The Rumor Mill News Reading Room
Rod Class gets FOURTH Administrative Ruling "Gov't Offices are Vacant"- All Gov't Officials are "Private Contractors"
Posted By: Maryhrt [Send E-Mail]
Date: Tuesday, 23-Oct-2012 13:34:09
Date: Tuesday, 23-Oct-2012 13:34:09
|
7 comments:
Does this mean we do not need to pay County Property Taxes, collected by the County Sheriff?
where is the actual ruling ? without that ruling as evidence it's just hearsay.
After reading this I take it if you are active duty or retired military you still fall under the jurisdiction of the corporation right? If you are paid by the corporation you have to follow thief laws.
If you read the rulings handed down by the judge in RC's case, it doesn't actually say what the headline says that it does! If you get on the biglist as they call it for the Rod info, it will list most of the documents. Or you can go to a website, www.harveyw26.minus.com and you find the documents. Please read them for yourselves before charging into court saying what the headlines do!
I am not condemning Rod's work, in fact I agree with him 100%, just these sensationalized headlines don't work for the truth.
If you are present or former active duty, you signed an enlistment contract. Did the Armed Forces advise you that you were signing up to a corporation? I don't think so. This lack of full disclosure would constitute fraud by omission. Any contract signed or agreed to where material fraud is found is null & void from the beginning. However if you served your time and retired the corporation still owes your the retirement. You did exchange your labor (the nexus of ALL property) for that retirement package. The thief "Laws" (rule, statues, codes, regulations...etc) fall away. The contract was fraudulent (see above).
TalkShoe link doesn't work. Any one have the proper link?
The Talkshoe Link:
http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web/talkCast.jsp?masterId=48361&cmd=tc
Also, the ORIGINAL post (by username 'the South') from the Daily Paul:
http://www.dailypaul.com/258853/bombshell-rod-class-gets-fourth-administrative-ruling-govt-offices-are-vacant-all-govt-officials-are-private-contractors#comment-2798194
Unfortunately, the South DOES take liberties with his embellished headline.
The ruling is actually a dismissal of a motion submitted by Rod.
I explain the whole convoluted way 'South' arrived at his ... misstatement ... in the comments at the
DP post cited above.
Here's the comment link:
http://www.dailypaul.com/comment/2798194
An excerpt:
"That said –
Your inference is that the Administrative Courts rulings prove (quote) “now on the court record; black ink on white paper” “that all government offices are vacant; no one is home; those supposed government offices/agencies are being occupied by PRIVATE CONTRACTORS”. (close quote)
Here’s the thing, you say it’s written in the court docs. Then you say, in effect - you have to listen to Rod, then you’ll see what I am saying is true.
I’m sorry, but there is nothing in the court docs that prove that the court doesn’t have jurisdiction over the ‘private contractors’ who work for the Corporations posing as Government, or that the offices of the Government are vacant.
You and I both KNOW it’s true.
But,that’s inference, my brother. Not a documented admission.
It DOES prove the judge summarily dismissed his motions without cause. (notice I didn’t afford the black robed impostor a capital J, it is not deserved)"
There's more there. Read it or don't. It matters not.
What SHOULD matter to all of us is how those, like Mr South, misquote, interject, and 'strawman' something into meaning an entirely different thing.
And, as you see - it goes viral.
While the truth ... that gets buried.
Post a Comment