SNOPES NO MORE - very interesting!
Many of the emails that I have sent or forwarded that had any anti Obama
in it were negated by Snopes. I thought that was odd. Check this out.
Shades of Krystalnacht
Snopes, Soros and the Supreme Court's Kagan. We-l-l-l-l now, I guess the
time has come to check out Snopes! Ya' don't suppose it might not be a good
time to take a second look at some of the stuff that got kicked in the ditch
by Snopes, do ya'?
We've known that it was owned by a lefty couple but hadn't known it to be
financed by Soros!
Snopes is heavily financed by George Soros, a big time supporter of Obama
and many other left wing organizations! In our Search for the truth
department, we find what I have suspected on many occasions.
I went to Snopes to check something about the dockets of the new
Supreme Court Justice. Elena Kagan, who Obama appointed, and Snopes said
the email was false and there were no such dockets. So I Googled the
Supreme Court, typed in Obama-Kagan, and guess what?
Yep, you got it; Snopes Lied! Everyone of those dockets are there.
So Here is what I wrote to Snopes:
Referencing the article about Elana Kagan and Barak Obama dockets:
The information you have posted stating that there were no such cases as
claimed and the examples you gave are blatantly false.
I went directly to the Supreme Courts website, typed in Obama Kagan and
immediately came up with all of the dockets that the article made reference
to.
I have long suspected that you really slant things but this was really
shocking.
Thank You. I hope you will be much more truthful in the future, but I doubt
it.
That being said, I'll bet you didn't know this.
Kagan was representing Obama in all the petitions to prove his citizenship.
Now she may help rule on them.
Folks, this is really ugly.
Chicago Politics at its best and the beat goes on and on and on.
Once again the US Senate sold us out!
Now we know why Obama nominated Elana Kagan for the Supreme Court.
Pull up the Supreme Courts website, go to the docket and search for Obama.
She was the Solicitor General for all the suits against him filed with the
Supreme Court to show proof of natural born citizenship. He owed her
big time. All of the requests were denied of course.
They were never heard.
It just keeps getting deeper and deeper, doesn't it?
The American people mean nothing any longer. It's all about payback time
for
those who compromised themselves to elect someone who really has no true
right to even be there.
Here are some websites of the Supreme Court Docket:
You can look up some of these hearings and guess what?
Elana Kagan is the attorney representing Obama!
However, if you hold sacred the freedoms granted to you by the
U.S. Constitution, by all means, PASS it ON!
There truly is tyranny afoot.
7 comments:
Old news Drake. I saw it reported almost a year ago that Soros has a vested interest in Snopes and I believe it was reported right her on Nesara-News.
Who cares who knew 1st. More people will see it now, including me. Thanks Drake for sharing and thanks for doing something proactive like the letter, even if "they" don't care
Drake is so far behind on what is happening it doesn't surprise me one bit he would be reporting something that we all seen right here over a year ago. Drake go back and report some up to date BREAKING news that can be verified and we might actually believe you have inside info.
Except you go to that very Snopes page, and it says that Kegan had nothing to do with his citizenship lawsuits. And going to the links that Drake provides does not at all prove otherwise. I don't doubt Soros is behind Snopes, but Drake is offering disinfo here
"However, if you hold sacred the freedoms granted to you by the
U.S. Constitution"
WRONG!!!!
The constitution has NOTHING to do with us! WE are not a party to it! It's a FOREIGN compact between the FOREIGN United States, Inc and all ITS subsidiary FOREIGN STATES!
Supreme Court of Georgia.
PADELFORD, FAY & Co. plaintiffs in error
v.
THE MAYOR AND ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF SAVANNAH.
No. 64.
January Term, 1854.
*55 But, indeed, no private person has a right to complain, by suit in Court, on the ground of a breach of the Constitution. The Constitution, it is true, is a compact, but he is not a party to it. The States are the parties to it. And they may complain.
YOUR rights have nothing to do with THEIR foreign CONstitution!
YOUR rights come from the CREATOR and NO CONstitutions or laws can supersede those rights! ANY man-made CONstitution or laws that are contrary to God's Laws man is conscience bound to DISOBEY their man-made laws and consider their laws as being VOID!
Jeff. 109, 1772 WL 11 (Va.Gen.Ct.)
General Court of Virginia.
Robin et al.
v.
Hardaway, et al.
April, 1772.
Now all acts of legislature apparently contrary to natural right and justice, are, in our laws, and must be in the nature of things, considered as void. The laws of nature are the laws of God; whose authority can be superseded by no power on earth. A legislature must not obstruct our obedience to him from whose punishments they cannot protect us. All human constitutions which contradict his laws, we are in conscience bound to disobey. Such have been the adjudications of our courts of justice. And cited 8 Co. 118. a. Bonham's case. Hob. 87; 7 Co. 14. a. Calvin's case. And so he concluded the act of 1782, originally void, because contrary to natural right and justice.
==================
Time to WAKE UP people! Learn who you really are and what you are not!
I hope Drake knows that not only did Snopes debunk the original Obama-Kagan connection, they debunked the resultant 'debunking' of them as well:
http://www.snopes.com/info/notes/kagan.asp
Apparently this all started with somebody who just saw the names 'Obama' and 'Kagan' in a Supreme Court docket and didn't bother to actually READ the docket. They just assumed it had to do with the two being in on a conspiracy together.
Sorry, Drake, but you might wanna pick an easier target to discredit than Snopes. It looks like they've been on the ball with this one, and you just look kind of foolish for forwarding this.
When a Supreme Court Justice has been involved in a case, and there could be some type of bias, the Supreme Court Justice is supposed to recuse themselves from the ruling. This especially holds true for Elena Kagan. She has a lot of things that she needs to recuse herself from, and we need to demand that she does!!
Post a Comment