"War on Cancer" Largely a Fraud

"War on Cancer"  Largely a Fraud

The (evil) cancer industry exposed by medical doctors.

(NaturalNews) The World Health Organization has admitted that "Cancer is a leading cause of death worldwide." For nearly 40 years, the United States has spent over $200 billion "trying" to find a cure - with no success. But, most doctors can't even tell you why (cancer) medicine is such a failure. (Hint: there's a hidden agenda)

Meet cancer expert - Nicholas Gonzalez, M.D. in a LIVE (audio) event exclusively for NaturalNews Inner Circle subscribers. Get your cancer questions answered plus much more!

Visit: http://www.naturalnews.com/innercirclespecial.html to subscribe today.

Medical (business) truths about the cancer industry
Did you know the average conventional cancer treatment costs over $300,000? Yet, most natural cancer remedies costs a few thousand dollars or less. So if cancer patients could effectively be treated for so much less money - why hasn't it been done?

Dr. Robert Atkins, one of the pioneers of complementary medicine in the United States, once said: "There is not one, but many cures for cancer available. But they are all being systematically suppressed by the ACS, the NCI and the major oncology centers. They have too much of an interest in the status quo."

Linus Pauling, one of the most important scientists of the 20th century and 2-time Nobel Prize winner gives us something to think about when he said: "Everybody should know that the 'war on cancer' is largely a fraud, and that the NCI and the ACS are derelict in their duties to the American people who support them."

Cancer news you won't hear on television
According to Dr. Nicholas Gonzalez and many other cancer experts, the "conventional medical world" really has NO interest in natural (nutritional) cures for cancer. The lame-stream media is corporately controlled by its advertisers (e.g. Big Pharma) and medical research is ONLY funded by pharmaceutical companies. But the news gets worse!

According to Dr. Gonzalez, conventional oncology used to promote bone marrow transplants as a powerful high-tech treatment for women with advanced or poor prognosis breast cancer. In fact, by the mid-1990's, the medical community was so excited - they called this therapy "standard of care" - without any real evidence that it worked! A coordinated effort by oncologist, media and trial lawyers forced insurance companies to pay for this procedure, which cost up to $450,000 per transplant.

There's only one BIG problem - 10-30 percent of those willing to undergo the treatment - died! (and that's not all).

Scientific fraud within the cancer industry
Thanks to a few honest oncologists - actual studies were preformed to determine whether the bone marrow transplants actually helped women with breast cancer. Eventually, with great resistance, five studies were completed - four showed the therapy was no more effective than standard chemotherapy against breast cancer and one study ("very positive") was ultimately proven to be completely fraudulent!

Even Dr. Gonzalez has witnessed the underhanded tactics of cancer agencies, like the National Cancer Institute, which undermined his successful methods of treating pancreatic cancer without radiation or chemotherapy. But, his story would need to be told another day.

The cost of cancer treatment rose dramatically between 1991 and 2002, sparking fears that many people may be going without the most effective treatment, according to a study conducted by researchers from the National Cancer Institute.

Researchers used data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End-Results (SEER) Medicare database to examine the costs of initial cancer treatments in 306,709 breast, colorectal, lung and prostate cancer patients over the age of 65. These treatments included surgery, chemotherapy, radiation and other hospitalization.

Over the ten-year period studied, the average cost of breast cancer treatment increased $4,189 to $20,964. The average cost of treating prostate cancer increased $5,435 to $41,134, while the average cost of lung cancer treatment went up $7,139 to $39,891.

The researchers attributed the increasing cost to an increase in the use of chemotherapy. The introduction of newer, more expensive drugs occurred so recently that it is unlikely to have influenced the numbers in the current study, they said - meaning that the cost of cancer treatment is probably already much higher than the numbers for 2002.

Researchers noted that increasing costs are placing a strain on Medicare and have led to changes in its reimbursement policy. This, in turn, can influence patients' ability to afford the most effective treatment.

"There were changes to Medicare payment policy over the period of this study," said Len Lichtenfeld, deputy chief medical officer of the American Cancer Society, "and they had significant impact on how physicians were reimbursed. The net result is that it may have influenced practice patterns that we are seeing, such as the transition from surgery and radiation therapy for prostate cancer."

The average cost paid for prostate cancer treatment actually decreased slightly ($196) to $18,261, an effect that researchers attributed to the decreasing popularity of expensive surgery.

"Some people are not able to afford [more expensive] treatments," Lichtenfeld said. "The increased use of expensive chemotherapy is having an impact on how we treat cancer patients." 

Don't become a victim of poor ideology or a lack of knowledge.

This is the latest in medicine, effective for cancer! 

You be the judge. 

See: http://www.scribd.com/doc/202255520/The-Cancer-Industry