This is a very interesting interview with University of
Pennsylvania law professor David Skeel regarding the dangers to the
nation resulting from a growing pattern of Executive Branch actions which
depart from the rule of law.
He offers the opinion that the current problems started with
the Bear Stearns bail-out, but I believe the problems go back at least to 1913
with the fraudulent ratification of the 16th and 17th
amendments to the Constitution, and the adoption of the unconstitutional
Federal Reserve Act.
In any case, Professor Skeel asserts that it is the job of
the courts to enforce the rule of law. The failure of the Supreme Court to
overturn the illegal Chrysler bankruptcy was a disturbing indication that the
courts do not have the resolve needed to block Executive Branch actions that
violate the rule of law.
Is that an understatement or what?
_____________________________________________________________________________
Note: There were
numerous violations of the rule of law in the Chrysler bankruptcy, including
politically-driven dealer rejections (rejected dealerships were almost
exclusively owned by Republicans); disparate treatment of the pensions of union
vs. non-union employees (Chrysler unions had close ties to the Obama
administration); and gross violations of the rights of bondholders in order to
fund protections for union pensions and health care benefits of union retirees.
In effect, the Chrysler bondholders were stripped of their claims on Chrysler
assets, in violation of the bond covenants, in order to pay off the unions.
A recent interview on
Fox News with an attorney for the non-union employees, including former
management employees, who lost their pensions in the strange and unorthodox
Chrysler bankruptcy suggested that the final resolution of the Chrysler
bankruptcy engineered by the Obama administration may not survive a coming
legal challenge.
Chrysler
Bankruptcy, case of judicial fraud? Dealership Attorneys to appeal Motion
denial
Public Docket
For Chrysler Bankruptcy Has Been Sabotaged To Conceal The Fraudulent Dealer
Rejection Opinion by Judge Gonzalez.
2 comments:
Thank you for this thoughtful post. Macon Lawyers
thanks for helpful post. i am really happy to know about this .
Post a Comment