: Seawitch [Send E-Mail]
Date: Wednesday, 19-Sep-2012 00:42:01

Arpaio investigator: Hawaii still covering up for Obama
Mike Zullo back from another trip to Honolulu with 'more evidence'
by Jerome R. Corsi
Mike Zullo, the lead investigator in Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s investigation of Barack Obama’s eligibility to be president, says he has returned from a second trip to Hawaii with additional evidence the state’s Department of Health is maintaining a cover-up of Obama’s 1961 birth records.
When Arpaio dispatched Zullo for the second trip, the assignment was kept confidential for Zullo’s safety and to prevent media links. Only Arpaio and the chief deputy of the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office were aware of the assignment.
In Honolulu, Zullo worked closely with local contacts, including Duncan Sunahara, the brother of Virginia Sunahara, an infant child born in Hawaii Aug. 4, 1961, the same day Obama was born, and died the next day.
As WND reported, Virginia Sunahara entered as a figure in the Obama birth controversy because no birth certificate for her had been located, leading to speculation her birth certificate could have been the source of Obama’s.
Duncan Sunahara has tried to obtain a copy of his sister’s original birth certificate but has been denied.
“I was shocked by the lengths the Hawaii Department of Health has gone to deny the family of Virginia Sunahara a copy of the original long-form birth certificate that the family is lawfully entitled to request and obtain,” Zullo told WND. “I had to ask the question why this little girl’s 1961 long-form birth certificate was so disconcerting to the Hawaii Department of Health?”
DHOH stonewalls
Zullo obtained from Duncan Sunahara a copy of proceedings in the Hawaii Circuit Court of the First Circuit in which Hawaii Deputy Attorney General Jill Nagamine appeared before Judge Rhonda Nishimura on March 8, 2012, to argue Duncan Sunahara was not entitled under Hawaii statutes to observe or obtain a copy of his sister’s original 1961 long-form birth certificate.
During the proceeding, Nagamine argued that Duncan Sunahara’s request did not derive from a true interest to examine or obtain a copy of his sister’s original birth records, to which he was entitled under Hawaii law. Nagamine insisted his underlying interest was to produce evidence in Obama’s birth controversy, to which he was not entitled under Hawaii law.
Nagamine argued that the original 1961 birth certificate records were delicate and needed protection, and accessing them was burdensome.
But to get the long form you actually do have to go to the vault. And the records that are in the vault have been bound in volumes, not just the one, not just plaintiff’s sister’s records, but other records from around that time of birth, for example, in this case, the president’s birth certificate, which we know this is all about.
So these volumes in the vault are kept in temperature-controlled areas, they are bound in volumes, the clerk would have to go and find the volume that it’s in, pull out the volumes. These are old records, and in plaintiff’s case it’s more than 50 years old. They would have to open the volume. They have a special Xerox machine that copies those old records that they don’t remove the binding. They have been bound.
The plaintiff could not back (sic) in the area of the Department of Health where that special Xerox machine is and he couldn’t go in the vault without this disrupting the security and safety of the other records, the temperature in the room in the vault where the records are kept. So it would be very, very burdensome, not only for the legwork involved going to retrieve the volume, find the volume, find the page, take it to the Xerox machine, copy it.
So, Nagamine concludes, Duncan Sunahara should be satisfied with the short-form certificate of live birth the Department of Health issued for his sister, even though it is a modern computer-generated form, not a certified exact copy of the original:
If everybody was getting [a copy of the long-form birth certificate], those days of copies like they did in the old days, the records could not be preserved safely, the pages would be torn, they could not be protected. So the fact that all of this data is computerized, they can get the data. The law means that this data is as good as the original. Plaintiff got the birth certificate, he knows his sister was born. To there – there – it would be very, very burdensome.
Judge Nishimura denied Duncan Sunahara’s request, agreeing with Nagamine.
Zullo charges Hawaii with lying
Zullo was quick to point out that in the court proceedings Nagamine admitted the entire volume of birth certificates containing not only Virginia Sunahara’s long-form certificate, but also those of the Nordyke twins and Barack Obama, has been moved to a special secure location with very limited access.
“The point apparently is to hide away Obama’s original birth certificate, if it exists and then deny anyone access to see the document on the premise it’s too fragile to examine,” he said.
“What purpose did the Hawaii Department of Health have in preserving these records if it was not to show them when requested to family members and others who have a legal interest in seeing the documents?”
See Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s most recent press conference on Obama’s eligibility
Zullo dismissed Nagamine’s argument that getting a photocopy of a long-form original 1961 birth certificate was a burdensome, time-consuming process that would jeopardize the integrity of all birth documents.
“Nagamine’s arguments were utterly disingenuous,” Zullo stressed.
“Her vigorous defense has nothing to do with the integrity of original 1961 birth records. Most likely, Virginia Sunahara’s original long-form birth certificate has a different number than the number on the computer-generated short-form certificate of live birth that the agency released to the family.”
Zullo further pointed out that Nagamine’s arguments in the Sunahara hearing seem to contradict photographic evidence of Dr. Alvin T. Onaka, registrar of the Hawaii Department of Health, easily locating a volume on a wall-length bookshelf of bound birth certificate volumes.
READ THE FULL ARTICLE AT THIS LINK:
http://www.wnd.com/2012/09/arpaio-investigator-hawaii-still-covering-up-for-obama/ 

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

No rational official or leader believes Zullo or the rest of the Cold Case Posse or Sheriff Joe.

http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/292780/conspiracy-again-editors

A sign of this was the action of the CONSERVATIVE secretary of state of Arizona following Sheriff Joe's press conference in mid July. The CONSERVATIVE secretary of state of Arizona asked Hawaii to confirm that Obama has a Hawaii birth certificate and to confirm some of the facts on it. Hawaii did that, and the CONSERVATIVE secretary of state of Arizona accepted that as proof that Obama was born in Hawaii, and ruled that Obama will be on the ballot in Arizona in November.

The evidence that Obama was born in Hawaii goes beyond his Hawaii birth certificate and the confirmation of the facts on it by the officials of BOTH parties in Hawaii. There is also the birth notices in the Hawaii newspapers in 1961. These were sent to the papers by the DOH of Hawaii, and only by the DOH of Hawaii (and in 1961 a Republican was the governor of Hawaii and the DOH was under him).

We know from (1) the DOH; (2) the newspaper; and (3) the name of the section of the newspaper, which was Health Bureau Statistics----that only the Department of Health of Hawaii sent out those birth notices to the newspapers in 1961.

We know from the DOH that in 1961 the DOH only sent out those records for the children that it had issued birth certificates to. And we know from both the DOH and from the Hawaii laws that in 1961 the DOH was not allowed to issue a birth certificate to a child who was not born in Hawaii.

In short, in Hawaii in 1961, a birth notice in the Health Bureau Statistics section of the newspapers, which Obama has, is proof that confirms his birth certificate that he was born IN HAWAII.

This, as I said, is merely confirming evidence to; (1) the birth certificate itself; (2) the confirmation of its existence and the accuracy of the facts on it by the officials of both parties in Hawaii, (3) the Index Data file; (4) the witness who recalls being told of Obama's birth in Hawaii and of writing home to her father, named Stanley, about the birth in the USA of a child to a woman, also named Stanley. AND, of course, there is not a shred of evidence that Obama's mother traveled outside of the USA in 1961---which would have been very rare for a woman late in pregnancy in those days, and the government of Kenya has eliminated birthers' claim that Obama was born there in an investigation.

A child brought into the USA, unless smuggled across the Mexican or Canadian border, requires a US travel document that would have had to have been applied for in the country of birth. No such document has been found for Obama, and the Bush Administration was in charge of those records for eight years until January of 2009. No such record has turned up. There is, in short, no proof that Obama or his mother traveled in 1961. There is overwhelming proof that he was born in Hawaii.

Anonymous said...

Sherriff Joe is a Hollywood Actor who's name is really Frank Rizzo.


Whatever he calls himself, he can't be trusted as far as you throw him. Forget Hollywood Sherriff Joe. Find some real sheriffs and bring charges of treason instead.