Why Is China Having Measles Outbreaks When 99% Are Vaccinated?
China
has one of the most vaccination compliant populations in the world. In
fact, measles vaccine is mandatory. So why have they had over 700
measles outbreaks from 2009 and 2012 alone? The obvious answer is the
the measles vaccines are simply NOT effective.
A recent study published in PLoS titled, “Difficulties
in eliminating measles and controlling rubella and mumps: a
cross-sectional study of a first measles and rubella vaccination and a
second measles, mumps, and rubella vaccination,” has brought to light the glaring ineffectiveness of two measles vaccines (measles–rubella (MR) or measles–mumps–rubella (MMR) ) in fulfilling their widely claimed promise of preventing outbreaks in highly vaccine compliant populations.
According to the study,
“The reported coverage of the measles-rubella (MR) or measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine is greater than 99.0% in Zhejiang province. However, the incidence of measles, mumps, and rubella remains high.” [emphasis added]
China’s Great Mandatory Vaccine Experiment FAILURE
Zhejiang is an eastern coastal province
of the People’s Republic of China and home to 55 million inhabitants.
All children there receive a compulsory first dose of MR at 8 months and
another dose of the MMR vaccine at 18–24 months.
In the new study researchers analyzed a
subset of 1,015 Zehjiang inhabitants and found that despite the recent
measles outbreaks 93.6% of them were seropositive for measles
antibodies, meaning they had presumably vaccine-induced protective
antibodies against measles in their blood serum — more than is required
to obtain so-called ‘herd immunity’ threshold of 88%–92%, which is often
claimed to be the solution to extinguishing infectious diseases
altogether.[2] And yet despite this theoretical ‘protection,’ eight-seven (8.6%) of the subjects developed measles anyway.
Another recent study, published in the highly authorative Bulletin of the World Health Organization,
looked at recent measles occurrences throughout China and found that
there were 707 measles outbreaks in the country recorded between 2009
and 2012, with a steep trend upwards in 2013: “The number of measles
cases reported in the first 10 months of 2013 – 26
443
– was three times the number reported in the whole of 2012.” This is
all the more odd considering that since 2009 “…the first dose of
measles-virus-containing vaccine has reached more than 90% of the target
population.” One would expect with increasing measles vaccine uptake
there would result in a decrease in measles incidence.
443
– was three times the number reported in the whole of 2012.” This is
all the more odd considering that since 2009 “…the first dose of
measles-virus-containing vaccine has reached more than 90% of the target
population.” One would expect with increasing measles vaccine uptake
there would result in a decrease in measles incidence.
Clearly the vaccines aren’t as effective as claimed, nor is the concept of herd immunity — which is debunked and decimated here and here — supported unequivocally by the epidemiological evidence.
The failure of vaccine-induced antibody
titers to protect against ‘vaccine preventable disease’ may make more
sense when you consider the antibody-based theory of vaccine efficacy – a fundamental tenet of vaccinology/immunology – was recently called into question: Study Calls Into Question Primary Justification for Vaccines.
Injecting aluminum and other highly immunotoxic adjuvants into the body
in order to stimulate elevated antibody titers does not in and of
itself guarantee their affinity for the antigen they are supposed to be
protecting you against. To the contrary, It is much like saying you have
improved the overall health of the beehive by kicking it with your boot
to stir its angry residents and getting them to sting (and hence die)
the closest thing around them. We highly suggest you obtain a copy
of Tetyana Obukhanych’s layperson oriented book Vaccine Illusion (she
is a Ph.D. in immunology from Rockefeller University, New York, NY) to
learn the almost universally repressed truth about the dangers and
ineffectiveness of vaccines.
The WHO’s Goal of Eradicating Measles in China with Mandatory Vaccines Has Failed
In 2005, the Regional Committee of WHO
Western Pacific Region established 2012 as the target date for the
complete regional elimination of measles, and the Chinese Ministry of
Health initiated mandatory measles vaccination to accomplish this. A
year later, in 2006, China set a goal of accelerating the progress of
eliminating measles by 2012, striving to keep measles incidence below
0.1 per 100,000, and then developed a series of vaccination strategies
to execute these goals.
And yet, despite the full and near
universal implementation of multi-dose vaccines, measles, mumps and
rubella outbreaks continued to afflict those receiving them:
“Measles outbreaks continued in 2008, with 12782 cases reported, which translated to 252.61 per million of the population. From 2009 to 2011, the incidence of measles remained high at 3.14–17.2 per million of the population. Similarly, the incidence of mumps increased from 394.32 to 558.26 per million of the population in 2007 and 2008, respectively. Finally, the reported cases of rubella increased from 3284 to 4284 in 2007 and 2011, respectively, representing a 30.45% increase or an increase from 65.94 to 78.71 per million of the population. Therefore, the elimination of measles and control of mumps and rubella are urgent public health priorities in local regions.”[1]
As we have explored in a previous article, “Measles: A Rash of Misinformation,” the measles vaccine
is not nearly as safe and effective as is widely believed. Measles
outbreaks have consistently occurred in highly immunization complaint
populations. For a more extensive review of the epidemiological
literature on measles outbreaks happening within highly vaccine
complaint populations read: The 2013 Measles Outbreak: A Failing Vaccine, Not A Failure To Vaccinate
Sadly, the latest study concludes with
the recommendation that the MMR vaccine should be increased to two doses
with the first dose at 8 months and the second dose at 18–24 months.
They further suggest, that in addition to another MMR vaccine, “An MR
vaccination speed-up campaign may be necessary for elder adolescents and
young adults, particularly young females.” As has been the historical
response pattern of the medical establishment’s pro-vaccine agenda when
facing the evidence of their failed vaccine campaigns, instead of
acknowledging the folly of relying exclusively on a vaccine-centric view
of immunity (what about nutrition, vitamin D, improved sanitation and
hygiene?) they default counter-intuitively to increasing the number of
vaccines given, adding 1 or 2 ‘boosters’ when the vaccines clearly are
not working. [Take a look at other failed vaccine campaigns here,
often followed by the same dead-end recommendations.] This
intellectually dishonest and callous approach, in fact, is a primary
driver for the expansion of already dangerously high number of vaccines
that are presently populating the CDC’s arguably insane immunization schedule
— a schedule with the highest number of vaccines in the world, and
which we are supposed to believe has nothing to do with the
exponentially increasing autism rate (1 in 5,000 in 1975; 1 in 65 today)
in our country, or its shameful if not outrageous 33th-worst infant mortality rate in the developed world.
Another highly concerning problem with the new study is its conspiculous lack of mention of the known unintended, adverse effects of vaccination. In fact, earlier this year we reported on another Chinese vaccine study that found that “42% of Drug Reactions Are Vaccine Related, groundbreaking Chinese Study Finds.”
And of course, we cannot leave out
mention of what is likely the greatest medical cover-up of our time: the
senior vaccine scientist William Thompson at the CDC blows the whistle
on how his agency covered up the autism/vaccine link for over a decade
(and likely much more malfeasance still to be uncovered), and which is
still ongoing, as no mainstream media group has yet to cover the facts
of the story in a serious or honest manner. How many of these Chinese
infants and children will undergo neurodevelopmental regression or
suffer other neurological insults as a result of using the same MMR
vaccine the CDC identified as doing harm to African-American boys? We
may never know, but we can be certain that they are not immune to the well-documented dangers.
Given the gravity of potential harms
associated with routine vaccines, juxtaposed to the perhaps far lesser
risk associated with contracting what were once considered normal,
immune system building natural infections (measles), the issue here is
really about balancing the pro’s versus the con’s, with the medical
literature itself guiding parents decisions, who have the legal right
and responsibility to choose what medical interventions their children
should succumb to.
For more research use our vaccination database to make an informed choice.
REFERENCES
[1] Zhifang Wang, Rui Yan, Hanqing He, Qian Li, Guohua Chen, Shengxu Yang, Enfu Chen. Difficulties
in eliminating measles and controlling rubella and mumps: a
cross-sectional study of a first measles and rubella vaccination and a
second measles, mumps, and rubella vaccination. PLoS One. 2014 ;9(2):e89361. Epub 2014 Feb 20. PMID: 24586717
[2] Vaccination and herd immunity to infectious diseases. Anderson RM, May RM Nature. 1985 Nov 28-Dec 4; 318(6044):323-9. [PubMed]
Article Contributed by Sayer Ji, Founder of GreenMedInfo.com.
Sayer Ji is an author, researcher, lecturer, and advisory board member of the National Health Federation. He founded Greenmedinfo.com
in 2008 in order to provide the world an open access, evidence-based
resource supporting natural and integrative modalities. It is
internationally recognized as the largest and most widely referenced
health resource of its kind.
No comments:
Post a Comment