"95% OF
WHAT PEOPLE ARE REPORTING AS EXTRATERRESTRIAL UFO'S, ARE IN POINT OF FACT OUR
OWN DEEP BLACK MILITARY AEROSPACE VEHICLES" - Michael
Schratt
"WE ARE
LOOKING AT A FINANCIAL SYSTEM THAT MAKES NO SENSE IF YOU LEAVE OUT THIS HIDDEN
SYSTEM OF FINANCE AND THE UFO." - Joseph P
Farrell
"THIS
SECRET CAN’T LAST FOREVER, TRANSFORMATION OF OUR SOCIETY WILL MOVE US INTO A
COMPLETELY DIFFERENT WORLD AND THIS WILL RESULT IN THE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF THE
UFO REALITY." - Richard
Dolan
“THERE IS
NOTHING UGLY ABOUT WINNING, WHEN VICTORY MEANS LIBERATION FROM THE FORCES WHO
WOULD HOLD US IN SUBCONSCIOUS SLAVERY. WINNING THEN IS A BEAUTIFUL THING." ~
Jon Rappoport
“THE
FUTURE IS CREATED BY THE PEOPLE WHO BUILD IT, NOT THE PEOPLE WHO PREDICT IT WILL
NOT EXIST.” ~ Catherine Austin
Fitts
See also: ? Red Ice
Radio - Catherine Austin Fitts - Hour 1 - Secret Space Program & The Black
Budget - YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?
What's
Up With The Black Budget? - The $64 Question http://www.bibliotecapleyades.
What's Up With...
The Black Budget?
- The $64 question
-
by
Catherine Austin Fitts23 September
2002
from
Scoop Website
Catherine Austin Fitts is the President of
Solari, Inc., a former Assistant Secretary of Housing – Federal Housing
Commissioner in the first Bush Administration and a former partner and member of
the board of Dillon, Read & Co. Inc and President of Hamilton Securities.
She is a member of the advisory board of Sanders Research Associates http://www.sandersresearch.
"Engrave this upon my heart:
There isn't anyone you couldn't love once you've heard their story."
Mary Lou Kownacki
"What is relevant is what
solves the problem. If we had thought through real relevancies, we would be on
Sirius by now." Peter Medewar
It is
time to deal with the 64 dollar question - the biggest crazy aunt in the living
room.
The
questions that need to be raised in any effort to find the truth about a
significant event related to power and money in the US - and answered if we are
to ever find the truth of how our world works - are:
I do not
know the answer to these questions. What I do know is that asking these
questions brings up a whole pile of challenging uncertainty.
(For
background on my experience dealing with black budget/slush fund operations at
FHA and Ginnie Mae at the Department of Housing and Urban Development -
HUD - Justice, Treasury and the New York Federal Reserve Bank, see my article,
"The Myth of the Rule of Law.")
When
dealing with challenging uncertainty, I find that many researchers simply delete
the existence of such uncertainty from their reality. That is a big mistake -
again pretending that we do not have a very big crazy aunt sitting in the living
room.
George
Orwell once said that,
"Omission is the greatest lie."
Hence,
our crazy aunt has to be dealt with.
If you
listen to the Ferdinand video/audio depositions
in the Carone/Tyree lawsuit, what you will hear is something I have heard many
times.
Carone
Ferdinand gives his family the sense of all of the organized crime
operations by CIA, Army and Mafia through the 1970's as legitimate for national
security purposes that then got out of hand and turned bad in the 1980's.
That is,
what started out as justifiable got out of hand.
This begs
the question,
Why Were Such Activities Considered Justifiable?
The way
to deal with uncertainty is with scenario design and probability - i.e. to
create a framework of the possible explanations with your best estimate of the
plausible scenarios and the probability (all adding up to 100%) of each one
being true based on intuition.
Maintaining such a framework allows data collection on key variables
and assumptions and an evolution to occur that can enlighten - even determine -
concrete questions and answers over time.
So, let
me tell a story, give you my framework that I use to handle the fact that I do
not have the answers and invite your framework.
I am not
looking to hear only what is wrong with my framework. I am looking to improve
mine or find a better one. Or better inform my estimate of the probabilities
that this one or that one is true. Hence, I invite you to put forward your
framework for managing this uncertainty. If we had the truth of the issue I am
going to introduce, I dare say we could get to the bottom of 9-11
faster.
In 1998,
I was approached by John Peterson, head of the Arlington Institute, a
small high quality military think tank in Washington, DC. I had gotten to know
John through Global Business Network and had been impressed by his intelligence,
effectiveness and compassion. John asked me to help him with a high level
strategic plan Arlington was planning to undertake for the Undersecretary of the
Navy.
At the
time I was the target of an intense smear campaign that would lead the normal
person to assume that I would be in jail shortly or worse. John explained that
the Navy understood that it was all politics - they did not care.
I met
with a group of high level people in the military, in the process - including
the Undersecretary. According to John, the purpose of the plan - discussed in
front of several military or retired military officers and former government
officials - was to help the Navy adjust their operations for a world in which it
was commonly known that aliens exist and live among us.
When John
explained this purpose to me, I explained that I did not know that aliens existed and lived among us.
John asked me if I would like to meet some aliens. For the only time in my life,
I declined an opportunity to learn about something important.
I was
concerned that my efforts with Arlington could boomerang and be connected with
the smear campaign and the effects that I was managing. I regret that decision.
At John's suggestion I started to read books on the topic and read about 25
books over the next year on the alien question, the black budget, and alien technology.
I had to
drop from the project due to the need to attend to litigation and the physical
harassment and surveillance of me and some of the people helping me.
This
process - which turned out to be incredibly time consuming - I now believe was
connected with the black budget/slush fund activities connected with FHA and
Ginnie Mae at HUD. (See, "The Myth of the Rule of Law") John then asked me if I
would join the board of the Arlington Institute.
When I
attended one of my first meetings, I joined in discussion with about 10 people
which included James Woolsey, former head of the CIA in the Clinton
Administration, Napier Collyns, founder of Global Business Network and
former senior Shell executive, Joe Firmage, and other members of the
Arlington board.
The main
topic of discussion was whether or not the major project for the coming year
should be a white paper on how to help the American people adjust to aliens
existing and living among us.
I said
nothing - just listened. Not that long after, I dropped from the board due to
the continued demands related to litigation with the Department of Justice and
their informant.
To cut a
series of additional long stories short, when I talk with my few sources from
the military and intelligence community, I hear the same themes:
As a
result of these experiences, here is my framework for dealing with this very
large pile of uncertainty.
ONE OF THE THREE FOLLOWING POSSIBLE SCENARIOS MUST BE
TRUE
Could my
experiences with Arlington and the Navy or any subsequent contacts fit with a
disinformation scenario? Absolutely.
I have no
evidence to support any scenario. The only evidence I believe I have is my
experience dealing with tremendous amounts of money siphoned off over the years,
whether through Iran-Contra S&L, HUD and BCCI fraud, or the latest round of
money missing from the federal government in the last five years.
This is
all documented in the articles below. This cash
flow and the operations and syndicates it appears to fund are important to what
drives the governance and allocation of resources in this country and around the
globe.
There is
a reason that power and money are centralizing and the rich are getting richer.
I want to know what it is.
Whichever
scenario is true - and I do not know which one is - if we had the
truth it will help us grapple with 9-11 and the War on Terrorism. It would also
help us better understand all the efforts to press for centralization of
economic and political power that have grown as the black budget has grown since
WWII. The reality is the possibilities of why 9-11 occurred and how it was
operationalized are impacted by the facts of the US black budget and the
advanced technology it has developed.
Why would
sane and even decent people think it was the best option for the good of the
whole? We must sit in the shoes of the person or people who gave the order -
whoever they may be and wherever they may be - and understand how their power
and money worked.
Why would
a group with the operational and financial capacity to effect a 9-11 operation
give the green light to plan 9-11, finance 9-11, do 9-11, stand down so 9-11
could happen, take advantage of 9-11 or to make sure the truth was not
illuminated? My experience in Washington and Wall Street would indicate that
there is a reasonable chance that all these various people and many in the food
chain Are Not Bad Or Irrational People.
That is,
we have a better chance of finding the truth if for purposes of our explorations
we assume that the people involved in all these roles were people like you and
me - just with a different map of certain parts of the world and dealing with a
variety of stress and pressures trying to build cooperation or achieve goals
that we do not understand.
Watching
the federal government contract announcements and without benefit of seeing the
full budget and assuming The Disclosure Project allegations
regarding the estimates of the black budget size, if I had to guess today my
guess would be that 9-11 has been highly successful in permitting the black
budget to be moved on budget, partly in the normal budget and partly in the
budget that is only disclosed to the Congressional intelligence
committees.
The
solution to continued growth and funding of the black budget may have been to
steal as much money and assets as possible from the federal budget and then to
move the black budget on budget when control of media, Congress, Justice and
Securities & Exchange Commission ensured that the legal budget was
non-transparent, controlled by private government contractors and could not be
harmed or fiddled with by Congress.
(See various stories on the
disappearance of over $3.3 trillion from the federal government from fiscal
1998-2001)
Grossly
oversimplified, by the end of the 2004 fiscal year, covert operations and the
black budget may be fully legal, run and controlled by corporations and banks
without interference from knowledgeable career civil service, taxpayer funded,
and non-transparent.
Why do I
say all of this?
We do not
have time to pay attention to people who use smears like "conspiracy theorist"
to waste our time. Money, budgets, finance... these are all facts. If something
does not work, and it continues to not work, there is a reason.
Systems
have a logic. They have a rationale. Money helps explain and illuminate that
rationale. Anyone who would smear a serious researcher or writer for trying to
understand where a great deal of money is disappearing to as a "conspiracy
theorist" is someone who would never be taken seriously or associated with in
the circles in which I travel.
The
exception is if the person doing the smearing is a professional being paid to
smear those who have the scent of "the real deal" - Cointelpro or related public
relations. The number of people paid to do such things are many and
growing.
9-11 was an operation that was implemented by
a conspiracy. To get to the bottom of what happened and why one must
develop and use conspiracy theories to research in what can only be described as
a conspiracy reality.
We know
in regards to 9-11 one of two scenarios must be true - some portion of the US
military and intelligence are,
We also
know that the official story is not truthful. Either scenario and the reality of
the official story beg the question, "why?"
This
course always leads us to consider the fact that US military and intelligence
have enjoyed significant expansion of their budgets and powers as a result of
9-11. We are rewarding failure. 9-11 was great for business. Lockheed Martin's
stock is up over 50% in a falling stock market. The oil companies have their
pipeline.
When a
system does not work and continues to not work, there is something that prevents
its learning.
Ultimately what we must understand [is] that the problem is not that
the system does not work and that it is not learning. The problem is that the
system is controlled and operated by the most powerful forces in that system and
that the system is indeed working and learning in the general direction they
want it to go.
This
happens in a manner that is highly organic and requires lots of planning, trial
and error and factionalism that involves competition and cooperation over time
in the pursuit of the system's real goals. Hence, the system is working and is
learning. It is our construct that is wrong. We do not understand the system and
the goals of the system.
Once we
are clear that the system is working and is learning, once we stop falling back
on scapegoating as a technique to explain events, we can start to understand the
real system that we are a part of. This is how power and money work in
reality.
The
amount of money and power spent to keep the general population from
understanding this - and focused on things like scapegoating, which keep us from
building a good map of "the real deal" or gaining the power to impact events by
using our money and time as a vote in the marketplace in which the banks and
corporations must thrive - is immense.
That is
why I strongly encourage reading Jon Rappoport's back interviews on his
Infomonster and becoming a subscriber for his ongoing interviews.
For those
[that] would like to know more, I would refer you to articles on all the money
missing from the US Treasury and the manipulation of the gold markets as well as
the Disclosure Project video of their event at the
National Press Club.
As for
me, I do not have the answers. I wish I did.
That is
why I am so appreciative of efforts like UnAnswered Questions and the effort of researchers
networking and collaborating globally to illuminate, research and answer the
right questions.
Let me
close with the unanswered questions with which I began and which I believe are
critical to our ongoing collaboration:
No comments:
Post a Comment