Tuesday, June 18, 2013

Has the NSA ever Used its Surveillance Powers for Purposes other than Combating Terrorism?

The "national security" envelope has been stretched so far that, as such, it's no longer recognizable. Aside from the fact that the "national security" applies only to the lying agencies of the government(s) and not the nation, what good is "national security" if it's "interests" are shared with other "governments" (i.e., 'a British intelligence agent, Katharine Gun') in the world, for them to "leak"?

It's more like "national insecurity" and classic paranoia! (Sighing and SMH hard...!) pjr



Has the NSA ever Used its Surveillance Powers for Purposes other than Combating Terrorism? You Bet

Monday, June 17, 2013

Michael Hayden, director of NSA
in 2003
Defenders of the National Security Agency (NSA) claim the agency must be trusted to do right by the country as it carries out its intelligence operations, presumably to deter only dangerous threats from terrorists and other foreign sources.
But history has already demonstrated that the NSA has allowed its surveillance tools to be used for political purposes.
In 2003, as President George W. Bush prepared to invade Iraq, his administration used the NSA’s capabilities to spy on diplomats from countries undecided about voting to support the United Nations’ authorization for the American-led attack against Saddam Hussein’s regime. The NSA intercepted the home and office telephone and email communications of the U.N. delegates
“The entire purpose of the NSA surveillance was to help the White House gain leverage, by whatever means possible, for a resolution in the U.N. Security Council to green light an invasion,” Norman Solomon wrote in his book War Made Easy: How Presidents and Pundits Keep Spinning Us to Death.
The spying only came to light after a British intelligence agent, Katharine Gun, leaked a memo to the press from an NSA agent named Frank Koza that described the American effort to monitor the communications of six delegations to the UN who were undecided on the war resolution.
Part of the memo read (note: the “Agency” refers to the NSA):
“As you’ve likely heard by now, the Agency is mounting a surge particularly directed at the UN Security Council (UNSC) members (minus US and GBR of course) for insights as to how to membership is reacting to the on-going debate RE: Iraq, plans to vote on any related resolutions, what related policies/negotiating positions they may be considering, alliances/dependencies, etc—the whole gamut of information that could give US policymakers an edge in obtaining results favorable to US goals or to head off surprises. In RT, that means a QRC [Quick Response Capability] surge effort to revive/create efforts against UNSC members Angola, Cameroon, Chile, Bulgaria and Guinea, as well as extra focus on Pakistan UN matters….We'd appreciate your support in getting the word to your analysts who might have similar, more in-direct access to valuable information from accesses in your product lines.”
“So here is a clear case where the US government used its surveillance powers—ostensibly in place for national security—to target political opponents and advance an invasion of Iraq,” George Zornick wrote at The Nation.
-Noel Brinkerhoff
To Learn More:

NSA Spied on U.N. Diplomats in Push for Invasion of Iraq (by Norman Solomon, Huffington Post)

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

I was on Usatoday posting the Bushes and Kissinger supported the Nazi's, snd they shut down my internet and kept ringing my phone and hanging up, and flying helicopters around harrasing me.
I was in my dining area telling someone about them being traitors and Nazis and they shut off my Dish Network..I was emailing it on Yahoo, and they deleted out my email and it never reached thereceiving people..I started using codes to send the email....

Does this sound familiar? I am just a private citizen, housewife.....
YES, they do use it for private citizens