Saturday, April 18, 2015

Operation of every single claim in a nutshell. This is how the corporate courts swindle the living...



In shipping language, the chartered vessel (United States) took on cargo (the people), mortgaged that cargo to the hilt to pay for the voyage (used the credit of the people), then dumped that cargo (the people) over the railing and into the seas (commerce) to collect on the insurance (social security). Then, came back to the point of dumping for a salvage operation….(admiralty / maritime lien)

First, one is “welcomed” into a foreign jurisdiction by the "host nation" of whom, though its "occupying army", extended its hospitality to a foreigner upon registration of the birth event and, per the custom of the host nation, provided a vessel (NAME) whose cargo is destined for the Treasury and an indemnity receipt guaranteeing care and maintenance of the vessel by the host nation in order “his burden be light”. (Read Law of Nations Book II Section 99 and on for the ramifications of this action)

Until, that is, the host nation decided to grant an entrance and extend hospitality for the purpose of drawing foreigners into a snare. For once the snare was engaged, one’s duty as a foreigner is now towards defense of the host nation against pirates or robbers, against the ravages of an inundation, or the devastations of fire, for how can one pretend to live under the protection of a state, to participate in a variety of advantages that it affords, and yet make no exertion for its defense, but remain an unconcerned spectator of the dangers to which the citizens are exposed?



Now, the same foreigner is shanghaied at birth into that foreign jurisdiction (origination to image-nation), conscripted into citizenship (United States or whatever “nation”) as one can only become a Citizen “and not otherwise” via 2 Stat 153, given a “christened vessel” (NAME), then sent to battle across the seas (capitalism: war-shipper of a re-legion), and left for dead (collateral damage and casualty of war). (See Law of Nations Book III Section 15 for the ramifications of this action)

Then a “presumption of death” exists because the “infant” (foreigner) is “missing from beyond the seas” under International Maritime Law via Cestui Que Vie Acts 1540, 1666, and 1707. Now comes the “enforcement of a maritime lien” under “Admiralty Law” ... the IRS or any maritime lien is ONLY VAILD if one is “dead” (dead have no power over the living)



26 USC 6903
“(a) Rights and obligations of fiduciary

Upon notice to the Secretary that any person is acting for another person in a fiduciary capacity, such fiduciary shall assume the powers, rights, duties, and privileges of such other person in respect of a tax imposed by this title…” (Form 56)



(d) Definition of fiduciary. The term “fiduciary” is defined in section 7701(a)(6) to mean a guardian, trustee, executor, administrator, receiver, conservator, or any person acting in any fiduciary capacity for any person.



26 USC 1040 – Transfers of “real property” (issuance of securities under UCC 8-308 as the “appropriate person” is the “accommodation party”)



(a) executor of estate (Name) (resident) you are master of “your” dominion, correct?
(b) trustee of a trust (any portion of which is included in the gross estate of the decedent) (NAME) (14th Amendment Citizen) you are here to fulfill divine providence and self-determination (God’s will) for the benefit of all, thus are trustee.

IRS manual 21.7.13.3.2.2 - An infant is the decedent of an estate or grantor, owner or trustor of a trust, guardianship, receivership or custodianship that has yet to receive an SSN.

How can one be an executor of an estate of a decedent when the SSN has been issued?

Exactly what estate of what decedent is one “administrating”?


26 USC 2032
(a) (1)(A) decedent was a citizen/resident of the United States to time of death

(a)(1)(B) an “election” made on behalf of the executor
(d) election : agreement (remember “accommodation party”….this is where you come in)

(2) The agreement referred to in this paragraph is a written agreement signed by each person in being who has an interest.  (could be anything from a court case to a utility bill)

Now check out 26 USC 674 and Treas. Reg. § 1.674(b)... “the back door”



26 USC 2001

(a) imposes tax on the decedents estate for the transfer



26 USC 2002

executor of estate liable for the tax



So there is a claim in a nutshell. If one does not provide “proof of life” (infant still using the estate and trust) then the one before the court/corporation is presumed to be an “executor” of a decedent’s estate and trustee of the “citizen trust”. The “claim” is nothing more than a ruse to get one to be an accommodating party via UCC 3-419 for the agreement under 2032A(d)(2) for one is presumed to be an executor of a decedent’s estate and the 14th amendment citizen. NAME, is just a trust ANYONE can operate under 26 USC 674 and Treas. Reg. § 1.674(b), but you are trustee as the “presumed citizen” and thus liable under 26 USC 1040(b) for the tax imposed under 26 USC 2001(a) via 26 USC 2002 as if one were executor.

Now this is also the basis for the operation of the “exemption”, so do not go out and try to destroy this, you will not succeed, “they” will not allow it …. Once “proof of life” has been established, NAME now is the “security entitlement holder” and NAME now has whatever credit it needs as the IRS and all these other corporations are now bound to service the securities account (SS#) under UCC 8 as “securities intermediary” and usufructuary.

So, in reality "they" are actively engaged in infanticide and genocide in violation of international law and agreements under the Law of Nations and Lieber Code (Presidential Admiralty Law) for the purposes of accessing the estates of presumed decedents and while these apparent acts of genocide and infanticide may only be on paper, the results of these shenanigans crosses and carries over into the real world and real people suffer because of it each and every time one of their agents come to the door and identifies one through both name and number because one is the infant, now age of majority.



...committing all the oldest sins in all the newest ways


Now ask one of these guys something like:


Do I have a name? Do I have a SS number? Are you aware of IRS manual 21.7.13.3.2.2?  Then why am I being held liable as the executor of a decedent’s estate and as trustee of the resulting trust when it appears the infant has a SS number? Would you like production of the footprints of the infant to verify and validate this interest?



The insanity has to stop.



Now, before you guys got out and start running these guys down in the streets, one must also remember, this is also the operation of a peace treaty under Article 2 of the Lieber Code thru Article 43 of the Hague (restoration of public order and safety) of which the 1st essential task is to ensure the inhabitants can live their day to day lives, 2nd essential task is to establish an agreement which maximizes the benefits of both inhabitants and occupying army, and, in keeping with the provision of Article 2 of the Lieber Code that the occupying army remain as a condition of the peace, the 3rd essential task is that government administrates the agreement of which is laid out in Article 31 and 38 of the Lieber Code and Article 55 of the Hague, of which the occupying army is administrator and usufructuary of all public buildings, real estate, agricultural estates, etc… and must administrate them in accordance with the rules of usufruct. The “live birth certificate” is an “indemnity receipt” issued to the “spoliated owner”.

So, when these guys approach you and identify you by both name and number, whatever “lien right” they think they have has just been invalidated by the very fact the name and number was used to identify you. The infant now has a SS number and is no longer a decedent, thus no lien, trusteeship, or executorship to enforce and it is actually a breach of the International Peace Agreement between the “living” and the “dead”.

So, there  you have it … the presumption of death is the only thing wrong with “the system” but since it all operates on paper and translates into the real world with real ramifications, then that is a big problem. But a problem we can fix literally overnight.

Just have to accept one has a “NAME” and one has a “NUMBER” but owns neither, then since both NAME and NUMBER have vested within the one, the estate also re-vests within the one as the infant is no longer dead or “missing from beyond the seas”, which automatically “invalidates all maritime liens” as those are just “salvage rights”, and is “of age of majority” and now you operate in pure equity and they are now the usufruct and you are the “naked owner” with disposal rights over all of the estate of the Earth, just like the peace treaty demands.

Just be a good steward.

19 comments:

Anonymous said...

"he causes all, the small and the great, and the rich and the poor, and the free men and the slaves, to be given a mark on their right hand or on their forehead..and he provides that no one will be able to buy or to sell, except the one who has the mark, either the name of the beast or the number of his name." Revelations 13: 16-17

The above writing comes directly from Eschatology...All ancient texts confirm the NAME as the beast mark. Have fun willingly worshiping the beast then.

"It is then easy to be the executor."

No, this is illogical and full of half truths. In the first place, why would you wish to be executor for something that legally never belonged to you or had anything to do with you to start with?

The only logical reason for something that shallow is greed....The worship of Mammon.

Actually, you are illegally breaking the law twice by having any ties to the name. The NAME is not really a person but it is all the people, that's for sure.

1) You are using a copyrighted instrument for personal gain. That's copyright infringement, against who else but the world Crown Corporation. They could take you to the Hague.
2) You are using stolen property that does not belong to you, under Title 26 & Title 25. That is cordially known in all circles as fraud.
3) You are presuming they won't bother linking you to NAME and won't come after you anyway...Trust me, the covenant is not broken so they'll come after their property.

Of course you would know this if you had a single shred of caring about the original republic and you would presumably know, the only exit is to "lose" the NAME.
http://losethename.com

Don't join with it, lose it. Just like millions of police officers have done...did they get bothered? Nope. You aren't supposed to have anything to do with the deception called the NAME.

People claim they can't get a valid driver license. This is untrue. Do you have an original record of live birth, have you visited private merchants? You would then know you can get a private driver's license that looks like the regular thing, without a social security number.

If you have consulted with a lawyer, one can write you up an amendment making your right to travel permanent and nearly all police allow it from that day forward.

Are you truly serious about freedom, or do you wish to wind up back in jail among the cattle? Then well, you lose the name along finally with the identified SSN number or new global number coming soon.

Anonymous said...

Re: 7:48 P.M
Your way, My way, His way, Their way, Bla-bla-bla.
The only way is to remove these evil bastards. That's going to take courage which few have.
You can't talk or write or sue or file paper work. You have to go get them, have a common law trial and hang the bastards by the neck until dead. Until that becomes a reality to enough people we will continue to suffer!!!!!!!!!

Anonymous said...

Ok. What is the new global number coming? Whew! Can we just be left alone? Anon 7:48 can you please answer? Also, I have gone to the website of "losethename.com". What I got out of it is to just use another name. When you get pulled over tell the police officer that I are invoking my fifth amendment right and I cannot give him that name that he is asking for because it would be fraud and the police officer would be just as guilty of the fraud. As he is taking me to jail because I invoked my fifth amendment right and did not give him the drivers license with the name in ALL CAPS that I actually signed in Caps and small letter so they committed the fraud not me. Then what? Tell them I lost the name??? I have a whole spiel when I get in front of the judge such as. "I am here in the body of flesh and blood. I do not consent to these proceedings. I Do not accept your offer to contract. I do not consent to being surety for this case. Bring forth the bonds of those of who indemnify me if I am harmed. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED PURSUANT TO UCC 1-308 AND UCC 1-103.6. As he hauls me off to jail then what? Where one thing works one place it does not always work in another. I also have to use my social security number so what do you do? It all sounds very easy until it is not. I am basically with the other guy. It will just be easier and foolproof to just remove the evil bastards and hang them high. And what is this global number coming?

Anonymous said...

I get all that, however what the hell are people doing about the gruesome torture!??!??

Where is the concern for the thousands of spiritual purists, christians or others who have been kidnapped by this madman Obama and placed in a FEMA camp somewhere?


He already has many of them in the camp right now.....Some, particularly bankers lost their head! This is all going on before anything even gets moving!!!

I can see plain as day Obama is the twelfth madhi aka the Antichrist. His presence here is not wanted and is extremely dangerous!!

Most of the prophecies are fulfilled except to start the U.N. run One World Religion? Then Israel's demise.

When will this madman be stopped!!! Where is the concern!
Stop him, at the least the Courts need to shut down his biggest powers.

Anonymous said...

I think his point is you do not consent to court, you do not enter court.

If you aren't the legal name, then you do not carry an ID or hand one over.

Does this make sense? You tell them flat out, using the name is fraud. It is illegal and you hand them the affidavit. If they still bother you, you again repeat use of the name is fraud. It does not belong to you, so after a time they have to let you go since you aren't the name.

You do not go to court filing UCC filings, who told you this? Doing that keeps you a part of this illegal activity, which is total fraud since the name is not your property. You do not do anything except deny you are the name, and file a full brief in a court room that you offer no consent for using the NAME. They'll get the message. Then stop going into court, and lose the ss# all together like so many chose.

Anonymous said...

Confession and Avoidance you card carrying heathens of Satan Inc. YOU DO THE UCC-1 and 1ad FILING AFTER !!! Fixture Filing. Part of Puerto Rico trust #62. Transmitting utility.
HOW DO I KNOW ??????? I"VE DONE IT !!!!

Sincerely: Lucifer.

Anonymous said...

Re: 12:06 A.M.
Show us one success using this method ?.
I did all my homework and group research and I now have a criminal record. Until I was 69yrs, old I didn't have even a D.W.I. I was told I was the most principled man they had met and My principles were going to get Me 5 yrs, in jail.
You must understand these (people) have no humanity in them. They are bots, mammon is their god and you are their food, GOYIM!!!!

Anonymous said...

http://ChristmasIsALie.com,

In it's revelatory film
states 'Pope Sixtus III' = 666
???
My curiosity still wonders, who does the greater percentage
of fraud get blamed on for this creation and us in it,
the 'bankers' or 'papal bulls'
with this 'admiralty/maritime' law/conversion doublespeak?

The best day in our history will be when
these burdens are laid to rest.

Anonymous said...

It is quite terrible, yet they should not have had anything to do with the "Name."
How is it the rest of the public's responsibility of what happens to those who use the NAME?

All the celebrities, all the rich people they all live inside a fake Matrix which is run by the NAME game and now they know that terrifying reality up close in prison.

Like it or not, this was good because it teaches everyone worldwide (I hope) that their real wealth is spiritual wealth not physical wealth and the NAME is the fraud.

By using the NAME, they are breaking the law.
Flat out, you change your name period in the state you reside and "CUT" all ties to the legal name. Then you have a choice, then you have exit Babylon.

If you bother with court at all, don't carry an ID. What is "identification" why, it is the definition of how the government identifies dissenters.

Maxim of law says Identification is how Government identifies everyone!! What do you think happened to the pseudo sovereigns of CA, MT, WI who said I do not consent to use that name but I still carry ID around that has the name everywhere I go?

They are now locked up, tortured and by total luck some let go. Stop with the identification!! Maybe have an ID good for your current state and that is all, do not have any ties to the legal name period.

If they arrest you, you simply point out you are not the legal name. Give them your regular name and let them ask you questions and then let you go. If they continually keep demanding your legal name, you are supposed to say using the name is fraud.

Because it is, it is illegal and Babylon is fallen. Give them the address to Babylon is fallen? Who cares at this point? Don't give them a legal name, just be polite and keep drilling it home that using the copyrighted name is fraud.

In 72 hours or less, they are legally required to let you go. If you are still in jail or they threaten you with 10 years, know that it is a bluff and not legally allowed.

Tell the Judge your regular name and state very clearly using the LEGAL NAME is fraud, I am not the LEGAL NAME, I am witness to a fraud by corporations who own this LEGAL NAME. Am I being detained? Am I free to go? They will finally spit you out very fast and not ever want you back...the alternative is prison camp.

Anonymous said...

I have had three courts deny me access to their courts and they refused to acknowledge my paperwork because I am not the corporate all caps entity or an attorney that can represent the all caps entity. Even the appeals court stated that I did not have standing to file an appeal as I was not the all CAPS defendant. The SSN is an IMF entity account I.D. number according to 26 CFR and can only be used by Federal Employee according to 20 CFR 422.104. If you have or use the number you are a "Trustee" and become a "Fiduciary" under 26 USC 6901 and a "transferee" under 26 USC 6903. The SSN and the Card are the property of the Social Security Administration according to 20 CFR 422.103(d). The SSN makes you a Federal employee under Federal and State statutory jurisdiction as defined at 5 USC 2105, 26 USC 3401 (c ), and 26 CFR 31.3401(c )-1. I have an Article 9 security agreement and a Hold Harmless Indemnity agreement with their All CAPS entity as a Secured party creditor allowing me the use of the IMF entity and number strictly in commerce in Admiralty. The "Trust" owns the roads, the property, etc. Under trust law you have to pay into the trust to become a beneficiary of the trust and obtain the trustee's permission to use the trust's property for your own use.

Anonymous said...

Under 26 USC Chap.1, Part 2, sec. 2.1-1, a taxpayer means a citizen who has established or seeks to establish a construction reserve fund under the provisions of section 511 of the Merchant Marine Act of 1936 (46 USC 27). You can separate yourselves and still operate just I have. You do have to minimize your exposure in their system. Under the Hague they only have jurisdiction in probate over the dead. But its their dead person, not you. When dragged into Court ask who is the principle and what is the full amount of the charges against the IMF entity account I.D. number. Then ask for the forms to access the Social Security account and the Treasury reserve account so that you may endorse them, pay the bill and discharge the matter in equity. Sign in all Caps with a TM after the name, by agent. The law of agency now applies and you will not be thrown in jail for failure of your fiduciary duty to discharge the debt against their decadent estate at the request of the holder in due course of the bond. The Drivers license bureau had my 16 year old son print the name in all caps with the TM on his license after I informed them that you have to be 18 years of age to lawfully enter into a contract with the corporate state to operate a motor vehicle on their roads. They confirmed that they were issuing the license to a corporation and not a real person which is why the name on the license is written in all caps. They also confirmed that it would be unlawful for my son to put his signature on it as surety. They Know!!! When he got his first ticket I put in a notice of non-appearance as we were not attorneys that could defend the charges against the decadent estate and would not appear before the court and perpetrate a fraud by trying to act as attorneys defending a corporate legal fiction. No bench warrants were issued and matter was assessed 50$ and we never heard from the court again. We did have to settle the matter of 50$ to get the license reinstated when it came up for renewal, but the courts know we aren't legal fictions. They don't have jurisdiction unless you contract with them. You must know how to handle yourselves. Don't ever sign anything! My son explained to a police officer that it would be unlawful to sign a ticket as he was an american national and not a U.S. citizen. The officer openly agreed that it would be a felony for him to sign the ticket and let him go on his way. Some of the cops do know. I had a friend that never had a SSN issued to him and got stopped for speeding. He informed the officer that he did not have a license because he did not have an SSN. The State Trooper checked his computer and then told him that he was right. He did not have a SSN, therefore he was outside of his jurisdiction and he let him go, asking that he drive safely. The SSN makes you a federal citizen of the District of Columbia (United States Inc., whose corporate charter is expired) and puts you in a fiduciary relationship with the corporation and now you can be held in a debtors prison regardless of what 42 USC 1945 states. 18 USC 4001(a) makes it unlawful for you to be detained or incarcerated except for a direct Act of Congress. My name is not on any act of congress, is yours? Educate your sheriffs and deputies. Some will quit when they discover the truth. Peace through superior knowledge and understanding.

Anonymous said...

Thank you for answering me. That statement would not be filed into the court. It is a statement to the court that I would read that I do not consent to any of their crap. I am not going to court but I have been kidnapped (The arrest was fraudulent and because they could not get me on anything else they said that I resisted and kicked a cop. I was so devastated I pleaded to R&O just to get it behind me) The kidnapping/arrest has left me devastated as I will NEVER allow them to kidnap me nor beat like they did again. I am on disability so I do use my social security number but if losing the name by calling it fraud when I get pulled over works I am all for it. I would do an affidavit but how do I sign it. NO NAME or choose a different name??? Thank you. I am just trying to be proactive as I am terrified of being pulled over.

Freewill said...

I actually had the Coast Guard attend a traffic ticket court case with me using this info. really spooked the judge and the rest of the court employees. Ended up in a conference room with the Coast Guard investigators for about two hours. They told me that I connected many dots with the information they knew. I also presented a resiprosity agreement to the investigators for the judge to sign that would change everything between the corporation and living people. A cop would have to have a coast guard officer present before he could write a ticket to anyone. The investigators asked me what I wanted them to do, I responded by telling them I wanted the pirates arrested. Meanwhile the entire court staff kept peeking in the window as they walked by. The investigators told me they needed to report back to their superiors first. a week later I found out that I created a shit storm between Judge Advocate General and the Department of Justice... They sent the investigators to Afghanistan and sent a Jesuit assassin after me. As soon as I realized what that court did, I had to neutralize the assassin by accepting their court appointed attorney. Next day, I fired the attorney and filed a challenge of jurisdiction that they cannot answer. The case cannot continue until they answer the challenge in full and correctly. Once jurisdiction is challenged, it must be proven. Hagens v. Lavine, 415 U.S. 533

They never answered it and haven't bothered me since.. That was two years ago.

Anonymous said...

Oh my God! That is great!! How did you get the coast guard to attend a traffic court case? Did you send them the information or???

Anonymous said...

How did you challenge them on jurisdiction? Can you give an example. Also, if the Coast Guard knows that we are being screwed and they obviously have the power to make such an impact then why aren't they helping us out of this mess? Thank you.

Freewill said...

I went to the coastguard station a couple miles from the court and gave them the documentation on this post and made a complaint of piracy against me. Courts operate in the same maritime jurisdiction the coastguard does... nailed them!

Freewill said...

Send me an email

Freewill said...

The corporate UNITED STATES is bankrupt, they are civilly dead, they do NOT exist in law. They cannot bring a claim against anyone! Period! Only a Bankruptcy court appointed trustee can speak on the behalf of a bankrupt corporation. Is the prosecutor in your local courthouse an appointed trustee of the bankruptcy? I think not!
This bit of info right here will kill any court claim that any state has against you. Use it wisely!

Freewill said...

I made a judge run out of the courtroom when I asked him of what right was this maritime lien placed against my estate right after I disclosed a proof of life that I have.