Congressional Democrats have a grand scheme to make America’s streets safer; incentivize people cannibalize to their Second Amendment rights for tax credits.
Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.) will introduce the Support Assault Firearm
Elimination and Education of our Streets Act, which will do just that
(via the Hill):
“Assault weapons are not about hunting, or even
self-defense,” DeLauro said. “There is no reason on earth, other than to
kill as many people as possible in as short a time as possible, that
anyone needs a gun designed for a battlefield.”
Though DeLauro is in favor of stronger guns laws
that would completely ban assault weapons and high-capacity ammunition,
she emphasized this bill would not force gun owners to turn in their
firearms.
The legislation would provide up to $2,000 in tax credits for gun owners who voluntarily hand over assault weapons to their local police departments.
The assault weapons legislation comes in
response to the horrific mass shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School
in Newtown, Conn., DeLauro’s home state, in December 2012.
DeLauro originally introduced the bill in
January 2013, just one month after the Newtown shooting, but the
legislation fell short in the Republican-controlled House. She plans to
reintroduce it next week when Congress returns from recess.
She said the bill would help “get more assault weapons off the streets."
“Just days after the Newtown tragedy, President
Obama asked, ‘Are we doing enough to protect our children?’ And he
admitted the answer is, ‘no.’ That must change,” DeLauro said.
DeLauro is announcing the assault weapons legislation this week in conjunction with National Public Health Week.
I wish we could ignore these pieces of legislation that are factually challenged, and somewhat offensive given that they feel tax credits
will incentivize Americans to depreciate their civil rights through
monetary means. Truth be told, you could hunt with a Ruger Mini-14,
which has a 30-round magazine and fires the same Remington .223–or
5.56–ammunition used by AR-15 owners. Also, any firearm can be used for
self-defense, congresswoman. Though, it comes down to a level of
practicality.
Lastly, rifles are seldom used in crimes. The
New York Times published ProPublica’s Lois Beckett’s piece on the
assault weapons in 2014, where she wrote it's a "myth" that banning
these firearms would curb gun violence; something we–on the pro-civil
rights side–have been saying for quite some time:
Over the past two decades, the majority of
Americans in a country deeply divided over gun control have coalesced
behind a single proposition: The sale of assault weapons should be
banned.
That idea was one of the pillars of the Obama
administration’s plan to curb gun violence, and it remains popular with
the public. In a poll last December, 59 percent of likely voters said
they favor a ban.
But in the 10 years since the previous ban
lapsed, even gun control advocates acknowledge a larger truth: The law
that barred the sale of assault weapons from 1994 to 2004 made little
difference.
It turns out that big, scary military rifles
don’t kill the vast majority of the 11,000 Americans murdered with guns
each year. Little handguns do.
In 2012, only 322 people were murdered with any kind of rifle, F.B.I. data shows.
Read More
2 comments:
What are the bastards so afraid of??... I still maintain if they want to fight take it to D.C.....
The continuous attack on the Second Amendment is not going to stop until these treasonous oath breakers start hanging at the end of a rope. Like daddy Bush once stated that if the American people knew what we have done we would be hanging from the lamp post.
Post a Comment