Major Banks, Governmental Officials and Their Comrade Capitalists Targets of Spire Law Group, LLP's Racketeering and Money Laundering Lawsuit Seeking Return of $43 Trillion to the United States Treasury
Published: Thursday, 25 Oct 2012 | 2:09 PM ET
Text Size
NEW YORK, Oct. 25, 2012 /PRNewswire via COMTEX/ -- Spire Law Group, LLP's national home owners' lawsuit, pending in the venue where the "Banksters" control their $43 trillion racketeering scheme (New York) - known as the largest money laundering and racketeering lawsuit in United States History and identifying $43 trillion ($43,000,000,000,000.00) of laundered money by the "Banksters" and their U.S. racketeering partners and joint venturers - now pinpoints the identities of the key racketeering partners of the "Banksters" located in the highest offices of government and acting for their own self-interests.
In connection with the federal lawsuit now impending in the United States District Court in Brooklyn, New York (Case No. 12-cv-04269-JBW-RML) - involving, among other things, a request that the District Court enjoin all mortgage foreclosures by the Banksters nationwide, unless and until the entire $43 trillion is repaid to a court-appointed receiver - Plaintiffs now establish the location of the $43 trillion ($43,000,000,000,000.00) of laundered money in a racketeering enterprise participated in by the following individuals (without limitation): Attorney General Holder acting in his individual capacity, Assistant Attorney General Tony West, the brother in law of Defendant California Attorney General Kamala Harris (both acting in their individual capacities), Jon Corzine (former New Jersey Governor), Robert Rubin (former Treasury Secretary and Bankster), Timothy Geitner, Treasury Secretary (acting in his individual capacity), Vikram Pandit (recently resigned and disgraced Chairman of the Board of Citigroup), Valerie Jarrett (a Senior White House Advisor), Anita Dunn (a former "communications director" for the Obama Administration), Robert Bauer (husband of Anita Dunn and Chief Legal Counsel for the Obama Re-election Campaign), as well as the "Banksters" themselves, and their affiliates and conduits. The lawsuit alleges serial violations of the United States Patriot Act, the Policy of Embargo Against Iran and Countries Hostile to the Foreign Policy of the United States, and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (commonly known as the RICO statute) and other State and Federal laws.
In the District Court lawsuit, Spire Law Group, LLP -- on behalf of home owner across the Country and New York taxpayers, as well as under other taxpayer recompense laws -- has expanded its mass tort action into federal court in Brooklyn, New York, seeking to halt all foreclosures nationwide pending the return of the $43 trillion ($43,000,000,000.00) by the "Banksters" and their co-conspirators, seeking an audit of the Fed and audits of all the "bailout programs" by an independent receiver such as Neil Barofsky, former Inspector General of the TARP program who has stated that none of the TARP money and other "bailout money" advanced from the Treasury has ever been repaid despite protestations to the contrary by the Defendants as well as similar protestations by President Obama and the Obama Administration both publicly on national television and more privately to the United States Congress. Because the Obama Administration has failed to pursue any of the "Banksters" criminally, and indeed is actively borrowing monies for Mr. Obama's campaign from these same "Banksters" to finance its political aspirations, the national group of plaintiff home owners has been forced to now expand its lawsuit to include racketeering, money laundering and intentional violations of the Iranian Nations Sanctions and Embargo Act by the national banks included among the "Bankster" Defendants.
The complaint - which has now been fully served on thousands of the "Banksters and their Co-Conspirators" - makes it irrefutable that the epicenter of this laundering and racketeering enterprise has been and continues to be Wall Street and continues to involve the very "Banksters" located there who have repeatedly asked in the past to be "bailed out" and to be "bailed out" in the future.
The Havens for the money laundering schemes - and certain of the names and places of these entities - are located in such venues as Switzerland, the Isle of Man, Luxembourg, Malaysia, Cypress and entities controlled by governments adverse to the interests of the United States Sanctions and Embargo Act against Iran, and are also identified in both the United Nations and the U.S. Senate's recent reports on international money laundering. Many of these entities have already been personally served with summons and process of the complaint during the last six months. It is now beyond dispute that, while the Obama Administration was publicly encouraging loan modifications for home owners by "Banksters", it was privately ratifying the formation of these shell companies in violation of the United States Patriot Act, and State and Federal law. The case further alleges that through these obscure foreign companies, Bank of America, J.P. Morgan, Wells Fargo Bank, Citibank, Citigroup, One West Bank, and numerous other federally chartered banks stole trillions of dollars of home owners' and taxpayers' money during the last decade and then laundered it through offshore companies.
This District Court Complaint - maintained by Spire Law Group, LLP -- is the only lawsuit in the world listing as Defendants the Banksters, let alone serving all of such Banksters with legal process and therefore forcing them to finally answer the charges in court. Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission, nor the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, nor the Office of the Attorney General, nor any State Attorney General has sued the Banksters and thereby legally chased them worldwide to recover-back the $43 trillion ($43,000,000,000,000.00) and other lawful damages, injunctive relief and other legal remedies.
James N. Fiedler, Managing Partner of Spire Law Group, LLP, stated: "It is hard for me to believe as a 47-year lawyer that our nation's guardians have been unwilling to stop this theft. Spire Law Group, LLP stands for the elimination of corruption and implementation of lawful strategies, and that is what we're doing here. Spire Law Group, LLP's charter is to not allow such corruption to go unanswered." Comments were requested from the Attorney Generals' offices in NY, CA, NV, NH , OH, MA and the White House, but no comment was provided.
About Spire Law Group Spire Law Group, LLP is a national law firm whose motto is "the public should be protected -- at all costs -- from corruption in whatever form it presents itself." The Firm is comprised of lawyers nationally with more than 250-years of experience in a span of matters ranging from representing large corporations and wealthy individuals, to also representing the masses. The Firm is at the front lines litigating against government officials, banks, defunct loan pools, and now the very offshore entities where the corruption was enabled and perpetrated.
Contact: James N. Fiedler877-438-8766
SOURCE Spire Law Group, LLP
Copyright (C) 2012 PR Newswire. All rights reserved -0- KEYWORD: New York INDUSTRY KEYWORD: RLT
RRL SUBJECT CODE: LAW
6 comments:
Sure is interesting the amount they are talking about is the same amount in Value of the GOLD that was taken by Bush out of the Twin Towers.
And, yet another misleading headline to make the story appear to conform with the Drake / Wilcox / Fulford claim of:
"Mass Arrests of banksters and elite are coming!"
First:
NO mention or inference of ANY CRIMINAL ACTION with regards to this lawsuit.
Arrests are a criminal action.
This is a CIVIL action.
Quoted from above -
"In the District Court lawsuit, Spire Law Group, LLP -- on behalf of home owner across the Country and New York taxpayers, as well as under other taxpayer recompense laws -- has expanded its mass tort action into federal court in Brooklyn, New York, seeking to halt all foreclosures nationwide pending the return of the $43 trillion."
Operative word here is NOT mass, it is "tort".
Educate yourself lest you will appear stupid when someone points out your folly.
A tort is a civil action as defined here:
http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Tort+Law
Quote: "First, the plaintiff must establish that the defendant was under a legal duty to act in a particular fashion. Second, the plaintiff must demonstrate that the defendant breached this duty by failing to conform his or her behavior accordingly. Third, the plaintiff must prove that he suffered injury or loss as a direct result of the defendant's breach."
Now, if this particular tort is ruled in the plaintiff's favor (The good guys win) and damages are assessed -
THEN, criminal actions against the Government officials involved in this case MUST be pursued by:
1) Reactivating the now dormant Office of the Independent Counsel.
2) Appointing a prosecutor to head that office.
This authority is provided to Congress under the Independent Counsel Reauthorization Act of 1994.
Obviously AG Holder can be charged so there is no choice but to authorize independent Counsel, whose only duties would be to perform an investigation, and if warranted, arrest and prosecute the individuals or parties responsible.
And, Drake? Not involved.
However ..
Dollars to doughnuts he TAKES CREDIT (after the fact)!
Or, will claim THIS is what he meant would happen.
Or, this is the process he was told would go down.
Yeah ...Uh-huh.
Right.
*** Bookmark this to reference when he broadcasts on Sunday. Let's see if I called it right on this one.***
Mark V: This was NOT posted on Drake's website therefore it did not come from him. Try a little harder to squeeze in an attack. It just makes you sound like a fool.
Mark V: Why don't you do yourself & us a favor and NOT listen on Sunday? Rest your pretty little knucklehead..
Mark, you're not very good at reading and comprehension. Money laundering and racketeering are federal crimes, not civil lawsuits. Try again...
Replies to the anonymous, collectively. I'll try to refrain from derogatory remarks -
Anon 11:04
I'm not good at reading? Where, exactly, does it say THIS lawsuit - and that is all this article covers - that CRIMINAL charges are being brought against ANYONE?
READ as QUOTED from above:
"Because the Obama Administration has failed to pursue any of the "Banksters" criminally, and indeed is actively borrowing monies for Mr. Obama's campaign from these same "Banksters" to finance its political aspirations, the national group of plaintiff home owners has been forced to now expand its lawsuit to include racketeering, money laundering and intentional violations of the Iranian Nations Sanctions and Embargo Act by the national banks included among the "Bankster" Defendants."
Again, "... failed to pursue any of the "Banksters" criminally"
- Who's the one who cannot read nor comprehend the very words in front of them! As you say, try again!
But, um, seriously ... Before you do, maybe you should take a study course to review the reading comprehension skills you should have learn in the 6th grade, ya think? I think.
Anon 7:14
Duh. I know that. It came from the Comtex online newswire.
Not being the ORIGINAL headline of the article, I was referring to the "mass arrests" addition; which is now synonymously attributed with the claim by Drake they were coming now. Or was it today? Next week, maybe?
Attack?
Try prediction. If Drake doesn't say he knew it was coming, either in his update or when asked the question about it, THEN, you're right to berate me for anticipating, or even suggesting it. We'll see come Sunday.
Anon 7:29
Haha. You're funny! That's some good advice! Maybe you should do yourself a favor and not listen either.
The reality is I never listen to his babble anymore. I, unlike you, am smart enough to follow an old sage's sound advise: "Fool me once, shame on you ..."
I'm sure you know the rest, but for some reason refuse to heed.
No. I won't be listening as there are always transcripts released after the show. I'd rather read those than to listen.
Unlike Anon 11:04, the poor chap who appears to have some difficulty with it, reading is effortless for me.
Post a Comment