Russia and China March Together and Eye a Common Adversary — the U.S.
Artyom Lukin, www.huffingtonpost.com/
VLADIVOSTOK, Russia — On Sept. 3 China marked the 70th anniversary of
Japan’s defeat in World War II with a grand parade on Tiananmen Square
in Beijing. As expected, most world leaders chose to stay away so as not
to confer international legitimacy on the commemorations that many in
the West see as an overly propagandistic, nationalistic and
anti-Japanese display of military force. The representation of the
United States and its major allies was downgraded to the level of
ambassadors and ex-leaders like Tony Blair and Gerhard Schröder. The
conspicuous exception was South Korean President Park Geun-hye who,
after some hesitation,went to Beijing despite Washington’s displeasure. Not very surprising, given that South Korea depends on China for 26.1 percent of its exports.
However, it was Vladimir Putin of Russia who was treated as the chief
guest of honor at the Chinese celebrations. Throughout the
commemoration proceedings Putin was to the right side of Chinese
President Xi Jinping. This exactly mirrored the May 9 parade in Moscow marking the defeat of Nazi Germany a few months earlier. At that event, no Western leader showed up and Xi Jinping was the most prominent and honored guest.
While displays of marching troops and rolling armor have been held
regularly on Moscow’s Red Square, for China it is quite a rare occasion.
Before, lavish parades on Tiananmen Square only took place once every
10 years to mark anniversaries of the founding of the People’s Republic
of China. The recent parade was the first ever to glorify China’s
victory in World War II, or “the Chinese People’s Resistance Against
Japanese Aggression and World Anti-Fascist War” as it is officially
called in China. It was not lost on the observers that the festivities
in Beijing strikingly resembled the Victory Day commemorations in
Moscow. Chinese officials acknowledged that they drew upon Russia’s experience in “mobilizing patriotic sentiments.”
Why should Russia and China celebrate the victory in the Second World
War as if it has just ended? After all, for most of the countries that
participated in the war it has long become history. But for Moscow and
Beijing the war continues to carry special significance. Not to be
forgotten, it is Russia and China that suffered the heaviest human toll
during the war. Russia lost some 27 million people, while China’s
casualties are estimated to be about 20 million people. The outcome of
World War II made the Soviet Union a superpower and thus accorded it a
top status in the international system — a privileged position that
contemporary Russia is striving to retain, at least in its post-Soviet
and European neighborhood. For China, victory over Japan has come to
symbolize the end of “the century of humiliation” at the hands of
foreign powers and has been used by the Chinese Communist Party to
legitimize its rule. The governments in Russia and China utilize victory
over Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan as a powerful tool to whip up and
manipulate nationalistic emotions of the populace.
Russian President Vladimir Putin and Chinese President Xi
Jinping, watching the Victory Parade in Moscow on May 9, 2015. AP
Photo/Alexander Zemlianichenko, Pool.
The victory in WWII has always been seen in Russia as achieved
primarily through the efforts and sacrifice of the Soviet Union, with
the help of America and Great Britain. Russia’s official discourse is
now palpably changing, with China replacing the Western allies as the
second most important contributor to the outcome of the war: the Soviet
Union made the decisive contribution to the defeat of the Nazi Germany
in Europe, while China overcame imperial Japan in Asia. Xi Jinping’s
participation in the Victory Day celebrations in Moscow and Putin’s
return visit to Beijing for the commemoration of the end of the war in
Asia consolidate this new interpretation of history with the obvious aim
of strengthening solidarity between the two countries in opposition to
the West.
Russia was among a handful of countries to send troops to take part
in the Chinese parade. The soldiers from the elite Preobrazhensky
Regiment were given the privilege to close the procession of marching
formations on Tiananmen Square, reciprocating Chinese troops’ participation
in the Red Square parade back in May. For those in Russia who are well
versed in history the sight of Russian and Chinese soldiers marching
together may evoke uneasy parallels. In 1808, during the pompous summit
of Alexander I and Napoleon in Erfurt, Russian and French troops paraded
together, an event followed only four years later by Napoleon’s
invasion of Russia. In September 1939, the Red Army and Wehrmacht staged
a joint parade in defeated Poland, less than two years before Nazi
Germany attacked the Soviet Union. And, perhaps even more to the point,
memories still linger of how “the eternal and unbreakable friendship between the Soviet and Chinese peoples” of the 1950s turned into a bitter confrontation in only a few years.
That said, the new edition of Sino-Russian alignment is unlikely to
rupture anytime soon. Even though Russia and China have their share of
disagreements and competing interests, they have no doubts about their
main adversary — the United States. As long as Washington is seen by
Moscow and Beijing as trying to contain them geopolitically and subvert
their domestic political regimes, the entente between Russia and China
will only grow stronger, a prospect that is of increasing concern to many strategic thinkers in the United States.
Just as the new PLA’s hardware was being shown off on Tiananmen Square, five Chinese warships sailed
into the Bering Sea near Alaska — the first time China’s navy appeared
so close to America’s Arctic shores. The Chinese flotilla came to the
Arctic waters fresh from joint exercises with the Russian navy in the
Sea of Japan. Right at that time Barack Obama happened to be travelling
in northern Alaska. Was it a message from China — “even if you don’t
come to our parade when invited, you are bound to see our flag anyway”?
Friday, September 11, 2015
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
This guy they call "Vladimir Putin" who is pictured above is not Vladimir Putin. This is a clone of Vladimir Putin. A political robot so to speak. Who is operating this political robot? That is the question. IMO
Post a Comment