That Quo Warranto action is not going
to work. They just don't work that way. If you want to see a real
Quo Warranto, have a look at this:
http://teamlawforum.net/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=1233
http://teamlawforum.net/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=1233
while you are at it, read this:
http://teamlaw.net/Government/usmap.htm
http://teamlaw.net/Government/usmap.htm
A Quo Warranto has to be brought by the
attorney general's office. It cannot be brought by the people like
that. And, in DC, the attorney general has the only authority to bring
the action and the he can deny it. It cannot be denied in the states,
only DC.
A collapse of the dollar may be coming,
but the solution is outlined by Team Law at those two links I gave you.
This other action is simply not going to work because it is not properly
brought.
Have a look at those links.
7 comments:
First, THE UNITED STATES, INC. is a corporation approved Unconstitutionally in 1871 to be our Government, and then the D.C. Attorney General has Full Control of what actions are to be taken, even for the 50 States, as Ohio was Incorporated really before it became a known State.
Where in the U.S. Constitution does it allow Congress to make that decision, but it does bring up Common Law and Grand Jury both being controlled by the People.
Where does it say in the U.S. Constitution that the CEO of a Corporation, that is a Government, Must be a “natural born citizen” which Obama is the CEO?
It comes down to Technicalities as to what you want to believe in.
The Unified Common Law Grand Jury is the People moving to Remove the Cabal out of the Courts to start with and then that should follow by the rest of us to get our Constitutional Republic back.
http://www.nesaranetwork.com/2014/11/10/quo-warranto/
If the people can't bring the Quo Warranto, except within the united States (50 states) then that is prima facia evidence the corporation is not a representative of the people.
If they are indeed separate from the people, then they have NO Authority, and that's what the Quo Warranto wanted to produce, evidence of authority or lack there of.
It has been said, what is passed in DC belongs to DC and it's inhabitants, which means anything passed by Congress including Obama care and Patriot Act and all executive orders really are Null and Void in the 50 states, so they cannot even push Agenda 21 or any of the other things theyv'e pushed outside of their jurisdiction of the 10 square miles.
People who posted the comment above, did not care to explain it in such detail why it doesn't work.
i do wonder who works for whom, because I expected to see the Quo Warranto on many sites and find it's barely visible on the ones I visit except for one, and this comment.
You, whoever posted this comment on why it won't work, have proved what it was meant to prove.
Either they have standing to keep their offices and mess with the people, or they don't, and they stand down on their actions against us, which is war, and vacate those offices or they act as stewards of the people and serve us as true servants should.
Quo Warranto!
Quo Warranto!
Quo Warranto!
The only thing with your assumption that this method won't work is that the AG is part of *their* system, and therefore subordinate to the People/Common Law.
If the AG is in bed with them, he isn't going to let that thing go through, now, is he!?!
We, the People, have the power to bring it, try it and ultimately enforce it.
JMHO - YMMV
This information is wrong. It doesn't matter if Obama is a citizen of the UNITED STATES to be president of same, because the UNITED STATES is a corporation NOT subject to any constitutional mandates. The congress critters, both house and senate, only give lip service to the constitution because they know it doesn't apply to the UNITED STATES, Inc. The constitution is all smoke and mirrors when it comes to the US government. The US Attorney General is also part of the corporation, just like the Supreme Court, congress, the cabinet members, etc. All corporate actors. None of whom operate under their oaths of office, in regard to a constitution, that does not apply to the corporation known as the UNITED STATES. Is Microsoft Corporation bound by the constitution for the united States of America? Of course there are two constitutions. One for the united States of America (Republic) and one Constitution of the UNITED STATES of AMERICA, Inc., which is nothing more than a corporate charter. So a Quo Warranto is not a request of any of these corporate fictions representing the the corporate US government, it is a demand of them to disregard the corporate aspect operating as government and to start acting under common law under the Republic form of government which is subject to the Constitution for the united States of America and under We The People, who are the true sovereigns and not the government. No government is superior to the people who institute it. So these idiots are operating under the corporations own system of unlawful jurisdiction. There is a difference between lawful and legal. Lawful is common law under constitutional authority and legal is just color of law without constitutional authority, i.e. statutes, rules, regulations, mandates, etc.
This is a blatant lie! Ouo Warranto; Habeas Corpus, etc are prerogative writs guaranteed by the common law and designed to challenge corruption and judicial errors. The DC Corporation has attempted to alter those writs by presidential suspension (who lacks any power) but they cannot successfully alter or change them without having all Lawyers and Judges in their pockets! Corruption must be knee deep in order to circumvent these writs.
"...sd Ohio was Incorporated really before it became known as a State'
Which came first, the chicken or the egg?
People. People are what makes a state a state.
So it was people who were there calling it Ohio before it became incorporated by someone who didn't disclose to the others (full disclosure) what operating a corporation over the land would do to them.
Also, it doesn't make sense that living male and female must live by the laws of the dead.
The people even if they live a century, have no right to determine a law that will outlive them and make the living who come after abide by it or be imprisoned.
Their conscience is not our conscience. Their science is not our science.
If the times have changed, so must the rules of the game.
To inherit some family has royal, or some man as the only one who can speak to God, or some people who are the only ones who can print money or some people who are the only ones who can live with unlimited credit every day for the rest of their lives, is just unatural.
There has to be a balance, and unless you have me under age of majority having full knowledge of the decision I make, deciding to accept the royal, or the banker's predetermined unlimited credit for himself, or the man who says only he communicates with the Creator of man and he'll repeat it to us in Latin that needs to be interpreted into other languages (you'd think he's speak the many tongues of the Creator), but anyway, we have a right to ask who is trying to be the 'God before us' and tell us what we can or cannot do.
I am NOT a slave.
I was NOT born a slave.
Someone claims by certain acts I was born into slavery, prove it.
Yes the body was born into bondage (feetprint bound to paper), some sort of magic - yes but that doesn't mean " I ", the real me; is a slave.
People are the co-Creators of our environment.
What man can stand before us and tell us he can tell us what we can or cannot do without using force against our will?
We have 'free will' and we are living wills.
These dead people with their dead bills, and dead laws signed by dead men are not our Creators, and any document they write, we can rewrite, or re-sign them for our times.
Quo Warranto...who are you and by what authority do you operate against me and my conscience? What? You want to put me in jail for smoking something that came from the ground that you claim you have rights to? Oh some plants can be smoked but others can't?
What? You say I may have labored to pay for a home, but you are taking it anyway? No one wants to see if the initial transaction was fraud? The initial transactor conveniently is gone, and someone else has papers claiming a right to what they created?
How about you can take the home when you give back the labor I expended keeping it up, and maintaining the landscape and creating the community relationships? Who can sell something someone cannot keep, only to let them find out years later it's not theirs to have? Who knew this and did not disclose when the transaction was initiated?
We are not fools.
We are not slaves.
We have been deceived, and some of us have stepped out of the corporation No! Not a US Citizen..
Those still in would call us illegal and want us killed for saying NO to the corporate body to get the Republic body back.
This is a blatant lie. These attorneys are purposely putting out lies to protect their job and protecting the corporation. The We The People
can indeed file a Quo Warranto and does not have be filed by the Attorney General who obviously is part of the cabal.
Post a Comment